Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Guy Makes A Vid Of Himself Riding a Bike Over A Lamborghini (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter chet
- Start date
chet
Footballguy
10+ years ago, there was a guy who posted a vid of himself pissing on a Ferrari. It didn't end well for him either.
D in the D
Footballguy
You would hope somehow the owner gets to this punk with charges or fists if he see fit. At a minimum one would hope karma catches up to the kid and he gets t-boned on his BMX bike by a different Lamborghini.
Foosball God
Foos
There sure are some idiots out there.
chet
Footballguy
Al O'Pecia
Footballguy
Here's another good bike-car video currently in the viral news cycle....
http://m.liveleak.com/view?i=9db_1429549017
http://m.liveleak.com/view?i=9db_1429549017
chet
Footballguy
ajourneythroughtime
Josh Navarro An explorer. Check out my BMX/pizza video below. http://youtu.be/xoKTGferaLk
BobbyLayne
Footballguy
ajourneythroughtime
Follow
Josh Navarro An explorer. Check out my BMX/pizza video below. http://youtu.be/xoKTGferaLk
Oh ####
IC FBGCav
Footballguy
The Big Guy
Fear the Blitz
The fact that it is recorded makes it look as a planned event. He probably said to his buddy "hey dude, wouldn't it be just sick if I ride over that car? Durr Hurr" and then his boy filmed it,because that is what idiots today do. Police must love this vine and instagram loving generation for making their lives so easy.
chet
Footballguy
Not mine. Google Gibby Pees on a Ferrari for the story.
I don't remember all the details but the owner lost his key and left it parked in a Mall. Gibby peed on it and a bunch of owners tracked him down and made his life miserable. I think he got fired. By the end, he was apologizing and asking for forgiveness.
GregR
Footballguy
Everyone laughed when they saw him do that involuntary shake thing at the end.
Humiliation galore.
chet
Footballguy
TobiasFunke
Footballguy
A kid rode a bike over a car, causing no apparent damage? What is this world coming to?
It's all over, people. This is the end of times.
It's all over, people. This is the end of times.
ILUVBEER99
Footballguy
it's a prank. the guy below owns tons of awesome cars and lets friends do weird #### with them.
https://instagram.com/vgtorious/
https://instagram.com/vgtorious/
chet
Footballguy
You're almost as stupid as the kid in the vid. What's your source on no damage? The instagram comments?
Ditkaless Wonders
Footballguy
Kids do stupid, disrespectful things. This is actually to be anticipated.
TobiasFunke
Footballguy
Maybe next time you call someone stupid you should read their comment more carefully first. See the word "apparent"? I bolded it for you, since you seem to have missed it the first time. If you don't know what it means, a quick Google search would have informed you that its an adjective that means "clearly visible or understood; obvious."
Now, since it's a video, I can see the car. And thus when I say there is no "apparent damage" I am saying that there is no damage that is clearly visible or understood or obvious damage. One does not need a source in order to claim that something is not apparent- they only need to look for it quickly and not see it.
Keep up the good fight, though. Vandalism to automobiles on city streets is rare, but it is debilitating. If we stand up to it and fight arm in arm I'm sure we can eradicate this terrible plague once and for all.
Last edited by a moderator:
lod01
Footballguy
Easy for you to say: Tobias Funke's ride.Maybe next time you call someone stupid you should read their comment more carefully first. See the word "apparent"? I bolded it for you, since you seem to have missed it the first time. If you don't know what it means, a quick Google search would have informed you that its an adjective that means "clearly visible or understood; obvious."
Now, since it's a video, I can see the car. And thus when I say there is no "apparent damage" I am saying that there is no damage that is clearly visible or understood or obvious damage. One does not need a source in order to claim that something is not apparent- they only need to look for it quickly and not see it.
Keep up the good fight, though. Vandalism to automobiles on city streets is rare, but it is debilitating. If we stand up to it and fight arm in arm I'm sure we can eradicate this terrible plague once and for all.
Last edited by a moderator:
Nick Vermeil
Footballguy
That's a pretty sweet hop on that bike. That would be really hard to do on something boxy like a range rover or mid 90s Volvo.
E-Z Glider
Footballguy
Would love to see a reaction vid of the toolbag that owns that thing.
TobiasFunke
Footballguy
I wish. I rock a minivan these days.Easy for you to say: Tobias Funke's ride.Maybe next time you call someone stupid you should read their comment more carefully first. See the word "apparent"? I bolded it for you, since you seem to have missed it the first time. If you don't know what it means, a quick Google search would have informed you that its an adjective that means "clearly visible or understood; obvious."
Now, since it's a video, I can see the car. And thus when I say there is no "apparent damage" I am saying that there is no damage that is clearly visible or understood or obvious damage. One does not need a source in order to claim that something is not apparent- they only need to look for it quickly and not see it.
Keep up the good fight, though. Vandalism to automobiles on city streets is rare, but it is debilitating. If we stand up to it and fight arm in arm I'm sure we can eradicate this terrible plague once and for all.
[story deleted- was about my wife who didn't agree to be a part of my internet hijinx]
Last edited by a moderator:
chet
Footballguy
alekseykorzun
Find this little dude and break both of his legs. Will PayPal you $100 w/ video proof.
Find this little dude and break both of his legs. Will PayPal you $100 w/ video proof.
chet
Footballguy
![[icon]](/data/avatars/m/5/5167.jpg?1660313464){kind=avatar}
[icon]
Insoxicated
chet
Footballguy
[icon]
Insoxicated
same guy was involved in a "prank" where someone spraypainted a penis on the hood of his bugatti. Google will peel back the layers, GB
Last edited by a moderator:
TheIronSheik
SUPER ELITE UPPER TIER
If a kid came up to you on the street and pushed you, would you get mad? Even if there was no apparent damage done to you?Maybe next time you call someone stupid you should read their comment more carefully first. See the word "apparent"? I bolded it for you, since you seem to have missed it the first time. If you don't know what it means, a quick Google search would have informed you that its an adjective that means "clearly visible or understood; obvious."
Now, since it's a video, I can see the car. And thus when I say there is no "apparent damage" I am saying that there is no damage that is clearly visible or understood or obvious damage. One does not need a source in order to claim that something is not apparent- they only need to look for it quickly and not see it.
Keep up the good fight, though. Vandalism to automobiles on city streets is rare, but it is debilitating. If we stand up to it and fight arm in arm I'm sure we can eradicate this terrible plague once and for all.
El Floppo
Footballguy
no imagine he pushes your bicycle- when you're not looking- with no apparent damage.If a kid came up to you on the street and pushed you, would you get mad? Even if there was no apparent damage done to you?Maybe next time you call someone stupid you should read their comment more carefully first. See the word "apparent"? I bolded it for you, since you seem to have missed it the first time. If you don't know what it means, a quick Google search would have informed you that its an adjective that means "clearly visible or understood; obvious."
Now, since it's a video, I can see the car. And thus when I say there is no "apparent damage" I am saying that there is no damage that is clearly visible or understood or obvious damage. One does not need a source in order to claim that something is not apparent- they only need to look for it quickly and not see it.
Keep up the good fight, though. Vandalism to automobiles on city streets is rare, but it is debilitating. If we stand up to it and fight arm in arm I'm sure we can eradicate this terrible plague once and for all.
Scoresman
Footballguy
TobiasFunke
Footballguy
Pushed me? Yeah, probably.If a kid came up to you on the street and pushed you, would you get mad? Even if there was no apparent damage done to you?Maybe next time you call someone stupid you should read their comment more carefully first. See the word "apparent"? I bolded it for you, since you seem to have missed it the first time. If you don't know what it means, a quick Google search would have informed you that its an adjective that means "clearly visible or understood; obvious."
Now, since it's a video, I can see the car. And thus when I say there is no "apparent damage" I am saying that there is no damage that is clearly visible or understood or obvious damage. One does not need a source in order to claim that something is not apparent- they only need to look for it quickly and not see it.
Keep up the good fight, though. Vandalism to automobiles on city streets is rare, but it is debilitating. If we stand up to it and fight arm in arm I'm sure we can eradicate this terrible plague once and for all.
Did something to my car worse than what appears to have happened to the car in the video? No. My cars have absorbed worse than what that car apparently did many times. It's a city street.
Did something to a complete stranger's car? Also no, and I'd laugh at someone who did get mad about it.
Fat Nick
Footballguy
There was a kid at Penn State when I was in graduate school who drove a yellow Lambo Murcielago. It was his daily-driver. He parallel parked it outside his apartment back off Beaver Ave. I have no clue how that car survived. I feel like with the number of drunkards who stagger around back there, it was bound to get keyed, peed on, etc. on a weekly basis.El Floppo said:
Officer Pete Malloy
Footballguy
What would Jesus do if somebody BMXed his Lambo?
Fat Nick
Footballguy
This is highly dependant on how people view their cars...and how OCD people are.TobiasFunke said:Pushed me? Yeah, probably.TheIronSheik said:If a kid came up to you on the street and pushed you, would you get mad? Even if there was no apparent damage done to you?TobiasFunke said:Maybe next time you call someone stupid you should read their comment more carefully first. See the word "apparent"? I bolded it for you, since you seem to have missed it the first time. If you don't know what it means, a quick Google search would have informed you that its an adjective that means "clearly visible or understood; obvious."chet said:
Now, since it's a video, I can see the car. And thus when I say there is no "apparent damage" I am saying that there is no damage that is clearly visible or understood or obvious damage. One does not need a source in order to claim that something is not apparent- they only need to look for it quickly and not see it.
Keep up the good fight, though. Vandalism to automobiles on city streets is rare, but it is debilitating. If we stand up to it and fight arm in arm I'm sure we can eradicate this terrible plague once and for all.
Did something to my car worse than what appears to have happened to the car in the video? No. My cars have absorbed worse than what that car apparently did many times. It's a city street.
Did something to a complete stranger's car? Also no, and I'd laugh at someone who did get mad about it.
I would flip #### (and have) at anyone touching my car, much less riding a bike over it. I know it's irrational to a degree, but I don't mess with someone else's property, so I guess I expect the same of others. I wouldn't dream of leaning against someone else's car while having a conversation on the street, but I see people do it all the time. I'm not saying accidents don't happen...parking on the street will lead to the inevitable bump or scrape, but those are accidents. This was pretty deliberate (under the guise that this WASN'T a staged stunt).
TheIronSheik
SUPER ELITE UPPER TIER
But you weren't injured when you were pushed. Seems odd that you'd get mad. All they did was touch you.TobiasFunke said:Pushed me? Yeah, probably.TheIronSheik said:If a kid came up to you on the street and pushed you, would you get mad? Even if there was no apparent damage done to you?TobiasFunke said:Maybe next time you call someone stupid you should read their comment more carefully first. See the word "apparent"? I bolded it for you, since you seem to have missed it the first time. If you don't know what it means, a quick Google search would have informed you that its an adjective that means "clearly visible or understood; obvious."chet said:
Now, since it's a video, I can see the car. And thus when I say there is no "apparent damage" I am saying that there is no damage that is clearly visible or understood or obvious damage. One does not need a source in order to claim that something is not apparent- they only need to look for it quickly and not see it.
Keep up the good fight, though. Vandalism to automobiles on city streets is rare, but it is debilitating. If we stand up to it and fight arm in arm I'm sure we can eradicate this terrible plague once and for all.
Did something to my car worse than what appears to have happened to the car in the video? No. My cars have absorbed worse than what that car apparently did many times. It's a city street.
Did something to a complete stranger's car? Also no, and I'd laugh at someone who did get mad about it.
JaxBill
Footballguy
TobiasFunke
Footballguy
Yes, I suppose there's no rhyme or reason to it. On the one hand I'd get mad if someone pushed me, but on the other hand I don't get mad when my iFriends ask me ridiculously silly questions on the internet that are really just incredibly transparent fishing attempts. We're all different, I suppose.But you weren't injured when you were pushed. Seems odd that you'd get mad. All they did was touch you.TobiasFunke said:Pushed me? Yeah, probably.TheIronSheik said:If a kid came up to you on the street and pushed you, would you get mad? Even if there was no apparent damage done to you?TobiasFunke said:Maybe next time you call someone stupid you should read their comment more carefully first. See the word "apparent"? I bolded it for you, since you seem to have missed it the first time. If you don't know what it means, a quick Google search would have informed you that its an adjective that means "clearly visible or understood; obvious."chet said:
Now, since it's a video, I can see the car. And thus when I say there is no "apparent damage" I am saying that there is no damage that is clearly visible or understood or obvious damage. One does not need a source in order to claim that something is not apparent- they only need to look for it quickly and not see it.
Keep up the good fight, though. Vandalism to automobiles on city streets is rare, but it is debilitating. If we stand up to it and fight arm in arm I'm sure we can eradicate this terrible plague once and for all.
Did something to my car worse than what appears to have happened to the car in the video? No. My cars have absorbed worse than what that car apparently did many times. It's a city street.
Did something to a complete stranger's car? Also no, and I'd laugh at someone who did get mad about it.
TheIronSheik
SUPER ELITE UPPER TIER
Not a fishing trip at all. I just don't understand how you think that someone messing with another person's property shouldn't bother people. What if that biker had missed the jump and crashed into the back of that car? Or what if it scratched the paint? Or dented the body? It's easy to say, "Nothing happened to the car", but something could have easily happened. Or it may have actually happened and we don't know. Either way, to mess with someone else's property is pretty f'd up. But what's even more messed up is people who see that and think, "Nothing wrong with that."Yes, I suppose there's no rhyme or reason to it. On the one hand I'd get mad if someone pushed me, but on the other hand I don't get mad when my iFriends ask me ridiculously silly questions on the internet that are really just incredibly transparent fishing attempts. We're all different, I suppose.But you weren't injured when you were pushed. Seems odd that you'd get mad. All they did was touch you.TobiasFunke said:Pushed me? Yeah, probably.TheIronSheik said:If a kid came up to you on the street and pushed you, would you get mad? Even if there was no apparent damage done to you?TobiasFunke said:Maybe next time you call someone stupid you should read their comment more carefully first. See the word "apparent"? I bolded it for you, since you seem to have missed it the first time. If you don't know what it means, a quick Google search would have informed you that its an adjective that means "clearly visible or understood; obvious."chet said:
Now, since it's a video, I can see the car. And thus when I say there is no "apparent damage" I am saying that there is no damage that is clearly visible or understood or obvious damage. One does not need a source in order to claim that something is not apparent- they only need to look for it quickly and not see it.
Keep up the good fight, though. Vandalism to automobiles on city streets is rare, but it is debilitating. If we stand up to it and fight arm in arm I'm sure we can eradicate this terrible plague once and for all.
Did something to my car worse than what appears to have happened to the car in the video? No. My cars have absorbed worse than what that car apparently did many times. It's a city street.
Did something to a complete stranger's car? Also no, and I'd laugh at someone who did get mad about it.
chet
Footballguy
You certainly got bent out of shape by my earlier comment.Yes, I suppose there's no rhyme or reason to it. On the one hand I'd get mad if someone pushed me, but on the other hand I don't get mad when my iFriends ask me ridiculously silly questions on the internet that are really just incredibly transparent fishing attempts. We're all different, I suppose.But you weren't injured when you were pushed. Seems odd that you'd get mad. All they did was touch you.TobiasFunke said:Pushed me? Yeah, probably.TheIronSheik said:If a kid came up to you on the street and pushed you, would you get mad? Even if there was no apparent damage done to you?TobiasFunke said:Maybe next time you call someone stupid you should read their comment more carefully first. See the word "apparent"? I bolded it for you, since you seem to have missed it the first time. If you don't know what it means, a quick Google search would have informed you that its an adjective that means "clearly visible or understood; obvious."chet said:
Now, since it's a video, I can see the car. And thus when I say there is no "apparent damage" I am saying that there is no damage that is clearly visible or understood or obvious damage. One does not need a source in order to claim that something is not apparent- they only need to look for it quickly and not see it.
Keep up the good fight, though. Vandalism to automobiles on city streets is rare, but it is debilitating. If we stand up to it and fight arm in arm I'm sure we can eradicate this terrible plague once and for all.
Did something to my car worse than what appears to have happened to the car in the video? No. My cars have absorbed worse than what that car apparently did many times. It's a city street.
Did something to a complete stranger's car? Also no, and I'd laugh at someone who did get mad about it.
TobiasFunke
Footballguy
It's a matter of degrees, my friend. Both of the extent of the damage and your connection to the victim. Seems like common sense to me, which is why I still assume you're fishing, because you are a man with common sense. For example, I was really angry when someone completely crushed my fiancee's car in a hit and run. I was kind of mad when I heard about some Islanders fans keying the car of some of my fellow Caps fans and removing their license plate during yesterday's playoff game at Nassau Coliseum. And I could not possibly care less about someone riding a bike over a complete stranger's car because who gives a ####. Depth of crime and connection to victim, same variables at work in every reaction we have when we hear about bad stuff.Not a fishing trip at all. I just don't understand how you think that someone messing with another person's property shouldn't bother people. What if that biker had missed the jump and crashed into the back of that car? Or what if it scratched the paint? Or dented the body? It's easy to say, "Nothing happened to the car", but something could have easily happened. Or it may have actually happened and we don't know. Either way, to mess with someone else's property is pretty f'd up. But what's even more messed up is people who see that and think, "Nothing wrong with that."Yes, I suppose there's no rhyme or reason to it. On the one hand I'd get mad if someone pushed me, but on the other hand I don't get mad when my iFriends ask me ridiculously silly questions on the internet that are really just incredibly transparent fishing attempts. We're all different, I suppose.But you weren't injured when you were pushed. Seems odd that you'd get mad. All they did was touch you.TobiasFunke said:Pushed me? Yeah, probably.TheIronSheik said:If a kid came up to you on the street and pushed you, would you get mad? Even if there was no apparent damage done to you?TobiasFunke said:Maybe next time you call someone stupid you should read their comment more carefully first. See the word "apparent"? I bolded it for you, since you seem to have missed it the first time. If you don't know what it means, a quick Google search would have informed you that its an adjective that means "clearly visible or understood; obvious."chet said:
Now, since it's a video, I can see the car. And thus when I say there is no "apparent damage" I am saying that there is no damage that is clearly visible or understood or obvious damage. One does not need a source in order to claim that something is not apparent- they only need to look for it quickly and not see it.
Keep up the good fight, though. Vandalism to automobiles on city streets is rare, but it is debilitating. If we stand up to it and fight arm in arm I'm sure we can eradicate this terrible plague once and for all.
Did something to my car worse than what appears to have happened to the car in the video? No. My cars have absorbed worse than what that car apparently did many times. It's a city street.
Did something to a complete stranger's car? Also no, and I'd laugh at someone who did get mad about it.
Scoresman
Footballguy
For the record, while I'm playing the odds and assuming the lambo-owning sidewalk-parker is probably a d-bag, I also dont think he deserves to have his car ridden over by an even d-baggier bike d-bag.
G
Guest
Guest
I'd be pissed. Value of my vehicle wouldn't matter. 
