Hyde or Ingram?? (1 Viewer)

[enyce]

I had Ingram penciled in for round 1 of the playoffs but even if he starts now he won't be 100%.  Assuming he still makes the start, should I roll with Ingram or should I plug in Carlos Hyde?  Thanks in advance.

 

[UofMAce]

Who are your other RBs?  I have both Ingram and Hyde.  I'm pretty much stuck starting Hyde.  As far as Ingram- maybe it's out there, but I haven't seen any information about the extent of his toe injury.  He looked good in the last game and I'm not sure how he injured his toe.  Antonio Brown had a toe injury and was iffy for Monday and somehow he played and put up great numbers.  If Ingram is available, I'm probably starting him.   If you have to choose between him and Hyde, I'm probably starting him over Hyde if he plays.  He's done great all season and I'm willing to take a chance because of the higher ceiling.  I'm up against the Kamara owner in  the playoffs so I'm screwed if Ingram doesn't start. 

 

[enyce]

I came into the season with Ingram, Hyde, Cook, Martin.  Made a deadline trade for Lynch.  So this week it'll be Lynch and one of Ingram or Hyde.  Man it's tough rolling out Ingram if he is not 100% though because they can just lean on Kamara.  Hmmm.

 

[Mr. Landry]

Personally, I'd go Hyde.  The Saints have too many other weapons that they can rely on, especially if Ingram is gimpy.  

 

[travdogg]

If Ingram is active, I think he's an easy call over Hyde. Even a limited Ingram can have a 2-TD game.