What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Hixon vs Breaston (1 Viewer)

Deuce'sWild

Footballguy
Lets's assume that Boldin is out. So, both of these guys are getting a chance to start this week because of injury or suspension. Both are on high powered offenses and are stepping into a roll that could produce solid numbers.

My take is that Fitz will get a TON of looks, but Breaston could benefit from Buffalo rolling their coverage towards Fitz. Buffalo has a solid DEF but they can be scored on and Arizona will have to pass to beat them. Breaston had a great game last week when Warner was forced to throw it a bunch in a catch up game. He's good in the open field and is active in the return game too.

Prediction for Breaston: 5 catches for 78 yds and 1 td

Hixon had a great preseason and is taking over Burress's spot in the offense. Unlike Breaston, he doesn't have a big name WR on the other side that will require double teams. That could be good and bad. Toomer will likely won't take away as many looks a Fitz will, but also won't open up one side of the field like Fitz will either. Seattle has a decent DEF, and a key is that they are getting Branch and Engram back so they may be able to keep up with the Giants offensively...meaning the Giants won't just run the ball to burn the clock in the 2nd half.

Prediction for Hixon: 6 catches for 92 yds and 0 td.

That's my take, what's yours?

 
Otis said:
Neither. Lance Moore.
Lance Moore doesn't apply the topic...and he's there to stay. Breaston and Hixon will be good for this week and maybe next week at the most.Question is, who's going to be putting up the best stats this week?
 
I picked up Moore off of the WW, dumping Antonio Bryant.

Then I traded Ocho Cinco and Moore to the Colston owner for Braylon Edwards and a throwin.

Then I dropped the throwin to pick up Breaston, after deliberating between him and Hixon. For me the tiebreaker was that Boldin could be out longer than a week, whereas Burress is for sure a one-week absence.

So apparently I've got Moore first, and then Breaston barely above Hixon, with the gap between Moore and Breaston/Hixon not that large, and Bryant behind all of them.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I picked up Moore off of the WW, dumping Antonio Bryant.Then I traded Ocho Cinco and Moore to the Colston owner for Braylon Edwards and a throwin.Then I dropped the throwin to pick up Breaston, after deliberating between him and Hixon. For me the tiebreaker was that Boldin could be out longer than a week, whereas Burress is for sure a one-week absence.So apparently I've got Moore first, and then Breaston barely above Hixon, with the gap between Moore and Breaston/Hixon not that large, and Bryant behind all of them.
Did I seriously mistype something that lead people to believe I want Lance Moore included in this?I own neither of these two WRs (Hixon or Breaston), I just though it would be interesting to see how well owners think both will do with their opportunities this weekend. Not sure where all this Lance Moore stuff is coming from. :shrug: :nerd:
 
Yet another thread that loses focus. What a shame because the OP's question is a good one. To me, it seems that Breaston will get his looks because Warner will spread the ball enough. He's already shown that he trusts Breaston enough to throw to him. In NY, I don't see enough evidence to suggest that Smith instead of Hixon will be the primary beneficiary of Plax's absence. It seems like a lot of people are ignoring Smith's production in the past in certain situations in favor of a Hixon that looked good in preseason.

 
Let me try to get this thread back on topic which is obviously who is the better start this week- Breaston or Hixon?

Let me start by saying in my 16 team dynasty league I had Breaston on my bench and dropped him to pick up a free agent before Boldin was injured. :confused: So, with Breaston gone, I dropped McMichael and picked up Hixon.

For this week I think Breaston is the better play. Warner probably won't throw as much as he did last week, but Arizona still loves to come out throwing. With Boldin possibly out, the only other competition for looks that Breaston has is Fitzgerald. The Cards don't throw much to the TE or RB, so if Fitz draws double coverage, Breaston should be able to use his speed to get open. Arizona also doesn't run the ball a ton.

Hixon will be competing with Toomer, Steve Smith, the RBs and Kevin Boss for looks. Toomer may draw Trufant in coverage, but that will only have Eli looking to one of Hixon, Smith, Boss or one of the RBs. My main point is, the Giants have a more balanced attack and there is more competition for looks among the WRs as well.

I'm not good at predicting numbers, but I would say among these two options for this week Breaston has the advantage.

 
Let me try to get this thread back on topic which is obviously who is the better start this week- Breaston or Hixon? Let me start by saying in my 16 team dynasty league I had Breaston on my bench and dropped him to pick up a free agent before Boldin was injured. :wall: So, with Breaston gone, I dropped McMichael and picked up Hixon.For this week I think Breaston is the better play. Warner probably won't throw as much as he did last week, but Arizona still loves to come out throwing. With Boldin possibly out, the only other competition for looks that Breaston has is Fitzgerald. The Cards don't throw much to the TE or RB, so if Fitz draws double coverage, Breaston should be able to use his speed to get open. Arizona also doesn't run the ball a ton. Hixon will be competing with Toomer, Steve Smith, the RBs and Kevin Boss for looks. Toomer may draw Trufant in coverage, but that will only have Eli looking to one of Hixon, Smith, Boss or one of the RBs. My main point is, the Giants have a more balanced attack and there is more competition for looks among the WRs as well.I'm not good at predicting numbers, but I would say among these two options for this week Breaston has the advantage.
:goodposting:
 
Breaston is the better talent and the Cardinals will almost certainly throw more to their WRs.

Breaston, and it's not close.

 
I've been wondering the exact same thing. I have Boldin and need a replacement this week. Both are available for me. Bloom and Dodds have Hixon above Breaston but I'm skeptical. Hixon has more competition for the ball than Breaston will, and Breaston has shown he can be productive. I wonder why Bloom and Dodds both like Hixon. I'm holding out picking either up until I hear or see a good response. At this point, I'm leaning towards Breaston for the reason mentioned above, plus if Boldin is out an extended period of time (surgery?) then I'd like his LT value.

 
I've been wondering the exact same thing. I have Boldin and need a replacement this week. Both are available for me. Bloom and Dodds have Hixon above Breaston but I'm skeptical. Hixon has more competition for the ball than Breaston will, and Breaston has shown he can be productive. I wonder why Bloom and Dodds both like Hixon. I'm holding out picking either up until I hear or see a good response. At this point, I'm leaning towards Breaston for the reason mentioned above, plus if Boldin is out an extended period of time (surgery?) then I'd like his LT value.
Very :thumbup: I also like Breaston, as I think Boldin is going to miss more time then people realize
 
I picked up Moore off of the WW, dumping Antonio Bryant.Then I traded Ocho Cinco and Moore to the Colston owner for Braylon Edwards and a throwin.Then I dropped the throwin to pick up Breaston, after deliberating between him and Hixon. For me the tiebreaker was that Boldin could be out longer than a week, whereas Burress is for sure a one-week absence.So apparently I've got Moore first, and then Breaston barely above Hixon, with the gap between Moore and Breaston/Hixon not that large, and Bryant behind all of them.
Did I seriously mistype something that lead people to believe I want Lance Moore included in this?I own neither of these two WRs (Hixon or Breaston), I just though it would be interesting to see how well owners think both will do with their opportunities this weekend. Not sure where all this Lance Moore stuff is coming from. :rolleyes: :nerd:
FWIW, the post you replied to here simply stated that he used Moore to make a trade that ultimately led to him picking up Breaston over Hixon. Why Otis included Moore, I don't know.I like Breaston myself, also.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I picked up Moore off of the WW, dumping Antonio Bryant.Then I traded Ocho Cinco and Moore to the Colston owner for Braylon Edwards and a throwin.Then I dropped the throwin to pick up Breaston, after deliberating between him and Hixon. For me the tiebreaker was that Boldin could be out longer than a week, whereas Burress is for sure a one-week absence.So apparently I've got Moore first, and then Breaston barely above Hixon, with the gap between Moore and Breaston/Hixon not that large, and Bryant behind all of them.
Did I seriously mistype something that lead people to believe I want Lance Moore included in this?I own neither of these two WRs (Hixon or Breaston), I just though it would be interesting to see how well owners think both will do with their opportunities this weekend. Not sure where all this Lance Moore stuff is coming from. :rolleyes: :nerd:
Either this is a strict WDIS thread, in which case it belongs in the other forum, or it's not a WDIS thread, in which case it's perfectly appropriate to compare/contrast against other WRs in this same tier.As others have alluded to, Arizona's pass/run balance seems likely to be more favorable than the Giants', and what passes are thrown, Breaston will face less competition from teammates for.Now having said that, it bears pointing out that Breaston is filling in for a guy who's averaging 8.8 targets per game, while Hixon's in for a guy averaging 9.3, so the above hypothesis might not hold water.
 
Breaston is the better talent and the Cardinals will almost certainly throw more to their WRs.Breaston, and it's not close.
Plax is only missing one game.. after this week, Hixon moves back too WR3 or 4. But Toomer is a bit injury prone and if Hixon has a good game, he could be next inline for the job... I still can't get that pre-season game out of my head.Breaston has always looked like a good WR... a great Homerun hitter. And who knows how long Boldin is out for, could be a could of games... could be the yr.But I would Take Breaston over Hixon right now.
 
I'm not sold on Breaston being able to beat a starting corner consistently. I think Urban puts up better numbers this week, but I don't have the stones to play either one.

I'm going Hixon on this one.

 
I picked up Moore off of the WW, dumping Antonio Bryant.Then I traded Ocho Cinco and Moore to the Colston owner for Braylon Edwards and a throwin.Then I dropped the throwin to pick up Breaston, after deliberating between him and Hixon. For me the tiebreaker was that Boldin could be out longer than a week, whereas Burress is for sure a one-week absence.So apparently I've got Moore first, and then Breaston barely above Hixon, with the gap between Moore and Breaston/Hixon not that large, and Bryant behind all of them.
Did I seriously mistype something that lead people to believe I want Lance Moore included in this?I own neither of these two WRs (Hixon or Breaston), I just though it would be interesting to see how well owners think both will do with their opportunities this weekend. Not sure where all this Lance Moore stuff is coming from. :coffee: :thumbdown:
WDIS threads belong in the ACF dude.
 
Good topic. I think when all things are considered, Breaston will be a better play. They have a weaker defense, which leads to more possessions for the offense (see last week, playing catch up) and that offense is more spread open. I think the Cards like to air it out, and Breaston would benefit more from Boldin's absence than Hixon will from Plax. I think you also made a good point when you talked about Fitz drawing coverage - as it was obvious that was what was happening early in the Jets game. Hixon played well in the preseason, but I am not sure it will translate this week. Breaston showed last week his ability.

That being said, I wouldn't be surprised if I am wrong. I just think Breaston will be the play this week. JMO.

 
I picked up Moore off of the WW, dumping Antonio Bryant.Then I traded Ocho Cinco and Moore to the Colston owner for Braylon Edwards and a throwin.Then I dropped the throwin to pick up Breaston, after deliberating between him and Hixon. For me the tiebreaker was that Boldin could be out longer than a week, whereas Burress is for sure a one-week absence.So apparently I've got Moore first, and then Breaston barely above Hixon, with the gap between Moore and Breaston/Hixon not that large, and Bryant behind all of them.
Did I seriously mistype something that lead people to believe I want Lance Moore included in this?I own neither of these two WRs (Hixon or Breaston), I just though it would be interesting to see how well owners think both will do with their opportunities this weekend. Not sure where all this Lance Moore stuff is coming from. :rolleyes: :)
WDIS threads belong in the ACF dude.
This is so far from a WDIS thread, if you only knew. Maybe I should post my lineup so you can see that I have neither of these guys.
 
This is so far from a WDIS thread, if you only knew. Maybe I should post my lineup so you can see that I have neither of these guys.
Whenever you contrast two players, and make comments about how you didn't include anyone else, it looks like a WDIS thread.If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck and is in the water, it's probably a duck.
 
Would 6 receptions 70 yards and a TD be too optimistic for Breaston's numbers this week?

 
This is so far from a WDIS thread, if you only knew. Maybe I should post my lineup so you can see that I have neither of these guys.
Whenever you contrast two players, and make comments about how you didn't include anyone else, it looks like a WDIS thread.If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck and is in the water, it's probably a duck.
thx to all of you who are adding so much to the thread with the WDIS posts. Top notch.
 
It's just a vs. thread. That's what we all do every week from the time cheatsheets are made, to the draft, and setting our lineups; comparing player to the player right below him on our list. It just so happens I have the same choice but with Hines Ward in the mix. Do you care? No. Then find the VS. thread that you re interested. Comparing two guys that are close is very helpful.

That said, I like Breatson a little more. I'm holding Hixon hoping he does well with his oppurtunity. He has to show somehthing before I put him in there. If he does well I may trade him.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is so far from a WDIS thread, if you only knew. Maybe I should post my lineup so you can see that I have neither of these guys.
Whenever you contrast two players, and make comments about how you didn't include anyone else, it looks like a WDIS thread.If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck and is in the water, it's probably a duck.
No question. ACF.
 
This is so far from a WDIS thread, if you only knew. Maybe I should post my lineup so you can see that I have neither of these guys.
Whenever you contrast two players, and make comments about how you didn't include anyone else, it looks like a WDIS thread.If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck and is in the water, it's probably a duck.
thx to all of you who are adding so much to the thread with the WDIS posts. Top notch.
I'd rather not have the clutter in the SP when it's clear what this thread is.
 
I picked up Moore off of the WW, dumping Antonio Bryant.Then I traded Ocho Cinco and Moore to the Colston owner for Braylon Edwards and a throwin.Then I dropped the throwin to pick up Breaston, after deliberating between him and Hixon. For me the tiebreaker was that Boldin could be out longer than a week, whereas Burress is for sure a one-week absence.So apparently I've got Moore first, and then Breaston barely above Hixon, with the gap between Moore and Breaston/Hixon not that large, and Bryant behind all of them.
Did I seriously mistype something that lead people to believe I want Lance Moore included in this?I own neither of these two WRs (Hixon or Breaston), I just though it would be interesting to see how well owners think both will do with their opportunities this weekend. Not sure where all this Lance Moore stuff is coming from. :goodposting: :lmao:
WDIS threads belong in the ACF dude.
This is so far from a WDIS thread, if you only knew. Maybe I should post my lineup so you can see that I have neither of these guys.
Dude, I think you've gotten enough mileage off this WDIS thread in the Shark Pool already. I wouldn't press your luck by posting your roster and asking for MORE help.
 
Yes, I'd totally start LMoore this week above Berrian, maybe even A. Gonzalez.

Maybe Boldin's fill-in would be worth a pickup...is it Urban getting the start?

 
Yes, I'd totally start LMoore this week above Berrian, maybe even A. Gonzalez.Maybe Boldin's fill-in would be worth a pickup...is it Urban getting the start?
Breaston is getting the start for Boldin.We get return yards in my league so I have to go with Breaston.Please answer my WDIS post.
 
This is so far from a WDIS thread, if you only knew. Maybe I should post my lineup so you can see that I have neither of these guys.
Whenever you contrast two players, and make comments about how you didn't include anyone else, it looks like a WDIS thread.If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck and is in the water, it's probably a duck.
thx to all of you who are adding so much to the thread with the WDIS posts. Top notch.
I already answered, start Breaston.
 
Good topic. I think when all things are considered, Breaston will be a better play. They have a weaker defense, which leads to more possessions for the offense (see last week, playing catch up) and that offense is more spread open. I think the Cards like to air it out, and Breaston would benefit more from Boldin's absence than Hixon will from Plax. I think you also made a good point when you talked about Fitz drawing coverage - as it was obvious that was what was happening early in the Jets game. Hixon played well in the preseason, but I am not sure it will translate this week. Breaston showed last week his ability.That being said, I wouldn't be surprised if I am wrong. I just think Breaston will be the play this week. JMO.
I was off, apologies to those (probably none) that may have listened. In PPR Breaston did alright, but anyway you slice it Hixon was the better play.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top