guru_007 said:
One guy not mentioned (because he's not in the hof) is Pete Rose. Ichiro's numbers compare quite favorably to his, and without Rose's off field problems, I think it's safe to say he would be a hof'er.It is weird though when you see the comparable players comparison done by baseball reference and you see a bunch of mediocre major leaguers, Ralph Garr, Mickey Rivers, and a bunch of guys well before my time. I think Ichiro's more of an outlyer than anything. The only active player with a higher career batting average is Albert Pujols. Todd Helton is right behind Ichiro and Helton is another interesting candidate deserving of a thread of his own.
Rose seems like a pretty good comparison, but interestingly, Rose's similar batters are all HOFers. Even the comparibles through various ages are a more impressive list: Carew, Molitor, Damon, etc.Rose went for extra bases at a higher rate than Ichiro, and had a very fine OPS+ during his most productive years. Ichiro's career OPS+ is 117. Rose's career OPS+ is 118 even with his watered down years where he was simply chasing Cobb's hit record until age 45. In his best season, Rose had a 158 OPS+ compared to Ichiro's 130 in his first MLB season. Rose also walked more and struck out less. They do have similar RC/G numbers, but Rose peaked at 8.4 to Ichiro's 7.9.I still can't quite put my finger on why Ichiro's similar batters aren't better players. Clearly amassing numbers matters for the career comparisons, and Ichiro will get there, but for the similar by age comparisons, the best Ichiro can muster in his best two seasons (at 27 and 30) are comparisons with Al Wingo and Bill Everitt. Granted, these comparative seasons weren't bad, but the entirety of his list is pretty ho-hum.