sooo...stop the suspense....what is the next tie breaker?surely you have one....both socred 63 points.both "OT" players scored 12 points.Oops.What sealed the deal was Ronnie Brown rushing for 110 yards and catching 15 yards. That was the magic number to make it happen.
Nope.This has never, ever happened before in 9 years of this league's existence.sooo...stop the suspense....what is the next tie breaker?surely you have one....both socred 63 points.both "OT" players scored 12 points.Oops.What sealed the deal was Ronnie Brown rushing for 110 yards and catching 15 yards. That was the magic number to make it happen.
Nonsense. The next tie-breaker should be a dance-off.I suggest letting them play a tiebreaker next week. Consider week 17 as an overtime period.
"If I'd known I'd have to worry about week 17, I'd have picked up Player X." I can hear it now.No rule to cover the situation, split the money and the title. That's the only fair way to do it. Any time you make up rules in the postseason, it's bad on priciple.I suggest letting them play a tiebreaker next week. Consider week 17 as an overtime period.
Not having enough tiebreakers is also bad "priciple"."If I'd known I'd have to worry about week 17, I'd have picked up Player X." I can hear it now.No rule to cover the situation, split the money and the title. That's the only fair way to do it. Any time you make up rules in the postseason, it's bad on priciple.I suggest letting them play a tiebreaker next week. Consider week 17 as an overtime period.
so ronnie would've had 12 1/2 pts...sweet2 wordsfractional scoring.
I don't. The reason is because what if one team's backup RB's or QB's are the real backups to the real starters? For example, a LT owner's best backup RB is Michael Turner. The owner that is smart enough to backup his starters is then screwed.I like bench points as a tiebreaker.
It happened to me in my championship game. We tied in the final. Our league doesn't have a playoff tie-break situation, so (as commish) I have to declare Co-Champions and a prize split.Of course, we have to install rules regarding this in the offseason, but, I expect some flak.soooo...what happens now?if you dont have any rules governing this, It seems you have to declare co-champions? (Assuming this is the championship game)our leagues next tie-break for situations like this is "higher seed advances"....not that this piece of info helps you now.
No, it would have been 25/2 pts.so ronnie would've had 12 1/2 pts...sweet2 wordsfractional scoring.
Additionally, we moved our host site from CBS to Yahoo this year, to pay out more to the respected parties. I print a pretty lengthly rule sheet prior to the draft, and, pass out to each team. Yahoo, on the other end, has its own system regarding tie-breaks. You guessed it, someone (other than the 2 in the finals) pointed out the system and is raising a stink.Now, if we adhere to the rules that are on printed paper, how does one as commish go about tackling this issue? The 2 guys in the final are fine with a split prize. Yet others with no vested interest are raising red flags.Once again, obviously rules will have to be revised prior to next year's draft.It happened to me in my championship game. We tied in the final. Our league doesn't have a playoff tie-break situation, so (as commish) I have to declare Co-Champions and a prize split.Of course, we have to install rules regarding this in the offseason, but, I expect some flak.soooo...what happens now?if you dont have any rules governing this, It seems you have to declare co-champions? (Assuming this is the championship game)our leagues next tie-break for situations like this is "higher seed advances"....not that this piece of info helps you now.![]()
Why would you get any flak? Who plays FF to tie!?Tony Jabroni said:It happened to me in my championship game. We tied in the final. Our league doesn't have a playoff tie-break situation, so (as commish) I have to declare Co-Champions and a prize split.Of course, we have to install rules regarding this in the offseason, but, I expect some flak.Fruitbat said:soooo...what happens now?
if you dont have any rules governing this, It seems you have to declare co-champions? (Assuming this is the championship game)
our leagues next tie-break for situations like this is "higher seed advances"....not that this piece of info helps you now.
![]()
I like the week 17 playoff idea. Adds to the tension.