bulger2holt
Footballguy
VS Detroit. Does he see many targets this week?
Says the guy who doesn't even know how to spell the city that he lives in...How do some people not know how to spell player names?
Yeah, because Hakeem is such a common name. Why do some people have to post about how someone mis-spells an unusual name? Nothing better to do? Lonely? No friends? All the above?How do some people not know how to spell player names?
This game will come down to who chokes last.I'm flexing Randle in my deep league. I think Detroit defense is fools gold this week. Looks great on paper but the defense is pretty piss poor. I expect a shootout.
I like Randle over Nicks too. Both could be decent flex options if Eli has a good game.I'm flexing Randle in my deep league. I think Detroit defense is fools gold this week. Looks great on paper but the defense is pretty piss poor. I expect a shootout.
see: Week 15...and every week prior this season.I like Randle over Nicks too. Both could be decent flex options if Eli has a good game.I'm flexing Randle in my deep league. I think Detroit defense is fools gold this week. Looks great on paper but the defense is pretty piss poor. I expect a shootout.
I love how everybody keeps bringing up week 15 like getting embarrassed by the Seahawks D isn't the norm. They made the Saints look like a arena football team. The Lions are NOT the Seahawks. Just because Gruden sold a dream on SNF doesn't make them a good defense. Their "Silver Bullet Band" or whatever they call the line isn't even a leader in sacks. Nobody is stopping Calvin and Eli will have a very decent game.see: Week 15...and every week prior this season.I like Randle over Nicks too. Both could be decent flex options if Eli has a good game.I'm flexing Randle in my deep league. I think Detroit defense is fools gold this week. Looks great on paper but the defense is pretty piss poor. I expect a shootout.
maybe a board member who used to play for the Houston Rockets?bulger2holt said:Yeah, because Hakeem is such a common name. Why do some people have to post about how someone mis-spells an unusual name? Nothing better to do? Lonely? No friends? All the above?Phenix said:How do some people not know how to spell player names?
This. Grammar police have self esteem issues imobulger2holt said:Yeah, because Hakeem is such a common name. Why do some people have to post about how someone mis-spells an unusual name? Nothing better to do? Lonely? No friends? All the above?Phenix said:How do some people not know how to spell player names?
Gomer has sucked vs everyone. Doesn't matter who they play, no one on offense has any clue where to be or what to do. To top that all off, it appears that Gomer is calling for KillDrive's return next year. Seems he's too stupid to learn another offense and wants to keep sucking in the one he knows.I love how everybody keeps bringing up week 15 like getting embarrassed by the Seahawks D isn't the norm. They made the Saints look like a arena football team. The Lions are NOT the Seahawks. Just because Gruden sold a dream on SNF doesn't make them a good defense. Their "Silver Bullet Band" or whatever they call the line isn't even a leader in sacks. Nobody is stopping Calvin and Eli will have a very decent game.see: Week 15...and every week prior this season.I like Randle over Nicks too. Both could be decent flex options if Eli has a good game.I'm flexing Randle in my deep league. I think Detroit defense is fools gold this week. Looks great on paper but the defense is pretty piss poor. I expect a shootout.
really? Like who?I would need to be truly, truly desperate to consider starting Randle or Nicks during a championship game.
There are almost certainly better options on the WW.
Depends on the league size, but I would start guys like Baldwin, Marvin Jones, Streater, Holmes, Caldwell and even Riley Cooper over either of those two this week.JohnnyU said:really? Like who?EastonBlues22 said:I would need to be truly, truly desperate to consider starting Randle or Nicks during a championship game.
There are almost certainly better options on the WW.
Every one of those players are rostered except for Caldwell which I do not think is a better play.Depends on the league size, but I would start guys like Baldwin, Marvin Jones, Streater, Holmes, Caldwell and even Riley Cooper over either of those two this week.JohnnyU said:really? Like who?EastonBlues22 said:I would need to be truly, truly desperate to consider starting Randle or Nicks during a championship game.
There are almost certainly better options on the WW.
I can't find these guys in my program. I must have gotten an old one.With Cruise out, I expect a healthy bump in production for Gerald Jergens. Eddie loves having that slot WR that he can rely on to move the chains. Last really good slot receiver they had was Steph Smiff. Coffline has a lot of positive stuff to say about Jergens. Knicks is too up and down to be reliable IMO.
Jernigan has been limited in practice with a knee injury.Jerrel Jernigan anyone?
7-67 last week, expected to handle slot-receiver duties this week with Cruz out.
Jones is owned in 27% of ESPN leagues, Cooper in 25%, Baldwin in 18.1%, Streater in 7.8%, Caldwell in 1.3%, Holmes in 0.5%.Every one of those players are rostered except for Caldwell which I do not think is a better play.Depends on the league size, but I would start guys like Baldwin, Marvin Jones, Streater, Holmes, Caldwell and even Riley Cooper over either of those two this week.JohnnyU said:really? Like who?EastonBlues22 said:I would need to be truly, truly desperate to consider starting Randle or Nicks during a championship game.
There are almost certainly better options on the WW.
16 team rosters do not have WW luxuries.EastonBlues22 said:I would need to be truly, truly desperate to consider starting Randle or Nicks during a championship game.
There are almost certainly better options on the WW.
I'm not sure what your point is. Most advice on a forum like this isn't applicable for 16 or 32 team leagues, but it's given anyway because most leagues aren't 16 or 32 team leagues.16 team rosters do not have WW luxuries.EastonBlues22 said:I would need to be truly, truly desperate to consider starting Randle or Nicks during a championship game.
There are almost certainly better options on the WW.
Welcome to FBG!I'm not sure what your point is. Most advice on a forum like this isn't applicable for 16 or 32 team leagues, but it's given anyway because most leagues aren't 16 or 32 team leagues.16 team rosters do not have WW luxuries.EastonBlues22 said:I would need to be truly, truly desperate to consider starting Randle or Nicks during a championship game.
There are almost certainly better options on the WW.
Those that play in non-standard leagues (scoring, size, etc.) simply need to be aware of how that affects their take on the information that's being presented. In this particular case, they should take from my post that I think that Nicks and Randle are terrible options this week.
This is one of the best posts I have seen in a while. Great play on the grammar police.With Cruise out, I expect a healthy bump in production for Gerald Jergens. Eddie loves having that slot WR that he can rely on to move the chains. Last really good slot receiver they had was Steph Smiff. Coffline has a lot of positive stuff to say about Jergens. Knicks is too up and down to be reliable IMO.
I don't feel like I am overlooking that. All the guys I mentioned are good bets for 5+ targets with a reasonable shot at a TD in an offense that will likely score more passing TDs than the Giants this weekend.Welcome to FBG!I'm not sure what your point is. Most advice on a forum like this isn't applicable for 16 or 32 team leagues, but it's given anyway because most leagues aren't 16 or 32 team leagues.16 team rosters do not have WW luxuries.EastonBlues22 said:I would need to be truly, truly desperate to consider starting Randle or Nicks during a championship game.
There are almost certainly better options on the WW.
Those that play in non-standard leagues (scoring, size, etc.) simply need to be aware of how that affects their take on the information that's being presented. In this particular case, they should take from my post that I think that Nicks and Randle are terrible options this week.
My point is that this forum discusses every sort of league size and format, snake draft, auction, blind bid, keeper and every scoring option too. The fact is that w/o Cruz in the lineup, there are X amount of passing targets out there for the taking. There is opportunity (however bleak) and that should not be overlooked.
They don't call him Hakim the Drim for nothing.I know I am most likely the last man standing that believes Nicks is still an elite talent, but I do.
Maybe a couple weeks helps his stock too?lod01 said:I wouldn't expect Nicks to try very hard the next 2 weeks. He's already done the damage to his expected payday. Only an injury could worsen his free agency.
Nicks has trouble staying healthy and plays hurt too-let's face it he always seems hurt.lod01 said:I wouldn't expect Nicks to try very hard the next 2 weeks. He's already done the damage to his expected payday. Only an injury could worsen his free agency.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZVS Detroit. Does he see many targets this week?