What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Housh wants to be an Eagle (1 Viewer)

CentralPA

Footballguy
From Philly.com

Eagles yesterday during an interview with Mike Missanelli on ESPN 950.Houshmandzadeh, considered the top free-agent receiver on the market, said he could potentially be interested in playing in Philadelphia."If the Eagles are interested in me, let's put it like this. If they'll be interested in me, I'll be interested in them," he said when asked if the Eagles would be his top choice.Houshmandzadeh, 31, had 92 catches for 904 yards last season, but keep in mind he was dealing with Ryan Fitzpatrick at quarterback after Carson Palmer went down with an injury. When asked about Donovan McNabb, Houshmandzadeh said he's a fan."I think McNabb is a fine quarterback," he said. "He's one of the best quarterbacks in the league, probably, I can't even think of another quarterback that has performed throughout his career the way he has and would be put in a situation like he was put in in Baltimore, but he bounced back very well."He was going to playoff games consistently with Todd Pinkston and Freddie Mitchell starting for him," Houshmandzadeh said. "Consistently performing well, making it easy for them. A quarterback is gonna make it easy for his receivers and his receiver is gonna make those catches that is out of his radius where he puts the ball, ball sails on him, you go get it, I mean it goes hand in hand. You just need somebody to make plays. And you make each other look good, and I think that's what he needs."Earlier in the interview, he addressed McNabb's inability to get the Eagles' over the hump."Trust me man, you would prefer to go to the playoffs every year than not go," he said. "Even though you're not winning it, you always have a chance. It can be very difficult when you don't have a chance. And imagine how you guys would act if you're not in the playoffs. So he [McNabb] gets you guys in the playoffs. Things might not go the way you like when you get there but you guys are always there and you just need the weapons. When he had the weapons, look what he did."There's a chance that Houshmandzadeh could get the franchise tag from the Bengals, which would pay him $9.88 million for one season. However, NFL Network's Adam Schefter cited a league source at the end of December who said the Bengals would not franchise the wide receiver. Per Schefter, if the Bengals want him back, they'll attempt to sign Houshmandzadeh to a long-term deal.During the Eagles' now infamous tie with the Bengals last season, Houshmandzadeh caught 12 balls for 149 yards and a touchdown."Did you watch the Eagles and the Bengals game during the season? I was just giving Andy Reid, I was giving him an interview in person," Houshmandzadeh said. "That's all I was doing. I was giving him a three-month interview ahead of time. That's all."Now before you go e-mailing your friends and telling them that the Eagles are going to sign Houshmandzadeh, keep in mind that he's making the rounds. He also spoke to a Chicago radio station yesterday, and actually praised Rex Grossman."You know what's funny, man? Y'all probably going to laugh at me when I tell you this; I kind of like Rex Grossman," he said.The free-agency signing period starts on Feb. 27. Last week, Eagletarian listed the wide receivers available, and it's slim pickings behind Houshmandzadeh.
As an Eagles fan i'd love to see this happen but an OT or TE may be more of a priority. Should the Eagles pay big bucks to get Housh in here, how much do you think they should spend. I'd say if they can get him for 3 yrs for 21 mill that would be great but i'm not very market savy when it comes to the NFL.
 
I think the Eagles should focus on RB more than WR, but WR is also a concern with no legit #1 threat. Skipping over the Owens=Cancer stuff, that team did fantastically well when Owens opened up the offense by drawing double coverage. Right now, Westbrook is the only player that really warrants double coverage - and he's likely near the end of his productive career with yet more off-season knee surgery.

DeSean Jackson and TJ Housh would make a nice tandem going forward with guys like Curtis available as the WR3.

 
He'd be a great addition; a true #1 possession receiver to go alongside Jackson for next season with Curtis in the slot... but I agree - OT takes #1 priority, with RB 2nd IMO. RB I think they can/will address in the draft, and the Eagles have a TON of cap space. I think Eagles fans will have to wait and see what course of action Carolina takes w/ Peppers & Gross...

 
I rank the Eagles needs as such:

1) OT

2) TE

3) RB

4) WR

5) SS

With that said it be hard not to like what Housh bring to the table. If the price is right then I hope they can get him. Who is T.J.'s agent, if it's Rosenhaus forget about it. Antonio Bryant might be a cheaper option.

 
I rank the Eagles needs as such:

1) OT

2) TE

3) RB

4) WR

5) SS

With that said it be hard not to like what Housh bring to the table. If the price is right then I hope they can get him. Who is T.J.'s agent, if it's Rosenhaus forget about it. Antonio Bryant might be a cheaper option.
Brent Celek looked pretty good in the later portion of the season and the playoffs.
 
I think Eagles fans will have to wait and see what course of action Carolina takes w/ Peppers & Gross...
Kind of getting off topic but i'd sign Gross in a heartbeat, he's defintely the best at what will be available out there. I think Peppers, whether it's injuries or what, has lost a step. He's also mentioned he would perfer a 3-4 defensive scheme.
 
I rank the Eagles needs as such:

1) OT

2) TE

3) RB

4) WR

5) SS

With that said it be hard not to like what Housh bring to the table. If the price is right then I hope they can get him. Who is T.J.'s agent, if it's Rosenhaus forget about it. Antonio Bryant might be a cheaper option.
Brent Celek looked pretty good in the later portion of the season and the playoffs.
He looked good getting open and catching the ball, a Chad Lewis type of guy but he's a horrible blocker. They need some one with all around game, great offensive weapon but an efficent blocker. That's why I hope Pettigrew is there at 21 or they can swing a trade for Gonzo or if need be Kellen Winslow.
 
Housh is the perfect compliment to Smurf Jackson. My biggest concern of signing Housh would be do the Eagles have too much $ tied up at the WR position? They'll probably want to extend the Smurf before he gets too close to free agency, but not as long as Curtis is still on the team.

Something else that may hurt Housh this offseason, the glutton of WR talent entering the league, the struggling economy should be an issue too.

 
I rank the Eagles needs as such:1) OT2) TE3) RB4) WR5) SSWith that said it be hard not to like what Housh bring to the table. If the price is right then I hope they can get him. Who is T.J.'s agent, if it's Rosenhaus forget about it. Antonio Bryant might be a cheaper option.
I defintiely put the priority on OT & RB. If they deal for Gonzo that essentially fills needs @ TE & WR simultaneously - he's one of the few guys who is dynamic enough a receiver while being a good enough blocker.Housh certainly wouldn't hurt on top of that though.
 
I rank the Eagles needs as such:

1) OT

2) TE

3) RB

4) WR

5) SS

With that said it be hard not to like what Housh bring to the table. If the price is right then I hope they can get him. Who is T.J.'s agent, if it's Rosenhaus forget about it. Antonio Bryant might be a cheaper option.
Ahhh , mikell played more then fine and should be there for the forseeable future . FS might be a need if dawkins does not come back

 
From Philly.com

"If the Eagles are interested in me, let's put it like this. If they'll be interested in me, I'll be interested in them," he said when asked if the Eagles would be his top choice.
Translation: If they offer me the most money, I'll play in Philly.
:thumbup: The tread title is a serious stretch.

Sounds like if he was asked about a number of team's he would have said, ""If team X is interested in me, let's put it like this. If they'll be interested in me, I'll be interested in them," he said when asked if team X would be his top choice.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
There are going to be few good players in free agency.

There's also going to be a boatload of $$$$ for free agents. I forget what it was earlier exactly, but I did the math and it was about $400M for free agents across the league. That's huge.

Those who want to go wherever they want will be paid well - almost to the point of players like Housh, Ray Rice and Haynesworth just saying to their agents "get me $10M a year from a good team and let's sign". Teams like Detroit have little to no chance to get someone good.

As for Philly, the have lots of $ for free agents but so do many teams. I'd expect them to go after a true #1 WR and push the rest of the current roster down a notch on the depth chart. DeSean and Curtis may not be great WR1/WR2 material, but they're very good WR2/WR3 options. Avant at #4 also would be good.

The Eagles do need TE, RB and WR along with O-line. If they can address two of these with big free agent signings then they can draft the other two and look quite strong for 09 and beyond.

Imagine them with Housh, Gross and a rookie RB and TE drafted in Round 1?

 
Housh is a west coast guy who's family still lives there.

He'll land in either San Francisco or Seattle. My money's on the Niners.

That Philly talk is just the same kind of talk we hear every year during Pro Bowl week.

Players get together out there in Hawaii and start trying to recruit each other.

Interested in Philly? Sure, if the west coast plan falls thru.

 
Housh is the perfect compliment to Smurf Jackson. My biggest concern of signing Housh would be do the Eagles have too much $ tied up at the WR position? They'll probably want to extend the Smurf before he gets too close to free agency, but not as long as Curtis is still on the team.Something else that may hurt Housh this offseason, the glutton of WR talent entering the league, the struggling economy should be an issue too.
How much will it cost us to dump Brown? What a waste that guy is.
 
Housh is the perfect compliment to Smurf Jackson. My biggest concern of signing Housh would be do the Eagles have too much $ tied up at the WR position? They'll probably want to extend the Smurf before he gets too close to free agency, but not as long as Curtis is still on the team.Something else that may hurt Housh this offseason, the glutton of WR talent entering the league, the struggling economy should be an issue too.
How much will it cost us to dump Brown? What a waste that guy is.
Apparently if he's on the team he will count $3M on the cap but if cut or traded he'll count $5.8M
 
Housh is the perfect compliment to Smurf Jackson. My biggest concern of signing Housh would be do the Eagles have too much $ tied up at the WR position? They'll probably want to extend the Smurf before he gets too close to free agency, but not as long as Curtis is still on the team.Something else that may hurt Housh this offseason, the glutton of WR talent entering the league, the struggling economy should be an issue too.
How much will it cost us to dump Brown? What a waste that guy is.
Reggie Brown will stick around because he's cheap.2009 pricetag is $644K.2010 is $1M2011 is $1.2M2012 is $1.6M2013 is when he'd likely be cut for his salary at $3M.He signed a 5-year extension in Nov. 2006 that had $10M guaranteed, including a $9M signing bonus. They won't want to accelerate that.If 2010 is uncapped, that'd be an out.
 
Jeff Pasquino said:
GoBirds said:
Housh is the perfect compliment to Smurf Jackson. My biggest concern of signing Housh would be do the Eagles have too much $ tied up at the WR position? They'll probably want to extend the Smurf before he gets too close to free agency, but not as long as Curtis is still on the team.Something else that may hurt Housh this offseason, the glutton of WR talent entering the league, the struggling economy should be an issue too.
How much will it cost us to dump Brown? What a waste that guy is.
Reggie Brown will stick around because he's cheap.2009 pricetag is $644K.2010 is $1M2011 is $1.2M2012 is $1.6M2013 is when he'd likely be cut for his salary at $3M.He signed a 5-year extension in Nov. 2006 that had $10M guaranteed, including a $9M signing bonus. They won't want to accelerate that.If 2010 is uncapped, that'd be an out.
I thought we signed him to a bigger deal than that in the $30M range.......Thank God! ;)
 
Housh is a west coast guy who's family still lives there.He'll land in either San Francisco or Seattle. My money's on the Niners.
neither of those teams are ready to win now, so I think the Eagles still have a shot...considering the 9ers have so many holes to fill, I can't imagine they'd break the bank for a WR with Morgan and Hill both waiting in the wings...
 
There are going to be few good players in free agency.There's also going to be a boatload of $$$$ for free agents. I forget what it was earlier exactly, but I did the math and it was about $400M for free agents across the league. That's huge.Those who want to go wherever they want will be paid well - almost to the point of players like Housh, Ray Rice and Haynesworth just saying to their agents "get me $10M a year from a good team and let's sign". Teams like Detroit have little to no chance to get someone good.As for Philly, the have lots of $ for free agents but so do many teams. I'd expect them to go after a true #1 WR and push the rest of the current roster down a notch on the depth chart. DeSean and Curtis may not be great WR1/WR2 material, but they're very good WR2/WR3 options. Avant at #4 also would be good.The Eagles do need TE, RB and WR along with O-line. If they can address two of these with big free agent signings then they can draft the other two and look quite strong for 09 and beyond.Imagine them with Housh, Gross and a rookie RB and TE drafted in Round 1?
I'd much prefer Housh, Gross, Gonzo, a RB & a OL. They need more youth at OL.
 
As an Eagles homer, you have to break it down.

I feel it should be like this:

Priorities in Free Agency

1. WR

2. Right Tackle

3. CB (for the nickel)

4. Replace Considine on special teams

Priorities in the Draft

1. OT

2. Safety

3. RB

4. OLB

 
I'm probably in the minority here, but I don't think he's much of an upgrade. What's so great about 9.8 ypr? Avant showed he can be a pretty solid possession guy, and I still think Baskett can turn into a threat in the redzone. I don't really see how Housh fits at all, and I certainly wouldn't call him a #1.

Agree with the rest of the thread that #1 priority is OL. I'm still holding out hope Andrews plays again, but if he doesn't and they lose Runyan and Tra, that line could be a mess. Would like to see them get a RB and a taller CB in the draft as well.

 
I think the Eagles should focus on RB more than WR, but WR is also a concern with no legit #1 threat. Skipping over the Owens=Cancer stuff, that team did fantastically well when Owens opened up the offense by drawing double coverage. Right now, Westbrook is the only player that really warrants double coverage - and he's likely near the end of his productive career with yet more off-season knee surgery.DeSean Jackson and TJ Housh would make a nice tandem going forward with guys like Curtis available as the WR3.
They can draft a RB and get instant production. WRs usually take more time so buying a WR like Housh would be well worth the money. Other than the one year of TO McNabb has never had a top notch WR to catch his throws. Give him a weapon like Housh and the Eagles will be much harder to beat. Jackson is a good slot guy, but he is not a featured WR. Curtis is a good WR2. Brown sucks. They need a WR1. Pay Housh.
 
I'm probably in the minority here, but I don't think he's much of an upgrade. What's so great about 9.8 ypr? Avant showed he can be a pretty solid possession guy, and I still think Baskett can turn into a threat in the redzone. I don't really see how Housh fits at all, and I certainly wouldn't call him a #1. Agree with the rest of the thread that #1 priority is OL. I'm still holding out hope Andrews plays again, but if he doesn't and they lose Runyan and Tra, that line could be a mess. Would like to see them get a RB and a taller CB in the draft as well.
i tend to agree that i don't think housh is the answer. i like him, but i don't see him putting us over the top. i might be more inclined to make a run at ocho cinco if he's available.let's improve on the OL and at RB. can't someone teach celek to block? he's probably a good enough receiver that that would outweigh his negatives as a blocker. but i gotta believe he could improve if someone worked with him throughout the offseason.
 
The funny thing is, he said the same thing about the Bears in an interview with a Chicago show.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/footb...,0,191052.story

This is TJ making his rounds letting everyone know he is available and willing to play with a team that wants him. My guess is that he feels the Bengals don't "want" him bad enough (i.e. won't pay him enough in a long-term deal). By doing this, he gets a team to sign him to a nice FA deal, or he forces the Bengals hand in re-signing him or franchising him. He has already hinted about not showing up if they franchise him.

 
I'm probably in the minority here, but I don't think he's much of an upgrade. What's so great about 9.8 ypr? Avant showed he can be a pretty solid possession guy, and I still think Baskett can turn into a threat in the redzone. I don't really see how Housh fits at all, and I certainly wouldn't call him a #1. Agree with the rest of the thread that #1 priority is OL. I'm still holding out hope Andrews plays again, but if he doesn't and they lose Runyan and Tra, that line could be a mess. Would like to see them get a RB and a taller CB in the draft as well.
Did you just compare Avant and Baskett to Housh? I personally would rather have Boldin and expect neither one but Housh is no upgrade over Baskett and Avant? Are you friggin' kidding me? :thumbup:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I rank the Eagles needs as such:

1) OT

2) TE

3) RB

4) WR

5) SS

With that said it be hard not to like what Housh bring to the table. If the price is right then I hope they can get him. Who is T.J.'s agent, if it's Rosenhaus forget about it. Antonio Bryant might be a cheaper option.
Ahhh , mikell played more then fine and should be there for the forseeable future . FS might be a need if dawkins does not come back
Yes that was a mistake, Free Safety is the need, Mikell is fine there.
 
I'm probably in the minority here, but I don't think he's much of an upgrade. What's so great about 9.8 ypr? Avant showed he can be a pretty solid possession guy, and I still think Baskett can turn into a threat in the redzone. I don't really see how Housh fits at all, and I certainly wouldn't call him a #1. Agree with the rest of the thread that #1 priority is OL. I'm still holding out hope Andrews plays again, but if he doesn't and they lose Runyan and Tra, that line could be a mess. Would like to see them get a RB and a taller CB in the draft as well.
i tend to agree that i don't think housh is the answer. i like him, but i don't see him putting us over the top. i might be more inclined to make a run at ocho cinco if he's available.
I think I'd rather have Housh then Chad Johnson, the guy is TO 2.0 But when he is healthy he can produce. His numbers were only slightly worse then Housh's in '07 but career wise he's better then Housh.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm probably in the minority here, but I don't think he's much of an upgrade. What's so great about 9.8 ypr? Avant showed he can be a pretty solid possession guy, and I still think Baskett can turn into a threat in the redzone. I don't really see how Housh fits at all, and I certainly wouldn't call him a #1. Agree with the rest of the thread that #1 priority is OL. I'm still holding out hope Andrews plays again, but if he doesn't and they lose Runyan and Tra, that line could be a mess. Would like to see them get a RB and a taller CB in the draft as well.
Did you just compare Avant and Baskett to Housh? I personally would rather have Boldin and expect neither one but Housh is no upgrade over Baskett and Avant? Are you friggin' kidding me? :goodposting:
Baskett and Avant are very similar to Housh in that they have good hands and are willing to fight for catches. Are they comparable to housh? Probably not. I am a big fan of TJ and have been for many years, but his talent comes with the caveat that he has had Chad Johnson lining up opposite from him his entire career. I don't care what anyone says about who's the #1 on that team, or who is Palmers favorite, blah blah blah. Having Johnson as your complementary WR will make you a better player. Period. Put Housh on a team where his complement is not Moss, Andre, TO, Fitz, SSmith or Chad and I think he produces 60-70% of what he did in Cincy. Just sayin. Also, I've been complaining about them not getting Baskett more involved all season. It seems like the kid makes every grab, he's tall enough to be effective on the fade route (if we ever ran one.) I can't believe I am saying this but I see many more weaknesses in our team and even just our offense that warrant attention before WRs. I guess what I am saying is that "our WRs are good enough" :boxing:
 
Housh is a west coast guy who's family still lives there.He'll land in either San Francisco or Seattle. My money's on the Niners.
neither of those teams are ready to win now, so I think the Eagles still have a shot...considering the 9ers have so many holes to fill, I can't imagine they'd break the bank for a WR with Morgan and Hill both waiting in the wings...
Not too mention that they want to be a ball control, run first offense and already have a Housh in Isaac Bruce. Bruce has seen his better days but is still an effctive possession WR to lead the young corp.
 
I'm probably in the minority here, but I don't think he's much of an upgrade. What's so great about 9.8 ypr? Avant showed he can be a pretty solid possession guy, and I still think Baskett can turn into a threat in the redzone. I don't really see how Housh fits at all, and I certainly wouldn't call him a #1.

Agree with the rest of the thread that #1 priority is OL. I'm still holding out hope Andrews plays again, but if he doesn't and they lose Runyan and Tra, that line could be a mess. Would like to see them get a RB and a taller CB in the draft as well.
Did you just compare Avant and Baskett to Housh? I personally would rather have Boldin and expect neither one but Housh is no upgrade over Baskett and Avant? Are you friggin' kidding me? :headbang:
Baskett and Avant are very similar to Housh in that they have good hands and are willing to fight for catches. Are they comparable to housh? Probably not. I am a big fan of TJ and have been for many years, but his talent comes with the caveat that he has had Chad Johnson lining up opposite from him his entire career. I don't care what anyone says about who's the #1 on that team, or who is Palmers favorite, blah blah blah. Having Johnson as your complementary WR will make you a better player. Period. Put Housh on a team where his complement is not Moss, Andre, TO, Fitz, SSmith or Chad and I think he produces 60-70% of what he did in Cincy. Just sayin. Also, I've been complaining about them not getting Baskett more involved all season. It seems like the kid makes every grab, he's tall enough to be effective on the fade route (if we ever ran one.) I can't believe I am saying this but I see many more weaknesses in our team and even just our offense that warrant attention before WRs. I guess what I am saying is that "our WRs are good enough" :X
:thumbup: I love Housh, but I'm not 100% convinced that he's a stud #1 in his own right. Philly may not have the flashiest WR corps in the NFL, but it's certainly one of the deepest. Even Lewis is generally under=appreciated by Philly fans (IE: He's much better then most team's #5/6!!!!!!!!) OT and RB are MUCH bigger concerns. TE/S should also be bigger priorities.

 
I'm probably in the minority here, but I don't think he's much of an upgrade. What's so great about 9.8 ypr? Avant showed he can be a pretty solid possession guy, and I still think Baskett can turn into a threat in the redzone. I don't really see how Housh fits at all, and I certainly wouldn't call him a #1. Agree with the rest of the thread that #1 priority is OL. I'm still holding out hope Andrews plays again, but if he doesn't and they lose Runyan and Tra, that line could be a mess. Would like to see them get a RB and a taller CB in the draft as well.
Did you just compare Avant and Baskett to Housh? I personally would rather have Boldin and expect neither one but Housh is no upgrade over Baskett and Avant? Are you friggin' kidding me? :popcorn:
Indeed I did. Housh is better than each of them individually. He's probably better than the two of them if you use each of them to their strengths. However, he's nowhere near that much better to consider paying mega bucks. Housh has a fun name to say, and he has excellent hands, but I don't think he's a special WR and I wouldn't consider him a #1 (by the Eagles fans' definition). If you see him differently, I'd like to hear what it was that you liked so much about him. These aren't the 2002 Eagles. They have lots of talent at WR now. Boldin is a special talent, significantly better than the other guys on their team, but his injury history would scare me away. Again, I would pour all my $$ into the o-line if I were them.
 
Housh is a west coast guy who's family still lives there.He'll land in either San Francisco or Seattle.
This is exactly what Michael Smith said yesterday. Hard to know if he was being anything more than polite/political. hedging his bets, etc, about the Eagles, but I'd be happy if he went there.
 
If you guys bring in a solid OT and RB, Avant will be able to give you the same thing Housh can.
I don't know about that, Avant is turning in to a nice short yardage catching machine but I don't think he's gonig to reach numbers that Housh compiles.
 
CentralPA said:
harryhood said:
If you guys bring in a solid OT and RB, Avant will be able to give you the same thing Housh can.
I don't know about that, Avant is turning in to a nice short yardage catching machine but I don't think he's gonig to reach numbers that Housh compiles.
If TJ played in philly he wouldn't reach those #'s either. In Cincy he was option #1 or #2 on every play. The way philly spreads the ball around that just woudn't be so. I also don't think people write off Reggie Brown just yet (from an earlier post). People were ready for him to break out just two years ago, funny how the pendulum swings. The guy had 3 pretty productive years here. Once he started with the hamstring problems, I figured that this year would be lost. That happens to so many WRs. He really needs to improve his concentration, but I'm not ready to cut the guy just yet. I wouldn't be surprised if he finished next year as the 2nd or 3rd best WR on the team. I think people need to stop talking about this position as a weakness on this team. When you consider talent, youth, and depth - they are pretty scary. Player--Age--Best year statsJackson 22 62/912/2.5Curtis 30 77/1110/6Brown 28 47/816/8Avant 25 32/377/2Baskett 26 33/440/3And they signed Danny Amendola to the practice squad, who everyone was gaga over. I think it stacks up pretty nicely for the next few years, all things considered.
 
I am one who doesn't want Housh. He's too old to lock yourself in for 4 years. And I really think Avant is good enough to get the job done as the possession reciever.

 
CentralPA said:
harryhood said:
If you guys bring in a solid OT and RB, Avant will be able to give you the same thing Housh can.
I don't know about that, Avant is turning in to a nice short yardage catching machine but I don't think he's gonig to reach numbers that Housh compiles.
If TJ played in philly he wouldn't reach those #'s either. In Cincy he was option #1 or #2 on every play. The way philly spreads the ball around that just woudn't be so. I also don't think people write off Reggie Brown just yet (from an earlier post). People were ready for him to break out just two years ago, funny how the pendulum swings. The guy had 3 pretty productive years here. Once he started with the hamstring problems, I figured that this year would be lost. That happens to so many WRs. He really needs to improve his concentration, but I'm not ready to cut the guy just yet. I wouldn't be surprised if he finished next year as the 2nd or 3rd best WR on the team. I think people need to stop talking about this position as a weakness on this team. When you consider talent, youth, and depth - they are pretty scary. Player--Age--Best year statsJackson 22 62/912/2.5Curtis 30 77/1110/6Brown 28 47/816/8Avant 25 32/377/2Baskett 26 33/440/3And they signed Danny Amendola to the practice squad, who everyone was gaga over. I think it stacks up pretty nicely for the next few years, all things considered.
I can't see Reggie Brown getting cut. He would be a bigger cap hit to cut then to keep him around.
 
harryhood said:
If you guys bring in a solid OT and RB, Avant will be able to give you the same thing Housh can.
What is Westbrook?
The steal of next year's fantasy draft if the Eagles get their Oline issues sorted out. He was banged up most of the year (the chronic knee is an issue) but let's not forget that he lost a Pro Boel guard in week 2 who is probably the best pulling guard in the league and both Runyan and Thomas started showing their age. The Eagles need a young back who is better than Westbrook in short yardage and who can get some experience while helping to reduce the need for Westbrook to have so many touches.
 
If you guys bring in a solid OT and RB, Avant will be able to give you the same thing Housh can.
What is Westbrook?
Amen brother...I'm trying to figure out why the Philly guys are putting a fork in this guy already. Were these the same guys that dumped CMart and Tiki a couple years too early? 30 is not the ceiling anymore. He will not turn 30 till the first month of next season. He has a season if not two of top flight football left. Teams don't often draft top flight RB's to ride the pine...Particularly with a vet RB early on into a big contract. In before the Priest Holmes/LJ posts. That is by no means the norm...
 
Philly may not have the flashiest WR corps in the NFL, but it's certainly one of the deepest. Even Lewis is generally under=appreciated by Philly fans (IE: He's much better then most team's #5/6!!!!!!!!)
No he's not and no they aren't.I think you're being a bit of a homer here. I'm sure I could search here and link to a slew of Eagle fans that wanted Lewis off the team.

By making a team, making a poor WR corps, does not make them deep. If they were a good WR corp Pinkston or Lewis wouldn't be on the team. IIRC Pinkston went on to get cut by every team he tried out for which could also be worded as the Eagles were the only team he could make and he actually started for them too.

Desean looks good but they probably asked him to do too much as a rook.

Curtis is a fine veteran but probably more of a complimentary type.

Baskett and Avant are fine "players for tomorrow".

Eagles are totally missing a top WR here to put it all in place. Don't you think it'd mesh up so much better?

Housh is a number 1 WR because of what he can do when the play is broken down in any fashion. Come back for the ball, "go up and get it", block, layout or stretch and catch a poorly thrown ball. He's got some fight to him when that ball is in the air. McNabb throws a bunch of head scratchers. Housh would aid that alot.

 
If you guys bring in a solid OT and RB, Avant will be able to give you the same thing Housh can.
What is Westbrook?
Amen brother...I'm trying to figure out why the Philly guys are putting a fork in this guy already. Were these the same guys that dumped CMart and Tiki a couple years too early? 30 is not the ceiling anymore. He will not turn 30 till the first month of next season. He has a season if not two of top flight football left. Teams don't often draft top flight RB's to ride the pine...Particularly with a vet RB early on into a big contract. In before the Priest Holmes/LJ posts. That is by no means the norm...
A solid RB doesnt mean throwing out Westbrook(eagle fans are getting a little riled up these days when talking about their team) and overhauling the running game. But a backup plan for when he does miss that collection of games would be nice wouldn't it?Think of it as a "turner" to your LT. Someone who can take over when Westbrook goes down.

As a Giants fan I am more than happy if you don't address the RB position in the off season.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top