Help w/ LB Keepers... $500 salary Cap (1 Viewer)

[KellysHeroes]

This is a 3 yr contract keeper league.. all 5 LBs are going into yr 2; so whoever I keep this yr I can keep again next yr w/ a 10% increase in pay.

$500 Salary Cap

Scoring system

1.5 solo tackle (receive 3 pt bonus after the 5th)

.5 asst (receive 1 pts after the 3rd)

3 per sack (2 pt bonus at 2nd sack)

*1 pt per 5 sack yd

4 per int (2 pt bonus at 2nd int)

2 pts FF (2 bonus on the 2nd)

2 pts FR (2 bonus on the 2nd)

1 pass def (2 pt bonus after the 3rd pd)

3 safety, 3 blk kicks, 6 td

Thank you guys

Note: I've already Traded A Davis for 2.03 in rookie draft

 

[Jene Bramel]

Cap questions are almost impossible to answer accurately because every league and owner set is so different. Sometimes you can get away with dropping studs because you can get similar value much more cheaply, sometimes your roster situation and other players available dictate keeping a worse player at a better cost and using your funds elsewhere.

In a vacuum, I'd suggest keeping Bulluck and then Fletcher and banking the 200 plus solo tackles. Julian Peterson though, given the extra point sack bonus for yardage (on average over the past three seasons, a sack has averaged a 6.1 yard loss per play), might be really attractive to you at that cost if you feel he'll continue as such a dual threat in the boxscore. Especially so if you can get Fletcher (or another big tackler) back at a decent cost.

I voted Fletcher/Peterson as the best bang for the buck but can see how that could be a horrible answer in some scenarios.

 

[KellysHeroes]

In a vacuum, I'd suggest keeping Bulluck and then Fletcher and banking the 200 plus solo tackles. Julian Peterson though, given the extra point sack bonus for yardage (on average over the past three seasons, a sack has averaged a 6.1 yard loss per play), might be really attractive to you at that cost if you feel he'll continue as such a dual threat in the boxscore. Especially so if you can get Fletcher (or another big tackler) back at a decent cost.I voted Fletcher/Peterson as the best bang for the buck but can see how that could be a horrible answer in some scenarios.

Bulluck is the most expensive IDPer in the league and Fletcher is in the Top most expensive LBs....But I like keeping Fletcher.Here their Points.Fletcher / ranked #14 in the league (out of all players; IDPs & offensive) / 250.00 pts / $17Bulluck / ranked #25 in the league / 232.50 pts / $35A Thomas / ranked #77 in the league / 186.10 pts / $7Trotter / ranked #83 in the league / 182.50 pts / $9J Peterson / ranked #93 in the league / 178.30 pts / $2

 

[KellysHeroes]

I know everyone's Picking Bulluck... but I bet that I can release him and redraft him for a cheaper $..

 

[TecmoBeast]

if you got the money to spend, bullock and fletcher-baker are worth it. consistent 200+ pt LBs are not that easy to come by

if you need to save some bucks, i might go with F-Baker and Peterson. I'd really have to tight on cash to do this. I would at least trade bullock to get some kind of value back or I might draft him like you said.

 

[KellysHeroes]

I was leaning towards Fletcher ($17 is a little cheap than what he'll go for) and Thomas (I think he'll do just as good in NE)

 

[Jeff Pasquino]

Trotter is out of the question.

Went with Fletcher and Peterson. Bullock - Too much $ even for the solid numbers he'll put up. AD was a consideration, but I went Fletcher and Peterson.

 

[KellysHeroes]

J Peterson is getting the most votes which is odd since he's the lowest scoring one on the list.

You guys must be loving the $

Fletcher / ranked #14 in the league (out of all players; IDPs & offensive) / 250.00 pts / $17

Bulluck / ranked #25 in the league / 232.50 pts / $35

A Thomas / ranked #77 in the league / 186.10 pts / $7

Trotter / ranked #83 in the league / 182.50 pts / $9

J Peterson / ranked #93 in the league / 178.30 pts / $2