I can't believe this thread is still going. It's even harder to believe the crazy subthemes that have developed (Happy marriages defined; Did Joe sexually harass Suzy?). To get back to the original question, Joe appeared pretty drunk from the get-go. His answer to Suzy's first question made it clear he was drunk, even without the "kiss" comment. Despite this, after a play on the field, the announcers went back to Suzy so she could ask a second question. Maybe nobody knew before the interview that Joe was drunk. But once his first answer removed all doubt, Suzy should have ended the interview right there in a professional manner, without any acknowledgement of Joe's dopey behavior. For whatever reason, she did not. Thus, Joe was given further opportunity to embarrass himself and he took full advantage of that opportunity. Maybe Suzy had planned for a lengthier interview and so ESPN could be correct when it said they cut it because of Joe. So, to sum up, Joe acted like a drunken a##, Suzy used poor judgment in asking a follow-up question, Joe didn't sexually harrass Suzy, he just embarassed himself, and I am glad he did as I found the segment to be freaking hilarious. I don't care for sideline interviews in general but I absolutely hate them when they happen during action on the field. At least this one provided entertainment.