I would like a weather report first.BTW, Joe was a stud in his day, and I recognize nostalgia is a powerful drug that is always going to boost value against a current player, but if you had 1M of your own money on the line and had to pick a guy to QB your team to a win today, and you could choose any QB of all time in their prime, you'd have to be picking Peyton.
not if the game is in januaryBTW, Joe was a stud in his day, and I recognize nostalgia is a powerful drug that is always going to boost value against a current player, but if you had 1M of your own money on the line and had to pick a guy to QB your team to a win today, and you could choose any QB of all time in their prime, you'd have to be picking Peyton.
So you would pick him in the SB then?not if the game is in januaryBTW, Joe was a stud in his day, and I recognize nostalgia is a powerful drug that is always going to boost value against a current player, but if you had 1M of your own money on the line and had to pick a guy to QB your team to a win today, and you could choose any QB of all time in their prime, you'd have to be picking Peyton.
nope.So you would pick him in the SB then?not if the game is in januaryBTW, Joe was a stud in his day, and I recognize nostalgia is a powerful drug that is always going to boost value against a current player, but if you had 1M of your own money on the line and had to pick a guy to QB your team to a win today, and you could choose any QB of all time in their prime, you'd have to be picking Peyton.
yea but they are 3-3 against each other in the playoffs and Manning had terrible defenses in INDY just like Brady is getting now.....Sorry.
Despite yesterday's stomping, Brady still has a superior body of work. After yesterday's win manning is now 5-10 all time vs. Brady.
Neither is as good as Montana.
So, if you said Manning is the third best of all time, you might be right.
Arguing over these guys is obviously futile and pointless, but those sentiments are why I put Peyton at the top of my list.I have to go with Elway he carried an average Denver team to two SB's and even though they lost them very few Qb's could have done what he did. Then when he got a stud rb he started winning them. Montana, Bradshaw and Aikman might have had the best teams out of any SB winning Qb and really I think average Qb's could have won a SB with those teams. Manning IMO is a great season QB but if Elways was on his teams with those weapon and the new laxed touching rules he might have looked like Bill Russell when he put his jewelry on
How many SB's does Peyton win with Montana's 49ers? At least 4 IMO.I have to go with Elway he carried an average Denver team to two SB's and even though they lost them very few Qb's could have done what he did. Then when he got a stud rb he started winning them. Montana, Bradshaw and Aikman might have had the best teams out of any SB winning Qb and really I think average Qb's could have won a SB with those teams. Manning IMO is a great season QB but if Elways was on his teams with those weapon and the new laxed touching rules he might have looked like Bill Russell when he put his jewelry on
Greatest of all-time behind: (in no particular order)This is like watching Rocky. Highest Scoring Offense of All Time. Suffocated Brady at home.
Now just one more ring to tie his brother.
There are some who would take Aikman......at least that is the impression I am getting in the AFC title thread.BTW, Joe was a stud in his day, and I recognize nostalgia is a powerful drug that is always going to boost value against a current player, but if you had 1M of your own money on the line and had to pick a guy to QB your team to a win today, and you could choose any QB of all time in their prime, you'd have to be picking Peyton.
How many does Marino win?How many SB's does Peyton win with Montana's 49ers? At least 4 IMO.I have to go with Elway he carried an average Denver team to two SB's and even though they lost them very few Qb's could have done what he did. Then when he got a stud rb he started winning them. Montana, Bradshaw and Aikman might have had the best teams out of any SB winning Qb and really I think average Qb's could have won a SB with those teams. Manning IMO is a great season QB but if Elways was on his teams with those weapon and the new laxed touching rules he might have looked like Bill Russell when he put his jewelry on
Manning and Balboa are both white.How is this in anyway similar to rocky?
How many SB's does Peyton win with Montana's 49ers? At least 4 IMO.I have to go with Elway he carried an average Denver team to two SB's and even though they lost them very few Qb's could have done what he did. Then when he got a stud rb he started winning them. Montana, Bradshaw and Aikman might have had the best teams out of any SB winning Qb and really I think average Qb's could have won a SB with those teams. Manning IMO is a great season QB but if Elways was on his teams with those weapon and the new laxed touching rules he might have looked like Bill Russell when he put his jewelry on
Lik Rocky, Russell is a few inches shorter than his adversary.How is this in anyway similar to rocky?
Good post.Arguing over these guys is obviously futile and pointless, but those sentiments are why I put Peyton at the top of my list.For 13 of 15 seasons, having Peyton Manning on your team meant you were winning at least 10 games. For 10 of the 15 seasons, you were winning 12+ games. That's with 4 different coaches and 2 different franchises. Insane.I have to go with Elway he carried an average Denver team to two SB's and even though they lost them very few Qb's could have done what he did. Then when he got a stud rb he started winning them. Montana, Bradshaw and Aikman might have had the best teams out of any SB winning Qb and really I think average Qb's could have won a SB with those teams. Manning IMO is a great season QB but if Elways was on his teams with those weapon and the new laxed touching rules he might have looked like Bill Russell when he put his jewelry on
The rules have helped his cause and there was plenty of talent on many of those teams, but what my eyes told me watching him over the years was that this guy had more control of the game than any player I've ever seen. For the vast majority of his games, the defense just seemed helpless in a way I just didn't see as much with other QBs.
Watching him has led me to believe that throwing him on most any team will make them far better than they would've been otherwise, and for most, one of the best in the NFL. IMO, moreso than any other QB in history.
There's no way to ever prove who was the best, but it's Manning for me.
Exactly as good? I disagree. Do you think if he completely chokes in the SB it has no bearing on his standing as the GOAT? If he goes out and throws for 400 and 4 TD's against this Seattle D on the biggest possible stage, it does nothing to increase his standing?In three weeks, Peyton Manning will be exactly as good of a quarterback as he is today. Just like how today he's exactly as good of a quarterback as he was three weeks ago.
His statement is erroneous because he incorrectly assumes Manning won't gain any experience and understanding of the game in 2 weeks.Exactly as good? I disagree. Do you think if he completely chokes in the SB it has no bearing on his standing as the GOAT? If he goes out and throws for 400 and 4 TD's against this Seattle D on the biggest possible stage, it does nothing to increase his standing?In three weeks, Peyton Manning will be exactly as good of a quarterback as he is today. Just like how today he's exactly as good of a quarterback as he was three weeks ago.
A QB does not get many chances at the big stage, so when they do have a chance, it really matters.
Question: would Peyton Manning be a better quarterback today if Rahim Moore was three inches taller? Manning would be more ACCOMPLISHED, he would have a BETTER CAREER, but he'd be exactly the same quarterback.Exactly as good? I disagree. Do you think if he completely chokes in the SB it has no bearing on his standing as the GOAT? If he goes out and throws for 400 and 4 TD's against this Seattle D on the biggest possible stage, it does nothing to increase his standing?In three weeks, Peyton Manning will be exactly as good of a quarterback as he is today. Just like how today he's exactly as good of a quarterback as he was three weeks ago.
A QB does not get many chances at the big stage, so when they do have a chance, it really matters.
As this thread & the movie series continue it will start to suck more & more.How is this in anyway similar to rocky?
Whatever Big Ben hits, he destroys.Lik Rocky, Russell is a few inches shorter than his adversary.How is this in anyway similar to rocky?
But if we're in the qb boxing league, think Ben would beat them both.
Except all of Tom Brady's superbowl rings came from cheating, good defense, and great kicking. Not great quaterback play.Sorry.
Despite yesterday's stomping, Brady still has a superior body of work. After yesterday's win manning is now 5-10 all time vs. Brady.
Neither is as good as Montana.
So, if you said Manning is the third best of all time, you might be right.
+1I agreeI think Peyton already is the best of all-time.
You also had Young winning one with that SF team, while with Manning you would have him winning with 2 different teams.I think Manning would be the greatest of all-time. I loved Montana but besides the 1981 Super Bowl season, Montana was on some of the greatest teams of all-time with hall of famers all around him as a supporting cast. Peyton Manning had a good supporting cast in some years but none on the level that Montana had with stellar defenses and offenses. It was a different era with no salary cap back then, so the 49ers could just load up on talent.
Yea but the op said watching peyton was like watching rocky.Lik Rocky, Russell is a few inches shorter than his adversary.But if we're in the qb boxing league, think Ben would beat them both.How is this in anyway similar to rocky?
But that is in February...nope.So you would pick him in the SB then?not if the game is in januaryBTW, Joe was a stud in his day, and I recognize nostalgia is a powerful drug that is always going to boost value against a current player, but if you had 1M of your own money on the line and had to pick a guy to QB your team to a win today, and you could choose any QB of all time in their prime, you'd have to be picking Peyton.
It wasn't Self. Somebody told Dean Smith that after he won his first title. Probably made its way to Self as he is from the same coaching tree.Question: would Peyton Manning be a better quarterback today if Rahim Moore was three inches taller? Manning would be more ACCOMPLISHED, he would have a BETTER CAREER, but he'd be exactly the same quarterback.Exactly as good? I disagree. Do you think if he completely chokes in the SB it has no bearing on his standing as the GOAT? If he goes out and throws for 400 and 4 TD's against this Seattle D on the biggest possible stage, it does nothing to increase his standing?In three weeks, Peyton Manning will be exactly as good of a quarterback as he is today. Just like how today he's exactly as good of a quarterback as he was three weeks ago.
A QB does not get many chances at the big stage, so when they do have a chance, it really matters.
I believe it was Bill Self who, when asked what it was like to finally break through and win a championship after coming so close so many times, said he was no better a coach today than he had been yesterday. A lot of things have to go right in order to win a championship. No one player is going to be in control of all of those things. Every player's legacy is going to hinge on things that are 100% outside of his control... but no player or coach is a "better" or "worse" player because of things that are outside of his control. The game in two weeks will change how Peyton Manning is remembered, but it will have no impact on how great he actually was.
You're smarter than you look.But that is in February...nope.So you would pick him in the SB then?not if the game is in januaryBTW, Joe was a stud in his day, and I recognize nostalgia is a powerful drug that is always going to boost value against a current player, but if you had 1M of your own money on the line and had to pick a guy to QB your team to a win today, and you could choose any QB of all time in their prime, you'd have to be picking Peyton.
Indy went all in with their offense and hoped their defense was "good enough". Peyton's numbers are product of that decision as well as their post season success. The Pats went a different direction and the same can be said of Brady and their post season results. Sure, you can argue that, given the Pats D, Peyton wins more playoff games, but it also follows that, given theColts skill players, Brady would have put up similar passing numbers that Peyton has..yea but they are 3-3 against each other in the playoffs and Manning had terrible defenses in INDY just like Brady is getting now.....Sorry.
Despite yesterday's stomping, Brady still has a superior body of work. After yesterday's win manning is now 5-10 all time vs. Brady.
Neither is as good as Montana.
So, if you said Manning is the third best of all time, you might be right.
Waiting for the Brady defenders...But you're correct. Essentially, according to Adam's legacy vs. Greatness theory, Brady owes his entire legacy to Vinatieri's right foot.Except all of Tom Brady's superbowl rings came from cheating, good defense, and great kicking. Not great quaterback play.Sorry.
Despite yesterday's stomping, Brady still has a superior body of work. After yesterday's win manning is now 5-10 all time vs. Brady.
Neither is as good as Montana.
So, if you said Manning is the third best of all time, you might be right.
Thanks for the correction.It wasn't Self. Somebody told Dean Smith that after he won his first title. Probably made its way to Self as he is from the same coaching tree.