oubrownsfan
Footballguy
The word has been that he will be ready for week 1....however, I have not heard of him practicing on the side, running, or testing the knee without contact...any inside scoop?
PT was a one year wonder anyway, at least now his owners will have the injury excuse to dismiss his poor upcoming season.

I watched Pierre Thomas, in person, score 2 TD's against the Bears on a Thursday night game last year. One was about a 30-40 yard td run. He clearly is a better runner than Reggie Bush. Everything my eyes told me said he was not a one year wonder. But hey, if we all agreed what fun would this be?PT was a one year wonder anyway, at least now his owners will have the injury excuse to dismiss his poor upcoming season.
Talk about a one year wonder.One decent PRESEASON game agains the hapless Raiders, and fantasy footballers the world over are scouring ebay for used Mike Bell jock straps.Shhhhh...I picked up Mike Bell late in two leagues.
In the only game he started in 07:20 rushes 105 yds (5.3 avg), 12 rec 121 yds (10.1 avg) 1 TD.PT was a one year wonder anyway, at least now his owners will have the injury excuse to dismiss his poor upcoming season.
Anyone that can't beat out Tatum "Five Fingers" Bell for the starting spot is not going take the Saints starting tailback spot.Yeah, people need to check themselves on Mike Bell. He's not going to play much when Bush & PT are healthy. Bell is the Damien Anderson of this year's preseason RBs.
PT was a one year wonder anyway, at least now his owners will have the injury excuse to dismiss his poor upcoming season.![]()

This is simply not based in fact. Brees and coach Payton have both indicated he will have a role in the backfield. People will still ignore the facts however and believe what they want to believe.Yeah, people need to check themselves on Mike Bell. He's not going to play much when Bush & PT are healthy. Bell is the Damien Anderson of this year's preseason RBs.
It is very rare that you hear a coach discuss a veteran player and say something like - "He is an OK player. He probably wont see the field much unless we have an injury or are up by 3 TDs in the 4th quarter". Even if that is what they want to say, which I imagine is what they want to say about Mike Bell.If you want to take all the coach-speak sound bytes from the pre-season as the gospel, I would warn that you will be in for a very long season.My opinion for whatever it's worth is that Bell will have a prominant role....on special teams.This is simply not based in fact. Brees and coach Payton have both indicated he will have a role in the backfield. People will still ignore the facts however and believe what they want to believe.Yeah, people need to check themselves on Mike Bell. He's not going to play much when Bush & PT are healthy. Bell is the Damien Anderson of this year's preseason RBs.
Why I made him my last pick this weekend for a handcuffI'm about 99% sure that Mike Bell will be in my starting lineup week 1. At home, vs. the Lions, should be up 20 in no time. Pound the ball in the second half. If they are going to pound, I want the back who is completely healthy. No matter what, they won't give the ball 20X to guys who aren't practicing. Even if Bush and Thomas figure more prominently in their success (and they do), for WEEK 1 Bell will be the better play, and could be in for a big week. Common sense my friends. Use it.
Why not?I'm about 99% sure that Mike Bell will be in my starting lineup week 1. At home, vs. the Lions, should be up 20 in no time. Pound the ball in the second half. If they are going to pound, I want the back who is completely healthy. No matter what, they won't give the ball 20X to guys who aren't practicing. Even if Bush and Thomas figure more prominently in their success (and they do), for WEEK 1 Bell will be the better play, and could be in for a big week. Common sense my friends. Use it.
I wouldn't be too sure. Ladell Betts has been told how big a role he'll have with the Skins for the last 3 years, only to rot on the bench unless Portis needs a breather. I'm not saying you are wrong about Bell, just saying I've learned to take what a coach says with a grain of salt.Payton and Brees both mean it and they are not just praising Bell, they are actually going beyond that into detail about he he could be used. That would be highly unfair to Bell to spout that kind of information off and then don't do it especially considering the effort he has put in this offseason.
Betts is in the backfield with one of the great running backs - Clinton Portis. you are not comparing Pierre Thomas to Portis are you?I wouldn't be too sure. Ladell Betts has been told how big a role he'll have with the Skins for the last 3 years, only to rot on the bench unless Portis needs a breather. I'm not saying you are wrong about Bell, just saying I've learned to take what a coach says with a grain of salt.Payton and Brees both mean it and they are not just praising Bell, they are actually going beyond that into detail about he he could be used. That would be highly unfair to Bell to spout that kind of information off and then don't do it especially considering the effort he has put in this offseason.
Why do you assume PT & Bush are going to be healthy? PT is injured coming into the season, even though he's supposed to be ready for week 1 it still isn't good for a RB to start the season nicked up, and Bush is coming off major knee surgery. To me, at the very least, Mike Bell is an extremely valuable insurance policy.Yeah, people need to check themselves on Mike Bell. He's not going to play much when Bush & PT are healthy. Bell is the Damien Anderson of this year's preseason RBs.
I remember that game, he was unstoppable. Heres to great valueI watched Pierre Thomas, in person, score 2 TD's against the Bears on a Thursday night game last year. One was about a 30-40 yard td run. He clearly is a better runner than Reggie Bush. Everything my eyes told me said he was not a one year wonder. But hey, if we all agreed what fun would this be?PT was a one year wonder anyway, at least now his owners will have the injury excuse to dismiss his poor upcoming season.

Spot on. Sometimes a change of scenery/coaches is just what a player needs.This is the same team that turned Colston, Moore, & Thomas into prominent studs. Saying "its just Mike Bell" is ignoring the history here.
So using your logic Jeremy Shockey, Meachem and Henderson should all have become studs as well, since the Saints turn players into studs. Not trying to be a donkey here but this logic does not validate why Bell should be considered. Opportunity is the only real reason why Mike Bell could ever be considered.This is the same team that turned Colston, Moore, & Thomas into prominent studs. Saying "its just Mike Bell" is ignoring the history here.
I respect your opinion but you are sooo completely wrong on your analysis on these two RB's its not even close.Bell is a better RB then PT, that is why i like him for this season.
Shockey will be a stud this year. As for the WR's, Henderson has improved, I did not notice near as many drops last season. Meachum just needs to stay healthy. He is the Reggie Bush of our Wr corps (stays hurt and hasn't reached his potential). Bell is not injured in fact he is the only healthy starting RB we have at the moment.So using your logic Jeremy Shockey, Meachem and Henderson should all have become studs as well, since the Saints turn players into studs. Not trying to be a donkey here but this logic does not validate why Bell should be considered. Opportunity is the only real reason why Mike Bell could ever be considered.This is the same team that turned Colston, Moore, & Thomas into prominent studs. Saying "its just Mike Bell" is ignoring the history here.
Im saying disregarding Mike Bell cuz hes a "nobody" is stupid cuz the Saints have a recent history with some other "nobodies" (Colston, Moore, Thomas) and them becoming studs. Im not saying Bell is gonna be a stud but dont just ignore him and Im a Thomas owner.So using your logic Jeremy Shockey, Meachem and Henderson should all have become studs as well, since the Saints turn players into studs. Not trying to be a donkey here but this logic does not validate why Bell should be considered. Opportunity is the only real reason why Mike Bell could ever be considered.This is the same team that turned Colston, Moore, & Thomas into prominent studs. Saying "its just Mike Bell" is ignoring the history here.
too each their own. PT played one competent defense last season, a high school RB could have blown up vs the D's he played.I respect your opinion but you are sooo completely wrong on your analysis on these two RB's its not even close.Bell is a better RB then PT, that is why i like him for this season.
Ok i will agree that the schedule last year was easy for the Saints on the Offensive side, however you cannot blame Pierre Thomas for taking advantage of it. You play who you are scheduled to play, plain and simple. Look at Deangelo Williams he took major advantage of this, and so did PT to a lesser degree. Just because the schedule was easy doesn't mean that PT is not good.The schedule looks a little bit harder this year but who knows, PT may excel this year again, and you will be saying that he had another easy schedule again next year while I take advantage and draft this donkey whenever I can. If Mike Bell outperforms PT I will be the first one to say moderated you were right.too each their own. PT played one competent defense last season, a high school RB could have blown up vs the D's he played.I respect your opinion but you are sooo completely wrong on your analysis on these two RB's its not even close.Bell is a better RB then PT, that is why i like him for this season.
most people i know don't have the balls to admit i was right (which i don't mean to sound like an #### but i am right a huge percentage of the time). so i'll appreciate it when i get that PM.I will be the first one to say moderated you were right.too each their own. PT played one competent defense last season, a high school RB could have blown up vs the D's he played.I respect your opinion but you are sooo completely wrong on your analysis on these two RB's its not even close.Bell is a better RB then PT, that is why i like him for this season.
Likewise i hopemost people i know don't have the balls to admit i was right (which i don't mean to sound like an #### but i am right a huge percentage of the time). so i'll appreciate it when i get that PM.I will be the first one to say moderated you were right.too each their own. PT played one competent defense last season, a high school RB could have blown up vs the D's he played.I respect your opinion but you are sooo completely wrong on your analysis on these two RB's its not even close.Bell is a better RB then PT, that is why i like him for this season.
i'll do one better. If PT breaks 1,200 yards from scrimmage i'll ship you $20 paypal.Likewise i hope
i'll do one better. If PT breaks 1,200 yards from scrimmage i'll ship you $20 paypal.Likewise i hope

People forget that Payton is a Bill Parcels guy. Parcels finds talent and players that do their job with heart from weird places. He also gives those guys the rock. Go and look at the 2003 Dallas Cowboys and tell me who he displaced Emmitt Smith for. Can anyone say Troy Hambrick?Who else was there.. Aveion Cason, Richie Anderson, and Murrell. Hmmmm....Can I get an amen... just sayin!Like I said people will believe what they want. The facts will be coming soon to wake you up however. Bell has been pretty much the best back this offseason and when coach Payton is talking about him it is not just paying him lip service. He will play and he will see some goal line love. Keep holding out hope he will go away based off of what he was looking like with other teams who cant evaluate or coach talent. Denver tried to make him a full back for Christ sakes! He is not a fullback for sure and Shanahan and Kubiac were ridiculous to think so. he has been a completely different animal this offseason. Payton and Brees both mean it and they are not just praising Bell, they are actually going beyond that into detail about how he could be used. That would be highly unfair to Bell to spout that kind of information off and then don't do it especially considering the effort he has put in this offseason. I tell you what, I will gladly bump this thread for the unbelievers in a few weeks when we know how this thing turned out.
Do you want to join the party?"i'll do one better. If PT breaks 1,200 yards from scrimmage i'll ship you $20 paypal."I have no problem with thisPeople forget that Payton is a Bill Parcels guy. Parcels finds talent and players that do their job with heart from weird places. He also gives those guys the rock. Go and look at the 2003 Dallas Cowboys and tell me who he displaced Emmitt Smith for. Can anyone say Troy Hambrick?Who else was there.. Aveion Cason, Richie Anderson, and Murrell. Hmmmm....Can I get an amen... just sayin!Like I said people will believe what they want. The facts will be coming soon to wake you up however. Bell has been pretty much the best back this offseason and when coach Payton is talking about him it is not just paying him lip service. He will play and he will see some goal line love. Keep holding out hope he will go away based off of what he was looking like with other teams who cant evaluate or coach talent. Denver tried to make him a full back for Christ sakes! He is not a fullback for sure and Shanahan and Kubiac were ridiculous to think so. he has been a completely different animal this offseason. Payton and Brees both mean it and they are not just praising Bell, they are actually going beyond that into detail about how he could be used. That would be highly unfair to Bell to spout that kind of information off and then don't do it especially considering the effort he has put in this offseason. I tell you what, I will gladly bump this thread for the unbelievers in a few weeks when we know how this thing turned out.
Haha.... You never know. BTW.... go look and see who was the Assistant Coach for that Cowboys team.Do you want to join the party?"i'll do one better. If PT breaks 1,200 yards from scrimmage i'll ship you $20 paypal."I have no problem with thisPeople forget that Payton is a Bill Parcels guy. Parcels finds talent and players that do their job with heart from weird places. He also gives those guys the rock. Go and look at the 2003 Dallas Cowboys and tell me who he displaced Emmitt Smith for. Can anyone say Troy Hambrick?Who else was there.. Aveion Cason, Richie Anderson, and Murrell. Hmmmm....Can I get an amen... just sayin!Like I said people will believe what they want. The facts will be coming soon to wake you up however. Bell has been pretty much the best back this offseason and when coach Payton is talking about him it is not just paying him lip service. He will play and he will see some goal line love. Keep holding out hope he will go away based off of what he was looking like with other teams who cant evaluate or coach talent. Denver tried to make him a full back for Christ sakes! He is not a fullback for sure and Shanahan and Kubiac were ridiculous to think so. he has been a completely different animal this offseason. Payton and Brees both mean it and they are not just praising Bell, they are actually going beyond that into detail about how he could be used. That would be highly unfair to Bell to spout that kind of information off and then don't do it especially considering the effort he has put in this offseason. I tell you what, I will gladly bump this thread for the unbelievers in a few weeks when we know how this thing turned out.
