ILoveMyLions
Footballguy
If this topic has been brought up before, please forgive me; but it seems that this is somewhat of a problem. The rookie list in dynasty should mirror the overall dynasty list for those making the lists IMO; especially since the all were made/updated on the same day or within a few days.
For instance, Jeff Pasquino has CJ #2, Lynch #3 and Rice #4 in the rookie rankings. Yet, in the dynasty rankings, Lynch is listed at #27 and CJ is at #41? Also, Booker and B Jackson make the top 75 and Rice isn't listed despite both of the RBs mentioned here are ranked 8th and 9th in the rookie list. I'm curious why RBs have more value in the dynasty ranking than they would in the rookie rankings? I would think the would be closer.
Bloom has a simlilar disparity, only not as severe. The rookie WRs are ranked much higher in the rookie dynasty list than in the overall dynasty list. Again, I fail to see how RBs under the same scoring system could have their value change so much.
Chris Smith has Irons ranked #4 in the rookie ranking and Booker #5; yet Booker make his top 75 and Irons does not.
This is not meant to be a stickler or criticizing post. I love all of your work, instead I want some light shed on the subject and to create communication as to why the difference or rethink the rankings. Thanks guys...
For instance, Jeff Pasquino has CJ #2, Lynch #3 and Rice #4 in the rookie rankings. Yet, in the dynasty rankings, Lynch is listed at #27 and CJ is at #41? Also, Booker and B Jackson make the top 75 and Rice isn't listed despite both of the RBs mentioned here are ranked 8th and 9th in the rookie list. I'm curious why RBs have more value in the dynasty ranking than they would in the rookie rankings? I would think the would be closer.
Bloom has a simlilar disparity, only not as severe. The rookie WRs are ranked much higher in the rookie dynasty list than in the overall dynasty list. Again, I fail to see how RBs under the same scoring system could have their value change so much.
Chris Smith has Irons ranked #4 in the rookie ranking and Booker #5; yet Booker make his top 75 and Irons does not.
This is not meant to be a stickler or criticizing post. I love all of your work, instead I want some light shed on the subject and to create communication as to why the difference or rethink the rankings. Thanks guys...
Last edited by a moderator:
