What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Is Kitna a viable starter (1 Viewer)

Deranged Hermit

Not cool & Pissed
Like many out there, I'm sure those McNabb owners are going with less than desirable QB's right now. Jon Kitna seems to have a pretty prime matchup vs GB (as opposed to other WW QB's like Leinart vs DEN, Young vs JAX, Losman vs MIA, etc), but it just seems to me that Kitna has a very real danger of being pulled and day now as starting QB.

Any Detroit homers, or anyone else, have any input here? How close is he to getting the hook?

 
I don't think Kitna is a viable starter in -INT leagues regardless of who he is playing. I started him last week over the likes of Rivers and Harrington and almost lost.

 
Yeah, I have the same dilemma this week. I've got Kitna, Garrard, and Garcia in a start 2 QB league. Really having a hard time deciding who sits. But with KJ out, I think they'll be throwing a lot against the Packers.

 
I have to decide between Kitna @ GB or Vick at home vs DAL.

I've already changed my mind about 100X between the two.

 
I don't see them pulling Kitna anytime soon. Marinelli recently committed to Kitna as the #1 QB for next year in the press, so I can't see them pulling him for one of the young guys right now. IMO.

Link

 
I am not sure I understand the question.

How does he rank on your league's scoring system?

What else do you have?

PLAY him

And no, he is not getting pulled

 
I don't think Kitna is a viable starter in -INT leagues regardless of who he is playing. I started him last week over the likes of Rivers and Harrington and almost lost.
My league is -1 for INT's so it's not a huge backbreaker if he heaves 3 INT's as long as he gets 250 yards and two TDs.
 
Kitna # 5 ranked QB in our league (no penalty for ints) I've been starting him with confidence all year and will do the same this week. Now ... week 16 is a different story! :ph34r:

 
Kitna has not played well this year when KJ is out. I think KJ is what makes that offense go.

I'd look for 210yd, 1 TD, 2-3 INT from Kitna despite the good paper matchup.

 
Kitna is a top 5-8 start this week...... giving him the nod in one of my leagues.

Should be a shoot-out. I would also bump up Furrey since Kitna seems to be getting annoyed at RW's effort.

 
Kitna is a top 5-8 start this week...... giving him the nod in one of my leagues.

Should be a shoot-out. I would also bump up Furrey since Kitna seems to be getting annoyed at RW's effort.
I'm actually benching Roy for Driver this week for that reason. Plus the fact that Favre and Driver really seem to be clicking right now.
 
I aslo have to make a choice betwean Kitna and Brady.

I know the coaches have said that Kitna will not get pulled but they sure look uneasy everytime he throws an INT. Brady scares me now after last week.

 
I aslo have to make a choice betwean Kitna and Brady. I know the coaches have said that Kitna will not get pulled but they sure look uneasy everytime he throws an INT. Brady scares me now after last week.
That's the same pair I have in a ppc league. I panicked and put in Kitna last minute last week and was frozen out when I tried to switch back to Brady right at kickoff. gb dumb luck.
 
Kitna is a top 5-8 start this week...... giving him the nod in one of my leagues.

Should be a shoot-out. I would also bump up Furrey since Kitna seems to be getting annoyed at RW's effort.
I'm actually benching Roy for Driver this week for that reason. Plus the fact that Favre and Driver really seem to be clicking right now.
Count me in as a Kitna + Furrey starter this week. I'm starting Kitna over Alex Smith (not a tough decision ... ) and Furrey over the now-injured D-Jax at my WR3. I'm thinking Kitna goes 285/2/2 and Furrey goes for 80 with a 50/50 shot at a short TD. This week's matchup looks good for both the GB & DET passing offenses (pending the weather??).
 
I aslo have to make a choice betwean Kitna and Brady. I know the coaches have said that Kitna will not get pulled but they sure look uneasy everytime he throws an INT. Brady scares me now after last week.
Brady @ Miami scared me. Brady @ home vs. Houston? Not so much. I think you'll be just fine.
 
same boat as all of you. I have Kitna, Brady or Romo. I like Kitna's matchup the best. But I am leaning towards Romo. Still not sure what to do. I actually don't like that KJ is out. I feel that hurts the offense.

 
same boat as all of you. I have Kitna, Brady or Romo. I like Kitna's matchup the best. But I am leaning towards Romo. Still not sure what to do. I actually don't like that KJ is out. I feel that hurts the offense.
Being a Lion hurts the offense, but I'd go with Romo if I had him.
 
As someone who expected the same from Kitna last week AT HOME vs. MIN (who Leinart put up 400+ against), no way am I trusting my playoff progress with him in my lineup. Lions play worse on the road, and without KJ able to run the ball, I think the GB secondary will put up a performance similar to the SEA game a few weeks back.

I have more faith in Cutler or Leinart than Kitna- they won't put up the yds that Kitna might, but we lose 2 pts per turnover, so 12 pts has been his ceiling for a number of weeks now.

 
I don't see them pulling Kitna anytime soon. Marinelli recently committed to Kitna as the #1 QB for next year in the press, so I can't see them pulling him for one of the young guys right now. IMO.

Link
I had the good fortune to be back in Minnesota last weekend. Watched the Lions lose to the Vikings. Really poor offensive line play. Vikings were getting pressure on Kitna the whole game and the Lions could not run the ball. No one seems to be able to run the ball on the Vikings... Ahman Green actualy is the best Rb performance I have seen against them all year.. but anyways.. the announcers stated that the coach and front office is happy with Kitna.They went on to say that 95% of whats wrong with the Lions offense has nothing to do with Kitna. They are paraphrasing the coaching staff when they said this. Also said that they plan for Kitna to be thier starter next year as well and that most of the interceptions Kitna has thrown are not Kitnas fault but the fault of the recievers not being in the right place or not making the play.

So Kitna's job is solid for this year. I wouldn't trust them on next year if a better option becomes available to the Lions though..

Mike Williams straight up SUCKS he runs really crappy routes and made no effort to up for the ball. The Vikings defensive backs just plain took the ball away from him and Roy Williams too.. although Roy Williams runs much better routes and is a good WR. Mike Williams is a waste. I guess they wanted to see if he plays better than practices?? Well they got thier answer. I don't see how they can play him again.. he was terrible and it was all about not making an effort imho.

Kevin Jones helps Kitnas passing numbers.. not having him in the lineup may hurt his performace a bit against the Pack and I think the Pack is playing a bit better vs. the pass lately than they did in the 1st half of the season.

Kita has thrown back to back 3 interception games.. and he has been very consistent throwing ints this season. Starting Pack defense or IDPs against the Lions looks like a good idea to me right now.

But Kitna wont get benched.

 
I'm also trying to decide if I should start Kitna this week. My other choice is Eli Manning, who have been playing better lately but Kitna's matchup is better.

I also have no fear that Kitna will be benched, but I do think Jones' injury is going to hurt Kitna a lot. Jones was a huge part of their passing offense and if it wasn't for the late TD to Jones last week, Kitna's numbers would have been horrible.

I am definitely worried about starting him this week and may go with Eli.

 
As a Lions homer and an owner of Kitna, KJ and Roy, I feel compelled to point out that the Lions have not won at Green Bay since 1991 and have had some dreadful showings there in that period. Here's my take on playing Kitna this week:

Reasons to play Kitna: (1) He is guaranteed to be the starter; (2) He had his best game of the year in week 3 against GB (342 yards, 2 TDs, 1 INT); (3) the Packers continue to be a nice matchup for opposing QBs; and (4) now that KJ is done for the season even the minimal running game that did exist is no longer and Kitna will likely throw even more than usual.

Reasons not to play Kitna: (1) He is a lock for at least 2 turnovers -- 11 of his 19 INTs have come in the Lions' 6 road games; (2) the OL was terrible to start with and now is playing new guys (some just off the practice squad) because the starters are injured; (3) without KJ, Kitna no longer has his safety outlet and Cason/Harris are unlikely to fill the void; (4) many of the Lions, and Roy Williams in particular, looked like they were thinking about their offseason plans during most of last week's game; (5) the Lions are traditionally poor @ GB; and (6) Kitna is just not good enough to rise above all of the Lions' problems.

Getting back to the original question, Kitna is certainly a viable starter because he will have the opportunity to put up points in a promising matchup. That said, I would look elsewhere if possible (and especially in leagues that penalize for INTs or fumbles) because there are just too many other things wrong with the Lions to allow Kitna to make the most of this opportunity.

 
As a Lions homer and an owner of Kitna, KJ and Roy, I feel compelled to point out that the Lions have not won at Green Bay since 1991 and have had some dreadful showings there in that period. Here's my take on playing Kitna this week:Reasons to play Kitna: (1) He is guaranteed to be the starter; (2) He had his best game of the year in week 3 against GB (342 yards, 2 TDs, 1 INT); (3) the Packers continue to be a nice matchup for opposing QBs; and (4) now that KJ is done for the season even the minimal running game that did exist is no longer and Kitna will likely throw even more than usual. Reasons not to play Kitna: (1) He is a lock for at least 2 turnovers -- 11 of his 19 INTs have come in the Lions' 6 road games; (2) the OL was terrible to start with and now is playing new guys (some just off the practice squad) because the starters are injured; (3) without KJ, Kitna no longer has his safety outlet and Cason/Harris are unlikely to fill the void; (4) many of the Lions, and Roy Williams in particular, looked like they were thinking about their offseason plans during most of last week's game; (5) the Lions are traditionally poor @ GB; and (6) Kitna is just not good enough to rise above all of the Lions' problems.Getting back to the original question, Kitna is certainly a viable starter because he will have the opportunity to put up points in a promising matchup. That said, I would look elsewhere if possible (and especially in leagues that penalize for INTs or fumbles) because there are just too many other things wrong with the Lions to allow Kitna to make the most of this opportunity.
:thumbup:
 
Getting back to the original question, Kitna is certainly a viable starter because he will have the opportunity to put up points in a promising matchup. That said, I would look elsewhere if possible (and especially in leagues that penalize for INTs or fumbles) because there are just too many other things wrong with the Lions to allow Kitna to make the most of this opportunity.
Grab Green Bay D off waivers to nullify the INTs.
 
Between INTs, Fumbles and sacks (all negative points in my league) Kitna always left at least 6 or more points on the table each week for me. Last week he got me 14 and would have got me 28 if he avoided all of those negatives.

I don't know what's worse: having a QB that only puts up 10-14 a week with few negative stats, or one that puts up 20-25 a week but winds up with 10-14 because of negative points.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top