Is 3 Vikings too many? (1 Viewer)

[hounder]

Need to make solid decisions (unlike Phily over Minn Def last week) and have slotted in Keenum and the Minn. Def with L. Murray as flex.  Never heard of it being too cold in GB until this week on some podcasts.  Would you limit risk by playing Goff over Keenum or maybe Dez or Cooks over Murray (I for one don’t understand the Cooks top ten rankings this week, Buffalo shut him down a few weeks ago and Hogan may be back).  Other options at def are Eagles and Panthers but I’m feeling good about Vikes as they are a solid def even though haven’t been great fantasy defense until last week.  Thanks.

 

[snoochieboochies]

Starting goff is actually a nice play. The titans run defense is actually pretty good, and i think goff passes more this game than usual. Woods is back and the game has nice weather. 

The vikings game is going to be very cold. Dropped passes are likely. Running against GB should be heavy in the game plan, and starting the defense against hundley is a safe bet. 

Goff over keenum is fine, but i would start murray and the vikings defense. 

 

[Gally]

I don't worry about playing multiple players on one team.  Evaluate the players individually and if you project them to be the top scorers for the week then you should play them.  You could use them being on the same team as a tie break if  you really can't project one player being better than another but I would say the players you are considering are all solid plays. 

I don't have an issue playing Goff over Keenum however I would probably still go with Keenum.  Vikes are playing for seeding and I really like playing the QB and RB from the same team.  You get pieces of almost every TD.  Murray and Vikes D are solid plays based on your other options. 

Truth be told I will be rolling out Keenum, McKinnon, Thielen, and Forbath this week but I don't have other kicker or QB options.

 

[travdogg]

I'd stick with Keenum and the Vikings D, I'd sit Murray for Cooks though.