What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Herm states that there will be about a 60/40 (1 Viewer)

gocats

Footballguy
Chiefs | Edwards needs to figure out running back situation

Chiefs | Edwards needs to figure out running back situation

Wed, 5 Jul 2006 17:19:49 -0700

Jim Corbett, of the USA Today, reports Kansas City Chiefs head coach Herman Edwards faces the challenge of figuring out the team's running back situation for 2006. It's impossible for one running back, no matter how gifted, to hold up under the 500- to 550-carry load Edwards plans for a more run-heavy offense. It's not that RB Larry Johnson isn't tough enough to withstand a heavy load. He led the AFC with 1,750 yards on 336 carries last season. But it's an issue of having something left to be an effective closer come the playoffs, especially because Edwards believes the best way to improve a 25th-ranked defense is to keep it fresh by running more. "You need two runners in this game," Edwards says. "One guy can't do it alone. We want to run the ball 500-550 times. They ran 520 times here last year. You're lucky if one guy gets 300 carries. I'm hoping that other guy will be RB Priest Holmes. Priest wants to come back, and I'm anticipating he will. He's in great shape. He's hoping to be medically cleared in early July out in California." If Holmes is unable to return or begins the season on the physically unable to perform list, RB Dee Brown is expected to be Johnson's primary backup.
550-300=250 carries for the backup? Did Dee Browns stock just go up or what? I mean Holmes is done, no way he comes back, and if he does he'll be promply put back on IR like every year. Dee Brown :thumbup:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Jim Corbett, of the USA Today, reports Kansas City Chiefs head coach Herman Edwards faces the challenge of figuring out the team's running back situation for 2006. It's impossible for one running back, no matter how gifted, to hold up under the 500- to 550-carry load Edwards plans for a more run-heavy offense. It's not that RB Larry Johnson isn't tough enough to withstand a heavy load. He led the AFC with 1,750 yards on 336 carries last season. But it's an issue of having something left to be an effective closer come the playoffs, especially because Edwards believes the best way to improve a 25th-ranked defense is to keep it fresh by running more. "You need two runners in this game," Edwards says. "One guy can't do it alone. We want to run the ball 500-550 times. They ran 520 times here last year. You're lucky if one guy gets 300 carries. I'm hoping that other guy will be RB Priest Holmes. Priest wants to come back, and I'm anticipating he will. He's in great shape. He's hoping to be medically cleared in early July out in California." If Holmes is unable to return or begins the season on the physically unable to perform list, RB Dee Brown is expected to be Johnson's primary backup.
550-300=250 carries for the backup? Did Dee Browns stock just go up or what? I mean Holmes is done, no way he comes back, and if he does he'll be promply put back on IR like every year. Dee Brown :thumbup:
I just moved Dee Brown up to 1.02 on my cheatsheet :thumbup:
 
Jim Corbett, of the USA Today, reports Kansas City Chiefs head coach Herman Edwards faces the challenge of figuring out the team's running back situation for 2006. It's impossible for one running back, no matter how gifted, to hold up under the 500- to 550-carry load Edwards plans for a more run-heavy offense. It's not that RB Larry Johnson isn't tough enough to withstand a heavy load. He led the AFC with 1,750 yards on 336 carries last season. But it's an issue of having something left to be an effective closer come the playoffs, especially because Edwards believes the best way to improve a 25th-ranked defense is to keep it fresh by running more. "You need two runners in this game," Edwards says. "One guy can't do it alone. We want to run the ball 500-550 times. They ran 520 times here last year. You're lucky if one guy gets 300 carries. I'm hoping that other guy will be RB Priest Holmes. Priest wants to come back, and I'm anticipating he will. He's in great shape. He's hoping to be medically cleared in early July out in California." If Holmes is unable to return or begins the season on the physically unable to perform list, RB Dee Brown is expected to be Johnson's primary backup.
550-300=250 carries for the backup? Did Dee Browns stock just go up or what? I mean Holmes is done, no way he comes back, and if he does he'll be promply put back on IR like every year. Dee Brown :thumbup:
I just moved Dee Brown up to 1.02 on my cheatsheet :thumbup:
:excited:
 
This will be the first time in history where TWO RBs rush for 2,000 yds in a season on the same team!!!!!

 
Dee Brown will also cure cancer, but will only don the labcoat after scoring his 29th TD of the season and giving CPR to a choking baby in the endzone!

 
Chiefs | Edwards needs to figure out running back situation

Chiefs | Edwards needs to figure out running back situation

Wed, 5 Jul 2006 17:19:49 -0700

Jim Corbett, of the USA Today, reports Kansas City Chiefs head coach Herman Edwards faces the challenge of figuring out the team's running back situation for 2006. It's impossible for one running back, no matter how gifted, to hold up under the 500- to 550-carry load Edwards plans for a more run-heavy offense. It's not that RB Larry Johnson isn't tough enough to withstand a heavy load. He led the AFC with 1,750 yards on 336 carries last season. But it's an issue of having something left to be an effective closer come the playoffs, especially because Edwards believes the best way to improve a 25th-ranked defense is to keep it fresh by running more. "You need two runners in this game," Edwards says. "One guy can't do it alone. We want to run the ball 500-550 times. They ran 520 times here last year. You're lucky if one guy gets 300 carries. I'm hoping that other guy will be RB Priest Holmes. Priest wants to come back, and I'm anticipating he will. He's in great shape. He's hoping to be medically cleared in early July out in California." If Holmes is unable to return or begins the season on the physically unable to perform list, RB Dee Brown is expected to be Johnson's primary backup.
550-300=250 carries for the backup? Did Dee Browns stock just go up or what? I mean Holmes is done, no way he comes back, and if he does he'll be promply put back on IR like every year. Dee Brown :thumbup:
I must be having technical difficulties. I cannot find exactly where Herm is quoted describing his 60/40 plan.My version just says "You're lucky if one guy gets 300 carries." I think this is an acknowledgement of NFL reality after watching Curtis Martin get injured last year. Martin's touches fell to 250 after numbering 419 and 374 the previous two seasons. Maybe you're just :fishing: but this seems like typical pre-training camp coachspeak that underscores the very real possibility of injury. Johnson should get 25 touches a game at minimum, almost precisely what Martin got from 2003-04.

 
Jim Corbett, of the USA Today, reports Kansas City Chiefs head coach Herman Edwards faces the challenge of figuring out the team's running back situation for 2006. It's impossible for one running back, no matter how gifted, to hold up under the 500- to 550-carry load Edwards plans for a more run-heavy offense. It's not that RB Larry Johnson isn't tough enough to withstand a heavy load. He led the AFC with 1,750 yards on 336 carries last season. But it's an issue of having something left to be an effective closer come the playoffs, especially because Edwards believes the best way to improve a 25th-ranked defense is to keep it fresh by running more. "You need two runners in this game," Edwards says. "One guy can't do it alone. We want to run the ball 500-550 times. They ran 520 times here last year. You're lucky if one guy gets 300 carries. I'm hoping that other guy will be RB Priest Holmes. Priest wants to come back, and I'm anticipating he will. He's in great shape. He's hoping to be medically cleared in early July out in California." If Holmes is unable to return or begins the season on the physically unable to perform list, RB Dee Brown is expected to be Johnson's primary backup.
550-300=250 carries for the backup? Did Dee Browns stock just go up or what? I mean Holmes is done, no way he comes back, and if he does he'll be promply put back on IR like every year. Dee Brown :thumbup:
I just moved Dee Brown up to 1.02 on my cheatsheet :thumbup:
trade down, he'll be there at 1.05
 
Jim Corbett, of the USA Today, reports Kansas City Chiefs head coach Herman Edwards faces the challenge of figuring out the team's running back situation for 2006. It's impossible for one running back, no matter how gifted, to hold up under the 500- to 550-carry load Edwards plans for a more run-heavy offense. It's not that RB Larry Johnson isn't tough enough to withstand a heavy load. He led the AFC with 1,750 yards on 336 carries last season. But it's an issue of having something left to be an effective closer come the playoffs, especially because Edwards believes the best way to improve a 25th-ranked defense is to keep it fresh by running more. "You need two runners in this game," Edwards says. "One guy can't do it alone. We want to run the ball 500-550 times. They ran 520 times here last year. You're lucky if one guy gets 300 carries. I'm hoping that other guy will be RB Priest Holmes. Priest wants to come back, and I'm anticipating he will. He's in great shape. He's hoping to be medically cleared in early July out in California." If Holmes is unable to return or begins the season on the physically unable to perform list, RB Dee Brown is expected to be Johnson's primary backup.
550-300=250 carries for the backup? Did Dee Browns stock just go up or what? I mean Holmes is done, no way he comes back, and if he does he'll be promply put back on IR like every year. Dee Brown :thumbup:
I just moved Dee Brown up to 1.02 on my cheatsheet :thumbup:
trade down, he'll be there at 1.05
Not if I have the 1.04 pick. :football:
 
Every year coaches come up with "new math" on how many carries people will or won't get, and very rarely do they come close to what they say. Portis was going to get limited to 15 carries a game in Washington. The Cowboys were going to run the ball 35 times a game last year. The Rams were going to commit more to the run last year. Chester Taylor could get 30 touches a game this year. It's all just talk, as 99% of the time these statements do not pan out at all.

 
Of the Chiefs' 520 carries last year, 37 went to QBs, 14 to WRs, and 13 to RBs other than LJ and the Priest. So even if LJ rushes for only 300 carries (not likely) and the Chiefs run 550 times (not likely), that doesn't mean Dee Brown gets 250 carries.

 
I saw plenty of occasions when the Jets had 10 or 12 players on the field in critical situations plus a multitude of other times when the Herm's team bungled the clock.

I'm going to venture that math isn't Hermie's forte.

 
Jim Corbett, of the USA Today, reports Kansas City Chiefs head coach Herman Edwards faces the challenge of figuring out the team's running back situation for 2006. It's impossible for one running back, no matter how gifted, to hold up under the 500- to 550-carry load Edwards plans for a more run-heavy offense. It's not that RB Larry Johnson isn't tough enough to withstand a heavy load. He led the AFC with 1,750 yards on 336 carries last season. But it's an issue of having something left to be an effective closer come the playoffs, especially because Edwards believes the best way to improve a 25th-ranked defense is to keep it fresh by running more. "You need two runners in this game," Edwards says. "One guy can't do it alone. We want to run the ball 500-550 times. They ran 520 times here last year. You're lucky if one guy gets 300 carries. I'm hoping that other guy will be RB Priest Holmes. Priest wants to come back, and I'm anticipating he will. He's in great shape. He's hoping to be medically cleared in early July out in California." If Holmes is unable to return or begins the season on the physically unable to perform list, RB Dee Brown is expected to be Johnson's primary backup.
550-300=250 carries for the backup? Did Dee Browns stock just go up or what? I mean Holmes is done, no way he comes back, and if he does he'll be promply put back on IR like every year. Dee Brown :thumbup:
I just moved Dee Brown up to 1.02 on my cheatsheet :thumbup:
:lmao:
 
Every year coaches come up with "new math" on how many carries people will or won't get, and very rarely do they come close to what they say. Portis was going to get limited to 15 carries a game in Washington. The Cowboys were going to run the ball 35 times a game last year. The Rams were going to commit more to the run last year. Chester Taylor could get 30 touches a game this year. It's all just talk, as 99% of the time these statements do not pan out at all.
First thx for a post that isn't yet another tee hee/gigglefest. :rolleyes: Your point is well taken, but there's little doubt that KC will run a great deal once again. Given their personnel, it's a no-brainer. The question is Priest's health, which still is very up in the air near as I can tell. Basically I wouldn't exactly be worried about the lack of carries for LJ regardless.

 
For those Holmes owners still holding out....

Holmes, 32, said Saturday "everything is on hold" until doctors decide if his neck can withstand the rigors of a 10th NFL season. Although he appeared to be in good physical shape, he said he hasn't been able to work out and lift weights like he has in previous offseasons.
link
 
Herm Edwards said in five consecutive pre-seasons that the Jets were going to run Curtis Martin less this year, and the Jets were going to throw the ball deep more often. Herm didn't do so well on those predictions.

Herm admits that his pre-seasons goals are lofty and that when the game is on the line those things become irrelevant.

 
I saw plenty of occasions when the Jets had 10 or 12 players on the field in critical situations plus a multitude of other times when the Herm's team bungled the clock.

I'm going to venture that math isn't Hermie's forte.
I remember how one game, they had only 10 guys on the field and were still shutting down the opposing offense :loco:
 
Herm Edwards said in five consecutive pre-seasons that the Jets were going to run Curtis Martin less this year, and the Jets were going to throw the ball deep more often. Herm didn't do so well on those predictions.
:goodposting: Further, it's very unlikely that a player of Dee Brown's caliber will assume so many of the carries. I expect the Chiefs to run the ball around 500 times, and I expect Johnson to get around 350 of them.That leaves 150, but note that things such as wide receiver reverses, fullback dives, quarterback scrambles, etc., are rushing attempts. I estimate that the backup running backs will have between 120 and 130 carries, and I think Brown will see only 75-80 percent of those. Go easy with drafting him. It wouldn't surprise me if he had less than 300 yards and only a touchdown or two. For that matter, it wouldn't surprise me if he was cut.
 
M.Bennett a possibility?
I don't think so. He'll be eaten alive by STL if NO decides to reel in one of the bites.And if somehow he escapes STL, he'll get swooped up by MIA.

You guys don't believe in Dee Brown? I'd barely heard of the guy until the "worst case scenario: LJ" thread, but I think the guy could have legitimate RB3/flex value this season if they really plan on keeping LJ under 400 touches (recept included).

 
I pulled this off a Chiefs message board. It's a very long article, but it was written by Joe Posnanski of the Kanas City Star, but sorry, no link. Words of wisdom from Herm:

He switches topics again, and like one song blending into another, he talks about the Chiefs. “The thing about the Chiefs is everybody needs to understand the job. The job of the offense is not to score points. The job of the defense is not to stop the other team from scoring points. You understand, Coach? That’s what people think it’s about. That’s the way this team was playing. But that’s not what the job is.” Behind him, there are the cracks and laughter of kids playing pool.

“The job,” he says, “is to win. That’s all. Everybody’s heard me say that. You play to win the game (it is even the name of his book), but nobody knows what I mean by that. What I mean is, sometimes scoring 30 points is worse than scoring 20 points because you score too quickly, and your defense is on the field all day and can’t stop anybody in the fourth quarter. You understand me, Coach?

“I mean sometimes our defense has to stop the other team deep in their territory so Dante Hall will be in position to get a punt return. I mean sometimes our offense needs to hold the ball for 6 minutes to give our defense a break. I mean it all has to work together. Everybody has to work to win. That’s the whole thing.”

:excited: This doesn't seem to be a widely held offensive philosphy in the NFL.... thank God. I am sooooooo glad Hermie is someone else's problem now. Sure, it's a bad thing to score too fast. Yep, sounds like the Herman Edwards I know.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
By Jim Corbett, USA TODAYKansas City Chiefs coach Herm Edwards is trying to balance all those fantasy football expectations for Larry Johnson with NFL reality.It's impossible for one running back, no matter how gifted, to hold up under the 500- to 550-carry load Edwards plans for a more run-heavy offense.Coincidentally, the man who will replace former Pro Bowl running back Priest Holmes as Kansas City's offensive drivetrain will benefit most if Holmes can return from last year's season-ending neck injury, sustained Oct. 30 against the San Diego Chargers.In today's NFL, a team is only as good as its fourth-quarter run game, especially late in the season. See last season's Super Bowl champion Pittsburgh Steelers and the 1-2 running back tandem of Willie Parker and Jerome Bettis. That is why Edwards remains hopeful Holmes will be able to return for a 10th season and serve as Johnson's backup.It's not that Johnson isn't tough enough to withstand a heavy load. He led the AFC with 1,750 yards on 336 carries last season. But it's an issue of having something left to be an effective closer come the playoffs, especially because Edwards believes the best way to improve a 25th-ranked defense is to keep it fresh by running more."You need two runners in this game," Edwards says. "One guy can't do it alone. We want to run the ball 500-550 times. They ran 520 times here last year. You're lucky if one guy gets 300 carries. I'm hoping that other guy will be Priest Holmes. Priest wants to come back, and I'm anticipating he will. He's in great shape. He's hoping to be medically cleared in early July out in California."Edwards is impressed by the way Johnson has handled higher expectations after his breakout performance in nine starts replacing Holmes."L.J. has done a great job," Edwards says. "He has a lot of pressure with all the expectations on him. I told him, 'After the first game you run for 78 yards, the question everyone will ask is, "Did you get enough carries?" ' It's about the wins. And it's about showing he can do it over 16 games."Johnson goes from arguably last season's second-half MVP to the fulcrum for Kansas City's return to the playoffs for the first time since 2003."He's got that bull's-eye on him now," Edwards says. "He's a hard worker and knows he has to continue to improve in his blocking. That's the one thing about Curtis Martin that he didn't get enough attention for. Curtis was a great pass blocker. That's the next step for L.J. And he wants to be a complete player, has great respect for the history of the game and the great running backs."If Holmes is unable to return or begins the season on the physically unable to perform list, fifth-year journeyman Dee Brown is expected to be Johnson's primary backup.The 2001 sixth-round pick by the Carolina Panthers has impressed during offseason workouts and is running ahead of former Denver Broncos back Quentin Griffin.Foretold is forewarnedEach day when another NFL player made the wrong type of news during the offseason, Edwards would begin his team meeting by mimicking the opening theme from SportsCenter:"Da-na-na, na-na-na!"To hammer the point home, the coach would flash a headline and account of the latest player to run afoul of the law on the meeting-room monitor.Edwards believes the best defense to prevent players from messing up is a good offense. He made sure his players were more than forewarned about the consequences."I showed them every single guy who got arrested this offseason," Edwards says. "I said, 'Hey guys, we got 36 days off until training camp (June 27). The only reason you guys should be on SportsCenter is either because you're in last year's highlights or for something special you did in the community.' "
Being that KC ran the ball 520 times and Herm wants to run more, I think you can Mark Dee Brown down foratleast 200 carries for around 1100 all purpose
 
:excited: This doesn't seem to be a widely held offensive philosphy in the NFL.... thank God. I am sooooooo glad Hermie is someone else's problem now. Sure, it's a bad thing to score too fast. Yep, sounds like the Herman Edwards I know.
2001: 10-6 (WC2 in a division with SB Champs Pats 11-5, Dolphins 11-5 WC1)2002: 9-7 (Won Division after starting 1-4)

2003: 6-10 (Pennington injured in preseason)

2004: 10-6 (WC1 with SB Champ 14-2 Pats)

2005: 4-12 (lost QB1&2 in week 3 in the same drive, then his RB1&2 after guys were stacking 11 guys in the box.)

Despite having the 31st ranked offense last year, he still managed to coach a 12th ranked defense.

I'd take a coach who leads his team to the playoffs 60% of the time, and 100% of the time when he doesn't lose his starting QB at the beginning of the season.

 
M.Bennett a possibility?
I don't think so. He'll be eaten alive by STL if NO decides to reel in one of the bites.And if somehow he escapes STL, he'll get swooped up by MIA.
???I think the only thing that matters to the Saints is getting a 3rd round or higher draft pick for MBennett. Otherwise they keep him.

 
:excited: This doesn't seem to be a widely held offensive philosphy in the NFL.... thank God. I am sooooooo glad Hermie is someone else's problem now. Sure, it's a bad thing to score too fast. Yep, sounds like the Herman Edwards I know.
2001: 10-6 (WC2 in a division with SB Champs Pats 11-5, Dolphins 11-5 WC1)2002: 9-7 (Won Division after starting 1-4)

2003: 6-10 (Pennington injured in preseason)

2004: 10-6 (WC1 with SB Champ 14-2 Pats)

2005: 4-12 (lost QB1&2 in week 3 in the same drive, then his RB1&2 after guys were stacking 11 guys in the box.)

Despite having the 31st ranked offense last year, he still managed to coach a 12th ranked defense.

I'd take a coach who leads his team to the playoffs 60% of the time, and 100% of the time when he doesn't lose his starting QB at the beginning of the season.
Herm's not as bad as Rovers indicated nor as good as you seem to suggest. Don't forget that in all three years the Jets made the playoffs, they were very close to missing the playoffs:2001: John Hall kicks a 53 yard FG with 59 seconds left, Jets win 24-22. Hall misses, the Jets are out of the playoffs. More importantly, Herm made one of the all time biggest coaching blunders the week before, as the Jets lost to the 2-12 Bills.

2002: If the Patriots don't score 11 points in the final three minutes against the Dolphins, and then kick a FG in overtime, the Jets miss the playoffs.

2004: If the Steelers third string doesn't win @ Buffalo in week 17, the Jets probably miss the playoffs.

The Jets were a borderline playoff team each of Edwards' three seasons. He's an excellent motivator but a bad Xs and Os guy who knows little about offense. He wore out his welcome in NY and it was beneficial for both sides to move on.

 
:excited: This doesn't seem to be a widely held offensive philosphy in the NFL.... thank God. I am sooooooo glad Hermie is someone else's problem now. Sure, it's a bad thing to score too fast. Yep, sounds like the Herman Edwards I know.
2001: 10-6 (WC2 in a division with SB Champs Pats 11-5, Dolphins 11-5 WC1)2002: 9-7 (Won Division after starting 1-4)

2003: 6-10 (Pennington injured in preseason)

2004: 10-6 (WC1 with SB Champ 14-2 Pats)

2005: 4-12 (lost QB1&2 in week 3 in the same drive, then his RB1&2 after guys were stacking 11 guys in the box.)

Despite having the 31st ranked offense last year, he still managed to coach a 12th ranked defense.

I'd take a coach who leads his team to the playoffs 60% of the time, and 100% of the time when he doesn't lose his starting QB at the beginning of the season.
Herm's not as bad as Rovers indicated nor as good as you seem to suggest. Don't forget that in all three years the Jets made the playoffs, they were very close to missing the playoffs:2001: John Hall kicks a 53 yard FG with 59 seconds left, Jets win 24-22. Hall misses, the Jets are out of the playoffs. More importantly, Herm made one of the all time biggest coaching blunders the week before, as the Jets lost to the 2-12 Bills.

2002: If the Patriots don't score 11 points in the final three minutes against the Dolphins, and then kick a FG in overtime, the Jets miss the playoffs.

2004: If the Steelers third string doesn't win @ Buffalo in week 17, the Jets probably miss the playoffs.

The Jets were a borderline playoff team each of Edwards' three seasons. He's an excellent motivator but a bad Xs and Os guy who knows little about offense. He wore out his welcome in NY and it was beneficial for both sides to move on.
I could go into a long litany about why Edwards was in fact, much worse than I indicated. Whenever things went wrong, Edwards wasted no time in finding people to throw under the bus. From coordinators to players. Can someone tell me what competent NFL HC has a 34 year old center, and no backup? Or why he'd allow a kneel down call, intentionally losing 2 yards for a FG kicker that already missed from that disatnce in a playoff game? Look at what he said. It isn't good to score fast because the D will get tired. The man is a lunatic. Now, why would his defense get tired? Because he ran soft camps. Great way to compensate.... don't score. Just how bad is Edwards as a game day coach? He was at least smart enough to know he was stupid, so he hired an asst coach to manage the clock. Only problem was, #### Curl was just as clueless as Herm.

A BIG part of the Jets implosion was Edwards' fault. Now, is someone going to tell me getting Vinny Testaverde off the couch was a smart move? Or playing Martin on one knee, when he later admitted he never should have sent Martin out there with torn ligaments in his knee for at least several games? Or sending Pennington back out there AFTER the second shoulder injury in the same game? I can make this a 1000 word post, and still have material.

But.... he is entertaining. The "Micheal Vick is a chicken" speech was a great one. I will enjoy his speeches much more, now that he is the HC somewhere else. I wonder if he is going to tell LJ to fall down after a twenty yard run. Don't wanna score too fast, ya know!

 
Did Dee Browns stock just go up or what? I mean Holmes is done, no way he comes back, and if he does he'll be promply put back on IR like every year.

Dee Brown :thumbup:
Last spring+summer Dee Brown, McKenzie Smith, Quentin Griffin, and Samkon Gado(yep Chief in the spring) were all Chiefs. Which one was on the Chiefs roster all last year?
 
I could go into a long litany about why Edwards was in fact, much worse than I indicated.
Why bother?For every word you speak bad of Edwards, anyone could quadruple that about the Jets and their players, who, lets be real here, suck. A few nice players here and there, but the team lacks talent. Bill Walsh wouldn't be able to coach that team we saw last year to anywhere but the basement. Edwards' resume (read: accomplishments, not bitter Jets fans' opinions) is impressive given the team he coached in New York. Move a bunch of miles West and he's now with a much better team. In fact, a team that's 27 points better. Unless, of course, you count the garbage-time touchdown the Jets scored against the Chiefs back in week one. It's easy to say, "Edwards doesn't know offense". Could well be, and probably is, true. But Edwards has never had a running back, quarterback, tight end or offensive line like he will have in 2006. It's a little easier to "know offense" when you have great players.
 
I could go into a long litany about why Edwards was in fact, much worse than I indicated.
Why bother?For every word you speak bad of Edwards, anyone could quadruple that about the Jets and their players, who, lets be real here, suck.

A few nice players here and there, but the team lacks talent. Bill Walsh wouldn't be able to coach that team we saw last year to anywhere but the basement.

Edwards' resume (read: accomplishments, not bitter Jets fans' opinions) is impressive given the team he coached in New York. Move a bunch of miles West and he's now with a much better team. In fact, a team that's 27 points better. Unless, of course, you count the garbage-time touchdown the Jets scored against the Chiefs back in week one.

It's easy to say, "Edwards doesn't know offense". Could well be, and probably is, true. But Edwards has never had a running back, quarterback, tight end or offensive line like he will have in 2006. It's a little easier to "know offense" when you have great players.
Edwards inheritted a line that had Curtis be the 2nd leading rusher in the NFL and Vinny had some superlow number like 5-10 sacks or somesuch. That was an excellent line and he(and the GM) messed with it. They also had Mawae who IMO is a future HOFer and probably better than any single Chiefs lineman though with Roaf it might be debatable to some. Curtis is a HOFer, LJ is not. IMO Tony G is far better. Pennington was super accurate and a rising star in the NFL, not Herm's fault he threw out his shoulder. Santana Moss-look how he did in Washington. That's way better than any Chiefs WR has done in year(Jets one too for that matter)I'm not saying the Jets had a great O or a comparable one. I just think you sold them short. IMO they had alot to work with.

They ran well under him. Martin probably averaged being the 2nd leading rusher in the NFL under him. I'm very confident LJ will also have a ton of success. Passing.....well this is where I think ya beat up on Herm.

 
Edwards inheritted a line that had Curtis be the 2nd leading rusher in the NFL and Vinny had some superlow number like 5-10 sacks or somesuch. That was an excellent line and he(and the GM) messed with it. They also had Mawae who IMO is a future HOFer and probably better than any single Chiefs lineman though with Roaf it might be debatable to some.
"Debateable to some"? Mawae is not in Roaf's league, nor Will Shields in terms of career accomplishments. In terms of right now? Brian Waters has him beat by a large margin, too.
Curtis is a HOFer, LJ is not.
Johnson is elite right now, Martin is not. Martin hasn't had a season in his entire career that matches what Johnson did last year.
I'm not saying the Jets had a great O or a comparable one. I just think you sold them short. IMO they had alot to work with.
I sold them for what they were -- not near as good as the Chiefs. Like I said, it's easier to "know offense" when you've got multiple Pro Bowlers and Hall of Famers.2005 Chiefs offensive Pro Bowlers -- 62005 Jets offensive Pro Bowlers -- 0In the end, all I'm saying is that Edwards is working off of a new slate with a new team. His challenge to put a successful offensive product on the field will not be near as tough as it was in New York. On the other hand, it'll be more of a challenge for him to field a successful defense.
 
I think Herm has every intention of doing a 60/40 split, but it's like Paul Brown said about why he ran Jim Brown so much:

"When you have a big gun, you shoot it."

As a Raider fan, I hope he spilts it 60/40, I really do. But I don't think he will.

 
Herm Edwards said in five consecutive pre-seasons that the Jets were going to run Curtis Martin less this year, and the Jets were going to throw the ball deep more often. Herm didn't do so well on those predictions.

Herm admits that his pre-seasons goals are lofty and that when the game is on the line those things become irrelevant.
These words out of Herm's mouth will make most Jet fans Explode into laughter OR Cry.Curtis Martin could have had both legs lost on the way to the stadium and the guy was going to get fed the ball.... Down by 20, Feed it to Martin... Locked out of the playoffs, down by 27, Martin injured - FEED it to Martin.....

I'm convinced Herm is one of the bigger Boobs in the game. There was no reason for Jordan not to get fed the ball a ton a few years back or for Houston not to get the ball a ton last year but, there was always some kind of Martin Milestone or some reason that Herm would say "The Veteran must get fed the ball"..... Guy is all talk.

 
If they really run the ball 550x total, a 60/x/x split isn't that far fetched.

LJ had 65% of their total rushing attempts last year. If the remaining carries are consolidated into a backup, as opposed to spread out between 2 or 3 guys, great.

 
:excited: This doesn't seem to be a widely held offensive philosphy in the NFL.... thank God. I am sooooooo glad Hermie is someone else's problem now. Sure, it's a bad thing to score too fast. Yep, sounds like the Herman Edwards I know.
2001: 10-6 (WC2 in a division with SB Champs Pats 11-5, Dolphins 11-5 WC1)2002: 9-7 (Won Division after starting 1-4)

2003: 6-10 (Pennington injured in preseason)

2004: 10-6 (WC1 with SB Champ 14-2 Pats)

2005: 4-12 (lost QB1&2 in week 3 in the same drive, then his RB1&2 after guys were stacking 11 guys in the box.)

Despite having the 31st ranked offense last year, he still managed to coach a 12th ranked defense.

I'd take a coach who leads his team to the playoffs 60% of the time, and 100% of the time when he doesn't lose his starting QB at the beginning of the season.
Herm's not as bad as Rovers indicated nor as good as you seem to suggest. Don't forget that in all three years the Jets made the playoffs, they were very close to missing the playoffs:2001: John Hall kicks a 53 yard FG with 59 seconds left, Jets win 24-22. Hall misses, the Jets are out of the playoffs. More importantly, Herm made one of the all time biggest coaching blunders the week before, as the Jets lost to the 2-12 Bills.

2002: If the Patriots don't score 11 points in the final three minutes against the Dolphins, and then kick a FG in overtime, the Jets miss the playoffs.

2004: If the Steelers third string doesn't win @ Buffalo in week 17, the Jets probably miss the playoffs.

The Jets were a borderline playoff team each of Edwards' three seasons. He's an excellent motivator but a bad Xs and Os guy who knows little about offense. He wore out his welcome in NY and it was beneficial for both sides to move on.
As borderline a playoff team as they were, they still won a playoff game 2 of the 3 times they went there under Edwards.Had it not been for multiple missed kicks by Doug Brien, they would've been in the AFC Championship game in 2004.

I think he's a lot better than he is given credit for.

 
Curtis Martin could have had both legs lost on the way to the stadium and the guy was going to get fed the ball.... Down by 20, Feed it to Martin... Locked out of the playoffs, down by 27, Martin injured - FEED it to Martin.....

I'm convinced Herm is one of the bigger Boobs in the game. There was no reason for Jordan not to get fed the ball a ton a few years back
I agree with you, but this is interesting at the same time.I think that Jordan could've sealed the deal against the Steelers in 2004 because he appeared to be running much better @ that point in the season.

However, Herm gets second guessed no matter what if they lose.

If he gives it to Martin and they miss some field goals, he gets questioned for not running with Jordan more.

If he gives it to Jordan and Jordan fumbles or gets stuffed or does better and Brien STILL misses the field goals, he gets questioned for not giving the ball more to the regular season rushing leader.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I saw plenty of occasions when the Jets had 10 or 12 players on the field in critical situations plus a multitude of other times when the Herm's team bungled the clock.

I'm going to venture that math isn't Hermie's forte.
WE DON'T DO MATH. WE PLAY THE GAME TO WIN
 
If they really run the ball 550x total, a 60/x/x split isn't that far fetched.

LJ had 65% of their total rushing attempts last year. If the remaining carries are consolidated into a backup, as opposed to spread out between 2 or 3 guys, great.
You make a good point, but the thing to keep in mind is that no backup the Chiefs have in 2006 will come close to what they had in previous years. Johnson is going to have to carry the load, because whoever else gets the opportunity is probably going to waste it; at least in comparison to what Johnson would've done with it.Even if Priest Holmes returns, is he really going to be the "great backup" that some people would only naturally assume? I don't think so. And for that reason, I don't see enough talent to take 40% of the Chiefs' total rushing attempts away from Johnson.

 
:excited: This doesn't seem to be a widely held offensive philosphy in the NFL.... thank God. I am sooooooo glad Hermie is someone else's problem now. Sure, it's a bad thing to score too fast. Yep, sounds like the Herman Edwards I know.
2001: 10-6 (WC2 in a division with SB Champs Pats 11-5, Dolphins 11-5 WC1)2002: 9-7 (Won Division after starting 1-4)

2003: 6-10 (Pennington injured in preseason)

2004: 10-6 (WC1 with SB Champ 14-2 Pats)

2005: 4-12 (lost QB1&2 in week 3 in the same drive, then his RB1&2 after guys were stacking 11 guys in the box.)

Despite having the 31st ranked offense last year, he still managed to coach a 12th ranked defense.

I'd take a coach who leads his team to the playoffs 60% of the time, and 100% of the time when he doesn't lose his starting QB at the beginning of the season.
Herm's not as bad as Rovers indicated nor as good as you seem to suggest. Don't forget that in all three years the Jets made the playoffs, they were very close to missing the playoffs:2001: John Hall kicks a 53 yard FG with 59 seconds left, Jets win 24-22. Hall misses, the Jets are out of the playoffs. More importantly, Herm made one of the all time biggest coaching blunders the week before, as the Jets lost to the 2-12 Bills.

2002: If the Patriots don't score 11 points in the final three minutes against the Dolphins, and then kick a FG in overtime, the Jets miss the playoffs.

2004: If the Steelers third string doesn't win @ Buffalo in week 17, the Jets probably miss the playoffs.

The Jets were a borderline playoff team each of Edwards' three seasons. He's an excellent motivator but a bad Xs and Os guy who knows little about offense. He wore out his welcome in NY and it was beneficial for both sides to move on.
As borderline a playoff team as they were, they still won a playoff game 2 of the 3 times they went there under Edwards.Had it not been for multiple missed kicks by Doug Brien, they would've been in the AFC Championship game in 2004.

I think he's a lot better than he is given credit for.
The Jets had quality teams in 2002 and 2004 when they made the playoffs. The 2004 team was very good IMO, but not great. Making the AFCC game is nice and all, but what does it mean? Even the biggest Jets homer knows that they would have been crushed in NE that week. All Brien's missed FGs saved was some embarrassment.Herm's a great motivator, but don't underestimate that he's made some very poor decisions. Maybe it's just me, but when a coach does something so unbelievably stupid, it's hard for me to think that highly of him. Edwards' decision to kick the ball to start off both halves against the Bills in 2001 nearly cost the Jets a playoff spot, and is worse (but not nearly as celebrated) than Mornhinweg's decision to kickoff to start OT.

Herm gets some things, and doesn't get others. He ended up with a losing record as HC of the Jets. You can bring up the playoff stats all you want, but you can't ignore the horrific 2005 that Jets fans had to suffer through.

 
He ended up with a losing record as HC of the Jets. You can bring up the playoff stats all you want
He who accomplishes something in the postseason is greater than he who accomplishes something in the regular season.I'll take 10 wins and a playoff win over 13+ wins and a playoff one-and-done.
you can't ignore the horrific 2005 that Jets fans had to suffer through.
Sure you can't. It's tough to ignore a season in which your top quarterback, second quarterback, running back, among other key players, all go down with injuries.It's entertaining when people bag on Edwards for the 2005 Jets, but remember this: Vince Lombardi couldn't coach a team to any success with third-stringers lining up as starters and, more importantly than anything else, at the quarterback position.I'd love to see a list of teams that have made the playoffs after losing their top two quarterbacks due to injury (not bad performance; injury). It'll be short.
 
He ended up with a losing record as HC of the Jets. You can bring up the playoff stats all you want
He who accomplishes something in the postseason is greater than he who accomplishes something in the regular season.I'll take 10 wins and a playoff win over 13+ wins and a playoff one-and-done.

you can't ignore the horrific 2005 that Jets fans had to suffer through.
Sure you can't. It's tough to ignore a season in which your top quarterback, second quarterback, running back, among other key players, all go down with injuries.It's entertaining when people bag on Edwards for the 2005 Jets, but remember this: Vince Lombardi couldn't coach a team to any success with third-stringers lining up as starters and, more importantly than anything else, at the quarterback position.

I'd love to see a list of teams that have made the playoffs after losing their top two quarterbacks due to injury (not bad performance; injury). It'll be short.
I didn't ask for the Jets to make the playoffs. I asked for Herm to not quit on the team and for the Jets to win more than 3 of their first 15 fifteen games. I think Vince Lombardi could have done that. Big difference between a 4-12 season and an 8-8 season. If you don't see that, that's fine.

And if you want to give Herm the excuse for the injuries, you can't credit him as much for the Jets making the playoffs with a very talented team in 2004.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top