That is 26th overall in a non-IDP, non-TE required league.Pickings get a little slim, ya know?
Don't forget Chaos Commish was pouring the kool aid before i got a sip. I want him to share the (blame/credit).
Well, I have to get ahead of Chaos Commish, who picks at 35.That is 26th overall in a non-IDP, non-TE required league.Pickings get a little slim, ya know?
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I know what I saw, and the man can play. I don't know if he'll fall to me, but I have decided against drafting him early. There's a few WRs who were drafted earlier in the real draft who probably have better situations and deserve consideration right around the same ADP as Marshall. We certainly boosted his stock by sharing the koolaid. :(Don't forget Chaos Commish was pouring the kool aid before i got a sip. I want him to share the (blame/credit).![]()
watch his highlights on yahoo and tell us what you think.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I know what I saw, and the man can play. I don't know if he'll fall to me, but I have decided against drafting him early. There's a few WRs who were drafted earlier in the real draft who probably have better situations and deserve consideration right around the same ADP as Marshall. We certainly boosted his stock by sharing the koolaid. :(Don't forget Chaos Commish was pouring the kool aid before i got a sip. I want him to share the (blame/credit).![]()
watch his highlights on yahoo and tell us what you think.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Him Norwood, Harrison and Hass are players I'm most interested in following come training camp. Construx already reached a round early for Harrison. If he moves up for Marshall, I'll just cheer for his team (and plan his assassination).
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
and dont forget Domenik Hixon - definitely another top 5 sleeper WR from this class. I would love to be able to have both on a dynasty team.I love his upside, but he is big-time high risk.
If I didn't have a couple of other high risk/high reward type WRs on my dynasty roster (Larry Brackins, David Terrell, & Brandon Williams) I sure would have taken the risk with him, but there's only so much roster space for those kinds of players.
There's no question he's a lightening-in-a-bottle type of guy. If you're depending on him to contribute significantly to your FF team in his 1st two years, I think you're going to be disappointed badly, unless he really does have T.O. caliber talent in him. Smith is probably good for 2 years at least now that Walker is on board & signed for 6 years in DEN, meaning as this season goes on Walker can evolve into the #1 WR and R Smith can devolve into the #2 WR he probably is with his age starting to affect his ability. Lelie appears to have run himself out of a job, so there may be room for Marshall to contribute a little in the first 2 years if Terrell, Devoe, & Adams all end up being bench material - which they could very well be.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I love his upside, but he is big-time high risk.
If I didn't have a couple of other high risk/high reward type WRs on my dynasty roster (Larry Brackins, David Terrell, & Brandon Williams) I sure would have taken the risk with him, but there's only so much roster space for those kinds of players.
There's no question he's a lightening-in-a-bottle type of guy. If you're depending on him to contribute significantly to your FF team in his 1st two years, I think you're going to be disappointed badly, unless he really does have T.O. caliber talent in him. Smith is probably good for 2 years at least now that Walker is on board & signed for 6 years in DEN, meaning as this season goes on Walker can evolve into the #1 WR and R Smith can devolve into the #2 WR he probably is with his age starting to affect his ability. Lelie appears to have run himself out of a job, so there may be room for Marshall to contribute a little in the first 2 years if Terrell, Devoe, & Adams all end up being bench material - which they could very well be.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
okay Chaos Commish, thanks for the drink.The yahoo clips are where?Don't forget Chaos Commish was pouring the kool aid before i got a sip. I want him to share the (blame/credit).![]()
watch his highlights on yahoo and tell us what you think.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I agree with that wholeheartedly. Looking for WR prospects that had the package of skills to be a #1, Marshall really stood out. There arent many in this class - Travis Wilson, Chad Jackson, Demetrius Williams if he bulks up...The other thing that really got me excited about Marshall was how he consistently got better over the course of the season, culminating in DOMINANT performances in his bowl game and all star game (maybe its something about Hawaii). If you think of his development as a curve, that curve went up and at a higher rate as the year went on - points to possible big things imo.Much of my opinion was influenced by the low quality WR talent in this draft.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I like Hixon myself, but one of Hixon or Marshall is going to end up on the taxi squad, I would guess. Hixon may give enough in the return game to merit a spot, which would pretty much end Marshall's possibility of making the regular roster, unless, like I said earlier, he flashes some serious T.O. talent almost immediately. If that's the case, there's going to be some serious bloodshed in the DEN vet WRs. That would indicate cutting 3 of Terrell, Adams, Devoe, & Watts at least - maybe all 4 if Lelie gets his head on straight very quickly.All of a sudden there's lots of competition at WR in DEN. My head is spinning - I don't know how to handle that.and dont forget Domenik Hixon - definitely another top 5 sleeper WR from this class. I would love to be able to have both on a dynasty team.I love his upside, but he is big-time high risk.
If I didn't have a couple of other high risk/high reward type WRs on my dynasty roster (Larry Brackins, David Terrell, & Brandon Williams) I sure would have taken the risk with him, but there's only so much roster space for those kinds of players.
There's no question he's a lightening-in-a-bottle type of guy. If you're depending on him to contribute significantly to your FF team in his 1st two years, I think you're going to be disappointed badly, unless he really does have T.O. caliber talent in him. Smith is probably good for 2 years at least now that Walker is on board & signed for 6 years in DEN, meaning as this season goes on Walker can evolve into the #1 WR and R Smith can devolve into the #2 WR he probably is with his age starting to affect his ability. Lelie appears to have run himself out of a job, so there may be room for Marshall to contribute a little in the first 2 years if Terrell, Devoe, & Adams all end up being bench material - which they could very well be.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
linkclick on the camera next to his name.okay Chaos Commish, thanks for the drink.The yahoo clips are where?Don't forget Chaos Commish was pouring the kool aid before i got a sip. I want him to share the (blame/credit).![]()
watch his highlights on yahoo and tell us what you think.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Big time buffering issues for me there...that's okay. The one play I did see made me think of TO when I was watching him cut and run.linkclick on the camera next to his name.okay Chaos Commish, thanks for the drink.The yahoo clips are where?Don't forget Chaos Commish was pouring the kool aid before i got a sip. I want him to share the (blame/credit).![]()
watch his highlights on yahoo and tell us what you think.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
youll notice a couple of things there that i really like:1) natural hands catcherBig time buffering issues for me there...that's okay. The one play I did see made me think of TO when I was watching him cut and run.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Nice to see some highlights. A very interesting prospect.linkclick on the camera next to his name.okay Chaos Commish, thanks for the drink.The yahoo clips are where?Don't forget Chaos Commish was pouring the kool aid before i got a sip. I want him to share the (blame/credit).![]()
watch his highlights on yahoo and tell us what you think.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I ended up taking him at 16.12 since this thread made sure he wouldn't make it back to me at 18.12. What I liked about Marshall is that he's a team player and him converting to safety for his junior year was impressive. He's going into a situation I really like, with Cutler learning on the sidelines with him. I really think Cutler and Marshall will develop some chemistry and it will show in a couple years when they both become starters. The downside to Marshall is that he's unlikely to do much his rookie or maybe even his 2nd year if Rod Smith keeps playing.I know what I saw, and the man can play. I don't know if he'll fall to me, but I have decided against drafting him early. There's a few WRs who were drafted earlier in the real draft who probably have better situations and deserve consideration right around the same ADP as Marshall. We certainly boosted his stock by sharing the koolaid. :(Don't forget Chaos Commish was pouring the kool aid before i got a sip. I want him to share the (blame/credit).![]()
watch his highlights on yahoo and tell us what you think.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Him Norwood, Harrison and Hass are players I'm most interested in following come training camp. Construx already reached a round early for Harrison. If he moves up for Marshall, I'll just cheer for his team (and plan his assassination).
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Now I'm glad you did!I ended up taking him at 16.12 since this thread made sure he wouldn't make it back to me at 18.12. What I liked about Marshall is that he's a team player and him converting to safety for his junior year was impressive. He's going into a situation I really like, with Cutler learning on the sidelines with him. I really think Cutler and Marshall will develop some chemistry and it will show in a couple years when they both become starters. The downside to Marshall is that he's unlikely to do much his rookie or maybe even his 2nd year if Rod Smith keeps playing.I know what I saw, and the man can play. I don't know if he'll fall to me, but I have decided against drafting him early. There's a few WRs who were drafted earlier in the real draft who probably have better situations and deserve consideration right around the same ADP as Marshall. We certainly boosted his stock by sharing the koolaid. :(Don't forget Chaos Commish was pouring the kool aid before i got a sip. I want him to share the (blame/credit).![]()
watch his highlights on yahoo and tell us what you think.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Him Norwood, Harrison and Hass are players I'm most interested in following come training camp. Construx already reached a round early for Harrison. If he moves up for Marshall, I'll just cheer for his team (and plan his assassination).
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
In all due respect, NS, if you are basing dynasty rookie picks only on production over the next 2 years, then I think you will regret a lot of your picks.Now I'm glad you did!With the effects of the Kool-Aid wearing off, getting picked by Denver is a very bad situation. Rod Smith, barring injury, probably has at least a couple of good ones left in him, Head-case Walker with get a starting gig along with Headcase Lelie. Add in TE & RB catches, you don't have much left for the rookie.
Again, barring injuries, he will see very little playing time over the next 2 years.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
6'6" Jones, Matt JAC 6'6" Moore, Clarence BAL 6'5" Bannister, Alex SEA 6'5" Bennett, Drew TEN 6'5" Burress, Plaxico NYG 6'5" Finneran, Brian ATL 6'5" Jackson, Vincent SD 6'5" Jurevicius, Joe CLE 6'5" Osgood, Kassim SD 6'4" Brackins, Larry TB 6'4" Calico, Tyrone TEN 6'4" Gage, Justin CHI 6'4" Gibson, Fred MIA 6'4" Hamilton, Derrick SF 6'4" Henry, Chris CIN 6'4" Jenkins, Michael ATL 6'4" Johnson, Keyshawn CAR6'4" Lyman, Chase NO 6'4" Maxwell, Marcus SF 6'4" McMullen, Billy PHI 6'4" Morant, Johnnie OAK 6'4" Moss, Randy OAK 6'4" Wilford, Ernest JAC 6'4" Williams, Mike DET 6'4" Williams, Reggie JAC 6'4" Marshall, Brandon DEN6'4" Nance, Martin BUF6'4" Stovall, Maurice TB
It's the 16th and 17th round - I'm not expecting guys drafted here to be studs this year. Marshall is a long-term project who will hopefully be ready to take over on my team when Bruce retires.Now I'm glad you did!I ended up taking him at 16.12 since this thread made sure he wouldn't make it back to me at 18.12. What I liked about Marshall is that he's a team player and him converting to safety for his junior year was impressive. He's going into a situation I really like, with Cutler learning on the sidelines with him. I really think Cutler and Marshall will develop some chemistry and it will show in a couple years when they both become starters. The downside to Marshall is that he's unlikely to do much his rookie or maybe even his 2nd year if Rod Smith keeps playing.I know what I saw, and the man can play. I don't know if he'll fall to me, but I have decided against drafting him early. There's a few WRs who were drafted earlier in the real draft who probably have better situations and deserve consideration right around the same ADP as Marshall. We certainly boosted his stock by sharing the koolaid. :(Don't forget Chaos Commish was pouring the kool aid before i got a sip. I want him to share the (blame/credit).![]()
watch his highlights on yahoo and tell us what you think.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Him Norwood, Harrison and Hass are players I'm most interested in following come training camp. Construx already reached a round early for Harrison. If he moves up for Marshall, I'll just cheer for his team (and plan his assassination).
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>With the effects of the Kool-Aid wearing off, getting picked by Denver is a very bad situation. Rod Smith, barring injury, probably has at least a couple of good ones left in him, Head-case Walker with get a starting gig along with Headcase Lelie. Add in TE & RB catches, you don't have much left for the rookie.Again, barring injuries, he will see very little playing time over the next 2 years.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Where did you get the list?I thought it'd be interesting to see a list of current WRs who are 6'4" and up. I wanted to see if there was some sort of 'excessive height' issue with WRs as there appears to be with small RBs. With names like Bennett, Burress, Key Johnson, Randy Moss, and other successful WRs on the list, being that tall doesn't seem to be a negative.
6'6" Jones, Matt JAC 6'6" Moore, Clarence BAL 6'5" Bannister, Alex SEA 6'5" Bennett, Drew TEN 6'5" Burress, Plaxico NYG 6'5" Finneran, Brian ATL 6'5" Jackson, Vincent SD 6'5" Jurevicius, Joe CLE 6'5" Osgood, Kassim SD 6'4" Brackins, Larry TB 6'4" Calico, Tyrone TEN 6'4" Gage, Justin CHI 6'4" Gibson, Fred MIA 6'4" Hamilton, Derrick SF 6'4" Henry, Chris CIN 6'4" Jenkins, Michael ATL 6'4" Johnson, Keyshawn CAR6'4" Lyman, Chase NO 6'4" Maxwell, Marcus SF 6'4" McMullen, Billy PHI 6'4" Morant, Johnnie OAK 6'4" Moss, Randy OAK 6'4" Wilford, Ernest JAC 6'4" Williams, Mike DET 6'4" Williams, Reggie JAC 6'4" Marshall, Brandon DEN6'4" Nance, Martin BUF6'4" Stovall, Maurice TB<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Wow! Now that I see that list, I think that being tall is a red flag on a WR. For every Moss, Burress, & KeyJohn, you've got 3 Osgoods, Lymans, & Maxwells.I'd disagree. That list makes me think completely differently than I already did about tall WRs - there are a lot of tall busts out there.I thought it'd be interesting to see a list of current WRs who are 6'4" and up. I wanted to see if there was some sort of issue with 'too tall' WRs as there appears to be with 'too small' RBs. With names like Bennett, Burress, Key Johnson, Randy Moss, and other successful WRs on the list, being that tall doesn't seem to be a negative.
I keep a spreadsheet the likes of which you wouldn't believe. It's now up to 1.2 MB, and just grows and grows as I add new bells and whistles to it.
2- 3 yrs on 75% of my picks, 25% 3+ yrs. (rough numbers).You cannot accurately project beyond 3 years, so you're just taking a guess at that point.In all due respect, NS, if you are basing dynasty rookie picks only on production over the next 2 years, then I think you will regret a lot of your picks.Now I'm glad you did!With the effects of the Kool-Aid wearing off, getting picked by Denver is a very bad situation. Rod Smith, barring injury, probably has at least a couple of good ones left in him, Head-case Walker with get a starting gig along with Headcase Lelie. Add in TE & RB catches, you don't have much left for the rookie.
Again, barring injuries, he will see very little playing time over the next 2 years.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I agree with you and you did a good job of getting a mix of young/old, but your pick of Aaron Rodgers is just as risky as Brandon Marshall.2- 3 yrs on 75% of my picks, 25% 3+ yrs. (rough numbers).You cannot accurately project beyond 3 years, so you're just taking a guess at that point.In all due respect, NS, if you are basing dynasty rookie picks only on production over the next 2 years, then I think you will regret a lot of your picks.Now I'm glad you did!With the effects of the Kool-Aid wearing off, getting picked by Denver is a very bad situation. Rod Smith, barring injury, probably has at least a couple of good ones left in him, Head-case Walker with get a starting gig along with Headcase Lelie. Add in TE & RB catches, you don't have much left for the rookie.
Again, barring injuries, he will see very little playing time over the next 2 years.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
WIN now & WIN later.![]()
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Fixed.
I had a thread about this a few weeks back. Noone has convinced me of something better than 'takinig the beads' yet.
My opinion:Tall WRs = more mass = more difficult to get seperation from NFL CBs >> Leaping abilityWow! Now that I see that list, I think that being tall is a red flag on a WR. For every Moss, Burress, & KeyJohn, you've got 3 Osgoods, Lymans, & Maxwells.I'd disagree. That list makes me think completely differently than I already did about tall WRs - there are a lot of tall busts out there.I thought it'd be interesting to see a list of current WRs who are 6'4" and up. I wanted to see if there was some sort of issue with 'too tall' WRs as there appears to be with 'too small' RBs. With names like Bennett, Burress, Key Johnson, Randy Moss, and other successful WRs on the list, being that tall doesn't seem to be a negative.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
But Pony Boy, that's not really a fair statement unless you examine whether it might be true at all heights. Maybe the same ratio of 6'1" guys or 5'11" guys are successes too. I really don't know. Tell you what. I'll list all 6'0" guys and you can judge for yourself. I picked 6'0" just because it seems about the norm, with as many WRs at that height as any other. I'm not evaluating this list, I'm just putting it out there (by the way, my spreadsheet might not be 100% up to date right now. I sometimes miss offseason transactions).Wow! Now that I see that list, I think that being tall is a red flag on a WR. For every Moss, Burress, & KeyJohn, you've got 3 Osgoods, Lymans, & Maxwells.I'd disagree. That list makes me think completely differently than I already did about tall WRs - there are a lot of tall busts out there.I thought it'd be interesting to see a list of current WRs who are 6'4" and up. I wanted to see if there was some sort of issue with 'too tall' WRs as there appears to be with 'too small' RBs. With names like Bennett, Burress, Key Johnson, Randy Moss, and other successful WRs on the list, being that tall doesn't seem to be a negative.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
6'0" Avant, Jason PHI6'0" Blackmon, Will GB6'0" Booker, Marty MIA 6'0" Bruce, Isaac STL 6'0" Burleson, Nate SEA6'0" Caldwell, Reche NE 6'0" Carter, Jason MIN6'0" Carter, Tim NYG 6'0" Copper, Terrance DAL 6'0" Cotchery, Jerricho NYJ 6'0" Crayton, Patrick DAL 6'0" Driver, Donald GB 6'0" Ford, Carl CHI 6'0" Gilmore, Bryan SF 6'0" Givens, David TEN 6'0" Hankton, Cortez JAC 6'0" Harrison, Marvin IND 6'0" Hass, Mike NO6'0" Holt, Torry STL 6'0" Jacobs, Taylor WAS 6'0" Kilmer, Ethan CIN6'0" Lewis, Greg PHI 6'0" Lloyd, Brandon WAS 6'0" Looker, Dane STL 6'0" Parker, Eric SD 6'0" Pathon, Jerome ATL 6'0" Ponder, Willie NYG 6'0" Proehl, Ricky CAR 6'0" Roby, Courtney TEN 6'0" Rodgers, Cory GB6'0" Smith, Rod DEN 6'0" Stallworth, Donte' NO 6'0" Swinton, Reggie ARI 6'0" Taylor, Jamaar NYG 6'0" Thrash, James WAS 6'0" Tyree, David NYG 6'0" Ward, Hines PIT 6'0" Wayne, Reggie IND 6'0" White, Roddy ATL 6'0" Whitted, Alvis OAK 6'0" Williams, Roydell TEN 6'0" Wilson, George BUF
Risky, yes. But as high as Marshall. no way. Rodgers is the #2 QB, a former first round pick, behind a VET that wants to retire every 10 minutes or so. Marshall is at best 4th man on a WR roster.I agree with you and you did a good job of getting a mix of young/old, but your pick of Aaron Rodgers is just as risky as Brandon Marshall.2- 3 yrs on 75% of my picks, 25% 3+ yrs. (rough numbers).You cannot accurately project beyond 3 years, so you're just taking a guess at that point.In all due respect, NS, if you are basing dynasty rookie picks only on production over the next 2 years, then I think you will regret a lot of your picks.Now I'm glad you did!With the effects of the Kool-Aid wearing off, getting picked by Denver is a very bad situation. Rod Smith, barring injury, probably has at least a couple of good ones left in him, Head-case Walker with get a starting gig along with Headcase Lelie. Add in TE & RB catches, you don't have much left for the rookie.
Again, barring injuries, he will see very little playing time over the next 2 years.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
WIN now & WIN later.![]()
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
No, no, no. You misunderstand me. I always had a notion that height was a huge advantage for WRs and so I'd favor a taller WR over a shorter WR given the opportunity to pick them came up in a dynasty rookie draft. I gave taller WRs an edge with really nothing to support that other than NFL team's seeming love for height at the position.Now seeing your list, I really don't see my preconceived notion being supported. It's an assumption of mine that was apparently wrong. In fact, I started being suspicious of this as we started seeing some great success by smaller WRs in the past couple of years. This just reinforces how wrong my prejudices were. This is on me, not on anyone else.But Pony Boy, that's not really a fair statement unless you examine whether it might be true at all heights. Maybe the same ratio of 6'1" guys or 5'11" guys are successes too. I really don't know. Tell you what. I'll list all 6'0" guys and you can judge for yourself. I picked 6'0" just because it seems about the norm, with as many WRs at that height as any other. I'm not evaluating this list, I'm just putting it out there (by the way, my spreadsheet might not be 100% up to date right now. I sometimes miss offseason transactions).
Sorted by year and round drafted:6'4" Johnson, Keyshawn CAR 1996 1st roundWow! Now that I see that list, I think that being tall is a red flag on a WR. For every Moss, Burress, & KeyJohn, you've got 3 Osgoods, Lymans, & Maxwells.I'd disagree. That list makes me think completely differently than I already did about tall WRs - there are a lot of tall busts out there.I thought it'd be interesting to see a list of current WRs who are 6'4" and up. I wanted to see if there was some sort of issue with 'too tall' WRs as there appears to be with 'too small' RBs. With names like Bennett, Burress, Key Johnson, Randy Moss, and other successful WRs on the list, being that tall doesn't seem to be a negative.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
OK gotcha. You're not saying being tall is a disadvantage, only that it may not be the advantage you had thought it was.I think height can be an advantage if the WR learns how to use his body to his advantage, but it's only one aspect of the total WR package. If he can't separate from coverage, doesn't have good hands, makes his cuts in routes poorly, etc. etc. etc. then that height advantage doesn't really matter.No, no, no. You misunderstand me. I always had a notion that height was a huge advantage for WRs and so I'd favor a taller WR over a shorter WR given the opportunity to pick them came up in a dynasty rookie draft. I gave taller WRs an edge with really nothing to support that other than NFL team's seeming love for height at the position.Now seeing your list, I really don't see my preconceived notion being supported. It's an assumption of mine that was apparently wrong. In fact, I started being suspicious of this as we started seeing some great success by smaller WRs in the past couple of years. This just reinforces how wrong my prejudices were. This is on me, not on anyone else.But Pony Boy, that's not really a fair statement unless you examine whether it might be true at all heights. Maybe the same ratio of 6'1" guys or 5'11" guys are successes too. I really don't know. Tell you what. I'll list all 6'0" guys and you can judge for yourself. I picked 6'0" just because it seems about the norm, with as many WRs at that height as any other. I'm not evaluating this list, I'm just putting it out there (by the way, my spreadsheet might not be 100% up to date right now. I sometimes miss offseason transactions).
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
and to bring this full circle, Marshall definitely has a natural feel for using his frame to his advantage. And his strength and physical style of play.I think height can be an advantage if the WR learns how to use his body to his advantage, but it's only one aspect of the total WR package. If he can't separate from coverage, doesn't have good hands, makes his cuts in routes poorly, etc. etc. etc. then that height advantage doesn't really matter.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
What's your take on him being the 17th WR picked, was it due to inexperience, his school, or something else?and to bring this full circle, Marshall definitely has a natural feel for using his frame to his advantage. And his strength and physical style of play.I think height can be an advantage if the WR learns how to use his body to his advantage, but it's only one aspect of the total WR package. If he can't separate from coverage, doesn't have good hands, makes his cuts in routes poorly, etc. etc. etc. then that height advantage doesn't really matter.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><--- brandon marshall ale
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Does that taste like Mike Williams ale?and to bring this full circle, Marshall definitely has a natural feel for using his frame to his advantage. And his strength and physical style of play.I think height can be an advantage if the WR learns how to use his body to his advantage, but it's only one aspect of the total WR package. If he can't separate from coverage, doesn't have good hands, makes his cuts in routes poorly, etc. etc. etc. then that height advantage doesn't really matter.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><--- brandon marshall ale
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
inexperience, some character questions, some questions about being too bigWhat's your take on him being the 17th WR picked, was it due to inexperience, his school, or something else?and to bring this full circle, Marshall definitely has a natural feel for using his frame to his advantage. And his strength and physical style of play.I think height can be an advantage if the WR learns how to use his body to his advantage, but it's only one aspect of the total WR package. If he can't separate from coverage, doesn't have good hands, makes his cuts in routes poorly, etc. etc. etc. then that height advantage doesn't really matter.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><--- brandon marshall ale
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
thats fair, but remember how highly regarded mike williams was. we're talking about someone you had to get in the top 10 of rookie drafts vs. someone you can get in the mid 20s.Does that taste like Mike Williams ale?and to bring this full circle, Marshall definitely has a natural feel for using his frame to his advantage. And his strength and physical style of play.I think height can be an advantage if the WR learns how to use his body to his advantage, but it's only one aspect of the total WR package. If he can't separate from coverage, doesn't have good hands, makes his cuts in routes poorly, etc. etc. etc. then that height advantage doesn't really matter.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><--- brandon marshall ale
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>![]()
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I think Jackson went higher because A) jackson is faster, and has good speed for a WR of just about any size and B) the talent level in the 2006 draft was better than the 2005 draft.I would rather have Marshall, but removing my marshall believer glasses, im sure jackson has more value.Sigmund - Marshall and Vincent Jackson are both tall WRs who dominated a lower level of competition in college. What would you say it was that made Jackson worth a 2nd round pick vs. Marshall's 4th round status? Who would you rather have on your dynasty team?
SD
McCardell - soon to retire
Parker - small, possession type
Woods - 1st rounder has shown nothing so far
TE Gates - dominant
DEN
Smith - soon to retire
Walker - potentially dominant
Lelie - 1st rounder is as good as gone
TE - Scheffler - good hands rookie w/upside
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Very true. Getting him at a decent value isn't bad at all. 26th overall in a Dynasty league is pretty high in my opinion, but he could certainly prove me wrong.thats fair, but remember how highly regarded mike williams was. we're talking about someone you had to get in the top 10 of rookie drafts vs. someone you can get in the mid 20s.Does that taste like Mike Williams ale?and to bring this full circle, Marshall definitely has a natural feel for using his frame to his advantage. And his strength and physical style of play.I think height can be an advantage if the WR learns how to use his body to his advantage, but it's only one aspect of the total WR package. If he can't separate from coverage, doesn't have good hands, makes his cuts in routes poorly, etc. etc. etc. then that height advantage doesn't really matter.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><--- brandon marshall ale
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>![]()
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>