Actually, most hardcore fans and NFL histrorians would say Jim Brown is the best ever. Sanders is definitely the best player I ever actually saw, though.Hard to judge with AP. Obviously, it's WAY too soon. There have been a ton of RBs that had 2 or 3 really good seasons in a row.I am sure this has been covered here but I had this conversation with a friend today. He says he would prefer Peterson over Barry Sanders (who most agree is the greatest running back in NFL history). I am not so sure.
I know. Just throwing it out there. If given the choice what RB in his prime would you build your franchise around though? This guy just blows me away.Way too early. c'mon.
Game Game Rush Rush Rush Rush RushRk Player From To Tm Lg G GS Att Yds Y/A TD Y/G1 Eric Dickerson* 1983 1984 RAM NFL 32 32 769 3913 5.09 32 122.32 Clinton Portis 2002 2003 DEN NFL 29 25 563 3099 5.50 29 106.93 Adrian Peterson 2007 2008 MIN NFL 30 24 601 3101 5.16 22 103.44 Jim Brown* 1957 1958 CLE NFL 24 24 459 2469 5.38 26 102.95 Edgerrin James 1999 2000 CLT NFL 32 32 756 3262 4.31 26 101.96 Earl Campbell* 1978 1979 OTI NFL 31 30 670 3147 4.70 32 101.57 George Rogers 1981 1982 NOR NFL 22 21 500 2209 4.42 16 100.48 Ottis Anderson 1979 1980 CRD NFL 32 32 632 2957 4.68 17 92.49 Billy Sims 1980 1981 DET NFL 30 30 609 2740 4.50 26 91.310 LaDainian Tomlinson 2001 2002 SDG NFL 32 32 711 2919 4.11 24 91.211 Barry Sanders* 1989 1990 DET NFL 31 29 535 2774 5.19 27 89.512 Terrell Davis 1995 1996 DEN NFL 30 30 582 2655 4.56 20 88.5
Exactly.Just off the top of my head, as far as RBs i've ever seen play, he's behind (in no particular order):SandersM.FaulkDickersonTomlinsonPaytonBo JacksonE.SmithE.JamesT.DavisC.MartinP.HolmesMarcus AllenHe's had zero top 20 seasons and one in the top 125.Right now he's not even Terril Davis pre-injury.Let's bump this in 2014.
Thanks Chase. Dickerson was so good.Most rushing yards per game after a player's first two seasons, min: 18 games:
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/play-index/tiny/4CLc4
Code:Game Game Rush Rush Rush Rush RushRk Player From To Tm Lg G GS Att Yds Y/A TD Y/G1 Eric Dickerson* 1983 1984 RAM NFL 32 32 769 3913 5.09 32 122.32 Clinton Portis 2002 2003 DEN NFL 29 25 563 3099 5.50 29 106.93 Adrian Peterson 2007 2008 MIN NFL 30 24 601 3101 5.16 22 103.44 Jim Brown* 1957 1958 CLE NFL 24 24 459 2469 5.38 26 102.95 Edgerrin James 1999 2000 CLT NFL 32 32 756 3262 4.31 26 101.96 Earl Campbell* 1978 1979 OTI NFL 31 30 670 3147 4.70 32 101.57 George Rogers 1981 1982 NOR NFL 22 21 500 2209 4.42 16 100.48 Ottis Anderson 1979 1980 CRD NFL 32 32 632 2957 4.68 17 92.49 Billy Sims 1980 1981 DET NFL 30 30 609 2740 4.50 26 91.310 LaDainian Tomlinson 2001 2002 SDG NFL 32 32 711 2919 4.11 24 91.211 Barry Sanders* 1989 1990 DET NFL 31 29 535 2774 5.19 27 89.512 Terrell Davis 1995 1996 DEN NFL 30 30 582 2655 4.56 20 88.5
Great query, thanks Chase.3rd in YPG...and 9th (out of those 12, there may be more) in TDs.Chase Stuart said:Most rushing yards per game after a player's first two seasons, min: 18 games:
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/play-index/tiny/4CLc4
Game Game Rush Rush Rush Rush RushRk Player From To Tm Lg G GS Att Yds Y/A TD Y/G1 Eric Dickerson* 1983 1984 RAM NFL 32 32 769 3913 5.09 32 122.32 Clinton Portis 2002 2003 DEN NFL 29 25 563 3099 5.50 29 106.93 Adrian Peterson 2007 2008 MIN NFL 30 24 601 3101 5.16 22 103.44 Jim Brown* 1957 1958 CLE NFL 24 24 459 2469 5.38 26 102.95 Edgerrin James 1999 2000 CLT NFL 32 32 756 3262 4.31 26 101.96 Earl Campbell* 1978 1979 OTI NFL 31 30 670 3147 4.70 32 101.57 George Rogers 1981 1982 NOR NFL 22 21 500 2209 4.42 16 100.48 Ottis Anderson 1979 1980 CRD NFL 32 32 632 2957 4.68 17 92.49 Billy Sims 1980 1981 DET NFL 30 30 609 2740 4.50 26 91.310 LaDainian Tomlinson 2001 2002 SDG NFL 32 32 711 2919 4.11 24 91.211 Barry Sanders* 1989 1990 DET NFL 31 29 535 2774 5.19 27 89.512 Terrell Davis 1995 1996 DEN NFL 30 30 582 2655 4.56 20 88.5
No they don't.monkeysee said:I am sure this has been covered here but I had this conversation with a friend today. He says he would prefer Peterson over Barry Sanders (who most agree is the greatest running back in NFL history). I am not so sure.
Ok well people that live on my planet do.No they don't.monkeysee said:I am sure this has been covered here but I had this conversation with a friend today. He says he would prefer Peterson over Barry Sanders (who most agree is the greatest running back in NFL history). I am not so sure.
Jim Brown would get my vote.Ok well people that live on my planet do.No they don't.monkeysee said:I am sure this has been covered here but I had this conversation with a friend today. He says he would prefer Peterson over Barry Sanders (who most agree is the greatest running back in NFL history). I am not so sure.
Jim Brown gets my vote, too. I think he would get the highest percentage of votes.I get the OP's point, though. Peterson looks like he's on pace to be considered among the greats that have ever played the game. Like most here, though, I agree that we have to let it play out.Jim Brown would get my vote.Ok well people that live on my planet do.No they don't.monkeysee said:I am sure this has been covered here but I had this conversation with a friend today. He says he would prefer Peterson over Barry Sanders (who most agree is the greatest running back in NFL history). I am not so sure.
And from that list only Barry Sanders is in the top 5 for career yardage, and only Jim Brown registers in addition to Sanders in the top ten.Not a good barometer. Peterson has light years to go before he enters this conversation.Chase Stuart said:Most rushing yards per game after a player's first two seasons, min: 18 games:
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/play-index/tiny/4CLc4
Game Game Rush Rush Rush Rush RushRk Player From To Tm Lg G GS Att Yds Y/A TD Y/G1 Eric Dickerson* 1983 1984 RAM NFL 32 32 769 3913 5.09 32 122.32 Clinton Portis 2002 2003 DEN NFL 29 25 563 3099 5.50 29 106.93 Adrian Peterson 2007 2008 MIN NFL 30 24 601 3101 5.16 22 103.44 Jim Brown* 1957 1958 CLE NFL 24 24 459 2469 5.38 26 102.95 Edgerrin James 1999 2000 CLT NFL 32 32 756 3262 4.31 26 101.96 Earl Campbell* 1978 1979 OTI NFL 31 30 670 3147 4.70 32 101.57 George Rogers 1981 1982 NOR NFL 22 21 500 2209 4.42 16 100.48 Ottis Anderson 1979 1980 CRD NFL 32 32 632 2957 4.68 17 92.49 Billy Sims 1980 1981 DET NFL 30 30 609 2740 4.50 26 91.310 LaDainian Tomlinson 2001 2002 SDG NFL 32 32 711 2919 4.11 24 91.211 Barry Sanders* 1989 1990 DET NFL 31 29 535 2774 5.19 27 89.512 Terrell Davis 1995 1996 DEN NFL 30 30 582 2655 4.56 20 88.5
Of the 11 people on the list, 4 are in the HOF, one more will be soon (LT), one more should be (TD), and three more have had great careers (Edge/Portis/Anderson). Of the other 11 RBs, only two could possibly be labeled as busts, and both Rogers and Sims had injury issues. If half of the comps are HOF guys, that's not a bad barometer of anything.And from that list only Barry Sanders is in the top 5 for career yardage, and only Jim Brown registers in addition to Sanders in the top ten.Not a good barometer. Peterson has light years to go before he enters this conversation.Chase Stuart said:Most rushing yards per game after a player's first two seasons, min: 18 games:
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/play-index/tiny/4CLc4
Game Game Rush Rush Rush Rush RushRk Player From To Tm Lg G GS Att Yds Y/A TD Y/G1 Eric Dickerson* 1983 1984 RAM NFL 32 32 769 3913 5.09 32 122.32 Clinton Portis 2002 2003 DEN NFL 29 25 563 3099 5.50 29 106.93 Adrian Peterson 2007 2008 MIN NFL 30 24 601 3101 5.16 22 103.44 Jim Brown* 1957 1958 CLE NFL 24 24 459 2469 5.38 26 102.95 Edgerrin James 1999 2000 CLT NFL 32 32 756 3262 4.31 26 101.96 Earl Campbell* 1978 1979 OTI NFL 31 30 670 3147 4.70 32 101.57 George Rogers 1981 1982 NOR NFL 22 21 500 2209 4.42 16 100.48 Ottis Anderson 1979 1980 CRD NFL 32 32 632 2957 4.68 17 92.49 Billy Sims 1980 1981 DET NFL 30 30 609 2740 4.50 26 91.310 LaDainian Tomlinson 2001 2002 SDG NFL 32 32 711 2919 4.11 24 91.211 Barry Sanders* 1989 1990 DET NFL 31 29 535 2774 5.19 27 89.512 Terrell Davis 1995 1996 DEN NFL 30 30 582 2655 4.56 20 88.5
I thought you weren't a TD guy?Anyway, to add to your point... Sims and Rogers aren't valid comparisons, because the premise of this exercise is to assume Peterson stays healthy his whole career. Eliminate them and you've got 66% HoFers, and two more guys who still have a legit shot at the hall (I don't think James or Portis makes it, but they do have a legitimate shot- 618 yards this year and James is 7th all time, and Portis could easily climb even higher, still). When the worst guy on any list of comparisons is a career 10,000 yard rusher with a first-team AP All Pro, a RoY award, a Comeback PoY award, and a SB MVP, you're doing pretty well for yourself.Of the 11 people on the list, 4 are in the HOF, one more will be soon (LT), one more should be (TD), and three more have had great careers (Edge/Portis/Anderson). Of the other 11 RBs, only two could possibly be labeled as busts, and both Rogers and Sims had injury issues. If half of the comps are HOF guys, that's not a bad barometer of anything.
Sorry to digress, but TD is NOT a Hall of Famer...he had 4 good seasons and was subsequently injured. It's unfortunate, but true.Of the 11 people on the list, 4 are in the HOF, one more will be soon (LT), one more should be (TD), and three more have had great careers (Edge/Portis/Anderson). Of the other 11 RBs, only two could possibly be labeled as busts, and both Rogers and Sims had injury issues. If half of the comps are HOF guys, that's not a bad barometer of anything.And from that list only Barry Sanders is in the top 5 for career yardage, and only Jim Brown registers in addition to Sanders in the top ten.Not a good barometer. Peterson has light years to go before he enters thies conversation.Chase Stuart said:Most rushing yards per game after a player's first two seasons, min: 18 games:
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/play-index/tiny/4CLc4
Game Game Rush Rush Rush Rush RushRk Player From To Tm Lg G GS Att Yds Y/A TD Y/G1 Eric Dickerson* 1983 1984 RAM NFL 32 32 769 3913 5.09 32 122.32 Clinton Portis 2002 2003 DEN NFL 29 25 563 3099 5.50 29 106.93 Adrian Peterson 2007 2008 MIN NFL 30 24 601 3101 5.16 22 103.44 Jim Brown* 1957 1958 CLE NFL 24 24 459 2469 5.38 26 102.95 Edgerrin James 1999 2000 CLT NFL 32 32 756 3262 4.31 26 101.96 Earl Campbell* 1978 1979 OTI NFL 31 30 670 3147 4.70 32 101.57 George Rogers 1981 1982 NOR NFL 22 21 500 2209 4.42 16 100.48 Ottis Anderson 1979 1980 CRD NFL 32 32 632 2957 4.68 17 92.49 Billy Sims 1980 1981 DET NFL 30 30 609 2740 4.50 26 91.310 LaDainian Tomlinson 2001 2002 SDG NFL 32 32 711 2919 4.11 24 91.211 Barry Sanders* 1989 1990 DET NFL 31 29 535 2774 5.19 27 89.512 Terrell Davis 1995 1996 DEN NFL 30 30 582 2655 4.56 20 88.5
Sayers got in the HoF after essentially a four year career.I don't think TD is Sayers but he had an incredible four year run. Although if we are talking about small bodies of work I would like to see Boselli in the HoF long before TD. Boselli was the most dominant offensive tackle I have seen this side of Munoz and Shell.Sorry to digress, but TD is NOT a Hall of Famer...he had 4 good seasons and was subsequently injured. It's unfortunate, but true.Of the 11 people on the list, 4 are in the HOF, one more will be soon (LT), one more should be (TD), and three more have had great careers (Edge/Portis/Anderson). Of the other 11 RBs, only two could possibly be labeled as busts, and both Rogers and Sims had injury issues. If half of the comps are HOF guys, that's not a bad barometer of anything.And from that list only Barry Sanders is in the top 5 for career yardage, and only Jim Brown registers in addition to Sanders in the top ten.Not a good barometer. Peterson has light years to go before he enters thies conversation.Chase Stuart said:Most rushing yards per game after a player's first two seasons, min: 18 games:
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/play-index/tiny/4CLc4
Game Game Rush Rush Rush Rush Rush Rk Player From To Tm Lg G GS Att Yds Y/A TD Y/G 1 Eric Dickerson* 1983 1984 RAM NFL 32 32 769 3913 5.09 32 122.3 2 Clinton Portis 2002 2003 DEN NFL 29 25 563 3099 5.50 29 106.9 3 Adrian Peterson 2007 2008 MIN NFL 30 24 601 3101 5.16 22 103.4 4 Jim Brown* 1957 1958 CLE NFL 24 24 459 2469 5.38 26 102.9 5 Edgerrin James 1999 2000 CLT NFL 32 32 756 3262 4.31 26 101.9 6 Earl Campbell* 1978 1979 OTI NFL 31 30 670 3147 4.70 32 101.5 7 George Rogers 1981 1982 NOR NFL 22 21 500 2209 4.42 16 100.4 8 Ottis Anderson 1979 1980 CRD NFL 32 32 632 2957 4.68 17 92.4 9 Billy Sims 1980 1981 DET NFL 30 30 609 2740 4.50 26 91.3 10 LaDainian Tomlinson 2001 2002 SDG NFL 32 32 711 2919 4.11 24 91.2 11 Barry Sanders* 1989 1990 DET NFL 31 29 535 2774 5.19 27 89.5 12 Terrell Davis 1995 1996 DEN NFL 30 30 582 2655 4.56 20 88.5
Walter Payton would get mine.Jim Brown would get my vote.Ok well people that live on my planet do.No they don't.monkeysee said:I am sure this has been covered here but I had this conversation with a friend today. He says he would prefer Peterson over Barry Sanders (who most agree is the greatest running back in NFL history). I am not so sure.
X 2Adrian Peterson was the most talented high school player I ever watched play. I am positive he could have went pro straight from high school and he was the consensus national player of the year as a HS senior. Then he went on to Oklahoma and put up one of the greatest college seasons in history as a true freshman, breaking the rushing record and finishing second in the Heisman voting. Really only the college freshman seasons of Marshall Faulk and Emmitt Smith can compare. Then ADP goes on to the NFL and breaks the single game rushing record as a rookie. He wins rookie of the year and NFL Pro Bowl MVP. The only other player to achieve that feat as a rookie? Marshall Faulk. He has the talent of a top 5 RB in NFL history, he just needs to have the endurance and longevity of an Emmitt Smith or Payton. That may not happen but I still think he's one of the top 5 greatest RB's I have ever seen and I hope he has a long career.
You say 4 good seasons, I say the arguably greatest 4-season stretch of any back in NFL history. Few NFL RBs have accomplished as much in 12 years as Davis did in 4. You win an MVP, two OPoYs, three first-team AP All Pros, a SB MVP, two SB rings, rush for 2000 yards in the equivalent of 14 games, outperform two of the five greatest RBs in NFL history while both were in their prime (Smith and Sanders), and also break nearly every meaningful postseason and SB rushing record while posting two of the five best postseasons by an RB in NFL history and becoming inarguably the greatest postseason rusher ever, and you're a HoFer. That's a HoF resume whether it takes 4 years to compile or 12 years.Sorry to digress, but TD is NOT a Hall of Famer...he had 4 good seasons and was subsequently injured. It's unfortunate, but true.

This is not to bash any of these great players but Peterson is the greatest I have seen play. I didn't see Jim Brown play but I saw OJ (he reminds me of OJ and Dickerson actually) Payton, and all the great ones from the 70s to present. Now whether he can endure and continue to play at this level remains to be seen. But he does it all so well. Power. Speed. Moves. Receiving.Walter Payton would get mine.Jim Brown would get my vote.Ok well people that live on my planet do.No they don't.monkeysee said:I am sure this has been covered here but I had this conversation with a friend today. He says he would prefer Peterson over Barry Sanders (who most agree is the greatest running back in NFL history). I am not so sure.
), and has deservedly become about as popular for RBs to emulate as yodeling on cutting edge rap albums...Not even close. When I watch ADP run I don't need stats or historical data to tell me how great he is. It is as simple as an eye test. The only question is long-term health.A more interesting question is where does MJD wind up ranking if he stays healthy? Through age 23, the following players have more TDs than MJD's 38: Barry Sanders (47), Randy Moss (43), Emmitt Smith (43). Everyone is ready to talk about Peterson among the all-time greats, but I think, barring injury, MJD is going to rank right up there with him when all is said and done.
I don't need stats or historical data to tell me how great MJD is, either, I was merely supplying them to provide some context. MJD isn't as creative of a runner as ADP, but he's a much better blocker and receiver, and I think he's still one of the top 5 pure runners in the league. As massive and powerful as MJD is, people often forget that he was a sprinter on the track team for UCLA (and Reggie Bush's biggest track competition dating back to his prep days), and that he set the NCAA record for punt return average. He doesn't have Peterson's creativity or balance, but he's got just as much speed, more power, and is a much better goal line and short yardage back and a much more consistent runner. And, as I said, he's a bigger threat as a receiver. I think by the time he hangs up his cleats his name will easily make the list of the all-time greats.Not even close. When I watch ADP run I don't need stats or historical data to tell me how great he is. It is as simple as an eye test. The only question is long-term health.A more interesting question is where does MJD wind up ranking if he stays healthy? Through age 23, the following players have more TDs than MJD's 38: Barry Sanders (47), Randy Moss (43), Emmitt Smith (43). Everyone is ready to talk about Peterson among the all-time greats, but I think, barring injury, MJD is going to rank right up there with him when all is said and done.
A much better short yardage runner? MJD has more power than ADP? Based on what? ADP doesn't and hasn't had any problem cathing the ball, his offense doesn't call for him to do that and they like to use Chester on 3rd to help keep him fresh. the bottom line is it's all opinions so nothing really to argue about. I will take ADP every day of the week and twice on Sunday's over MJD and it isn't even close. That's just my .02I don't need stats or historical data to tell me how great MJD is, either, I was merely supplying them to provide some context. MJD isn't as creative of a runner as ADP, but he's a much better blocker and receiver, and I think he's still one of the top 5 pure runners in the league. As massive and powerful as MJD is, people often forget that he was a sprinter on the track team for UCLA (and Reggie Bush's biggest track competition dating back to his prep days), and that he set the NCAA record for punt return average. He doesn't have Peterson's creativity or balance, but he's got just as much speed, more power, and is a much better goal line and short yardage back and a much more consistent runner. And, as I said, he's a bigger threat as a receiver. I think by the time he hangs up his cleats his name will easily make the list of the all-time greats.Not even close. When I watch ADP run I don't need stats or historical data to tell me how great he is. It is as simple as an eye test. The only question is long-term health.A more interesting question is where does MJD wind up ranking if he stays healthy? Through age 23, the following players have more TDs than MJD's 38: Barry Sanders (47), Randy Moss (43), Emmitt Smith (43). Everyone is ready to talk about Peterson among the all-time greats, but I think, barring injury, MJD is going to rank right up there with him when all is said and done.
Nice video, he did look like a beast.My biggest question is how do you rank the "best rb of all time", yards, tuchdowns, superbowls??I can tell you right now that the G.O.A.T. is Earl Campbell. Best combination of size, speed, and power the the NFL has ever seen.
I disagree with you on your comparison of the two. Watching them run, it's pretty clear to me that Peterson runs with a lot more power than MJD. Yes, MJD is a better receiver and is just as fast as Peterson, but Peterson's vision for the hole and his ability to accelerate through the cut is unlike anything I've ever seen. Most backs lose speed when they make a cutback and then have to accelerate again, while ADP seems to gain speed while cutting back. It's uncanny.I don't need stats or historical data to tell me how great MJD is, either, I was merely supplying them to provide some context. MJD isn't as creative of a runner as ADP, but he's a much better blocker and receiver, and I think he's still one of the top 5 pure runners in the league. As massive and powerful as MJD is, people often forget that he was a sprinter on the track team for UCLA (and Reggie Bush's biggest track competition dating back to his prep days), and that he set the NCAA record for punt return average. He doesn't have Peterson's creativity or balance, but he's got just as much speed, more power, and is a much better goal line and short yardage back and a much more consistent runner. And, as I said, he's a bigger threat as a receiver. I think by the time he hangs up his cleats his name will easily make the list of the all-time greats.Not even close. When I watch ADP run I don't need stats or historical data to tell me how great he is. It is as simple as an eye test. The only question is long-term health.A more interesting question is where does MJD wind up ranking if he stays healthy? Through age 23, the following players have more TDs than MJD's 38: Barry Sanders (47), Randy Moss (43), Emmitt Smith (43). Everyone is ready to talk about Peterson among the all-time greats, but I think, barring injury, MJD is going to rank right up there with him when all is said and done.
I didn't read the whole thing to know what the breakdown was, but I think he fits the EYRB mold better (big play power back). Barry didn't move piles like Peterson does. While Adrian has moves, its nothing like what Sanders has. I can't believe with all the different categories you have, you think these two fit in the same.Sanders is certainly a solid comparison for Peterson.
Here's a wacky post I wrote on RB personality types. Peterson, like Sanders, falls into the E-Y-R-S personality type; exciting (high YPC), yardage guy (as opposed to a TD guy), rusher (as opposed to being more of a pass catcher) and small (as opposed to, uh, big).
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/blog/?p=3598
Priest Holmes? Really? He really only had 3 "good" years... albeit pretty damn good ones especially with the TDs... but still...Exactly.Just off the top of my head, as far as RBs i've ever seen play, he's behind (in no particular order):SandersM.FaulkDickersonTomlinsonPaytonBo JacksonE.SmithE.JamesT.DavisC.MartinP.HolmesMarcus AllenHe's had zero top 20 seasons and one in the top 125.Right now he's not even Terril Davis pre-injury.Let's bump this in 2014.
Billy Sims and Earl Campbell were amazing backs. Neither had really long careers, but if I had to pick guys just for one year, those two would be at the top of my list. Of course a box of rocks had more brains than Sims. Barry Sanders was the funnest back to watch in the history of the NFL. But he wasn't the best short yardage back. For running instincts and moves, best ever.As of today, hes Bill Sims. Next year, he can move into Wilbert Mongomrey category. In two years, he'll be hanging with George Rogers. After that, Earl Campbell. If hes still playing after that, we should probably bump this thread and revisit the discussion. Otherwise, its waaaay too early,
I think the point is that for the time being, even that fairly modest body of work is well ahead of ADP's career or single-season achievements. I certainly couldn't rationalize placing Peterson's career ahead of Holmes' yet by any metric. Could you?Priest Holmes? Really? He really only had 3 "good" years... albeit pretty damn good ones especially with the TDs... but still...Exactly.Just off the top of my head, as far as RBs i've ever seen play, he's behind (in no particular order):SandersM.FaulkDickersonTomlinsonPaytonBo JacksonE.SmithE.JamesT.DavisC.MartinP.HolmesMarcus AllenHe's had zero top 20 seasons and one in the top 125.Right now he's not even Terril Davis pre-injury.Let's bump this in 2014.
MOST POWERFUL, easily. What a jewel he was.I can tell you right now that the G.O.A.T. is Earl Campbell. Best combination of size, speed, and power the the NFL has ever seen.
Yes. ADP is much further along than Priest Holmes was at this point in his career. It is still early, but ADP should surpass Holmes best season this year.I think the point is that for the time being, even that fairly modest body of work is well ahead of ADP's career or single-season achievements. I certainly couldn't rationalize placing Peterson's career ahead of Holmes' yet by any metric. Could you?