NEGATIVES
— Not asked to make a lot of true progressions. Offense utilized a lot of wide receiver read routes that forced Fields to hold on to the ball and hitch while the wideout made a decision, so timing will be something he will have to keep improving upon in the NFL.
Did you guys know that "processing" bit got all racial on Twitter and it was at the point where if you suggested he read defenses slowly you were LAAAACIST.
Not kidding. I'll find the article in The Ringer that is evidence of it.
When evaluating players at any level, it's obviously important to know what concepts they're running, how those concepts magnify their attributes, and how those concepts may also get in the way of their ultimate athletic potential. It's a lesson we have to re-learn every…
touchdownwire.usatoday.com
Here's Doug "E. Fresh" Farrar firing the salvo: "So, perhaps Justin Fields isn't a slow processor. Perhaps Justin Fields is a potential next-level mind who has passed multiple processing tests at an NFL level before he ever enters an NFL facility. As ESPN's Dan Orlovsky recently pointed out, it's past time to stop thinking of Fields as an athlete, and to start thinking of him as a high-level quarterback."
LOL.
The Ringer got filthy with this one. Total race hacks.
The Ohio State quarterback came into the year as the clear no. 2 passer in the draft, then had a banner season. Yet now he’s seemingly sliding down draft boards due to clichéd critiques that reinforce the uphill battle Black QB prospects face.
www.theringer.com
“Fields’s film is as good as just about any other player in the 2021 class. At 6-foot-3 and 227 pounds, his ability to survive contact and deliver accurate, layered throws made him one of college football’s most nuanced pocket passers. Across two seasons (22 games) as Ohio State’s starter, Fields completed 68.4 percent of his passes for 5,373 yards (9.3 yards per attempt), 63 touchdowns, and nine interceptions, while finishing third (2019) and seventh (2020) in Heisman voting.
Of course, player assessments go beyond statistics. Back in February, Pro Football Network’s Tony Pauline
mentioned that an NFL team representative he spoke with at the Senior Bowl asserted that Fields moved to his second read—meaning he targeted a player who wasn’t the primary receiver on a play—seven times out of 225 attempts. This narrative coincided with the beginning of a drop in his perception. Take a look at the below graph from
Benjamin Robinson’s Grinding the Mocks site, which has tracked more than 1,000 different mock drafts, to see how Fields’s standing has changed in comparison to Wilson and Jones:
While the tunnel vision narrative has stuck, further analysis casts doubt on the idea that Fields struggled with advancing through his reads.
USA Today’s Doug Farrar detailed how Ohio State’s scheme prominently features advanced route progressions, including option patterns, which at times require the quarterback to hold on to the ball longer than usual. Furthermore,
per The Draft Network’s Benjamin Solak, Fields threw beyond his first read 42 times, for a rate of 19.09 percent. That mark is higher than those of the other four QB prospects who are likely to go in the first round: Lawrence (16.99 percent), Wilson (14.20 percent), Jones (9.72 percent), and Lance (16.61 percent).
Following Ohio State’s first pro day last month, Buckeyes coach Ryan Day said that he hadn’t heard from any NFL personnel suggesting Fields struggled to read the field. “I know there’s some people who are saying that in the media,” Day added. “I haven’t spoken to them. But I think it’s interesting.”
‘To be honest, we have some of the best receivers in the country,’ Fields said following his first pro day workout. ‘So if my first and second read is there, I’m not going to pass up that first or second read to get to [the third, fourth] or fifth read to prove that I can read.’”