I agree with this.Ocho did fine with Housh on the same field for a few years. The big issue for Johnson is the status of Palmer. IMO, Coles addition really won't impact COC's numbers much.
From 2003 - 2007, Johnson ranked 3,9,4,4,6. Last year, he and his starting QB were both hurt. Johnson missed 3 games altogether and the rest of the time was playing with one good shoulder. Do you really think at 31 he's fallen so far so fast that he won't rank in the Top 50?I'm not guaranteeing that he's a lock for the Top 10, but I think he's a decent candidate that will come at a discount next season.I don't have the high expectations of others.I view Cinco as a very inconsistent FF option,top 10 is a big reach, imo.Let's look a his last 2 seasons fantasywise.2007 - with Carson Palmer2008 - without Carson Palmer2007 - after coming out like a house on fire putting up 16, 38 and 19 FF points,he only put up double digit FF points in 3 of his final 13 games. His final numberslooked solid : 93 Rec / 1440 YDs / 8 TDs, but he was the model of inconsistency.2008 - two games all season with double digit FF points. 53 Rec / 540 YDs / 4 TDs.Based on the past 2 seasons I would not get too excited about this guy.I don't view a player who puts up 19-25 FF points one week then disappearsfor a month or longer as a viable FF option.Will he garner more attention from defensive secondaries with Coles lined upon the other side rather than TJ ? I really don't see a huge difference as to how opposing teams will game plan for him, and I don't see a whole lot of FF improvement for Cinco in 2009..
Heck yea he'll be top 50.My point with the numbers is to show his lack of consistency,and I believe consistency across the board is what wins FF championships.From 2003 - 2007, Johnson ranked 3,9,4,4,6. Last year, he and his starting QB were both hurt. Johnson missed 3 games altogether and the rest of the time was playing with one good shoulder. Do you really think at 31 he's fallen so far so fast that he won't rank in the Top 50?I'm not guaranteeing that he's a lock for the Top 10, but I think he's a decent candidate that will come at a discount next season.I don't have the high expectations of others.I view Cinco as a very inconsistent FF option,top 10 is a big reach, imo.Let's look a his last 2 seasons fantasywise.2007 - with Carson Palmer2008 - without Carson Palmer2007 - after coming out like a house on fire putting up 16, 38 and 19 FF points,he only put up double digit FF points in 3 of his final 13 games. His final numberslooked solid : 93 Rec / 1440 YDs / 8 TDs, but he was the model of inconsistency.2008 - two games all season with double digit FF points. 53 Rec / 540 YDs / 4 TDs.Based on the past 2 seasons I would not get too excited about this guy.I don't view a player who puts up 19-25 FF points one week then disappearsfor a month or longer as a viable FF option.Will he garner more attention from defensive secondaries with Coles lined upon the other side rather than TJ ? I really don't see a huge difference as to how opposing teams will game plan for him, and I don't see a whole lot of FF improvement for Cinco in 2009..
He'll be a good value, but more as someone taken as a WR3 (i.e. WR 25-36) that turns into WR 20...he won't be THAT good...just no way regardless of Palmer's status.mggoilers said:If Palmer is healthy, Ocho is back in the top 10.He should be healthy after ankle surgeries, and a cleaned up shoulder.He is going to be a great value in 2009.
Just curious, but why would you say his upside is WR 20? He's been top 10 several times, and if he and Palmer are healthy what will knock him down so many spots?He'll be a good value, but more as someone taken as a WR3 (i.e. WR 25-36) that turns into WR 20...he won't be THAT good...just no way regardless of Palmer's status.mggoilers said:If Palmer is healthy, Ocho is back in the top 10.He should be healthy after ankle surgeries, and a cleaned up shoulder.He is going to be a great value in 2009.
Honestly...it is a hunch. Why did Pickens and Herman Moore peter out by age 30 when Rod Smith and Jerry Rice went on to be productive in their mid 30s?? Work ethic? I would put CJ in with the former group there (is he some crazed workout warrior...I have not heard so)...Injuries? Neither Moore or Pickens had major injuries (ala Curtis Martin or Al Toon) that forced them to retire...they just broke down and I think CJ is breaking down. Now that process can appear to be stalled when considering surrounding talent, but who is going to draw attention away from CJ? Their stellar RB? Their stellar TE? Coles will make a living on 80 catches 900 yards and 4-5 TDs...God knows what CJ will walk away with. I think Top 20 is pretty fair. Not to mention they have Caldwell, Simpson and Henry chomping at the bit if either Coles or CJ show the slightest sign of getting long in the tooth.Just curious, but why would you say his upside is WR 20? He's been top 10 several times, and if he and Palmer are healthy what will knock him down so many spots?He'll be a good value, but more as someone taken as a WR3 (i.e. WR 25-36) that turns into WR 20...he won't be THAT good...just no way regardless of Palmer's status.mggoilers said:If Palmer is healthy, Ocho is back in the top 10.He should be healthy after ankle surgeries, and a cleaned up shoulder.He is going to be a great value in 2009.
Fair enough. I'll respectfully disagree but you put forth a good argument, though I'm not sure Caldwell/Simpson/Henry have proved they're ready to step into a starting role yet.Honestly...it is a hunch. Why did Pickens and Herman Moore peter out by age 30 when Rod Smith and Jerry Rice went on to be productive in their mid 30s?? Work ethic? I would put CJ in with the former group there (is he some crazed workout warrior...I have not heard so)...Injuries? Neither Moore or Pickens had major injuries (ala Curtis Martin or Al Toon) that forced them to retire...they just broke down and I think CJ is breaking down. Now that process can appear to be stalled when considering surrounding talent, but who is going to draw attention away from CJ? Their stellar RB? Their stellar TE? Coles will make a living on 80 catches 900 yards and 4-5 TDs...God knows what CJ will walk away with. I think Top 20 is pretty fair. Not to mention they have Caldwell, Simpson and Henry chomping at the bit if either Coles or CJ show the slightest sign of getting long in the tooth.Just curious, but why would you say his upside is WR 20? He's been top 10 several times, and if he and Palmer are healthy what will knock him down so many spots?He'll be a good value, but more as someone taken as a WR3 (i.e. WR 25-36) that turns into WR 20...he won't be THAT good...just no way regardless of Palmer's status.mggoilers said:If Palmer is healthy, Ocho is back in the top 10.He should be healthy after ankle surgeries, and a cleaned up shoulder.He is going to be a great value in 2009.
Good assessment. One more factor is Palmer and TJ were buddies, I see more balls going 85's way with Coles than with TJ.Housh > ColesHoush = threatColes = nice complimentCJ's value increases here.
Pickens was nowhere near the receiver Johnson has been. He had 3 good years. Moore's career ended with injuries. He didn't peter out. He completely fell apart due to injury.Honestly...it is a hunch. Why did Pickens and Herman Moore peter out by age 30 when Rod Smith and Jerry Rice went on to be productive in their mid 30s?? Work ethic? I would put CJ in with the former group there (is he some crazed workout warrior...I have not heard so)...Injuries? Neither Moore or Pickens had major injuries (ala Curtis Martin or Al Toon) that forced them to retire...they just broke down and I think CJ is breaking down. Now that process can appear to be stalled when considering surrounding talent, but who is going to draw attention away from CJ? Their stellar RB? Their stellar TE? Coles will make a living on 80 catches 900 yards and 4-5 TDs...God knows what CJ will walk away with. I think Top 20 is pretty fair. Not to mention they have Caldwell, Simpson and Henry chomping at the bit if either Coles or CJ show the slightest sign of getting long in the tooth.Just curious, but why would you say his upside is WR 20? He's been top 10 several times, and if he and Palmer are healthy what will knock him down so many spots?He'll be a good value, but more as someone taken as a WR3 (i.e. WR 25-36) that turns into WR 20...he won't be THAT good...just no way regardless of Palmer's status.mggoilers said:If Palmer is healthy, Ocho is back in the top 10.He should be healthy after ankle surgeries, and a cleaned up shoulder.He is going to be a great value in 2009.
Agree, but the other issue is the line. Even when Palmer was playing, the line didn't allow enough time for Johnson to run his routes. Palmer never had a chance to throw to Johnson. Only 22 targets during those 4 games that Palmer played.Ocho did fine with Housh on the same field for a few years. The big issue for Johnson is the status of Palmer. IMO, Coles addition really won't impact COC's numbers much.
Someone (Drinen?) did a study that showed that game-to-game inconsistency doesn't last. The sample size is so small that it's not useful information.Heck yea he'll be top 50.My point with the numbers is to show his lack of consistency,and I believe consistency across the board is what wins FF championships.