How to adjust for leagues with 1 RB, 1 WR and 2 RB/WR Flex (1 Viewer)

[djcolts]

This is a question for leagues with 2 flex positions (RB/WR) and 1 RB and 1 WR starting slots.

My thinking is to get a combined list of RBs and WRs, and basically do a 4 * (number of teams in the league) list of total projection points for each player, and then do a VBD for the top 4*(league size)players by point, using the combine lists 4*(league size) player as a baseline. Making sure to get at least 1 WR and 1 RB out of this list - and get lots of value out of the top 4*(league size) list. Does this sound right?

 

[Jayrod]

This is a question for leagues with 2 flex positions (RB/WR) and 1 RB and 1 WR starting slots. My thinking is to get a combined list of RBs and WRs, and basically do a 4 * (number of teams in the league) list of total projection points for each player, and then do a VBD for the top 4*(league size)players by point, using the combine lists 4*(league size) player as a baseline. Making sure to get at least 1 WR and 1 RB out of this list - and get lots of value out of the top 4*(league size) list. Does this sound right?

Yes.I am in a league that is like this and that is exactly how I did it. Our scoring is actually receiving heavy, so I figured that out of all of the starters available (48), it went about 20-28 in favor of receivers. Basically saying that what are normally high end WR3 guys are now starting quality flex players.With this structure it makes much more sense to group your RB's & WR's together as one position...just be careful not to ignore either position entirely.