cheese
Footballguy
Quick disclaimer. I use FBG rankings and very much respect the people putting in the work.
One guy that I think everyone is having an impossible time ranking is Achane. The issue that makes him hard is if you try to really project out the Dolphins snaps/touches/yards/TDs, it's basically impossible to rank him highly by math. From what I can tell, FBG has decided to just stick to the projection. The default rankings for the site show him RB15 where I'm looking, slightly behind guys like RWhite and Kamara. I clicked into some rankers lists to see if their actual rankings list show something different than the projections and, just for example, Matt Waldman has him behind Austin Ekeler. Maybe that's right, but that's an extreme ranking. You could play 50 home leagues and 50 best ball leagues and never get Achane once if you really rank him RB17. He's RB16 on the top300. In most drafts he goes around R2, something like RB9 and I don't know that I've ever seen him go after some of these guys. Again, maybe that's the point. Maybe it's right.
So I have a few questions for the Shark Pool.
How do you handle players that almost everyone would agree has league winning upside based on efficiency/talent/situation, but the volume just won't let the math rank him there?
How do you avoid drafting a "boring" team without ignoring projections? I am a math/analytics guy by nature. I don't feel comfortable drafting on gut or that I know better. With that said, if you base everything on projections, don't you just land with all the empty volume guys with very little upside?
Are you guys using the "upside" and "downside" bars on the rankings?
I personally believe the projection on Achane to just be wrong, but I also think it's more indicative of some bigger questions. There are certain guys every year that you already know can break fantasy football. Achane can be the RB1 and I wouldn't be all that surprised. So can the projection be correct, and the ranking be way wrong at the same time?
One guy that I think everyone is having an impossible time ranking is Achane. The issue that makes him hard is if you try to really project out the Dolphins snaps/touches/yards/TDs, it's basically impossible to rank him highly by math. From what I can tell, FBG has decided to just stick to the projection. The default rankings for the site show him RB15 where I'm looking, slightly behind guys like RWhite and Kamara. I clicked into some rankers lists to see if their actual rankings list show something different than the projections and, just for example, Matt Waldman has him behind Austin Ekeler. Maybe that's right, but that's an extreme ranking. You could play 50 home leagues and 50 best ball leagues and never get Achane once if you really rank him RB17. He's RB16 on the top300. In most drafts he goes around R2, something like RB9 and I don't know that I've ever seen him go after some of these guys. Again, maybe that's the point. Maybe it's right.
So I have a few questions for the Shark Pool.
How do you handle players that almost everyone would agree has league winning upside based on efficiency/talent/situation, but the volume just won't let the math rank him there?
How do you avoid drafting a "boring" team without ignoring projections? I am a math/analytics guy by nature. I don't feel comfortable drafting on gut or that I know better. With that said, if you base everything on projections, don't you just land with all the empty volume guys with very little upside?
Are you guys using the "upside" and "downside" bars on the rankings?
I personally believe the projection on Achane to just be wrong, but I also think it's more indicative of some bigger questions. There are certain guys every year that you already know can break fantasy football. Achane can be the RB1 and I wouldn't be all that surprised. So can the projection be correct, and the ranking be way wrong at the same time?