What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

How's your housing market? (3 Viewers)

Columbus, OH - my realtor told me, lots of buyers but few houses. This is a question I asked my realtor and CPA but I know you guys are smarter than they are. Here's the background and questions:

We have lived in our house for almost six years. It was your classic foreclosure/fixer upper that gave us great equity immediately. Currently the market here in Cbus is booming. Since neither the wife nor I consider this our forever house, we have considered selling now, while the market is hot and getting an apartment  until we find our next good deal on a house. We probably could sell the house for 150-160k and have about 82k total into it and currently owe about 71k. 
 
So, first question: would we owe tax on that profit? We are under the impression that we would not, since we have lived here for over five years.
 
Second question: should we just keep paying our mortgage down and not worry about the market? Our house payment is about $100 less a month than our rent on an apartment  would be. A year ago, houses like ours were selling for 10-15k less than they currently are now. I know it's impossible to tell what the market will be in a year from now but we hate to miss out on this time of selling since we don't absolutely love the house.
 
Thoughts?
Columbus is an extremely affordable market nationally. It isn't at any kind of an extreme, in terms of median home prices vs. household incomes or median home prices vs. rents. But it also hasn't gone into the kind of downward spiral that the Rust Belt portions of the state have.

I wouldn't try to be too clever. You could try to pay off your mortgage a little faster, or save the extra money for a rainy day.

 
Do you have enough cash in the bank to put the down payment on your forever house without selling your current home?

As you noted, rents here (Columbus area) are high and are probably going up faster than home prices.  Paying premium rent with nothing back in return isn't ideal.  Should you stay (and can afford a down payment on your forever house), you still make out if the market takes a down turn.  Saving 15% on the forever house outweighs the 15% you may lose on your own sale.  Any rent paid is a complete loss.

ETA-obviously you don't have to have the down payment already available before the sale of your house, but if you do it makes things much easier on your end (and avoids contingencies in your offer which can be deal breakers)
Probably not for the forever house plus, Cbus is probably not our forever location. I do have enough for a small house and we are casually looking at some forecloses, short sales, fixer uppers that we may venture into and try to do what we did with this one again - sweat equity. 

 
I checked Zillow for my house. 

The city and zip code for the area have a steady slow climb up. My particular chart actually had a spike up about two years ago and then has been basically flat. :shrug:

The rent number keeps moving up though- which I like because most likely when we are ready to move, I will keep this house and rent it out. With a 3.25% 30 year fixed, it is something to take advantage of. If I could get what the Zillow rent is- then it is enough to pay PITI and have $1K a month in cash flow. For the first year, I would take the extra cash flow and put it in an account to cover repairs and any missing rent months. After that, prob put $100-500 in the account to keep it nice and ready and use the extra for whatever else. 

 
I checked Zillow for my house. 

The city and zip code for the area have a steady slow climb up. My particular chart actually had a spike up about two years ago and then has been basically flat. :shrug:

The rent number keeps moving up though- which I like because most likely when we are ready to move, I will keep this house and rent it out. With a 3.25% 30 year fixed, it is something to take advantage of. If I could get what the Zillow rent is- then it is enough to pay PITI and have $1K a month in cash flow. For the first year, I would take the extra cash flow and put it in an account to cover repairs and any missing rent months. After that, prob put $100-500 in the account to keep it nice and ready and use the extra for whatever else. 
I strongly urge you not to make decisions off of Zillow.  People are now suing Zillow because their estimates are so far off in most areas.  A local, large property management company should be able to give you the rents for any house or area.  GL

 
Where are all these buyers coming from?  All I see around me is more and more building, are a ton of people transitioning from apartments to houses?  Shouldn't the boomers dying off lead to more inventory?  I thought the economy sucked?  I just don't get it.

 
I strongly urge you not to make decisions off of Zillow.  People are now suing Zillow because their estimates are so far off in most areas.  A local, large property management company should be able to give you the rents for any house or area.  GL
Oh, I know Zillow is for crap on estimates. I have been in banking and lending for a long time and had to have way too many conversations with people about estimates and Zillow etc. To be fair, I really don't know how good Zillow is on rent estimates but from the value estimates, I would never trust it and make big decisions. We are no where near making any move right now so it is more about just seeing what is says and if I get serious about things I would do much more due diligence about a whole lot of things. From what I know, the rent does sound to be in the right neighborhood. Value estimate? No, not so much. It was about $15K low when we purchased back in 2012. I have not looked at comps much but there should be no real reason why the surrounding area has been on an increase while my property is flat.

 
Where are all these buyers coming from?  All I see around me is more and more building, are a ton of people transitioning from apartments to houses?  Shouldn't the boomers dying off lead to more inventory?  I thought the economy sucked?  I just don't get it.
80% of my biz is first timers.  I'm seeing a lot of 20-30 year old couples with young families.  Also seeing many that were crushed ten years ago finally getting back on their feet with their incomes and credit scores.  I have an incredible amount of leads of FB with people less than 50 points from being approved.  The boomers are also trading down as they become empty nesters.

ETA -  Rents are $200-300 higher per month than a mortgage on the same house.  That's the main driving theme.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Where are all these buyers coming from?  All I see around me is more and more building, are a ton of people transitioning from apartments to houses?  Shouldn't the boomers dying off lead to more inventory?  I thought the economy sucked?  I just don't get it.
My post a couple pages back:

Also, our largest generation is reaching home-buying age.

Population by age for July 1, 2015:




Age Population
0 3,978,038
1 3,968,564
2 3,966,583
3 3,974,061
4 4,020,035
5 4,018,158
6 4,019,207
7 4,148,360
8 4,167,887
9 4,133,564
10 4,121,289
11 4,130,328
12 4,101,021
13 4,084,306
14 4,185,386
15 4,249,742
16 4,184,296
17 4,194,286
18 4,217,995
19 4,262,584
20 4,363,440
21 4,456,790
22 4,529,472
23 4,652,266
24 4,737,345
25 4,729,564
26 4,544,416
27 4,439,766
28 4,364,669
29 4,383,139
30 4,417,209
31 4,278,233
32 4,343,614
33 4,341,754
34 4,294,838
35 4,379,404
36 4,108,775
37 4,028,403
38 3,987,141
39 3,870,862
40 3,989,839
41 3,865,228
42 3,924,258
43 4,100,708
44 4,335,165
45 4,389,345
46 4,160,573
47 4,073,685
48 4,077,689
49 4,152,552
50 4,400,288
51 4,479,664
52 4,474,344
53 4,463,494
54 4,516,527
55 4,553,385
56 4,399,120
57 4,371,245
58 4,320,522
59 4,163,670
60 4,125,792
61 3,954,601
62 3,801,935
63 3,651,393
64 3,536,156
65 3,450,043
66 3,344,134
67 3,304,187
68 3,436,357
69 2,532,747
70 2,492,490
71 2,421,191
72 2,469,605
73 2,146,052
74 1,953,711
75 1,839,823
76 1,722,041
77 1,639,085
78 1,500,813
79 1,422,071
80 1,351,196
81 1,201,044
82 1,148,948
83 1,082,562
84 1,015,591
85 957,023
86 846,081
87 774,639
88 689,755
89 596,847
90 523,034
91 440,318
92 360,659
93 293,806
94 233,118
95 174,011
96 122,887
97 92,377
98 61,991
99 43,641
100+ 76,974

Generation Y is larger than the Boomer Generation. Large numbers of first time buyers coming up the next several years. Then in about 10-12 years, people are going to be wondering where all the buyers are and the problem will be that we haven't been having enough kids. Immigration will be needed to grow the population enough.

 
Where are all these buyers coming from?  All I see around me is more and more building, are a ton of people transitioning from apartments to houses?  Shouldn't the boomers dying off lead to more inventory?  I thought the economy sucked?  I just don't get it.
Prices are going up because of an inventory problem, not because there are so many buyers.

There was a long downward trend in home ownership rates that started in around 2004 and finally started to reverse itself a year ago. We'll see if it continues to trend back up. See data on page 5

The percentage of households buying a home is finally back to its long-term trend line too.

But again, the main factor in the recent spike in prices is lack of inventory.

 
This is one of the main problems we are having in Canada right now.  There really are only 2 cities in Canada people want to live in right now, and this is especially true for the immigrants from Asia and the Middle East who are coming here in droves.   In addition (or perhaps in conjunction), Toronto and Vancouver are the only two cities seeing steady employment growth in the country.   I've seen many of my finance colleagues come back to Toronto from places like Calgary or Edmonton now that the oil and resource boom has become a bust.  We've also seen a sizable influx of Syrian refugees and rates remain low.   It has created the perfect storm for a massive housing bubble, and when Vancouver announced their foreign buyers tax last summer, that just blew the Toronto market sky high.  30% spike in prices pretty much overnight. Buddy of mine bought a townhouse in August for $780K.  In December, a similar unit a few doors down sold for $1 million.  It was insane.  

The province put in a new 16 point plan to cool off the market in April, and I've been hearing anecdotally that things are finally starting to turn.  A lot of supply has recently hit the market and buyers have been more hesitant due to the new regulations.  But even with all of that, we still have had situations like this.  So who knows for sure what will happen going forward.  One thing I feel confident in is that, as hot as it has been recently, the Seattle market is likely going to go hyperbolic next.  To me, it is the most logical destination now for Asian hot money to pile in to. 
I'm ~90 minutes outside of Toronto and they've gone crazy here too. Average price has increased from under 300k to over 400k in less than a year.

 
dgreen said:
My post a couple pages back:

Generation Y is larger than the Boomer Generation. Large numbers of first time buyers coming up the next several years. Then in about 10-12 years, people are going to be wondering where all the buyers are and the problem will be that we haven't been having enough kids. Immigration will be needed to grow the population enough.
Meeting I was in earlier this week threw out a number that was 75M millennial's between the ages of 20 and 36, about 15% more than the entirety of Gen X and about equal to Boomers. It had the next generation (some dumb marketing group has coined it the "Edge" generation) estimated at 74M.

 
Meeting I was in earlier this week threw out a number that was 75M millennial's between the ages of 20 and 36, about 15% more than the entirety of Gen X and about equal to Boomers. It had the next generation (some dumb marketing group has coined it the "Edge" generation) estimated at 74M.
I guess it depends on how many years are counted in a particular generation. Using the above 2015 data, age 20-36 would have been 18-34, which does sum to 75m. That's 17 years worth of ages. If we then look at ages 1-17 above to have an equal number of years, it's 70m with a downward trend. We aren't having enough babies and I've heard some predicting a depression in the early 2030s with these demographics being part of the reason.

 
I guess it depends on how many years are counted in a particular generation. Using the above 2015 data, age 20-36 would have been 18-34, which does sum to 75m. That's 17 years worth of ages. If we then look at ages 1-17 above to have an equal number of years, it's 70m with a downward trend. We aren't having enough babies and I've heard some predicting a depression in the early 2030s with these demographics being part of the reason.
Long term economic growth potential is a function of the rate of growth of the workforce (demographics) and the rate of growth in worker efficiency. That latter has been low over the past 15%, after growing rapidly the previous fifty.

 
Class action lawsuit filed against Zillow. Article on Crains Chicago.

A couple if things jumped out. About 44% of sales within 5% high/low of Zestimate. The other was values routinely about 20% below market value in Chicago.

 
Class action lawsuit filed against Zillow. Article on Crains Chicago.

A couple if things jumped out. About 44% of sales within 5% high/low of Zestimate. The other was values routinely about 20% below market value in Chicago.
They're going to have a hard time equating Zestimates and appraisals.  

And I wish my Zestimates were 20% low.  Sadly for both the properties I care about they're not too far off.  (IMO, Zillow is most useful for easily finding comps in the area).

 
Class action lawsuit filed against Zillow. Article on Crains Chicago.

A couple if things jumped out. About 44% of sales within 5% high/low of Zestimate. The other was values routinely about 20% below market value in Chicago.
This seems like an awfully frivolous lawsuit.  Who the heck can say with a straight face that they materially rely on Zillow's estimates?  And if you do, you're a goober and get what you have coming to you.  

 
This seems like an awfully frivolous lawsuit.  Who the heck can say with a straight face that they materially rely on Zillow's estimates?  And if you do, you're a goober and get what you have coming to you.  
An incredible amount of people do.  It boggles the mind.  It's like when people thought AOL was the internet.

 
Housing is like $900+ sqft here, thought I bought at the ceiling 3 years ago and can probably sell for 40-50% more than I bought for going by comparable house sales.

 
Redfin is the low estimate for me, 8% below Zillow.  If I had to guess, Zillow is closer to the right answer, but a few % high.  Very likely within 5% of correct.

 
This seems like an awfully frivolous lawsuit.  Who the heck can say with a straight face that they materially rely on Zillow's estimates?  And if you do, you're a goober and get what you have coming to you.  
The big argument seems to be perception and making the Zestimate public info. There was a quote saying buyers telling sellers that Zillow says this and that is how much they are willing to pay. 

Illinois law specifically allows AVM's which Zillow basically is. 

It seems the first lawsuit was filed by a lawyer who was unhappy about not getting what she believes her townhouse was worth and blames Zillow. Then she represents a family of builders with the same complaint and withdrew her lawsuit so she could represent them and seek class action status.

 
This seems like an awfully frivolous lawsuit.  Who the heck can say with a straight face that they materially rely on Zillow's estimates?  And if you do, you're a goober and get what you have coming to you.  
Frivolous claims are the fuel and engine of the class action lawsuit "industry".

 
Houses in my neighborhood we selling almost immediately 6 months ago.  Realized on my walk this morning that there are 6 houses that I pass every day that have had for sale signs in the yard for 2-3 months now. 

Then by coincidence I get my Zillow estimated today and (FWIW) the value of my house declined by almost 5% since the last report.  I hope the tax man is paying attention. :rolleyes:

Also heard this morning that pending home sales are down for 3 straight months.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Houses in my neighborhood we selling almost immediately 6 months ago.  Realized on my walk this morning that there are 6 houses that I pass every day that have had for sale signs in the yard for 2-3 months now. 

Then by coincidence I get my Zillow estimated today and (FWIW) the value of my house declined by almost 5% since the last report.  I hope the tax man is paying attention. :rolleyes:

Also heard this morning that new housing starts are down for 3 months in a row now.
According to National Association of Realtors data on existing home sales1, the Midwest is the only region that is seeing sales volume down vs. last year. In the Midwest, May was also down from April, which is unusual. 

On a non-seasonally adjusted basis, Midwest sales volume is up versus last year, but only by 2.4%, which is by far the weakest of the regions. Sales volume is growing almost three times faster in the West and Northeast, and more than two and a half times faster in the South.

1 This is looking at the NAR's benchmark SAAR data. That stands for seasonally-adjusted, annual rate. In economics, SAAR data is very useful when assessing how a highly seasonal time-series is trending, but seasonal adjustment is a a tool that cuts both ways. It can sometimes lead to big distortions if it isn't done properly. 

 
Houses in my neighborhood we selling almost immediately 6 months ago.  Realized on my walk this morning that there are 6 houses that I pass every day that have had for sale signs in the yard for 2-3 months now. 

Then by coincidence I get my Zillow estimated today and (FWIW) the value of my house declined by almost 5% since the last report.  I hope the tax man is paying attention. :rolleyes:

Also heard this morning that new housing starts are down for 3 months in a row now.
Uffffff.  Stock Market to follow?

 
Uffffff.  Stock Market to follow?
The rate of growth in mortgage applications for purchases is actually trending up again, after having been in a slowing trend for the better part of a year. That was slowing from a remarkably high and unsustainable rate, though. And the recent re-acceleration has only been in evidence for about six weeks.

 
Lack of available homes are slowing down the numbers. 
Low inventories definitely make interpreting the data challenging. 

The NAR data is starting to show an increasing trend in months of inventory available, however. Still very low, but there appears to be a trend toward "restocking".

ETA: I believe that only applies to existing SF homes, however. Housing starts and permits have pulled back a little bit.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
According to National Association of Realtors data on existing home sales1, the Midwest is the only region that is seeing sales volume down vs. last year. In the Midwest, May was also down from April, which is unusual. 

On a non-seasonally adjusted basis, Midwest sales volume is up versus last year, but only by 2.4%, which is by far the weakest of the regions. Sales volume is growing almost three times faster in the West and Northeast, and more than two and a half times faster in the South.

1 This is looking at the NAR's benchmark SAAR data. That stands for seasonally-adjusted, annual rate. In economics, SAAR data is very useful when assessing how a highly seasonal time-series is trending, but seasonal adjustment is a a tool that cuts both ways. It can sometimes lead to big distortions if it isn't done properly. 


The pending home sales being down 3 straight months was on CNBC.  Not sure where they get those numbers.

Uffffff.  Stock Market to follow?
:shrug:   It has been a helluva bull run though.

 
The pending home sales being down 3 straight months was on CNBC.  Not sure where they get those numbers.

:shrug:   It has been a helluva bull run though.
Oh for sure.  I was probably too conservative on my allocations to take advantage though.  During that run, the currency fluctuations didn't help me either with the GBP and EUR dropping vs. a strong USD.

 
I've only had my home up for sale for 13 days and had 3 visits.  Seems a bit slow to me.

ETA: Wisconsin, mid 200's. 3br / 2.5ba / 2500 sq ft

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't follow rates much right now as I don't currently deal with lending but a colleague told me that 30 year fixed were back below 4% and heading towards 3.75%. If there is a falter in home buying, perhaps that will spur things forward still and you have to believe that lack of inventory means that new home builders will get the engine up and shugging along. (of course, that could end up causing too much inventory on top of inevitable rate increases in the not too distant future). 

 
I'm not in lending, but have seen rates back down around the 3.75 or as low as 3.675 the last few days. Curious if anyone is in lending and could explain why the Fed has raised twice this year and yet rates are basically the same as a year ago. Maybe uncertainty due to the election last year?

 
I'm not in lending, but have seen rates back down around the 3.75 or as low as 3.675 the last few days. Curious if anyone is in lending and could explain why the Fed has raised twice this year and yet rates are basically the same as a year ago. Maybe uncertainty due to the election last year?
Rates on a 30 year mortgage are tied to the market prices of the 10 year US treasury bond (not to the rates set by the fed).  

 
Rates on a 30 year mortgage are tied to the market prices of the 10 year US treasury bond (not to the rates set by the fed).  
Let me restate the question; if the Fed is attempting to normalize interest rates with hikes, can anyone share some insight into what may be causing the yield on the 10 year to remain flat or even decline despite increasing short term rates? Increased supply? F/X rates? The end of QE? Lower forecasts for inflation or unemployment?

Honestly, I don't follow the news much anymore with the all the partisan bickering and #### going on.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Let me restate the question; if the Fed is attempting to normalize interest rates with hikes, can anyone share some insight into what may be causing the yield on the 10 year to remain flat or even decline despite increasing short term rates? Increased supply? F/X rates? The end of QE? Lower forecasts for inflation or unemployment?
The fixed income market is sending pretty clear signals that the economy is slowing. Those signals include, falling 10 yr rates, a flattening yield curve, and lower inflation expectations (as measured by the spread between normal T-bonds and Inflation Protected bonds).

The Fed is often behind the curve, but the disconnect between the Fed's commentary and what is actually going on in the economy is particularly sharp right now, in my eyes. I think it is likely that their public talking points are at least a little bit disingenuous. But they need to get rates on the path to normalization at some point, otherwise when the next recession hits the only tools left in their toolkit will be more Quantitative Easing (empirically not a very effective policy tool for influencing the real economy) and negative rates (unprecedented here in the US and unproven globally).

The fact they waited until this economic expansion was in its 8th year to move off of the ZIRP is really quite stunning. And inexcusable.

 
Still up here. Hit half a million, that's the max it was just before 2008 crash.  Up 125k more than I bought it for less than 4 years ago and it will be paid off at the end of this year. :thumbup:   

 
Looking back it was on the market three months before I bought it, price dropped twice. The houses in the neighborhood that have sold lately haven't lasted a single month. 

 
We bought with a va loan last year - 30 year at 3.25%

I'm thinking of refinancing for a conventional 15 year, with rates according to lending tree, 2.63% (other sites list just over 3)

I really don't want to get spam for using their site but would it be worthwhile?  Or I can just add a few hundred each month to the payment.  Or neither and save up enough to put a down payment on a beach house to rent out.

Which brings another question - those of you who own rental property and use a manager, how do you estimate your cash flow before buying?  It's an investment but we'd be content to break even (minus down payment) for the first few years.  Have you had the manager provide estimates for rental history, maintenance and other costs?  We'd be buying in a place we'd need* the manager and there are hoa fees for things like lawn care. 

We're a couple years away, just trying to plan ahead and decide whether to pay down our mortgage, invest the max for retirement, or just get the match and save for the rental. 
Call me.  Not a wise idea IMO.

 
Where are all these buyers coming from?  All I see around me is more and more building, are a ton of people transitioning from apartments to houses?  Shouldn't the boomers dying off lead to more inventory?  I thought the economy sucked?  I just don't get it.
Population growth has been exceeding new starts for many years.

 
We have a rental house in a north Dallas suburb, bought it 3 years ago for $132K. 3BR/2BA, a little over 1500 sq ft. We renovated both bathrooms since we bought it and just did the kitchen. Listed for $199,900 yesterday and already have a full-price offer. The market is crazy down here right now. 

 
House up the street with disclosed "neighbor" issues sold for $1.325 million for around 1500 square feet. Great curb appeal but not particularly attractive on the inside. We are down the block at about 2400 square feet. We've owned for 10 years and have probably a close-to $2 million home that's nice but somewhat modest. We can't sell because where would we go? We have deep, deep roots here so not interested in leaving the area, at least now. Yes, this house is a big part of our retirement plan.

Oakland, California. Insane.

 
The fixed income market is sending pretty clear signals that the economy is slowing. Those signals include, falling 10 yr rates, a flattening yield curve, and lower inflation expectations (as measured by the spread between normal T-bonds and Inflation Protected bonds).

The Fed is often behind the curve, but the disconnect between the Fed's commentary and what is actually going on in the economy is particularly sharp right now, in my eyes. I think it is likely that their public talking points are at least a little bit disingenuous. But they need to get rates on the path to normalization at some point, otherwise when the next recession hits the only tools left in their toolkit will be more Quantitative Easing (empirically not a very effective policy tool for influencing the real economy) and negative rates (unprecedented here in the US and unproven globally).

The fact they waited until this economic expansion was in its 8th year to move off of the ZIRP is really quite stunning. And inexcusable.
Thanks I appreciate the insight and it kind of jives with what I was thinking as well. 8 years is pretty long for an expansion.

Things in Denver have slowed from crazy increases the last few years to closer to about 5% over this time last year (depends on the neighborhood of course.) Wife took a client to a showing yesterday and the client liked the house, but looking at comps it was probably about 100K overpriced, client also inquired about a "lease to buy" offer he saw that sounded like a terrible deal. Couple of houses down the street from us have been on the market a few months mainly because they are overpriced. Makes me think things have gotten too frothy, hopefully we are in for a soft landing.

 
Our house is for sale out in the Wisconsin boonies and we're getting 2-3 visits a week.  Homes are starting to move a little quicker now that we're past the holiday.

 
Bought in late 2008 for 440K, zestimate is 640K. Most homes in my neighborhood (suburb between Denver and Boulder) don't sit long. There have been a couple recently that have been sold or under contract before I even knew they were listed.

 
We have a rental house in a north Dallas suburb, bought it 3 years ago for $132K. 3BR/2BA, a little over 1500 sq ft. We renovated both bathrooms since we bought it and just did the kitchen. Listed for $199,900 yesterday and already have a full-price offer. The market is crazy down here right now. 
3 days, up to 4 offers with the highest at $205K. We have an open house tomorrow so we'll see if any more come in. 

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top