I caught the Hound stuff but don't remember the Mountain. I tried to start book 3 last week but then I found myself getting temporally displaced when watching the show, so I put it down and will probably read it and 4&5 after this season. That ought to get me straight in most plot lines and I won't have to reread if there's ever another book.Wow. Love this thread:
Qyburn "healed" the Mountain, resulting in the silent Kingsguard member. In case we needed more confirmation on this. I had no idea about the Sandor stuff. That's kinda cool.
Yeah, I pretty much agree with this. It's not like I thought he was a good dude in the books.Huh, I dig it. I thought he was meek but weaselly in the beginning when he had no overt political power and then grows bolder and bolder as the chaos starts whittling away at his opponents and increasing his own power. But really he only seems megalomaniacal when he's with Varys, but even among the rest of the people his increasing confidence is causing others to actually take him more seriously and it's affected some of his plans. There's cause and effect to his changes in demeanor, it's not like he out of the blue swapped into a new role. I think Gillen has done a great job with the transition, we'll see if his overt nature still dominates when he's away from King's Landing.Not a fan of Gillen in this role either. Too bad, he was great in The Wire.His subtle scheming in the book seems hamfisted when you see it on the screenNot trust a goateed man in the noble profession of a pimp? Come on...I think the acting is ok, but the evil goatee thing is what ruins it. "Can I trust Littlerfinger?" "No ####### way, you see that evil goatee?"Not a fan.Am I the only one who doesn't like Gillen's performance as Littlefinger? There's no subtlety at all to the character-- he's practically an 80s movie villain.
Yeah, I pretty much agree with this. It's not like I thought he was a good dude in the books.Huh, I dig it. I thought he was meek but weaselly in the beginning when he had no overt political power and then grows bolder and bolder as the chaos starts whittling away at his opponents and increasing his own power. But really he only seems megalomaniacal when he's with Varys, but even among the rest of the people his increasing confidence is causing others to actually take him more seriously and it's affected some of his plans. There's cause and effect to his changes in demeanor, it's not like he out of the blue swapped into a new role. I think Gillen has done a great job with the transition, we'll see if his overt nature still dominates when he's away from King's Landing.Not a fan of Gillen in this role either. Too bad, he was great in The Wire.His subtle scheming in the book seems hamfisted when you see it on the screenNot trust a goateed man in the noble profession of a pimp? Come on...I think the acting is ok, but the evil goatee thing is what ruins it. "Can I trust Littlerfinger?" "No ####### way, you see that evil goatee?"Not a fan.Am I the only one who doesn't like Gillen's performance as Littlefinger? There's no subtlety at all to the character-- he's practically an 80s movie villain.
The actor playing Greatjon had a scheduling conflict for season 2. Rumor has it, he wasn't invited back for season 3 and his character and personalities were rolled into the Blackfish. Not sure how they're going to handle the Umbers and the Blackfish going forward.Leeroy Jenkins said:Yea, I'm realizing how lazily I read the last 2 books. Maybe I need to reread now and again when wow comes out. When I went and read the theory yesterday though, I recalled thinking the same thing at the time if my first read. It's just I'm forgetting entire storylines apparently. Getting old.shuke said:Man, I don't even know what story you're talking about here.Sabertooth said:I think we see the guy digging the graves fight the silent new member of the kingsguard at some pointThunderlips said:If you're going to read into it a bit....Theon obviously has a pretty role to play in the unwritten material left. HBO's not going to waste this much time on a guy who basically gets freed and then executed by Stannis in the 7th or 8th season.The other nice thing about the show will be that it'll put to rest whether or not The Hound is still alive.Where has great Jon umber been this season?
The books are definitely worth the read. The show, as good as it is, is very condensed. Of course, you will already know the big reveals but in some ways that is good because it is like you are reading the books a second time and can pick up on hints and clues that you would likely miss on the first read.I haven't read the books but have seen every episode, but I need the input from those that read the books. I would love to go back and read all the books to get more back story, but having seen how things turn out already I wonder if it would be worth it?Thoughts?
I am sure they will do it.I wonder if we will get to see Grey Wind's head mounted on Robb's shoulders. I always thought that was a particularly stunning example of the brutality of the whole event. Reading it allowed me to conjure up the visual, but I am not sure anything short of a visual depiction in the show will do it justice (i.e., a convo about it)
I am sure they will do it. Yes. Wouldn't be surprised to see the top half of that pairing get featured more soon.I wonder if we will get to see Grey Wind's head mounted on Robb's shoulders. I always thought that was a particularly stunning example of the brutality of the whole event. Reading it allowed me to conjure up the visual, but I am not sure anything short of a visual depiction in the show will do it justice (i.e., a convo about it)
hope not, I might cry againI wonder if we will get to see Grey Wind's head mounted on Robb's shoulders. I always thought that was a particularly stunning example of the brutality of the whole event. Reading it allowed me to conjure up the visual, but I am not sure anything short of a visual depiction in the show will do it justice (i.e., a convo about it)
I posted this in the non-book thread:I haven't read the books but have seen every episode, but I need the input from those that read the books. I would love to go back and read all the books to get more back story, but having seen how things turn out already I wonder if it would be worth it?Thoughts?
Yeah, I pretty much agree with this. It's not like I thought he was a good dude in the books.Huh, I dig it. I thought he was meek but weaselly in the beginning when he had no overt political power and then grows bolder and bolder as the chaos starts whittling away at his opponents and increasing his own power. But really he only seems megalomaniacal when he's with Varys, but even among the rest of the people his increasing confidence is causing others to actually take him more seriously and it's affected some of his plans. There's cause and effect to his changes in demeanor, it's not like he out of the blue swapped into a new role. I think Gillen has done a great job with the transition, we'll see if his overt nature still dominates when he's away from King's Landing.Not a fan of Gillen in this role either. Too bad, he was great in The Wire.His subtle scheming in the book seems hamfisted when you see it on the screenNot trust a goateed man in the noble profession of a pimp? Come on...I think the acting is ok, but the evil goatee thing is what ruins it. "Can I trust Littlerfinger?" "No ####### way, you see that evil goatee?"Not a fan.Am I the only one who doesn't like Gillen's performance as Littlefinger? There's no subtlety at all to the character-- he's practically an 80s movie villain.He is pretty bold right from the outset - at least in hindsight.
Lots of spoilers forthcoming from all books:
1) He is likely responsible for telling Jon Arryn and Stannis that the royal children are really bastards of Jaime and Cersei
2) He is responsible for murdering Jon Arryn.
3) He is responsible for framing the Lannisters for that murder
These first three all happen in the first 50 pages or so in the first book.
4) He is responsible for framing Tyrion for the attempt on Bran.
5) He is responsible for the betrayal of Ned.
6) He is likely responsible for Jaqen Hghar being part of the group headed to the wall, and he might be partly responsible for Ned's beheading.
1-6 are in the first book/season.
7) He is responsible for the betrayal of Sansa's marriage into the Tyrells.
Future spoilers
8) He is directly involved in Joffrey's death and Sansa's disappearance.
9) He is responsible for Lysa's murder.
10) He is planning on supporting (or at least appearing to support) whichever Targaryen that returns to Westeros.
That is just the stuff off the top of my head.
i'm going to sam bostonfred's profile with spoilers

Yeah, I pretty much agree with this. It's not like I thought he was a good dude in the books.Huh, I dig it. I thought he was meek but weaselly in the beginning when he had no overt political power and then grows bolder and bolder as the chaos starts whittling away at his opponents and increasing his own power. But really he only seems megalomaniacal when he's with Varys, but even among the rest of the people his increasing confidence is causing others to actually take him more seriously and it's affected some of his plans. There's cause and effect to his changes in demeanor, it's not like he out of the blue swapped into a new role. I think Gillen has done a great job with the transition, we'll see if his overt nature still dominates when he's away from King's Landing.Not a fan of Gillen in this role either. Too bad, he was great in The Wire.His subtle scheming in the book seems hamfisted when you see it on the screenNot trust a goateed man in the noble profession of a pimp? Come on...I think the acting is ok, but the evil goatee thing is what ruins it. "Can I trust Littlerfinger?" "No ####### way, you see that evil goatee?"Not a fan.Am I the only one who doesn't like Gillen's performance as Littlefinger? There's no subtlety at all to the character-- he's practically an 80s movie villain.He is pretty bold right from the outset - at least in hindsight.Lots of spoilers forthcoming from all books: 1) He is likely responsible for telling Jon Arryn and Stannis that the royal children are really bastards of Jaime and Cersei2) He is responsible for murdering Jon Arryn.3) He is responsible for framing the Lannisters for that murder These first three all happen in the first 50 pages or so in the first book. 4) He is responsible for framing Tyrion for the attempt on Bran.5) He is responsible for the betrayal of Ned.6) He is likely responsible for Jaqen Hghar being part of the group headed to the wall, and he might be partly responsible for Ned's beheading. 1-6 are in the first book/season. 7) He is responsible for the betrayal of Sansa's marriage into the Tyrells. Future spoilers 8) He is directly involved in Joffrey's death and Sansa's disappearance.9) He is responsible for Lysa's murder.10) He is planning on supporting (or at least appearing to support) whichever Targaryen that returns to Westeros. That is just the stuff off the top of my head.
The thought occurred to me as we'll, with the spoilers in the subject line. CC to shadyridr and Crisco.i'm going to sam bostonfred's profile with spoilers![]()
Yeah, I pretty much agree with this. It's not like I thought he was a good dude in the books.Huh, I dig it. I thought he was meek but weaselly in the beginning when he had no overt political power and then grows bolder and bolder as the chaos starts whittling away at his opponents and increasing his own power. But really he only seems megalomaniacal when he's with Varys, but even among the rest of the people his increasing confidence is causing others to actually take him more seriously and it's affected some of his plans. There's cause and effect to his changes in demeanor, it's not like he out of the blue swapped into a new role. I think Gillen has done a great job with the transition, we'll see if his overt nature still dominates when he's away from King's Landing.Not a fan of Gillen in this role either. Too bad, he was great in The Wire.His subtle scheming in the book seems hamfisted when you see it on the screenNot trust a goateed man in the noble profession of a pimp? Come on...I think the acting is ok, but the evil goatee thing is what ruins it. "Can I trust Littlerfinger?" "No ####### way, you see that evil goatee?"Not a fan.Am I the only one who doesn't like Gillen's performance as Littlefinger? There's no subtlety at all to the character-- he's practically an 80s movie villain.He is pretty bold right from the outset - at least in hindsight.Lots of spoilers forthcoming from all books: 1) He is likely responsible for telling Jon Arryn and Stannis that the royal children are really bastards of Jaime and Cersei2) He is responsible for murdering Jon Arryn.3) He is responsible for framing the Lannisters for that murder These first three all happen in the first 50 pages or so in the first book. 4) He is responsible for framing Tyrion for the attempt on Bran.5) He is responsible for the betrayal of Ned.6) He is likely responsible for Jaqen Hghar being part of the group headed to the wall, and he might be partly responsible for Ned's beheading. 1-6 are in the first book/season. 7) He is responsible for the betrayal of Sansa's marriage into the Tyrells. Future spoilers 8) He is directly involved in Joffrey's death and Sansa's disappearance.9) He is responsible for Lysa's murder.10) He is planning on supporting (or at least appearing to support) whichever Targaryen that returns to Westeros. That is just the stuff off the top of my head.
Can you elaborate on the first part of number 6?Yeah, I pretty much agree with this. It's not like I thought he was a good dude in the books.Huh, I dig it. I thought he was meek but weaselly in the beginning when he had no overt political power and then grows bolder and bolder as the chaos starts whittling away at his opponents and increasing his own power. But really he only seems megalomaniacal when he's with Varys, but even among the rest of the people his increasing confidence is causing others to actually take him more seriously and it's affected some of his plans. There's cause and effect to his changes in demeanor, it's not like he out of the blue swapped into a new role. I think Gillen has done a great job with the transition, we'll see if his overt nature still dominates when he's away from King's Landing.Not a fan of Gillen in this role either. Too bad, he was great in The Wire.His subtle scheming in the book seems hamfisted when you see it on the screenNot trust a goateed man in the noble profession of a pimp? Come on...I think the acting is ok, but the evil goatee thing is what ruins it. "Can I trust Littlerfinger?" "No ####### way, you see that evil goatee?"Not a fan.Am I the only one who doesn't like Gillen's performance as Littlefinger? There's no subtlety at all to the character-- he's practically an 80s movie villain.He is pretty bold right from the outset - at least in hindsight.
Lots of spoilers forthcoming from all books:
1) He is likely responsible for telling Jon Arryn and Stannis that the royal children are really bastards of Jaime and Cersei
2) He is responsible for murdering Jon Arryn.
3) He is responsible for framing the Lannisters for that murder
These first three all happen in the first 50 pages or so in the first book.
4) He is responsible for framing Tyrion for the attempt on Bran.
5) He is responsible for the betrayal of Ned.
6) He is likely responsible for Jaqen Hghar being part of the group headed to the wall, and he might be partly responsible for Ned's beheading.
1-6 are in the first book/season.
7) He is responsible for the betrayal of Sansa's marriage into the Tyrells.
Future spoilers
8) He is directly involved in Joffrey's death and Sansa's disappearance.
9) He is responsible for Lysa's murder.
10) He is planning on supporting (or at least appearing to support) whichever Targaryen that returns to Westeros.
That is just the stuff off the top of my head.
Yeah, I pretty much agree with this. It's not like I thought he was a good dude in the books.Huh, I dig it. I thought he was meek but weaselly in the beginning when he had no overt political power and then grows bolder and bolder as the chaos starts whittling away at his opponents and increasing his own power. But really he only seems megalomaniacal when he's with Varys, but even among the rest of the people his increasing confidence is causing others to actually take him more seriously and it's affected some of his plans. There's cause and effect to his changes in demeanor, it's not like he out of the blue swapped into a new role. I think Gillen has done a great job with the transition, we'll see if his overt nature still dominates when he's away from King's Landing.Not a fan of Gillen in this role either. Too bad, he was great in The Wire.His subtle scheming in the book seems hamfisted when you see it on the screenNot trust a goateed man in the noble profession of a pimp? Come on...I think the acting is ok, but the evil goatee thing is what ruins it. "Can I trust Littlerfinger?" "No ####### way, you see that evil goatee?"Not a fan.Am I the only one who doesn't like Gillen's performance as Littlefinger? There's no subtlety at all to the character-- he's practically an 80s movie villain.He is pretty bold right from the outset - at least in hindsight.Lots of spoilers forthcoming from all books: 1) He is likely responsible for telling Jon Arryn and Stannis that the royal children are really bastards of Jaime and Cersei2) He is responsible for murdering Jon Arryn.3) He is responsible for framing the Lannisters for that murder These first three all happen in the first 50 pages or so in the first book. 4) He is responsible for framing Tyrion for the attempt on Bran.5) He is responsible for the betrayal of Ned.6) He is likely responsible for Jaqen Hghar being part of the group headed to the wall, and he might be partly responsible for Ned's beheading. 1-6 are in the first book/season. 7) He is responsible for the betrayal of Sansa's marriage into the Tyrells. Future spoilers 8) He is directly involved in Joffrey's death and Sansa's disappearance.9) He is responsible for Lysa's murder.10) He is planning on supporting (or at least appearing to support) whichever Targaryen that returns to Westeros. That is just the stuff off the top of my head.
The iq in that thread is somewhere between larryboy and mop. I don't get it.Eagerly awaiting the next episode...gonna be epic watching the guys in the non-book thread lose their minds.
Yeah, I pretty much agree with this. It's not like I thought he was a good dude in the books.Huh, I dig it. I thought he was meek but weaselly in the beginning when he had no overt political power and then grows bolder and bolder as the chaos starts whittling away at his opponents and increasing his own power. But really he only seems megalomaniacal when he's with Varys, but even among the rest of the people his increasing confidence is causing others to actually take him more seriously and it's affected some of his plans. There's cause and effect to his changes in demeanor, it's not like he out of the blue swapped into a new role. I think Gillen has done a great job with the transition, we'll see if his overt nature still dominates when he's away from King's Landing.Not a fan of Gillen in this role either. Too bad, he was great in The Wire.His subtle scheming in the book seems hamfisted when you see it on the screenNot trust a goateed man in the noble profession of a pimp? Come on...I think the acting is ok, but the evil goatee thing is what ruins it. "Can I trust Littlerfinger?" "No ####### way, you see that evil goatee?"Not a fan.Am I the only one who doesn't like Gillen's performance as Littlefinger? There's no subtlety at all to the character-- he's practically an 80s movie villain.He is pretty bold right from the outset - at least in hindsight.Lots of spoilers forthcoming from all books: 1) He is likely responsible for telling Jon Arryn and Stannis that the royal children are really bastards of Jaime and Cersei2) He is responsible for murdering Jon Arryn.3) He is responsible for framing the Lannisters for that murder These first three all happen in the first 50 pages or so in the first book. 4) He is responsible for framing Tyrion for the attempt on Bran.5) He is responsible for the betrayal of Ned.6) He is likely responsible for Jaqen Hghar being part of the group headed to the wall, and he might be partly responsible for Ned's beheading. 1-6 are in the first book/season. 7) He is responsible for the betrayal of Sansa's marriage into the Tyrells. Future spoilers 8) He is directly involved in Joffrey's death and Sansa's disappearance.9) He is responsible for Lysa's murder.10) He is planning on supporting (or at least appearing to support) whichever Targaryen that returns to Westeros. That is just the stuff off the top of my head.
But jaquen was indeed in a cage and only escaped because Arya gave him an axe. So how was he going to kill Ned if he couldn't escape the cage during a fire without the help of a little girl?
for me, but I get why people have fun with it. I don't buy point 6 from the spoiler at all, but hey - people will speculate when it takes 5+ years between books.Man, I don't even know what story you're talking about here.I think we see the guy digging the graves fight the silent new member of the kingsguard at some pointIf you're going to read into it a bit....Theon obviously has a pretty role to play in the unwritten material left. HBO's not going to waste this much time on a guy who basically gets freed and then executed by Stannis in the 7th or 8th season.The other nice thing about the show will be that it'll put to rest whether or not The Hound is still alive.the hound = guy digging the graves. The Mountain = silent new member of the kg. I had completely forgotten "where" the mountain was at the end of book 5 until this thread.
I never made that connection cuz of the splitting of book 4 and 5. Was there a battle between Brienne's group and some bandits near old ruins around this part of the story?
As impressive as the quote pyramid is becoming, I'll avoid it.
Littlefinger and Varys are the two characters that I see people building up the most due through inference, assumption, reading between the lines, or whatever you want to call it. Bit toofor me, but I get why people have fun with it. I don't buy point 6 from the spoiler at all, but hey - people will speculate when it takes 5+ years between books.
In the show, Littlefinger is definitely portrayed differently than what I imagined from the books. More James Bond villain-type deliberations with Varys, perpetual smugness, more flaunting of power. The machinations listed above are all calculated chess moves, but not outwardly bold in the same manner as the veiled threats he threw in Cersei's face in season 2, for instance. In the books, he always seemed low-key. Why would he want to draw attention to himself, even knowing that he could probably outsmart the other guy? I'm fine with the show version, but it's certainly a different approach, in my eyes. That's partly by necessity, as they don't have the screen time to have to show Littlefinger pulling the strings, so they just have him outright saying it.
that idea? I mean, if someone made the claim after book 1 that Littlefinger was responsible for all the stuff we *know* he is responsible for that person would garner more of a
response than what I posted. From the intensity and thoroughness of training that Arya is receiving in the 4th and 5th books does it really seem likely that a full fledged Faceless man would just be hanging out in the dungeon, be allowed to keep his coins, and know who Arya Stark is? How would you explain those three things? Also, from what we know of Littlefinger and his plotting doesn't it seem likely that if he wanted Ned dead that he would have backup plans to do it if the beheading failed?Eagerly awaiting the next episode...gonna be epic watching the guys in the non-book thread lose their minds.
Per the episode descriptions, episode 9 is what will be epic.Eagerly awaiting the next episode...gonna be epic watching the guys in the non-book thread lose their minds.are we thinking this is the Red Wedding episode. I think its called Rains of Castemere.
Last episode Robb and his crew were on their way to the wedding and Blackfish/Robb's wife were with them. In the books those two stay at Riverrun and have roles in the 4th book. If Blackfish is sort of taking on Umber's role I am wondering if they are going to include him in the red wedding or if next episode those two head back. Really hoping they don't go that route with Blackfish. I'd like to see him hold Riverrun in dead Robb's name next season.
Last episode Robb and his crew were on their way to the wedding and Blackfish/Robb's wife were with them. In the books those two stay at Riverrun and have roles in the 4th book. If Blackfish is sort of taking on Umber's role I am wondering if they are going to include him in the red wedding or if next episode those two head back. Really hoping they don't go that route with Blackfish. I'd like to see him hold Riverrun in dead Robb's name next season.

Last episode Robb and his crew were on their way to the wedding and Blackfish/Robb's wife were with them. In the books those two stay at Riverrun and have roles in the 4th book. If Blackfish is sort of taking on Umber's role I am wondering if they are going to include him in the red wedding or if next episode those two head back. Really hoping they don't go that route with Blackfish. I'd like to see him hold Riverrun in dead Robb's name next season.

Last episode Robb and his crew were on their way to the wedding and Blackfish/Robb's wife were with them. In the books those two stay at Riverrun and have roles in the 4th book. If Blackfish is sort of taking on Umber's role I am wondering if they are going to include him in the red wedding or if next episode those two head back. Really hoping they don't go that route with Blackfish. I'd like to see him hold Riverrun in dead Robb's name next season.I was pretty positive that the spoiler above was just going to contain the word "Hodor"

The tinfoil hat is for the rampant speculation in general. I'm not disputing that Littlefinger is basically Westeros' Moriarty, but I don't feel the need to ascribe even more stuff to him than what's already been confirmed. You admitted yourself that the evidence for those particular theories is circumstantial. It's more interesting than "Tyrion is a secret Targ~!" but the hat fits.As impressive as the quote pyramid is becoming, I'll avoid it.
Littlefinger and Varys are the two characters that I see people building up the most due through inference, assumption, reading between the lines, or whatever you want to call it. Bit toofor me, but I get why people have fun with it. I don't buy point 6 from the spoiler at all, but hey - people will speculate when it takes 5+ years between books.
In the show, Littlefinger is definitely portrayed differently than what I imagined from the books. More James Bond villain-type deliberations with Varys, perpetual smugness, more flaunting of power. The machinations listed above are all calculated chess moves, but not outwardly bold in the same manner as the veiled threats he threw in Cersei's face in season 2, for instance. In the books, he always seemed low-key. Why would he want to draw attention to himself, even knowing that he could probably outsmart the other guy? I'm fine with the show version, but it's certainly a different approach, in my eyes. That's partly by necessity, as they don't have the screen time to have to show Littlefinger pulling the strings, so they just have him outright saying it.Why do youthat idea? I mean, if someone made the claim after book 1 that Littlefinger was responsible for all the stuff we *know* he is responsible for that person would garner more of a
response than what I posted. From the intensity and thoroughness of training that Arya is receiving in the 4th and 5th books does it really seem likely that a full fledged Faceless man would just be hanging out in the dungeon, be allowed to keep his coins, and know who Arya Stark is? How would you explain those three things? Also, from what we know of Littlefinger and his plotting doesn't it seem likely that if he wanted Ned dead that he would have backup plans to do it if the beheading failed?
I could certainly see this with Littlefinger!As impressive as the quote pyramid is becoming, I'll avoid it.
Littlefinger and Varys are the two characters that I see people building up the most due through inference, assumption, reading between the lines, or whatever you want to call it. Bit toofor me, but I get why people have fun with it. I don't buy point 6 from the spoiler at all, but hey - people will speculate when it takes 5+ years between books.
In the show, Littlefinger is definitely portrayed differently than what I imagined from the books. More James Bond villain-type deliberations with Varys, perpetual smugness, more flaunting of power. The machinations listed above are all calculated chess moves, but not outwardly bold in the same manner as the veiled threats he threw in Cersei's face in season 2, for instance. In the books, he always seemed low-key. Why would he want to draw attention to himself, even knowing that he could probably outsmart the other guy? I'm fine with the show version, but it's certainly a different approach, in my eyes. That's partly by necessity, as they don't have the screen time to have to show Littlefinger pulling the strings, so they just have him outright saying it.Why do youthat idea? I mean, if someone made the claim after book 1 that Littlefinger was responsible for all the stuff we *know* he is responsible for that person would garner more of a
response than what I posted. From the intensity and thoroughness of training that Arya is receiving in the 4th and 5th books does it really seem likely that a full fledged Faceless man would just be hanging out in the dungeon, be allowed to keep his coins, and know who Arya Stark is? How would you explain those three things? Also, from what we know of Littlefinger and his plotting doesn't it seem likely that if he wanted Ned dead that he would have backup plans to do it if the beheading failed?
ya, things are going to be "slow" again this week.
Story lines based on the preview:
Arya + Hound
Sam and Gilly
Dario
Davos
Joff v. Tyrion
oh, the pissing and moaning that will occur!
wonder if Sam the Slayer (and maybe Coldhands) will appease the masses. I hope they shoot it well.
I thought there was a very quick clip in the preview that led me to believe your spoiler character's title will appear this ep.ya, things are going to be "slow" again this week. Story lines based on the preview: Arya + HoundSam and GillyDarioDavosJoff v. Tyrion oh, the pissing and moaning that will occur!
wonder if Sam the Slayer (and maybe Coldhands) will appease the masses. I hope they shoot it well.
I thought there was a very quick clip in the preview that led me to believe your spoiler character's title will appear this ep.ya, there is a clip. That list is based on the clips.ya, things are going to be "slow" again this week. Story lines based on the preview: Arya + HoundSam and GillyDarioDavosJoff v. Tyrion oh, the pissing and moaning that will occur!
wonder if Sam the Slayer (and maybe Coldhands) will appease the masses. I hope they shoot it well.
I'm sure the Arya/Hound scene(s) will have some nice dialogue and minor drama. Probably necessary before future events.ya, things are going to be "slow" again this week.
Story lines based on the preview:
Arya + Hound
Sam and Gilly
Dario
Davos
Joff v. Tyrion
oh, the pissing and moaning that will occur!
wonder if Sam the Slayer (and maybe Coldhands) will appease the masses. I hope they shoot it well.
Even after 5 books, we know precious little about the Faceless Men. Most of this hinges on our different interpretations of their capabilities. I have no idea why he'd be hanging out in the dungeon, but as Leroy brought up, he had to be freed from his cage by Arya, so I wouldn't assume that he's Harry Houdini and could escape at will. Maybe he could, but that's not the way the book portrays it, so if you choose to believe otherwise, it goes counter to the evidence we've been given. Despite that, given that we're dealing with dudes who can change faces at will, I think that using a hidden coin as evidence of anything is specious. The same goes for his knowledge of Arya's identity. The Faceless are taught how to see through people. Even without magical crystal balls, it's not unreasonable to expect Jaqen to have identified Arya by inference.
As for Littlefinger's intentions, there's a sizable jump from "he didn't care much for the Starks" to "he not only plotted to have Ned killed, but had a backup plan in place".
Despite Martin's talent, I find that people grossly overrate his structural prowess. He describes himself as more of a "gardener" than an "architect", and as boring as it may seem, it's far more likely that there isn't an explanation for Jaqen's presence in the Black Cells or in the party headed to the Night's Watch. Frankly, that's fine by me. Not every strand needs to be tied off, much less to the same knot.
I could certainly see this with Littlefinger!As impressive as the quote pyramid is becoming, I'll avoid it.
Littlefinger and Varys are the two characters that I see people building up the most due through inference, assumption, reading between the lines, or whatever you want to call it. Bit toofor me, but I get why people have fun with it. I don't buy point 6 from the spoiler at all, but hey - people will speculate when it takes 5+ years between books.
In the show, Littlefinger is definitely portrayed differently than what I imagined from the books. More James Bond villain-type deliberations with Varys, perpetual smugness, more flaunting of power. The machinations listed above are all calculated chess moves, but not outwardly bold in the same manner as the veiled threats he threw in Cersei's face in season 2, for instance. In the books, he always seemed low-key. Why would he want to draw attention to himself, even knowing that he could probably outsmart the other guy? I'm fine with the show version, but it's certainly a different approach, in my eyes. That's partly by necessity, as they don't have the screen time to have to show Littlefinger pulling the strings, so they just have him outright saying it.Why do youthat idea? I mean, if someone made the claim after book 1 that Littlefinger was responsible for all the stuff we *know* he is responsible for that person would garner more of a
response than what I posted. From the intensity and thoroughness of training that Arya is receiving in the 4th and 5th books does it really seem likely that a full fledged Faceless man would just be hanging out in the dungeon, be allowed to keep his coins, and know who Arya Stark is? How would you explain those three things? Also, from what we know of Littlefinger and his plotting doesn't it seem likely that if he wanted Ned dead that he would have backup plans to do it if the beheading failed?
ya, things are going to be "slow" again this week.
Story lines based on the preview:
Arya + Hound
Sam and Gilly
Dario
Davos
Joff v. Tyrion
oh, the pissing and moaning that will occur!
wonder if Sam the Slayer (and maybe Coldhands) will appease the masses. I hope they shoot it well.