My interpretation for this:He looked good, still catching them in spite of Carr.He looked good, but was still catching them from Carr. I would temper any expectations for this year, expect the normal learning curve.
Don't know if he will get any time with Eli next week either, given it seems he needs a tad more work with the WRs starting (Still).
How many teams in that league? I look at WR4 and WR5 as positions I am much more likely to use than RB4 or RB5...so I'm not sure he is worth that high of a pick. You think he finishes top40? I'm not sure he is really draftable in most 12 team leagues where you carry 5 WRs. Very borderline IMHO.He is definetly worth taking as a # 4or 5 reciever. the rest of theWR's are a pathetic group. easily see him becoming #1 there and putting up #3 WR stats by mid year. Think about it Smith and Manningham are impressing nobody. Hixon is ok. of all the rookie recievers I think he will be the best this year. Games like this build confidence in him to himself and to his coaches/QB. lets just see if he can nail down a starting job at some point.
The first TD the guy is all over him because he couldn't get separation- he makes a very nice read, adjustment and catch . The 2nd TD was a CB blitz where the CB covering Nicks came in- Carr read it and hit him, hes wide open because the safety blew his coverage and tried to hold him.It was late in the 4th when the two tds came, first one he caught sliding in the end zone with a guy all over him, it was a nice catch and he showed good concentration. The second one (think it was 71 yards) seemed like he put a double move on the CB, couldn't really tell due to the camera angle but he blew past the CB (who was also flagged for illegal contact) and he caught it wide open and went untouched into the end zone.Not sure how much he will see the field right now with Hixon, Smith and Manningham in front of him but I really like him in dynasty leagues. I don't think Manningham has looked too bad this year after being nonexistent so far in his career. He sure seems to be targeted a lot.
Close but not quite the same. His 1st TD was a quality catch . Against starters or 3rd teamers that was a talented play. The 2nd TD was awful defense but Nicks did his job.Nicks played with and against 3rd teamers. It means about as much as PJ Hills' 12-83-2 line for the Saints
Fortunately they can get smart and plug in Nicks instead.I am ewatching the replay on NFL network...Holy Guacomole do the 1st team WRs stink for the NYG...I was high on Hixon, still am but he dropped a ball where Bart Scott hit him and then it was an interception. Steve SMith dropped a ball that was equal to if not worse than the one Hixon dropped wide open deep lst season. Smith just flat out whiffed...he had the coverage beat, wide open, perfect pass from Eli dropping it in his bread basket and Smith drops it...Jimmy Johnson would have cut him for doing that. This is why the Ginats might not make the playoffs after all.
I disagree here - Nicks was a first round pick, and is generally expected/hoped to be their #1 at some point. I'm also looking at this from a dynasty perspective. He's still late-round material in redrafts.Nicks played with and against 3rd teamers. It means about as much as PJ Hills' 12-83-2 line for the Saints
He oozes with talent and will soon be the #1 WR in NY. I guarantee you that will come to pass, barring injury of course.In the 4th quarter .
Well that settles it then.../threadSeriously, I agree with Johnny on this one...He oozes with talent and will soon be the #1 WR in NY. I guarantee you that will come to pass, barring injury of course.In the 4th quarter .
If that comes to pass then I expect the Giants season will be toast.Rookie WR's making an impact are few and far between. Last year Eddie Royal and Desean Jackson were 900 yds guys. Royal had 5 rec TD's and Jackson had 2. Nice numbers for a TE - mediocre for a starting WR.Manningham, S. Smith, S. Moss, D. Hixon have all had their chance and havent seized the opportunity. None of those guys can or will be number one WR's. That leaves the first rounder Nicks. First round WR with unreal college stats and the big frame to go with it. Hakeem Nicks has an easy clear road to the number one WR spot in NY. I wouldnt be surprised if Ramses Barden is the number 3 by mid season either.
True. I mean it's not like the Eagles were any good. For fantasy purposes, you may not be a big fan of 900-5 type seasons, but from the Giants perspective, do you really expect any receiver to exceed that? I would think that is about where Hixon will be and there will be a lot of others that will end up with 450-3 type seasons. And last year, no WR on the Giants broke 600 yards fyi. But it's fairly likely that someone will emerge towards the end of the season to be the guy and right now, my money is on Nicks. Personally I'm less concerned with season totals and more concerned with how he might do if and when he emerges because a 600-5 season with most of that coming in the last half I can certainly live with.If that comes to pass then I expect the Giants season will be toast.Rookie WR's making an impact are few and far between. Last year Eddie Royal and Desean Jackson were 900 yds guys. Royal had 5 rec TD's and Jackson had 2. Nice numbers for a TE - mediocre for a starting WR.Manningham, S. Smith, S. Moss, D. Hixon have all had their chance and havent seized the opportunity. None of those guys can or will be number one WR's. That leaves the first rounder Nicks. First round WR with unreal college stats and the big frame to go with it. Hakeem Nicks has an easy clear road to the number one WR spot in NY. I wouldnt be surprised if Ramses Barden is the number 3 by mid season either.
It's not like any of their other WRs are any better than 900/5If that comes to pass then I expect the Giants season will be toast.Rookie WR's making an impact are few and far between. Last year Eddie Royal and Desean Jackson were 900 yds guys. Royal had 5 rec TD's and Jackson had 2. Nice numbers for a TE - mediocre for a starting WR.Manningham, S. Smith, S. Moss, D. Hixon have all had their chance and havent seized the opportunity. None of those guys can or will be number one WR's. That leaves the first rounder Nicks. First round WR with unreal college stats and the big frame to go with it. Hakeem Nicks has an easy clear road to the number one WR spot in NY. I wouldnt be surprised if Ramses Barden is the number 3 by mid season either.
Might as well go with the talented one.I don't think that has been determined yet. If Plexico's screwup had not occurred do you think the Giants draft would have looked the same ? I think teams draft for need much more ofter than BPA.My comments on WR's are just about their FF prospects only. I'll leave it to the Giant's coaches to decide who gives them the best chances to win the real games.It's not like any of their other WRs are any better than 900/5If that comes to pass then I expect the Giants season will be toast.Rookie WR's making an impact are few and far between. Last year Eddie Royal and Desean Jackson were 900 yds guys. Royal had 5 rec TD's and Jackson had 2. Nice numbers for a TE - mediocre for a starting WR.Manningham, S. Smith, S. Moss, D. Hixon have all had their chance and havent seized the opportunity. None of those guys can or will be number one WR's. That leaves the first rounder Nicks. First round WR with unreal college stats and the big frame to go with it. Hakeem Nicks has an easy clear road to the number one WR spot in NY. I wouldnt be surprised if Ramses Barden is the number 3 by mid season either.Might as well go with the talented one.
Smith, Hixon and Manningham are 3rd, 3rd and 2nd year players. Seizing the opportunity often takes a couple of years. Normally if a 3rd year receiver was coming off a large uptick in production in his 2nd year with more than half of his production coming in the latter part of the season- and was assured of a starting job to begin the year people would be all over him (Hixon).Manningham, S. Smith, S. Moss, D. Hixon have all had their chance and havent seized the opportunity.
It's not just numbers / years though... having watched almost all of Hixon's games, it's hard to be overly impressed with him. I mean in the context of a bonafide WR1 (or up and coming WR1). He's not necessarily a bad player, and can definitely be a decent NFL WR2/3 (and perhaps a FF WR3), but from what he's shown, he's just not going to be stud/WR1 material. He's a good football player who will be an asset to his team, but isn't someone I'm going out of my way to get onto my FF team. Nicks, however... I'd definitely like him on my dynasty squad.Anyone in a dynasty league going to give up Nicks for Hixon? How about Nicks for Hixon and Manningham... heck, let's throw in Smith too. You give Nicks; you get Hixon, Manningham and Smith. Anyone making that trade?Smith, Hixon and Manningham are 3rd, 3rd and 2nd year players. Seizing the opportunity often takes a couple of years. Normally if a 3rd year receiver was coming off a large uptick in production in his 2nd year with more than half of his production coming in the latter part of the season- and was assured of a starting job to begin the year people would be all over him (Hixon).Manningham, S. Smith, S. Moss, D. Hixon have all had their chance and havent seized the opportunity.
Only minnows make that trade (getting the 3).It's not just numbers / years though... having watched almost all of Hixon's games, it's hard to be overly impressed with him. I mean in the context of a bonafide WR1 (or up and coming WR1). He's not necessarily a bad player, and can definitely be a decent NFL WR2/3 (and perhaps a FF WR3), but from what he's shown, he's just not going to be stud/WR1 material. He's a good football player who will be an asset to his team, but isn't someone I'm going out of my way to get onto my FF team. Nicks, however... I'd definitely like him on my dynasty squad.Anyone in a dynasty league going to give up Nicks for Hixon? How about Nicks for Hixon and Manningham... heck, let's throw in Smith too. You give Nicks; you get Hixon, Manningham and Smith. Anyone making that trade?Smith, Hixon and Manningham are 3rd, 3rd and 2nd year players. Seizing the opportunity often takes a couple of years. Normally if a 3rd year receiver was coming off a large uptick in production in his 2nd year with more than half of his production coming in the latter part of the season- and was assured of a starting job to begin the year people would be all over him (Hixon).Manningham, S. Smith, S. Moss, D. Hixon have all had their chance and havent seized the opportunity.
(KFFL) Ralph Vacchiano, of the New York Daily News, reports New York Giants WR Hakeem Nicks could be in line for more playing time after his performance Saturday, Aug. 29, according to head coach Tom Coughlin. Nicks caught six passes for 144 yards and two touchdowns during the preseason game.
This is useless.blah,blah, blah, blah, blaaaah. It was the 4th quarter of a preseason game. Everybody take a breath and relax.
If you can tell me where else a rookie can show a coaching staff that he is "game ready" and deserves more playing time before we get into the season please let us know.Yeah it's pre-season. Yeah it's was the 4th quarter but in a WR situation as unsettled as the Giants have, if you think the coaches didn't notice Nicks doing well and didn't notice the other WRs doing poorly you have relaxed too much and should pay closer attention.agreedThis is useless.blah,blah, blah, blah, blaaaah. It was the 4th quarter of a preseason game. Everybody take a breath and relax.If you can tell me where else a rookie can show a coaching staff that he is "game ready" and deserves more playing time before we get into the season please let us know.Yeah it's pre-season. Yeah it's was the 4th quarter but in a WR situation as unsettled as the Giants have, if you think the coaches didn't notice Nicks doing well and didn't notice the other WRs doing poorly you have relaxed too much and should pay closer attention.
Dynasty is obviously different, but in terms of redraft I have Hixon > Nicks. Hixon's upside maybe lower but hes more likely to hit it this year. 1,000 + 6 is reasonable if he holds on to the starting job the wholeyear. Dynasty is obviously a totally different animal and so much more depends on your teams current makeup and what years you are projecting yourself to be competitive. Nicks is a better long term bet there.It's not just numbers / years though... having watched almost all of Hixon's games, it's hard to be overly impressed with him. I mean in the context of a bonafide WR1 (or up and coming WR1). He's not necessarily a bad player, and can definitely be a decent NFL WR2/3 (and perhaps a FF WR3), but from what he's shown, he's just not going to be stud/WR1 material. He's a good football player who will be an asset to his team, but isn't someone I'm going out of my way to get onto my FF team. Nicks, however... I'd definitely like him on my dynasty squad.Anyone in a dynasty league going to give up Nicks for Hixon? How about Nicks for Hixon and Manningham... heck, let's throw in Smith too. You give Nicks; you get Hixon, Manningham and Smith. Anyone making that trade?Smith, Hixon and Manningham are 3rd, 3rd and 2nd year players. Seizing the opportunity often takes a couple of years. Normally if a 3rd year receiver was coming off a large uptick in production in his 2nd year with more than half of his production coming in the latter part of the season- and was assured of a starting job to begin the year people would be all over him (Hixon).Manningham, S. Smith, S. Moss, D. Hixon have all had their chance and havent seized the opportunity.
Then I'd think you'd know his name.I'm a Tar Heel, so I watched a lot of Hicks as a college player. I thought the Giants would love the guy, but then I had heard suggestions that he had been struggling in camp. He is an absolute freak of nature with some of the catches you will see him make. He has a knack for big plays and he's a football player through and through. I realize that it's just preseason and that he did his damage against bench players, but I believe that once he learns the offense and adjusts to the speed of the game, he will be a real impact player.

WTF are we supposed to look at? it's not as if he's a unkown, or a questionable talent.blah,blah, blah, blah, blaaaah. It was the 4th quarter of a preseason game. Everybody take a breath and relax.
He's just being an intentional pain. Ignore it.WTF are we supposed to look at? it's not as if he's a unkown or a questionalbe talent.blah,blah, blah, blah, blaaaah. It was the 4th quarter of a preseason game. Everybody take a breath and relax.
Where did you hear this? Other than being slowed by injury, everything I've read since the draft suggested that Nicks was impressing coaches and teammates.I thought the Giants would love the guy, but then I had heard suggestions that he had been struggling in camp.
Agreed.Although due to a slow start in camp with injury issues, the payoff may not be as immediate and some hoped, or the Giants need.He looks like a man among boys. He'll be a starter this year, and he'll eventually be Eli's top target.