Hawk or Mario at 1.11 (1 Viewer)

[Lord of the Rings]

I know this belongs in the AC, but thought the discussion might be appropriate here as well.

I inherited a weak team defensively. I plan on spending most of my picks on IDP's. It's a 12 team dynasty league, start 2 DE/DT, 2 LBs, 2 DBs.

Scoring:

Sacks: 1.5 per half sack

Tackles: 1 pt each

Assists: .5 each

Forced Fumble: 2 pt

Recovered Fumble: 2 pt

Interception: 2 pt

My DE/DT:

R. Mathis

W. Smith

D. White

R. Brock

My LBs:

N. Barnett

P. Tinoisomia

D. Thornton

D. Clark

E. Henderson

B. Scott

N. Greisen

I will be spending my 3 and 4th round picks on 2-3 Tier LBs: Ryans, McIntosh, Hodge, Lawson, etc. I have two 3's and two 4's.

My dilemma is: Should I pick A. Hawk at 1.11 and try and get Hali, Wimbley, Ngata, etc. in the 3rd or 4th or should I grab Mario at 1.11 and try and get Dqwell Jackson, Carpentar at 2.11.

Which of AHawk or Mario is more important to my team based on scoring & who I have, etc?

BTW, this team lost in the championship game last year. Solid on offense, but if I can build my defense I'm hoping to get over the hump.

Thanks for any input.

:edit: Oops. Didn't see the earlier Hawk / Mario thread. That's helpful. But my concerns more specific to my situation.

 

[houndirish]

Even though this draft has little depth on the Defensive Line I still take Hawk over Mario and then see what's left when you pick in the 3rd and 4th. I wouldn't rule out taking 2 linebackers either. It's a deep class and you're much weaker at LB than you are on DL.

 

[Spike]

I think I would go Hawk only because he's the more sure thing and, even if they were rated equally for their positions (as far as "safe" goes), I'd still be looking at Hawk as LBs are more consistent than DLs.