netmau5
Footballguy
Watching the game tonight, some buddies and I were discussing the King's Ransom paid by the Redskins to move up four spots in this year's NFL draft. Let's be real, on the surface this seems like an epic failure of a trade on the level of the Viking's acquisition of Hershel Walker from the Cowboys. The Rams will certainly benefit over the coming years, but only time will tell with the Redskins.
In our discussion, one interesting question emerged: if you could go into the future and know that, in five years, the Redskins would win a Super Bowl and RGIII would have combined for 25,000 yards of offense, how much would you have traded? Our consensus was that RGIII would have been worth four first round picks, a second, and a third. In other words, given a ring, the Redskins came out well too. What do you guys think?
(no cynics please, you can't argue that knowing a Super Bowl was coming, it would be worth trading all 35 picks over 5 years)
In our discussion, one interesting question emerged: if you could go into the future and know that, in five years, the Redskins would win a Super Bowl and RGIII would have combined for 25,000 yards of offense, how much would you have traded? Our consensus was that RGIII would have been worth four first round picks, a second, and a third. In other words, given a ring, the Redskins came out well too. What do you guys think?
(no cynics please, you can't argue that knowing a Super Bowl was coming, it would be worth trading all 35 picks over 5 years)