Archer
Footballguy
I am surprised that so many people are starting to say Calvin's value is declining, that he only has a few elite years left. My question is, what do we base that assessment off of? By all accounts, Calvin is the ultimate pro. He keeps himself in shape year round, he never gets into trouble, and he absolutely loves the game. I see him similar to the way I view Larry Fitzgerald, Reggie Wayne, and even Jerry Rice. These guys are/were all about football, all year long.
Rice played at a high level until his mid to late 30s. Wayne is still playing at a high level, as is Fitz (although his QB issues have hurt him recently) Even Boldin is a good example, the top end speed is gone, but he's still tough, has great hands, and runs routes beautifully. He still is a very good receiver.
Is there any reason to think Calvin won't still be dominant until at least his mid 30s? Even when he starts to lose a step one day, he runs every route there is, has the height and vertical jump to catch a ton of balls and cause problems for most DBs in the league, and he's motivated to get that SB ring. He also might be the best WR that has ever played in the NFL. That should count for something.
Seems to me he's got at least 5+ years of elite football left. Would most agree with that? If so, why start treating him like he's on the decline? And if the consensus is that he's trending down, why does anyone keep RBs past the age of 25? Because most will be done by the time they are 30, if not sooner.
Rice played at a high level until his mid to late 30s. Wayne is still playing at a high level, as is Fitz (although his QB issues have hurt him recently) Even Boldin is a good example, the top end speed is gone, but he's still tough, has great hands, and runs routes beautifully. He still is a very good receiver.
Is there any reason to think Calvin won't still be dominant until at least his mid 30s? Even when he starts to lose a step one day, he runs every route there is, has the height and vertical jump to catch a ton of balls and cause problems for most DBs in the league, and he's motivated to get that SB ring. He also might be the best WR that has ever played in the NFL. That should count for something.
Seems to me he's got at least 5+ years of elite football left. Would most agree with that? If so, why start treating him like he's on the decline? And if the consensus is that he's trending down, why does anyone keep RBs past the age of 25? Because most will be done by the time they are 30, if not sooner.