He showed plenty of touch in the pre-season.Da Guru said:You saw what I saw. Stafford has no touch..can that be taught?I'm a Saints fan so I obviously saw him week 1. Stafford showed zero touch, he was a slow Mike Vick. It wasn't a matter of rookie mistakes, he seems to be missing a huge part of quarterbacking. Can touch be taught? I'm guessing it's something you have or you don't.
He has all the tools to be as great as he wants to be. It is a mental game now. He is much more talented than Harrington, Ware or Long ever dreamed about being. But he has a lot of growing to do. There was some improvement to game two. I am not sure I would let him learn a bit more from the sidelines and just let him play once the Lions get down in the second half. Let him get his playing time without so much pressure to win. Culpepper give the Lions the best chance to win right now.As a long suffering Lion fan I really want the Lions to someway, somehow finally contend for a NFL title in my lifetime.The Matt Stafford pick will either make the Lions or set them back another 5 years. I have not seen enough of Stafford to make an educated guess on his potential.Can Stafford be a 10-12 year franchise QB? Or do we have another Joey Harrington, Andre Ware, Chuck Long on our hands.
He was a bit better in week 2. I think it is still nerves. I think they need to put him on the sidelines and let him mop up. Probably a good way to pad stats anyways and give him confidence.I'm a Saints fan so I obviously saw him week 1. Stafford showed zero touch, he was a slow Mike Vick. It wasn't a matter of rookie mistakes, he seems to be missing a huge part of quarterbacking. Can touch be taught? I'm guessing it's something you have or you don't.
I think you do have to give a rookie 3-4 weeks to get their feet under them.I tried to get Stafford in our auction league, and I did so with the thought that he would not bee good to start until after Detroits Bye week. I still stand by this decision.Due to family committments I havnt been able to watch any of his regular season games, but he looked like he has the touch in the pre season games I saw.also, the defenses are likely showing more looks than he saw in pre season so I'm sure there's an adjustment period for him there too.He was a bit better in week 2. I think it is still nerves. I think they need to put him on the sidelines and let him mop up. Probably a good way to pad stats anyways and give him confidence.I'm a Saints fan so I obviously saw him week 1. Stafford showed zero touch, he was a slow Mike Vick. It wasn't a matter of rookie mistakes, he seems to be missing a huge part of quarterbacking. Can touch be taught? I'm guessing it's something you have or you don't.
jay cutler had a horrid stretch his rookie season... now 2 years later hes a pro-bowl QB. give the man time... hes going to be great.I think you do have to give a rookie 3-4 weeks to get their feet under them.I tried to get Stafford in our auction league, and I did so with the thought that he would not bee good to start until after Detroits Bye week. I still stand by this decision.Due to family committments I havnt been able to watch any of his regular season games, but he looked like he has the touch in the pre season games I saw.also, the defenses are likely showing more looks than he saw in pre season so I'm sure there's an adjustment period for him there too.He was a bit better in week 2. I think it is still nerves. I think they need to put him on the sidelines and let him mop up. Probably a good way to pad stats anyways and give him confidence.I'm a Saints fan so I obviously saw him week 1. Stafford showed zero touch, he was a slow Mike Vick. It wasn't a matter of rookie mistakes, he seems to be missing a huge part of quarterbacking. Can touch be taught? I'm guessing it's something you have or you don't.
I agree. Stafford has improved every single game this year and that's all you're asking of a rookie QB. He still needs to learn which situations to rifle the ball and which ones to put a little air on it, but I think he has the makings of a franchise QB. The Lions need to get a big ugly to protect his blind side though. I don't think Backus is the LT of the future. The knee injury was a dislocated knee cap and last I heard was 1-2 weeks so doesn't sound serious.I am on the Matt Stafford bandwagon. I think the Lions finally got it right at QB. It is very easy to by cynical about QBs given the Lions track record of drafting and developing QBs. Stafford has improved every week and yesterday in the first half he looked like an All-Pro. Granted Stafford then went on to make a couple of rookie mistakes but that is expected.I just hope his knee injury will not keep him down long.
I agree, yesterday I was really watching Stafford close. Reminds me a bit of dare I say a young John Elway. The arm is second to none, and he seems to have a nice grasp of the game. Threw a couple of really nice screen passes that had the defense totally fooled. Then he can bust a 30 yard out on a line.I was impressed with Stafford yesterday. Agree with the comments above, and the comments Billick has been making about him since he has been doing a few of his games. He needs to know when to zip balls in and when to put a little touch and get some air under his throws. Getting the air under some of those throws in the end zone is huge with a receiver like Calvin.Stafford should be a good qb in this league.
That Culpepper pass right there is why Stafford was the right choice to start the season. Culppeper still makes rookie mistakes and Calvin Johnson has one 2 yard catch today. He's Terrible with a capital T.I went to the Lions game today and keyed on Stafford pretty much the whole game and am not real happy with what I saw. Matt Stafford is not anywhere near ready to be a NFL starter. CJ should have had two TDs..Stafford short armed one when CJ was wide open in the end zone. On a broken play Bryant Johnson was running free and clear with nobody within 20 yards of him and Stafford overshot him by 15 yards. Plus Stafford looks slow when he tries to get out of trouble.Stafford looks very raw and the Lions could go 0-16 again unless they switch to Culpepper, because the defense is not good enough to win a game.The bottom line is that the Lions put the horse in front of the cart again.
Stafford was terrible week 1. Bad week 2. OK week 3. And better than average week 4. So progress.I'm a Saints fan so I obviously saw him week 1. Stafford showed zero touch, he was a slow Mike Vick. It wasn't a matter of rookie mistakes, he seems to be missing a huge part of quarterbacking. Can touch be taught? I'm guessing it's something you have or you don't.
I largely agree with the point you're making.But Brees played great as a rookie (in his one half of action). He also played well the following season -- his first as a starter. It was his second year as a starter (his third year in the league) when he really struggled.My opinion is that anyone who watched Rick Mirer and Drew Brees play during their rookie years will tell you that it's nearly impossible to tell at this stage.As always, just my opinion.
Has he? He's not even the best QB in his own class so far.Who knows? I don't think everyone felt Matt Ryan was a "can't miss" franchise QB last year, but he turned out well. Same with McNabb, Rivers, Roethlisberger, and Rodgers. Stafford has a chance to be successful. That's about all you can say.
That's debateable. I would like to see Sanchez on an 0-16 Lions team vs. a team that was on fire last year before Favre blew out his shoulder.Has he? He's not even the best QB in his own class so far.Who knows? I don't think everyone felt Matt Ryan was a "can't miss" franchise QB last year, but he turned out well. Same with McNabb, Rivers, Roethlisberger, and Rodgers. Stafford has a chance to be successful. That's about all you can say.
I like the way Stafford's looked so far this year. Sanchez has done well, but if I had to pick between the two, I'd take Stafford. I just see some throws made by Stafford that are special.Bojang0301 said:That's debateable. I would like to see Sanchez on an 0-16 Lions team vs. a team that was on fire last year before Favre blew out his shoulder.Sabertooth said:Has he? He's not even the best QB in his own class so far.Who knows? I don't think everyone felt Matt Ryan was a "can't miss" franchise QB last year, but he turned out well. Same with McNabb, Rivers, Roethlisberger, and Rodgers. Stafford has a chance to be successful. That's about all you can say.
So is my grandma.......who's been dead for 10 yearsHe's better than JaMarcus Russell.
I was talking about Matt Ryan. To say he's turned out well is jumping the gun a bit I think. He looks the part, but I don't think he's any better than Flacco.Bojang0301 said:That's debateable. I would like to see Sanchez on an 0-16 Lions team vs. a team that was on fire last year before Favre blew out his shoulder.Sabertooth said:Has he? He's not even the best QB in his own class so far.Who knows? I don't think everyone felt Matt Ryan was a "can't miss" franchise QB last year, but he turned out well. Same with McNabb, Rivers, Roethlisberger, and Rodgers. Stafford has a chance to be successful. That's about all you can say.
What's the consensus on whether or not Stafford will be a productive starting FANTASY football QB for years to come?

Pretty easy to see why Culpepper wasn't starting. He should be in the UFL or CFL, not NFL. Stanton is no better but no worse so I'd keep him as the back-up.DD, The Lions fane booed stafford today. On The Ticket they are killing him with abuse as well. If the Lions lose 5-6 out of the gate the Vets will know they don`t have a prayer.The Lions should have started Culpepper for the first 6-8 games. If we were 2-6, 1-7 or 0-8 the fans would be screaming for Stafford . Now today they were chanting for Culpepper. They put Stafford in a tough situation.If Stafford plays this way the next few weeks they will be forced to make a switch and it could hurt Stafford.They aren't going to go 0-16 again, it's almost impossible. Stafford looked like a player starting his 2nd NFL game today against a good defense. There is no sense putting Culppeper in IMO because they aren't going to the playoffs anyway. Stick with Stafford and let him take his lumps and in time he'll get better.I went to the Lions game today and keyed on Stafford pretty much the whole game and am not real happy with what I saw. Matt Stafford is not anywhere near ready to be a NFL starter. CJ should have had two TDs..Stafford short armed one when CJ was wide open in the end zone. On a broken play Bryant Johnson was running free and clear with nobody within 20 yards of him and Stafford overshot him by 15 yards. Plus Stafford looks slow when he tries to get out of trouble.Stafford looks very raw and the Lions could go 0-16 again unless they switch to Culpepper, because the defense is not good enough to win a game.The bottom line is that the Lions put the horse in front of the cart again.
Hey Detective>You do understand I wasn't responding to your post, but to Guru's right?Yes, I do understand that that the Jets have a superior O-line and a FAAAAR better defense (of course, Detroit has, by a long shot , the best offensive player on either team in CJ). That's why I added that I was only half-joking. I even added a just-for-fun winky emoticon guy! I also said that I hope for the best from the talented Mr. Stafford. Perhaps English is your second language? In that case, Welcome to America, amigo!As far as your last statement that Stafford would have the same success IF he QB'd in NY, I can't be sure about that, since I don't live in HappyPretendFantasyland.You do understand how much better the personnel on the Jets are right? If Stafford was in NY he'd be having the same success.Sanchez is looking like the real deal. Most Lions fans did not want a QB at #1, but it seemed like Lion fans liked Sanchez over Stafford. It is like FF..you are afraid to reach.Funny.....I could let you know right now that Sanchez is a franchise QB.I'll let you know in three years. He only has two career starts for Christ's sake.Just half-joking. I'm a Jets fan AND a Calvin Johnson owner in a keeper league, so I hope both QBs are awesome.
Stafford>SanchezThanks for playing.Quinn and Stafford have to feel a lot better about themselves today. The Lions may have a decent QB on their hands. Stafford was making so much progress then looked like crap last week. Good to see him rebound and engineer a great comeback.422 yards, 5 TDs, and tough as nails
First crow that I really enjoyed.Lions coach Jim Schwartz said an initial X ray of quarterback Matthew Stafford’s left shoulder came back negative after today’s dramatic 38-37 victory over Cleveland.Schwartz said Stafford was having more tests. He declined to give more details – including whether Stafford’s shoulder popped out – and said it was too early to tell whether Stafford could play Thursday against Green Bay.“There’s a lot more that needs to be done,” Schwartz said. “But the first thing you wanted to eliminate was a broken collarbone or one of those things.”Stafford suffered the injury when he took a crushing hit on the second-to-last play of the game. He said he was in pain, but he returned and threw the game-winning touchdown pass, a 1-yarder to tight end Brandon Pettigrew with no time on the clock.His left shoulder wrapped with ice after the game, Stafford said he was in pain but declined to give details about his injury. Asked if he could play against the Packers, he laughed.“That’s a good question,” Stafford said.
If Stafford is anything..he is tough. The kid has taken some punishment this year.Lions coach Jim Schwartz said an initial X ray of quarterback Matthew Stafford’s left shoulder came back negative after today’s dramatic 38-37 victory over Cleveland.Schwartz said Stafford was having more tests. He declined to give more details – including whether Stafford’s shoulder popped out – and said it was too early to tell whether Stafford could play Thursday against Green Bay.“There’s a lot more that needs to be done,” Schwartz said. “But the first thing you wanted to eliminate was a broken collarbone or one of those things.”Stafford suffered the injury when he took a crushing hit on the second-to-last play of the game. He said he was in pain, but he returned and threw the game-winning touchdown pass, a 1-yarder to tight end Brandon Pettigrew with no time on the clock.His left shoulder wrapped with ice after the game, Stafford said he was in pain but declined to give details about his injury. Asked if he could play against the Packers, he laughed.“That’s a good question,” Stafford said.
Overtime? First overtime game won by one point.Rotoworld) X-rays came back negative on Matthew Stafford's left shoulder following Sunday's 38-37 win over Cleveland.
Analysis: Coach Jim Schwartz, as usual, said it's "too early to tell" if Stafford will be ready for Week 12. The Lions will play his status close to the vest, but Stafford reentered Sunday's game and finished in overtime, throwing the game-winning touchdown pass to Brandon Pettigrew. The minor injury is to his non-throwing shoulder, so Stafford isn't likely to miss next week
Keep in mind, it was against Cleveland.
So? Matt Leinart couldn't. More than rothlisberger had against them.Keep in mind, it was against Cleveland.
Never. he's the first.Whens the last time a rookie QB threw for 400 yards and/or 5 TDs?

how do you win by one point in OT?Rotoworld) X-rays came back negative on Matthew Stafford's left shoulder following Sunday's 38-37 win over Cleveland.Analysis: Coach Jim Schwartz, as usual, said it's "too early to tell" if Stafford will be ready for Week 12. The Lions will play his status close to the vest, but Stafford reentered Sunday's game and finished in overtime, throwing the game-winning touchdown pass to Brandon Pettigrew. The minor injury is to his non-throwing shoulder, so Stafford isn't likely to miss next week
and? he is the first QB in NFL HISTORY to put up the numbers he did today...it doesn't matter who it was against...that's the best rookie QB performance in NFL HISTORY.Keep in mind, it was against Cleveland.
Marc Bulger put up 453 yards, 4 TDs and 0 INTs in a win against SD as a rookie.and? he is the first QB in NFL HISTORY to put up the numbers he did today...it doesn't matter who it was against...that's the best rookie QB performance in NFL HISTORY.Keep in mind, it was against Cleveland.