I am officially confused by the LB situation in... (1 Viewer)

[nortobc]

Arizona. Check out this link and look who is starting WLB and MLB:

http://www.localsports.ca/nfl_rosters/nfc_west.html

This is updated as of yesterday, June 27th.

MLB: Huff, Hayes, Mitchell

WLB: Darling

I have Darling on my dynasty IDP was going to drop him to make room for some rookies. Maybe I should keep him

This entire situation makes me want to go

 

[Weiner Dog]

Ignore this depth chart. Drop Darling.The last set of workouts ended with Hayes as the starting MLB and Huff as the starting WLB. I highly doubt Darling leap-frogged anybody while sitting on the couch the past week or so.Keep in mind, though...Once camp starts in the next few weeks, variations in teams' depth charts will/should take place.

 

[stevec]

Keep him for now - the AZ LB situation should clarify some in training camp, and you should be able to wait a bit to get an answer. I'd wait until you at least see who starts camp as the starters - things can shake up from end of workouts to camp.

 

[RAPTURE]

John, I believe at this point in time it is pure speculation at this point. Also, they have Pisa Tinoisamoa 2nd string behind Dexter Coakley.I see the Rams starting LB's as the following:SLB Pisa Tinoisamoa MLB Chris ClaiborneWLB Dexter CoakleyAgain, at this point in the game it is too early to dictate a position battle when training camp has not even began yet. I read in some FF magazines about the upcoming 2005 depth charts and it makes for a good laugh.RAPTURE

 

[Weiner Dog]

John, I believe at this point in time it is pure speculation at this point. Also, they have Pisa Tinoisamoa 2nd string behind Dexter Coakley.

I see the Rams starting LB's as the following:

SLB Pisa Tinoisamoa

MLB Chris Claiborne

WLB Dexter Coakley

Again, at this point in the game it is too early to dictate a position battle when training camp has not even began yet. I read in some FF magazines about the upcoming 2005 depth charts and it makes for a good laugh.

RAPTURE

Flip-flop Pisa and Dex. There is no way the Rams will have Tino and his bum shoulder smacking TE's on every play. On a side note, I'm going to find it comical watching teams run the ball down the throats of the Rams. Claiborne is the only physical presence in the front-seven and he'll be hurt by Week 5. Once he goes down, the Rams will insert Robert Thomas and their pint-size LB corp will be fully exposed.

 

[Beaumont]

Ignore this depth chart. Drop Darling.

The last set of workouts ended with Hayes as the starting MLB and Huff as the starting WLB. I highly doubt Darling leap-frogged anybody while sitting on the couch the past week or so.

Keep in mind, though...

Once camp starts in the next few weeks, variations in teams' depth charts will/should take place.

All true, but I would not drop Darling yet if you can avoid it ...

 

[stevec]

John, I believe at this point in time it is pure speculation at this point.  Also, they have Pisa Tinoisamoa 2nd string behind Dexter Coakley.

I see the Rams starting LB's as the following:

SLB Pisa Tinoisamoa

MLB Chris Claiborne

WLB Dexter Coakley

Again, at this point in the game it is too early to dictate a position battle when training camp has not even began yet.  I read in some FF magazines about the upcoming 2005 depth charts and it makes for a good laugh.

RAPTURE

Flip-flop Pisa and Dex. There is no way the Rams will have Tino and his bum shoulder smacking TE's on every play. On a side note, I'm going to find it comical watching teams run the ball down the throats of the Rams. Claiborne is the only physical presence in the front-seven and he'll be hurt by Week 5. Once he goes down, the Rams will insert Robert Thomas and their pint-size LB corp will be fully exposed.

If only my Seahawks can figure that out...