What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Guest speaker in class said China had 40,000 riots last year (1 Viewer)

Sabertooth

Footballguy
It sounded like a huge number to me. He said it just doesn't get reported. Predicted that communist regime won't last another 10 years in China. He taught there for two years and said that less than 10% carry almost all of the wealth. This is interesting to me especially in light of the organized labor bashing that goes on here.

Will the might of 1B Chinese vastly change in the next 10 years? Will the rampant polution change? Speaker stated that the reason communism has been in power is that it's the closest thing to empirialism.

Thoughts?

 
It sounded like a huge number to me. He said it just doesn't get reported. Predicted that communist regime won't last another 10 years in China. He taught there for two years and said that less than 10% carry almost all of the wealth. This is interesting to me especially in light of the organized labor bashing that goes on here. Will the might of 1B Chinese vastly change in the next 10 years? Will the rampant polution change? Speaker stated that the reason communism has been in power is that it's the closest thing to empirialism. Thoughts?
10% of the people there equals out to about 150 million people, right?Why is that shocking? How much different do you think it is here?
 
In some ways it's almost good that China is communist...it prevents them from becoming the world's superpower that they should be.

 
It sounded like a huge number to me. He said it just doesn't get reported. Predicted that communist regime won't last another 10 years in China. He taught there for two years and said that less than 10% carry almost all of the wealth. This is interesting to me especially in light of the organized labor bashing that goes on here. Will the might of 1B Chinese vastly change in the next 10 years? Will the rampant polution change? Speaker stated that the reason communism has been in power is that it's the closest thing to empirialism. Thoughts?
10% of the people there equals out to about 150 million people, right?Why is that shocking? How much different do you think it is here?
Well the whole concept of communism is that everyone gets the same. 15 Years ago I work with a guy named Zhou who was from China. He said that the jobs everybody wanted were jobs like doormen and waiters because in addition to the salary, which apparently is the same for everybody, those positions get tips.
 
From what I understand there has been a big economic shift that has left the coastal areas wealthy and the rural, interior areas less well off. I think that this has created some unrest in those areas. However, the communist party is having their once-every-4(?)-year meeting soon and the talk is that they are going to try and better foster economic growth in rural areas--even through reduction in tax rates and such.

I think things are going pretty well in China. That doesn't mean that some haven't been left behind, however.

 
What's his definition of a "riot"? I bet the U.S. had a proportionally-similar number of "group-skirmishes" last year.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
He made it sound like there was basically extremely wealthy (commies) and extremely poor (other) people. And that it can't last this way. May his numbers were off but he wasn't an anthropologist. He was a pastor that went over there with his family to teach.

He said there are way more males than females and the that males are very rude and crude too.

He said there is 30% unemployment and that it's not a welfare state where people get anything from the government like food. You work to live literally.

 
It sounded like a huge number to me. He said it just doesn't get reported. Predicted that communist regime won't last another 10 years in China. He taught there for two years and said that less than 10% carry almost all of the wealth. This is interesting to me especially in light of the organized labor bashing that goes on here. Will the might of 1B Chinese vastly change in the next 10 years? Will the rampant polution change? Speaker stated that the reason communism has been in power is that it's the closest thing to empirialism. Thoughts?
10% of the people there equals out to about 150 million people, right?Why is that shocking? How much different do you think it is here?
Well the whole concept of communism is that everyone gets the same. 15 Years ago I work with a guy named Zhou who was from China. He said that the jobs everybody wanted were jobs like doormen and waiters because in addition to the salary, which apparently is the same for everybody, those positions get tips.
I don't necessarily think that's the case. I've read that young people from rural areas moved to the city and made a decent nest egg and then moved back to the rural areas. I don't think that all salaries are the same there.
 
It sounded like a huge number to me. He said it just doesn't get reported. Predicted that communist regime won't last another 10 years in China. He taught there for two years and said that less than 10% carry almost all of the wealth. This is interesting to me especially in light of the organized labor bashing that goes on here. Will the might of 1B Chinese vastly change in the next 10 years? Will the rampant polution change? Speaker stated that the reason communism has been in power is that it's the closest thing to empirialism. Thoughts?
If you know anything about China, you know that the wealth is concentrated in areas along the coasts and in the big cities like Shanghai, Hong Kong and Wangzhou while the country side is very rural and in poverty. There really isn't a "middle class" like we think of in the US or the EU, you are either very rich or very poor. There is also a lot ot discrimination by the Han people (what we think of as "Chinese") against other ethnic groups, such as the Uyghurs, the Zhuang, and the Tibetans. (there are over 56 distinct ethnic groups in China).So 10,000 unreported "riots" yes, I'd believe that figure. And I also agree that the ChiCom party could well fall within 10 years.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
From what I understand there has been a big economic shift that has left the coastal areas wealthy and the rural, interior areas less well off. I think that this has created some unrest in those areas. However, the communist party is having their once-every-4(?)-year meeting soon and the talk is that they are going to try and better foster economic growth in rural areas--even through reduction in tax rates and such. I think things are going pretty well in China. That doesn't mean that some haven't been left behind, however.
It sounds like most are being left behind, not some. Just going off what he said. He said also that the everyday people are very giving and hospitable. Their normal greeting isn't "how are you?" but "have you eaten today?" He suspected though that because they are so caring, when something boils over...all the repressed anger overflows and they can be extremely violent. He said most Chinese like Americans because we helped them in WW2. They hate Japan however and most war movies are of the Chinese pounding on the Japanese.
 
He said there are way more males than females and the that males are very rude and crude too.
I've read several articles about this over the past few years, and I tend to agree that this phenomenon may end up being vastly more important than inequality in determining the fate of Asia over the next couple of decades.
 
It sounded like a huge number to me. He said it just doesn't get reported. Predicted that communist regime won't last another 10 years in China. He taught there for two years and said that less than 10% carry almost all of the wealth. This is interesting to me especially in light of the organized labor bashing that goes on here. Will the might of 1B Chinese vastly change in the next 10 years? Will the rampant polution change? Speaker stated that the reason communism has been in power is that it's the closest thing to empirialism. Thoughts?
If you know anything about China, you know that the wealth is concentrated in areas along the coasts and in the big cities like Shanghai, Hong Kong and Wangzhou while the country side is very rural and in poverty. There really isn't a "middle class" like we think of in the US or the EU, you are either very rich or very poor. There is also a lot ot discrimination by the Han people (what we think of as "Chinese") and other ethnic groups, such as the Uyghurs, the Zhuang, and the Tibetans. (there are over 56 distinct ethnic groups in China).So 10,000 unreported "riots" yes, I'd believe that figure. And I also agree that the ChiCom party could well fall within 10 years.
I didn't say I knew anything about China. Just listened to a guy who lived there for two years. HTH.
 
It sounded like a huge number to me. He said it just doesn't get reported. Predicted that communist regime won't last another 10 years in China. He taught there for two years and said that less than 10% carry almost all of the wealth. This is interesting to me especially in light of the organized labor bashing that goes on here. Will the might of 1B Chinese vastly change in the next 10 years? Will the rampant polution change? Speaker stated that the reason communism has been in power is that it's the closest thing to empirialism. Thoughts?
10% of the people there equals out to about 150 million people, right?Why is that shocking? How much different do you think it is here?
Well the whole concept of communism is that everyone gets the same. 15 Years ago I work with a guy named Zhou who was from China. He said that the jobs everybody wanted were jobs like doormen and waiters because in addition to the salary, which apparently is the same for everybody, those positions get tips.
I don't necessarily think that's the case. I've read that young people from rural areas moved to the city and made a decent nest egg and then moved back to the rural areas. I don't think that all salaries are the same there.
To this he said many young come to the cities, get an education and then move back to the farm because they can't find work and it's either "back to the farm" or "beg."
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It sounded like a huge number to me. He said it just doesn't get reported. Predicted that communist regime won't last another 10 years in China. He taught there for two years and said that less than 10% carry almost all of the wealth. This is interesting to me especially in light of the organized labor bashing that goes on here. Will the might of 1B Chinese vastly change in the next 10 years? Will the rampant polution change? Speaker stated that the reason communism has been in power is that it's the closest thing to empirialism. Thoughts?
If you know anything about China, you know that the wealth is concentrated in areas along the coasts and in the big cities like Shanghai, Hong Kong and Wangzhou while the country side is very rural and in poverty. There really isn't a "middle class" like we think of in the US or the EU, you are either very rich or very poor. There is also a lot ot discrimination by the Han people (what we think of as "Chinese") and other ethnic groups, such as the Uyghurs, the Zhuang, and the Tibetans. (there are over 56 distinct ethnic groups in China).So 10,000 unreported "riots" yes, I'd believe that figure. And I also agree that the ChiCom party could well fall within 10 years.
I didn't say I knew anything about China. Just listened to a guy who lived there for two years. HTH.
Didn't mean to sound like I was slamming you. Sorry.
 
It sounded like a huge number to me. He said it just doesn't get reported. Predicted that communist regime won't last another 10 years in China. He taught there for two years and said that less than 10% carry almost all of the wealth. This is interesting to me especially in light of the organized labor bashing that goes on here. Will the might of 1B Chinese vastly change in the next 10 years? Will the rampant polution change? Speaker stated that the reason communism has been in power is that it's the closest thing to empirialism. Thoughts?
If you know anything about China, you know that the wealth is concentrated in areas along the coasts and in the big cities like Shanghai, Hong Kong and Wangzhou while the country side is very rural and in poverty. There really isn't a "middle class" like we think of in the US or the EU, you are either very rich or very poor. There is also a lot ot discrimination by the Han people (what we think of as "Chinese") and other ethnic groups, such as the Uyghurs, the Zhuang, and the Tibetans. (there are over 56 distinct ethnic groups in China).So 10,000 unreported "riots" yes, I'd believe that figure. And I also agree that the ChiCom party could well fall within 10 years.
I didn't say I knew anything about China. Just listened to a guy who lived there for two years. HTH.
Didn't mean to sound like I was slamming you. Sorry.
I should have read the rest of your post :thumbup:
 
You work to live literally.
Welcome to the third world. Their economy is growing about 10% per year. Economic growth that fast is going to shift the economics away from the farmer types and in favor of educated workers. By the way, the percentage of people that own cell phones in China is ~70%. In the coastal areas it can be close to 100% and in the rural areas it will be in the 40% range--so there is some disposable income in China. Last year they added 60 million cellphone subscribers. I'm guessing from your description that this pastor was probably in a rural area and probably around some of the non-favored ethnicities.
 
From what I understand there has been a big economic shift that has left the coastal areas wealthy and the rural, interior areas less well off. I think that this has created some unrest in those areas. However, the communist party is having their once-every-4(?)-year meeting soon and the talk is that they are going to try and better foster economic growth in rural areas--even through reduction in tax rates and such. I think things are going pretty well in China. That doesn't mean that some haven't been left behind, however.
It sounds like most are being left behind, not some. Just going off what he said. He said also that the everyday people are very giving and hospitable. Their normal greeting isn't "how are you?" but "have you eaten today?" He suspected though that because they are so caring, when something boils over...all the repressed anger overflows and they can be extremely violent. He said most Chinese like Americans because we helped them in WW2. They hate Japan however and most war movies are of the Chinese pounding on the Japanese.
Twenty million Chinese died during World War 2--mostly civilians. If you want to see how bad it was google "Rape of Nanking". Very disturbing stuff there.
 
It sounded like a huge number to me. He said it just doesn't get reported. Predicted that communist regime won't last another 10 years in China. He taught there for two years and said that less than 10% carry almost all of the wealth. This is interesting to me especially in light of the organized labor bashing that goes on here. Will the might of 1B Chinese vastly change in the next 10 years? Will the rampant polution change? Speaker stated that the reason communism has been in power is that it's the closest thing to empirialism. Thoughts?
If you know anything about China, you know that the wealth is concentrated in areas along the coasts and in the big cities like Shanghai, Hong Kong and Wangzhou while the country side is very rural and in poverty. There really isn't a "middle class" like we think of in the US or the EU, you are either very rich or very poor. There is also a lot ot discrimination by the Han people (what we think of as "Chinese") against other ethnic groups, such as the Uyghurs, the Zhuang, and the Tibetans. (there are over 56 distinct ethnic groups in China).So 10,000 unreported "riots" yes, I'd believe that figure. And I also agree that the ChiCom party could well fall within 10 years.
I agree. It's doubtful that they can liberalize economically like they're doing and still maintain the same monopoly on political power.
 
You work to live literally.
Welcome to the third world. Their economy is growing about 10% per year. Economic growth that fast is going to shift the economics away from the farmer types and in favor of educated workers. By the way, the percentage of people that own cell phones in China is ~70%. In the coastal areas it can be close to 100% and in the rural areas it will be in the 40% range--so there is some disposable income in China. Last year they added 60 million cellphone subscribers. I'm guessing from your description that this pastor was probably in a rural area and probably around some of the non-favored ethnicities.
Sechaun (sp) like the spicy chicken. It was a Petroluem Universit he taught at. He said if you like spicy food, that's the place to be. Said some of the spices will actually numb your mouth. He loved it. Also said you can't find a pair of shoes bigger than men's 8.
 
From what I understand there has been a big economic shift that has left the coastal areas wealthy and the rural, interior areas less well off. I think that this has created some unrest in those areas. However, the communist party is having their once-every-4(?)-year meeting soon and the talk is that they are going to try and better foster economic growth in rural areas--even through reduction in tax rates and such. I think things are going pretty well in China. That doesn't mean that some haven't been left behind, however.
It sounds like most are being left behind, not some. Just going off what he said. He said also that the everyday people are very giving and hospitable. Their normal greeting isn't "how are you?" but "have you eaten today?" He suspected though that because they are so caring, when something boils over...all the repressed anger overflows and they can be extremely violent. He said most Chinese like Americans because we helped them in WW2. They hate Japan however and most war movies are of the Chinese pounding on the Japanese.
Twenty million Chinese died during World War 2--mostly civilians. If you want to see how bad it was google "Rape of Nanking". Very disturbing stuff there.
Saw a documentary on that once. That's some medieval #### there. Wow.
 
It sounded like a huge number to me. He said it just doesn't get reported. Predicted that communist regime won't last another 10 years in China. He taught there for two years and said that less than 10% carry almost all of the wealth. This is interesting to me especially in light of the organized labor bashing that goes on here.

Will the might of 1B Chinese vastly change in the next 10 years? Will the rampant polution change? Speaker stated that the reason communism has been in power is that it's the closest thing to empirialism.

Thoughts?
10% of the people there equals out to about 150 million people, right?Why is that shocking? How much different do you think it is here?
Well the whole concept of communism is that everyone gets the same. 15 Years ago I work with a guy named Zhou who was from China. He said that the jobs everybody wanted were jobs like doormen and waiters because in addition to the salary, which apparently is the same for everybody, those positions get tips.
I totally know the same guy!
 
It sounded like a huge number to me. He said it just doesn't get reported. Predicted that communist regime won't last another 10 years in China. He taught there for two years and said that less than 10% carry almost all of the wealth. This is interesting to me especially in light of the organized labor bashing that goes on here.

Will the might of 1B Chinese vastly change in the next 10 years? Will the rampant polution change? Speaker stated that the reason communism has been in power is that it's the closest thing to empirialism.

Thoughts?
10% of the people there equals out to about 150 million people, right?Why is that shocking? How much different do you think it is here?
Well the whole concept of communism is that everyone gets the same. 15 Years ago I work with a guy named Zhou who was from China. He said that the jobs everybody wanted were jobs like doormen and waiters because in addition to the salary, which apparently is the same for everybody, those positions get tips.
I totally know the same guy!
What was his last name?
 
It sounded like a huge number to me. He said it just doesn't get reported. Predicted that communist regime won't last another 10 years in China. He taught there for two years and said that less than 10% carry almost all of the wealth. This is interesting to me especially in light of the organized labor bashing that goes on here.

Will the might of 1B Chinese vastly change in the next 10 years? Will the rampant polution change? Speaker stated that the reason communism has been in power is that it's the closest thing to empirialism.

Thoughts?
If you know anything about China, you know that the wealth is concentrated in areas along the coasts and in the big cities like Shanghai, Hong Kong and Wangzhou while the country side is very rural and in poverty. There really isn't a "middle class" like we think of in the US or the EU, you are either very rich or very poor. There is also a lot ot discrimination by the Han people (what we think of as "Chinese") against other ethnic groups, such as the Uyghurs, the Zhuang, and the Tibetans. (there are over 56 distinct ethnic groups in China).So 10,000 unreported "riots" yes, I'd believe that figure. And I also agree that the ChiCom party could well fall within 10 years.
:hophead: The vast majority of the people in China are extremely poor. The economy is obviously booming, but all the wealth goes to a very small number of people. The rest are very poor.

 
Surprised to see there isn't a thread just about China, or about Tiananmen Square.

Anyway, today is the 25th anniversary of Tinanmen Square Uprising.

Brave Tank Man has got to be one of the most enduring symbols of freedom in teh world and it is hardly known in its country of origina.

Hong Kong (CNN) -- A needle is inside the body of Nobel Peace Prize laureate Liu Xiaobo, traveling along his veins and poking at his organs.

This piercing imagery is used by the pro-democracy activist in his poem "June Fourth in My Body" dedicated to the year 2009 -- the same year he was sentenced to 11 years in prison for inciting subversion of state power.

Prior to his arrest, Liu would write a poem every year around June 4 to commemorate the 1989 Tiananmen Square crackdown in Beijing and those who lost their lives.

"He is really forcing himself to look at this in order that other people don't forget, because it has been such a publicly erased moment in history in China," says fellow poet Jeffrey Yang, who is based in the U.S.

Liu was a fervent participant of the 1989 pro-democracy movement. He occupied Tiananmen Square, led hunger strikes, drafted public opinion polls and lobbied foreigners to donate toward the movement.

On June 4, 1989, tanks entered the streets around Tiananmen Square and opened fire on demonstrators. Liu escaped relatively unscathed.

Imprisonment

Two days after the crackdown, Liu was arrested and imprisoned for nearly 20 months. This was the first of many prison sentences that Liu would serve for speaking out against the Chinese leadership.

Liu is currently serving his sentence and could not be reached. It is unclear whether he is able to continue his annual tradition of composing a poem to remember those who died on June 4, 1989.

However, his works between 1990 and 2009 have been compiled into the anthology "June Fourth Elegies," published in 2012.

Yang translated the collection into English. "June Fourth in My Body" is the last entry in the collection and it particularly stands out for Yang.

"The very last poem in the collection is just heart breaking," he says.

The poem likens the tragic crackdown to a rusting but still piercing needle that has been left inside the activist's body.

"June 4 was a life-changing and defining date for Liu. Besides, he has been struggling with feelings of guilt as a survivor of the incident," says Teng Biao, founder of the rights group China Against Death Penalty.

Ending one-party rule

Teng, a well-known human rights lawyer, advised Liu in the drafting of Charter 08, a pro-democracy manifesto that called for an end to one-party rule.

The document ultimately led to Liu's 2008 arrest and eventual sentencing in December 2009. In 2010, Liu was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize while imprisoned.

To mark the 25th anniversary of the June 4 massacre, we asked Teng to recite the first three stanzas of the moving poem in a recording (see above), and Yang to recite his English version.

Translator Yang adds that: "The collection is an annual return to the same event, over and over again. Sometimes he's in prison, sometimes he's at a bar, at other times he's at home, but the one thing that is striking is that as the years pass, the emotional content is still very much alive through his work."
http://www.cnn.com/2014/06/03/world/asia/china-tiananmen-liu-xiaobo-poems/index.html

There was so much promise for China and the world that day, here's hoping that promise of freedom is fulfilled everywhere one day.

Freedom, long may she reign.

http://s40.photobucket.com/user/RileyNotOReilly/media/GoddessofDemocracy.jpg.html

 
Last edited by a moderator:
At some point in the near future they will be done....the one child policy is really a 'killer', they now have a 6 - 4 ratio of men to women....think about that...for every 10 dudes, 2 have no shot at a chick. That will crush them. Social instability. Aside from that, they are not innovative at all, they copy everything. That is a recipe for reproducing yesterday's news.

If you stop and think about it, just about every step of the way in human history, they have been second class. The Japs will probably end up creating some type of nanobot that they send over there to wipe out their population and then will take their land. China sucks. Always have, always will.

 
On a further note...for all of you China worshiping libs...what sets 'Merica apart from Charlie Chan is that in our country everyone at least gets a shot. I am not saying its fair, but it is always possible to go from the depths of despair to the highest of heights and vice versa. And in 'Merica, when a loser makes it big, it is celebrated. Not so in backwards loserville China. They preselect people for every type of role under the sun, thus wasting the massive amount of human potential that is available to them.

This is the main reason why they suck. I will laugh when they collapse sometime in the next few years. Sure it will have a bad effect on us, but we always bounce back, plus we have the best land.

 
On a further note...for all of you China worshiping libs...what sets 'Merica apart from Charlie Chan is that in our country everyone at least gets a shot. I am not saying its fair, but it is always possible to go from the depths of despair to the highest of heights and vice versa. And in 'Merica, when a loser makes it big, it is celebrated. Not so in backwards loserville China. They preselect people for every type of role under the sun, thus wasting the massive amount of human potential that is available to them.

This is the main reason why they suck. I will laugh when they collapse sometime in the next few years. Sure it will have a bad effect on us, but we always bounce back, plus we have the best land.
Who the hell worships China? :o

 
India is not too far behind in the level of stupid that drives their social culture. I just watched one of their most popular movies last night on Netflix, Dhoom3, it is so f*&king stupid it is actually worth watching. Plus they operate on the caste system!!! What a bunch of morons. I know there are idiots who will argue that we are worse, but those people really just know nothing about the caste system and how stupid it is.

AMERICA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 
On a further note...for all of you China worshiping libs...what sets 'Merica apart from Charlie Chan is that in our country everyone at least gets a shot. I am not saying its fair, but it is always possible to go from the depths of despair to the highest of heights and vice versa. And in 'Merica, when a loser makes it big, it is celebrated. Not so in backwards loserville China. They preselect people for every type of role under the sun, thus wasting the massive amount of human potential that is available to them.

This is the main reason why they suck. I will laugh when they collapse sometime in the next few years. Sure it will have a bad effect on us, but we always bounce back, plus we have the best land.
Who the hell worships China? :o
Don't mind a little bit of hyperbole. I like to get my licks in at libs whenever I can, but hey if it were not for them, we probably would not have the best land, right?

F^%K YEAH!! LIBS!!!!!

 
That is the great thing about about 'MERICA....even though the libs and conservaturds hate each other and declare them to be Satan at every turn, they really just balance each other out, a true version of Ying/Yang.

See....in 'Merica we took China's greatest idea (yingyang) and applied it 1000x better than they ever could even dream to!!! And we didn't frikking copy it, we APPLIED it!!! That is a higher level. Let's all make a toast to China....you suck China, all of your best talent wants to live and work in our great country.

 
There is even a guy who resides on this stupid little board who constantly laughs about the ease of which we can take their fine women, because the men are so dumb that they think a woman over 28 is used up. In 'Merica most smart people have sex until at least 75!!!! And soon we will probably all be working until we are 90!!!! Suck it, CHINA!!!!!!!

 
On a further note...for all of you China worshiping libs...what sets 'Merica apart from Charlie Chan is that in our country everyone at least gets a shot. I am not saying its fair, but it is always possible to go from the depths of despair to the highest of heights and vice versa. And in 'Merica, when a loser makes it big, it is celebrated. Not so in backwards loserville China. They preselect people for every type of role under the sun, thus wasting the massive amount of human potential that is available to them.

This is the main reason why they suck. I will laugh when they collapse sometime in the next few years. Sure it will have a bad effect on us, but we always bounce back, plus we have the best land.
Who the hell worships China? :o
Don't mind a little bit of hyperbole. I like to get my licks in at libs whenever I can, but hey if it were not for them, we probably would not have the best land, right?

F^%K YEAH!! LIBS!!!!!
And you wonder why people don't take you seriously.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
On a further note...for all of you China worshiping libs...what sets 'Merica apart from Charlie Chan is that in our country everyone at least gets a shot. I am not saying its fair, but it is always possible to go from the depths of despair to the highest of heights and vice versa. And in 'Merica, when a loser makes it big, it is celebrated. Not so in backwards loserville China. They preselect people for every type of role under the sun, thus wasting the massive amount of human potential that is available to them.

This is the main reason why they suck. I will laugh when they collapse sometime in the next few years. Sure it will have a bad effect on us, but we always bounce back, plus we have the best land.
Who the hell worships China? :o
Don't mind a little bit of hyperbole. I like to get my licks in at libs whenever I can, but hey if it were not for them, we probably would not have the best land, right?

F^%K YEAH!! LIBS!!!!!
You are pathetic.

 
You talk pretty tough for a guy that cried during "Guardians of the Galaxy"
Dude...I believe the actual quote was 'teared up'. Its a pretty big accomplishment for a sci fi movie to get somebody to tear up....I BET THAT WOULD NEVER HAPPEN IN A CHINESE FILM!!!! Oh wait, they are all too busy whacking their puds to Transformers 4.

 
On a further note...for all of you China worshiping libs...what sets 'Merica apart from Charlie Chan is that in our country everyone at least gets a shot. I am not saying its fair, but it is always possible to go from the depths of despair to the highest of heights and vice versa. And in 'Merica, when a loser makes it big, it is celebrated. Not so in backwards loserville China. They preselect people for every type of role under the sun, thus wasting the massive amount of human potential that is available to them.

This is the main reason why they suck. I will laugh when they collapse sometime in the next few years. Sure it will have a bad effect on us, but we always bounce back, plus we have the best land.
Who the hell worships China? :o
Don't mind a little bit of hyperbole. I like to get my licks in at libs whenever I can, but hey if it were not for them, we probably would not have the best land, right?

F^%K YEAH!! LIBS!!!!!
You are pathetic.
See dude, you prove my point as you speak....just my semi - benign catcall of 'F%^k YEAH!! LIBS!!!!' led to you label me as pathetic, a pretty strong insult if you ask me, and a serious one to boot. If I was in charge of a small province of some Chinese town and you said that to me, I would give you 10 years of breaking rocks. Around these parts, you will skate away scot free!! (don't call me gay though)

THAT IS WHY 'MERICA IS THE BEST!!!!!

 
On a further note...for all of you China worshiping libs...what sets 'Merica apart from Charlie Chan is that in our country everyone at least gets a shot. I am not saying its fair, but it is always possible to go from the depths of despair to the highest of heights and vice versa. And in 'Merica, when a loser makes it big, it is celebrated. Not so in backwards loserville China. They preselect people for every type of role under the sun, thus wasting the massive amount of human potential that is available to them.

This is the main reason why they suck. I will laugh when they collapse sometime in the next few years. Sure it will have a bad effect on us, but we always bounce back, plus we have the best land.
Who the hell worships China? :o
Don't mind a little bit of hyperbole. I like to get my licks in at libs whenever I can, but hey if it were not for them, we probably would not have the best land, right?

F^%K YEAH!! LIBS!!!!!
And you wonder why people don't take you seriously.
What leads you to believe that I feel people take me serious? I'll tell you what, go into the slow cooker thread and recreate the "granpa's pus-bucket dip' that I made up. Then eat a load of it and then get back to me. At that point, I will begin to take my job as Saturday night loner-ville FFA poster seriously.

P.S. I really do believe China is butt-backwards and will fall eventually for all the reasons posted. India sucks too, not Indian natives who are making our country better by spending their talents here (plus I love Indian food), just their country. To be clear. Chinese people who work here to escape to stupidity of communism and are not corporate spies are cool too.

 
You still teared up at a crappy sci-fi movie aimed at 12 year olds. That just screams "little liberal itch"
As I said....we f*cking APPLIED the Ying/Yang...WE OWN IT! Don't you realize that actually makes me almost half lib?!?!?! If you teleported a joint over to me right now I would be smoking it.

Don't send any meth or crack though. I have to wake up early tomorrow.

 
Could be an underestimation.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protest_and_dissent_in_China

...In 2006, the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences estimated the number of annual mass incidents to exceed 90,000, and Chinese sociology professor Sun Liping estimated 180,000 incidents in 2010...

...An estimated 65 percent of the 180,000 annual "mass incidents" in China stem from grievances over forced land requisitions, whereby government authorities—often in collusion with private developers—seize land from villages with little to no compensation. Since 2005, surveys have indicated a steady increase in the number of forced land requisitions. Every year, local government expropriates the land of approximately 4 million rural Chinese citizens. 43 percent of villagers surveys across China report being the victims of land grabs. In most instances, the land is then sold to private developers at an average cost of 40x higher per acre than the government paid to the villagers...

 
At some point in the near future they will be done....the one child policy is really a 'killer', they now have a 6 - 4 ratio of men to women....think about that...for every 10 dudes, 2 have no shot at a chick. That will crush them. Social instability. Aside from that, they are not innovative at all, they copy everything. That is a recipe for reproducing yesterday's news.

If you stop and think about it, just about every step of the way in human history, they have been second class. The Japs will probably end up creating some type of nanobot that they send over there to wipe out their population and then will take their land. China sucks. Always have, always will.
But they're relatively good at math.

 
At some point in the near future they will be done....the one child policy is really a 'killer', they now have a 6 - 4 ratio of men to women....think about that...for every 10 dudes, 2 have no shot at a chick. That will crush them. Social instability. Aside from that, they are not innovative at all, they copy everything. That is a recipe for reproducing yesterday's news.

If you stop and think about it, just about every step of the way in human history, they have been second class. The Japs will probably end up creating some type of nanobot that they send over there to wipe out their population and then will take their land. China sucks. Always have, always will.
But they're relatively good at math.
Clearly jhib is not because he thinks it is 1 to 1 for the other 8 guys. The rich guys get more than 1 chick.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
At some point in the near future they will be done....the one child policy is really a 'killer', they now have a 6 - 4 ratio of men to women....think about that...for every 10 dudes, 2 have no shot at a chick. That will crush them. Social instability. Aside from that, they are not innovative at all, they copy everything. That is a recipe for reproducing yesterday's news.

If you stop and think about it, just about every step of the way in human history, they have been second class. The Japs will probably end up creating some type of nanobot that they send over there to wipe out their population and then will take their land. China sucks. Always have, always will.
But they're relatively good at math.
I don't mean to be an #####, but are you kidding?

I know our 'rankings' do not measure up, but in reality what countries send ALL of their kids to school. I will tell you with certainty that China does not. I know we do. Talk to me about math when we are comparing apples to apples. Until then you are going to have to piss off with the ill-informed cracks at 'Merica's math prowess.

 
'MERICA!!!!!!!!!!!

'EATIN OUR FOOD FROM A SINGLE BOWL!!!! IN MY PARENTS' BASEMENT....WHERE I'M LIVIN....HAPPY BIRTHDAY....I'M 43.

I'll send a special prayer to anyone who identifies that quote correctly.

 
Someone has been hitting the alcohol tonight... hard!

Also, ratio of 6:4 men:women does not equal 2 dudes left out for every 10 dudes... as stated above.

6:4 = 12:8

or

3:2 = 6:4 = 9:6 = 12:8

so, for every 9 guys, three may be left without a woman. For every 12 guys, four might be left without a woman. For every 10 guys... 3.33 may be left without a woman. I'd hate to be that .33 guy... that's gotta hurt.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top