i realize i can just to this myself but just wondering has anyone else done out a ranking by VBD through the first 4 weeks?AD, Charles and McCoy are top 3 without a doubt. I'd say probably Forte at 4. I'd be fine grabbing Graham at the 5 spot, but would probably wait on Manning until later in the 1st. Calvin probably remains at the same (middle-late 1st).
Because 6 pt passing leagues is not the norm?Love how even after showing you guys that he's going to break 50 TD passes this season, Manning still isn't listed as 1.01. In 6 pt passing TD leagues, he's easily #1 with a bullet for me for 2013.
Oh well, at least you guys are finally giving the WRs their due.
Manning had some great weapons in Indy, but the quartet he has right now is unreal. Adding Welker and Julius to this mix is ridiculous. Still can't believe the Pats let Welker go for Glassendola.I'm a Manning fan. He's as good as there ever has been when he has a clean pocket to throw from. So what he's doing so far isn't a surprise to me at all. That said, the toughest part of his schedule has for sure yet to be played. I'm not sold on his OL and I think he could see some real pressure in a few of these games coming up. From following him many years in Indy, I can tell you, he's a different QB with guys in his face. I still think he'll produce but I'm not so sure the gawdy numbers are going to be there all year.
Tough call there. Add Edge to the Harrison/Wayne/Clark side. I'm not going to say that I'm not sold on DT/Decker/JT but they have hardly established themselves (possibly yet) as being among the best of their peers. I think you can say with the quartet of Harrision, Wayne, Clark, Edge that they were all considered top 5 (ish) at their position while they were together.Manning had some great weapons in Indy, but the quartet he has right now is unreal. Adding Welker and Julius to this mix is ridiculous. Still can't believe the Pats let Welker go for Glassendola.I'm a Manning fan. He's as good as there ever has been when he has a clean pocket to throw from. So what he's doing so far isn't a surprise to me at all. That said, the toughest part of his schedule has for sure yet to be played. I'm not sold on his OL and I think he could see some real pressure in a few of these games coming up. From following him many years in Indy, I can tell you, he's a different QB with guys in his face. I still think he'll produce but I'm not so sure the gawdy numbers are going to be there all year.
DT/Welker/Decker/JT >>> Harrison/Wayne/Clark
That said, losing Clady for the season hurts a lot and I get what you are saying. No QB is immune to heavy pressure.
A. You're forgetting Welker.Tough call there. Add Edge to the Harrison/Wayne/Clark side. I'm not going to say that I'm not sold on DT/Decker/JT but they have hardly established themselves (possibly yet) as being among the best of their peers. I think you can say with the quartet of Harrision, Wayne, Clark, Edge that they were all considered top 5 (ish) at their position while they were together.Manning had some great weapons in Indy, but the quartet he has right now is unreal. Adding Welker and Julius to this mix is ridiculous. Still can't believe the Pats let Welker go for Glassendola.I'm a Manning fan. He's as good as there ever has been when he has a clean pocket to throw from. So what he's doing so far isn't a surprise to me at all. That said, the toughest part of his schedule has for sure yet to be played. I'm not sold on his OL and I think he could see some real pressure in a few of these games coming up. From following him many years in Indy, I can tell you, he's a different QB with guys in his face. I still think he'll produce but I'm not so sure the gawdy numbers are going to be there all year.
DT/Welker/Decker/JT >>> Harrison/Wayne/Clark
That said, losing Clady for the season hurts a lot and I get what you are saying. No QB is immune to heavy pressure.
CalBear, you always do fine work. Thx.Current top-11 VBD (PFR scoring):
Manning 51
Graham 51
Peterson 46
Charles 41
McCoy 40
Jordan Cameron 35
Cruz 31
Forte 31
Brees 29
Lynch 29
Demaryius Thomas 28
Adjusting for position and likely future production, I think it should go something like:
Peterson
Manning
Charles
McCoy
Graham
Lynch
Forte
D.Thomas
Brees
Rodgers
After that you get a tier with Cameron, Welker, J.Nelson, Rivers, R.Bush, D.Murray, J.Jones, A.Foster, C.Johnson, V.Cruz.
Welker over Demaryius?Khy said:Through 4 weeks Id say PPR scoring my power rankings would look like this:
1.01: Peterson
1.02: Charles
1.03: Forte
1.04: Graham
1.05: McCoy
1.06: Julio
1.07: Bush
1.08: Calvin
1.09: Cruz
1.10: Lynch
1.11: Manning
1.12: Welker
I'd take any of the three, Charles, McCoy, AP without stressing one way or the other. Any of them could be the #1 this year and the other two shouldn't be too far behind, assuming health for each. Charles in PPR has been a beast. He is Andy Reid's new McCoy. AP is the best pure RB, but I grade his coach and QBs well below the other two and admittedly, I value situation more than most.I don't see how you can possibly put any RB over Peterson. He's leading the league in RB touches and is tops among top RBs in production per touch. And he's the best RB in the league. You'd really rather have McCoy, who's scored 2 touchdowns in 4 games? I see absolutely no reason to value Forte above Peterson, and even Charles is a tough case.
Let me check...is Andy Dalton still his QB? [Checks]I look forward to seeing the list in 4 more weeks. People totally dismissing AJ Green because of his lockdowns with Ike Taylor and Joe Haden. He's gonna blow up.
Last year the Vikings used a fullback in front of Peterson on a high percentage of his rushing plays for the first time in his career. He had over 2000 yards. The first 3 games of this year Peterson looked good, but seemed to not have any running lanes. This week, the Vikings got Jerome Felton back from his DUI suspension and Peterson exploded for 140 running behind his fullback again. Coincidence?I'd take any of the three, Charles, McCoy, AP without stressing one way or the other. Any of them could be the #1 this year and the other two shouldn't be too far behind, assuming health for each. Charles in PPR has been a beast. He is Andy Reid's new McCoy. AP is the best pure RB, but I grade his coach and QBs well below the other two and admittedly, I value situation more than most.I don't see how you can possibly put any RB over Peterson. He's leading the league in RB touches and is tops among top RBs in production per touch. And he's the best RB in the league. You'd really rather have McCoy, who's scored 2 touchdowns in 4 games? I see absolutely no reason to value Forte above Peterson, and even Charles is a tough case.
Why am I 2-2Current top-11 VBD (PFR scoring):
Graham 51
McCoy 40
Demaryius Thomas 28
I'm guessing you don't have the KC D.... Lol. Seriously, they are like a top 10 overall scorer in all my leagues.Why am I 2-2Current top-11 VBD (PFR scoring):
Graham 51
McCoy 40
Demaryius Thomas 28
Two of the guys you have listed don't make that tier either.Let me check...is Andy Dalton still his QB? [Checks]I look forward to seeing the list in 4 more weeks. People totally dismissing AJ Green because of his lockdowns with Ike Taylor and Joe Haden. He's gonna blow up.
Sorry, no, he doesn't make the Calvin Johnson/Jordy Nelson/Wes Welker tier.
Tell me about it: 2-2 with Brees, Peterson, Charles, D.Thomas, and J.Cameron (auction keeper league before anyone starts in on that). #1 scorer by 60 points. Shizzle happens.Why am I 2-2Current top-11 VBD (PFR scoring):
Graham 51
McCoy 40
Demaryius Thomas 28
Same, auction league.Tell me about it: 2-2 with Brees, Peterson, Charles, D.Thomas, and J.Cameron (auction keeper league before anyone starts in on that). #1 scorer by 60 points. Shizzle happens.Why am I 2-2Current top-11 VBD (PFR scoring):
Graham 51
McCoy 40
Demaryius Thomas 28
I'd kill to be 2-2... I'm currently 0-4 with the 3rd highest point total in the league. Everyone that's played me has out performed their season average (even taking into account the week they played me) by over 20 points. Mind you, this is a low scoring league where the 'average' weekly score in the league is around 75-80 and the top end scores where the whole teams blow up are around 115... so outscoring your average by 20 points is pretty amazing. Sitting in this redraft with Charles (#2 RB), Graham (#1 TE), Antonio Brown (#5 WR) and somehow I'm 0-4. It's been real rough these past few weeks.Tell me about it: 2-2 with Brees, Peterson, Charles, D.Thomas, and J.Cameron (auction keeper league before anyone starts in on that). #1 scorer by 60 points. Shizzle happens.Why am I 2-2Current top-11 VBD (PFR scoring):
Graham 51
McCoy 40
Demaryius Thomas 28
Here's my rule: Draft good players.I'm looking back at ADP going into the season. Since it was a strange year for RBs, I like to look at that to see what would have been the safest position to take in the 1st. IMO this should be a goal of more experienced FF owners because you are going to have a value advantage in the later round picks and managing the team throughout the season. It's the early round busts that can really kill your advantage over other owners.
Here are the groups of players by position who, within reason, you could have taken in the first round:
RB
Peterson *
Martin -
Richardson -
Spiller -
Charles *
McCoy *
Rice -
Morris
Lynch *
Foster -
Forte *
WR/TE
Calvin *
Graham *
AJ Green *
QB
Brees *
Rogers -
Manning *
I've got * if they performed in the ballpark of expectations or better and a - if they were a bust. Alf I had neither because he was below expectations but not a bust.
If you look at it this way, you had a 50% chance of your 1st round RB meeting or exceeding expectations, a 100% chance of your 1st round WR meeting or exceeding expectations, and a 66% chance of your 1st round QB meeting or exceeding expectations.
If your goal is to avoid your #1 pick being a bust, then RB 1st round may not be the best choice.
Thoughts?
Yes, but the implied premise of what I wrote is that we had about 10 RBs that were all at the same level. First round RBs were a crapshoot this year and we even knew it going into the draft. If you had a middle pick you were just throwing a dart at the RB list.CalBear said:Here's my rule: Draft good players.17seconds said:I'm looking back at ADP going into the season. Since it was a strange year for RBs, I like to look at that to see what would have been the safest position to take in the 1st. IMO this should be a goal of more experienced FF owners because you are going to have a value advantage in the later round picks and managing the team throughout the season. It's the early round busts that can really kill your advantage over other owners.
Here are the groups of players by position who, within reason, you could have taken in the first round:
RB
Peterson *
Martin -
Richardson -
Spiller -
Charles *
McCoy *
Rice -
Morris
Lynch *
Foster -
Forte *
WR/TE
Calvin *
Graham *
AJ Green *
QB
Brees *
Rogers -
Manning *
I've got * if they performed in the ballpark of expectations or better and a - if they were a bust. Alf I had neither because he was below expectations but not a bust.
If you look at it this way, you had a 50% chance of your 1st round RB meeting or exceeding expectations, a 100% chance of your 1st round WR meeting or exceeding expectations, and a 66% chance of your 1st round QB meeting or exceeding expectations.
If your goal is to avoid your #1 pick being a bust, then RB 1st round may not be the best choice.
Thoughts?
Good RBs are worth more than good WRs or QBs, but drafting marginal RBs just because they're RBs makes no sense. I think Charles, Peterson, and Forte were obvious solid picks going into the season; after that the rest of the first-round RBs all had questions, so you have to look at sure(ish) things at other positions. The really top QBs, WRs and TEs are all more solid picks than second-tier RBs.
You make a good point, but the bolded is much easier to say in hindsight. Forte was pretty solidly in the "marginal RB" group at the time and Charles was only as much a sure thing as Trent Richardson, CJ Spiller, Doug Martin, and Ray Rice.CalBear said:Here's my rule: Draft good players.
Good RBs are worth more than good WRs or QBs, but drafting marginal RBs just because they're RBs makes no sense. I think Charles, Peterson, and Forte were obvious solid picks going into the season; after that the rest of the first-round RBs all had questions, so you have to look at sure(ish) things at other positions. The really top QBs, WRs and TEs are all more solid picks than second-tier RBs.