Kegs & Eggs
Footballguy
is Henry a top 5 RB in 2007? I could see him putting up huge numbers in that scheme. I'd say 1500 and 15 TD's...am I off based?
IMO, that's a little high. Could see him cracking the top 10 though.is Henry a top 5 RB in 2007? I could see him putting up huge numbers in that scheme. I'd say 1500 and 15 TD's...am I off based?
I would like to read more on this before getting too excited...it still is Shanny! If they would commit to a back...I say definately top 10......but they rarely do. Broncos have one of the best if not the best O line on earthNo...possibly top10 though.
IMO, that's a little high. Could see him cracking the top 10 though.is Henry a top 5 RB in 2007? I could see him putting up huge numbers in that scheme. I'd say 1500 and 15 TD's...am I off based?
The Denver back Henry most resembles is Mike Anderson. Anderson did have 1500/15 in 2000, but I don't think Denver's rushing attack is as potent now as it was then, particularly with a green QB. If Henry is the undisputed starter (which seems likely at this point), I think 1500 total yards is a good lower bound, but 15 TDs seems too high. The entire Denver rushing offense produced just 11 TDs in 2006. I'd project him for 1500/10 with upside as Denver's featured back.
Agreed, thats why I think he could be a top 5 RB.The Denver back Henry most resembles is Mike Anderson. Anderson did have 1500/15 in 2000, but I don't think Denver's rushing attack is as potent now as it was then, particularly with a green QB. If Henry is the undisputed starter (which seems likely at this point), I think 1500 total yards is a good lower bound, but 15 TDs seems too high. The entire Denver rushing offense produced just 11 TDs in 2006. I'd project him for 1500/10 with upside as Denver's featured back.![]()
Right...I'm not sure Shanny wants to give Henry the ultra workhorse load if Bell can help shoulder the weight...Denver is usually in the playoff hunt.it's within reach but there is Mike Bell to consider. I see something like 1250-1350/9-11
Exactly. While Henry should do well in this system, too many seem to be extrapolating the Denver rushing attack in the TD/Portis years to today. It may very well not be the same anymore.but I don't think Denver's rushing attack is as potent now as it was then, particularly with a green QB.
I think he is a low end #1 RB with the potential to be an elite #1. I would take him over players like Rudy, Portis, and McGahee.Good question.Another question is what would u trade for him right now. It would probaly take a nice young rb or high draft pick to land him so whats his market value now?
It appears to be tremendously over-inflated.Another question is what would u trade for him right now. It would probaly take a nice young rb or high draft pick to land him so whats his market value now?
Rudy keeps producing and getting knocked down in rankings. I don't get it. You're not alone I just...well I don't understand it. Very solid player, seems like a limitted risk in FF, that's pretty sweet.I think he is a low end #1 RB with the potential to be an elite #1. I would take him over players like Rudy, Portis, and McGahee.Good question.Another question is what would u trade for him right now. It would probaly take a nice young rb or high draft pick to land him so whats his market value now?
Not sure what ya mean here. Dynasty wise Henry can't have all too much value, he changes teams just way too much and Denver has changed backs quite a bit too.It appears to be tremendously over-inflated.Another question is what would u trade for him right now. It would probaly take a nice young rb or high draft pick to land him so whats his market value now?I think we need an icon similar to the
one for these purposes.
:dynastyowner: with skewed perspective
I am guilty of dropping Rudi even though he is very productive every year, I just think Henry's ceiling is much higher than Rudi's.Rudy keeps producing and getting knocked down in rankings. I don't get it. You're not alone I just...well I don't understand it. Very solid player, seems like a limitted risk in FF, that's pretty sweet.I think he is a low end #1 RB with the potential to be an elite #1. I would take him over players like Rudy, Portis, and McGahee.Good question.Another question is what would u trade for him right now. It would probaly take a nice young rb or high draft pick to land him so whats his market value now?
what about the Ds impact? This seems somewhat predictable to meI've never believed that Henry is a top flight talent, but he's a good runner, and Cutler's inexperienced. Good coaches lean hard on their running game when they have a rookie QB. The Broncos would have done that more last year but they were having as many issues with their backs as they were with their QB. This year, I think Cutler's still going to be a little green, so I would expect more rushing from the Broncos than normal. I also think that Henry is better than the bells, he's the clear #1 on the team right now, and he can score, so I would expect him to put up top tier numbers. If you look at the Broncos the past decade or so, they've had plenty of rushing TDs when they've had a good running back, and not many when they've had a sucky one or a RBBC. This shouldn't be surprising. So the only question is how good Henry is. I think he's 1) better than any of the guys they've had recently, and more importantly, 2) he's going to get a greater portion of the carries than the other guys they've had recently. The Broncos have also gotten rid of a bootlegging QB who tended to run or flip the ball; I would expect a more traditional running game from Shanny this year. I don't know exactly where I'd draft him just yet, but at this moment, it looks like he's an instant first rounder in redrafts with the potential to end up as high as #1 overall.
I don't know exactly where I'd draft him just yet, but at this moment, it looks like he's an instant first rounder in redrafts with the potential to end up as high as #1 overall.
Wow! That would certainly put him top 5!No one has mentioned what a warrior he is yet in the thread, so i'll be the first.He's the superman of the NFL, plays with more broken bones then Evil Knievel.2100/18TD's
Wow! That would certainly put him top 5!No one has mentioned what a warrior he is yet in the thread, so i'll be the first.He's the superman of the NFL, plays with more broken bones then Evil Knievel.2100/18TD's
The negative case for Henry is that the offensive line isn't as good as it used to be and that the offense isn't as good as it used to be. The positive case for Henry is that the offensive line has been world class in the past, and is still good enough to make a couple of scrub backs look better than they were, while the passing game is good enough to get some big plays while the team relies even more heavily than in the past on the running game to move the chains and score TDs. Look at how some of the top coaches have broken in their young QBs. Antowain Smith had a big year when Brady came out. Tomlinson had his best year ever when Rivers finally started. Henry had his resurgent year when Young started. It seems like this happens fairly often. I expect the same thing here. As for how effective he'd be behind the Denver O line, I think Denver's line is better than Tennessee's, and I think Henry's better than either Bell. So I would expect him to do better than his numbers in Tennessee would suggest, and better than the Denver backs did the last couple years.Exactly. While Henry should do well in this system, too many seem to be extrapolating the Denver rushing attack in the TD/Portis years to today. It may very well not be the same anymore.but I don't think Denver's rushing attack is as potent now as it was then, particularly with a green QB.
A warrior like Henry is easily top 5 in Denver, my only decision is whether to take him over Jackson and LJ. I still rank LT #1, but only slightly over Henry.Wow! That would certainly put him top 5!No one has mentioned what a warrior he is yet in the thread, so i'll be the first.He's the superman of the NFL, plays with more broken bones then Evil Knievel.2100/18TD's
To clarify, I would not draft him #1 overall. I'm saying that he's one of a small handful of backs in the league with a reasonable chance of ending the season #1 overall. He could be a huge bust, too. But it's such a huge advantage to have that #1 guy that you have to mention it when discussing his value.I don't know exactly where I'd draft him just yet, but at this moment, it looks like he's an instant first rounder in redrafts with the potential to end up as high as #1 overall.I rarely disagree with Fred, but the "#1 overall" talk is being overly optimistic IMHO. LT, LJ, SA and SJax are still in the league.Silly Fred.
throw the crackpipe away man..I'm as big a BroncoA warrior like Henry is easily top 5 in Denver, my only decision is whether to take him over Jackson and LJ. I still rank LT #1, but only slightly over Henry.Wow! That would certainly put him top 5!No one has mentioned what a warrior he is yet in the thread, so i'll be the first.He's the superman of the NFL, plays with more broken bones then Evil Knievel.2100/18TD's
I thought I read that he got $12 million guaranteed. If thats the case, that lessens my concern over Bell stealing too much. They didnt pay him that well to not give him the ball.htrow the crackpipe away man..I'm as big a BroncoA warrior like Henry is easily top 5 in Denver, my only decision is whether to take him over Jackson and LJ. I still rank LT #1, but only slightly over Henry.Wow! That would certainly put him top 5!No one has mentioned what a warrior he is yet in the thread, so i'll be the first.He's the superman of the NFL, plays with more broken bones then Evil Knievel.2100/18TD'sas there is and I just don't see him getting anymore than maybe 1300 yards and 7-9 scores, little better than he did in TEN...I just can't discount Mike Bell's presence and his effect on Henry's potential numbers....
I think he seriously outperforms that range.14-18 slot.
Meaning Henry won't have to get his own Gatorade anymore... keeping him fresher for games?It's within reach but there is Mike Bell to consider.
Pass it to the left, bro....A warrior like Henry is easily top 5 in Denver, my only decision is whether to take him over Jackson and LJ. I still rank LT #1, but only slightly over Henry.Wow! That would certainly put him top 5!No one has mentioned what a warrior he is yet in the thread, so i'll be the first.He's the superman of the NFL, plays with more broken bones then Evil Knievel.2100/18TD's
Hmmm...I guess it's possible, but not likely.Now let's look at his downside...he hasn't played in 15 games since 2003. :XTo clarify, I would not draft him #1 overall. I'm saying that he's one of a small handful of backs in the league with a reasonable chance of ending the season #1 overall. He could be a huge bust, too. But it's such a huge advantage to have that #1 guy that you have to mention it when discussing his value.I don't know exactly where I'd draft him just yet, but at this moment, it looks like he's an instant first rounder in redrafts with the potential to end up as high as #1 overall.I rarely disagree with Fred, but the "#1 overall" talk is being overly optimistic IMHO. LT, LJ, SA and SJax are still in the league.Silly Fred.
I see three problems that can stop Henry from having a top 5ish season.1. Fumbling - Let's not forget the fumbling problem he had in Buffalo, yes he did not fumble much with the Titans but this problem could come back.2. 1 mistake away from being suspended for a whole year.3. Shanny - M Bell could start, they go more RBBC, draft a RB that falls into their lap,No one has mentioned what a warrior he is yet in the thread, so i'll be the first.He's the superman of the NFL, plays with more broken bones then Evil Knievel.2100/18TD's
That is just plain crazy talk.A warrior like Henry is easily top 5 in Denver, my only decision is whether to take him over Jackson and LJ. I still rank LT #1, but only slightly over Henry.Wow! That would certainly put him top 5!No one has mentioned what a warrior he is yet in the thread, so i'll be the first.He's the superman of the NFL, plays with more broken bones then Evil Knievel.2100/18TD's
That was five years ago!He did put up 1438 and 13 TD in 2002, so with Denver's O-Line I think 1500 is easily within reach.
I cant believe what Im readingYou guys have way too much confidence in Shanny to give the rock to henry and after the past couple of years I dont trust him one bit. I dont trust Henry's talent either. I'll avoid this mess like the plague and grab Mike bell late in the draft if anything.
Thank you for some much needed perspective.I thought I wondered into bizarro-world...I cant believe what Im readingYou guys have way too much confidence in Shanny to give the rock to henry and after the past couple of years I dont trust him one bit. I dont trust Henry's talent either. I'll avoid this mess like the plague and grab Mike bell late in the draft if anything.
That is just plain crazy talk.A warrior like Henry is easily top 5 in Denver, my only decision is whether to take him over Jackson and LJ. I still rank LT #1, but only slightly over Henry.Wow! That would certainly put him top 5!No one has mentioned what a warrior he is yet in the thread, so i'll be the first.He's the superman of the NFL, plays with more broken bones then Evil Knievel.2100/18TD's
Nah...you just wandered into "I have Henry on my dynasty squad" world.I thought I wondered into bizarro-world...
this guy gets it.I cant believe what Im readingYou guys have way too much confidence in Shanny to give the rock to henry and after the past couple of years I dont trust him one bit. I dont trust Henry's talent either. I'll avoid this mess like the plague and grab Mike bell late in the draft if anything.
Look behind the numbers, the games he has missed weren't due to injury. 2004 he got slightly dinged up and was benched for McGahee for the rest of the season. 2005 he was suspended 4 games, got in the doghouse because of it and spent the rest of the year in RBBC with Brown. 2006, he was inactivate for 2 games early in the season as Tennessee was imploding in on itself and playing the rotating backfield. He wasn't listed on the injury report either of those 2 weeks.Hmmm...I guess it's possible, but not likely.Now let's look at his downside...he hasn't played in 15 games since 2003. :XTo clarify, I would not draft him #1 overall. I'm saying that he's one of a small handful of backs in the league with a reasonable chance of ending the season #1 overall. He could be a huge bust, too. But it's such a huge advantage to have that #1 guy that you have to mention it when discussing his value.I don't know exactly where I'd draft him just yet, but at this moment, it looks like he's an instant first rounder in redrafts with the potential to end up as high as #1 overall.I rarely disagree with Fred, but the "#1 overall" talk is being overly optimistic IMHO. LT, LJ, SA and SJax are still in the league.Silly Fred.