When was the economy great in your opinion?
I assume that for the average person, having a "good economy" means having good-paying jobs available with stability and a chance for advancement. Boosting investment in equipment and software seems largely antithetical to that for the majority of the population.Companies’ Spending Spigots Are Opening: Business spending on equipment accelerated in the first three quarters of 2017 and posted the strongest average annual rate of growth since the first nine months of 2014. In a tightening labor market that’s put a premium on skilled and experienced workers, companies are likely to continue to boost investment in equipment and software. What’s more, the tax cuts on the verge of becoming law could spur businesses to spend more and lift productivity.
Where do you get good clams at in Tennessee?Why did he and others clam things were so bad then
Well except all the people working in the design, manufacturing, marketing, support and sales of said equipment and software.I assume that for the average person, having a "good economy" means having good-paying jobs available with stability and a chance for advancement. Boosting investment in equipment and software seems largely antithetical to that for the majority of the population.
The article did a good job of showing the direction those indicators are moving. But I don't think it said anything on causation. Which is, of course, the harder part to figure.
Yay for them? Again I see nothing in there that Fedex is going to change their hiring or employee compensation practices.
LolYay for them? Again I see nothing in there that Fedex is going to change their hiring or employee compensation practices.
I've read it a few times and am not seeing it. All I see is AT&T paying a bonus which @TobiasFunke showed was already a part of the collective bargaining agreement that AT&T entered into that had nothing to do with the tax cut.LolYay for them? Again I see nothing in there that Fedex is going to change their hiring or employee compensation practices.
You should keep reading.
The bonus is also going to non-represented 1st & 2nd level managers which had not been previously announced. My guess is this a gambit by Stephenson to give Trump some good press so the Time Warner deal might be approved.I've read it a few times and am not seeing it. All I see is AT&T paying a bonus which @TobiasFunke showed was already a part of the collective bargaining agreement that AT&T entered into that had nothing to do with the tax cut.
$100 million and it a matching program, not an independent gift. The other $200 million is infrastructure and training (ie normal corporate expenditures) that they’re trying to score some PR off.
I'm running into a lot of over-leveraged clients that are getting into ARMs with teaser rates.Re the economy, I'm most interested in what missteps that led to the Bush crash are being repeated now, or what other factors like inflation, interest rates, war etc. might contribute to the timing of the inevitable downturn. Both because I want Trump removed and because I'm trying to optimize the timing of selling my house.
Right, but how many people is that? And are they lower to middle class? And in the long run, those things are designed to generate more revenue with less labor costs.Well except all the people working in the design, manufacturing, marketing, support and sales of said equipment and software.
Wait until the congressional Republicans who just approved $1.5T in deficit spending to "spur our slumbering economy" get a load of this!
The equipment has to get delivered somehow. So that is a boost to train companies, shipping companies, truckers, gas stations, etc. More gas and shipping means more taxes, which means revenue for all 3 levels of government. The people with extra money will spend more money which is good for shop owners, cashiers, f/b staff, travel industry, housing industry, etc. It's also a boost to the companies that provide the raw materials like iron, silicon, plastic, highly educated workers. When industries are stimulated, it can transfer the positive effects vertically.Right, but how many people is that? And are they lower to middle class? And in the long run, those things are designed to generate more revenue with less labor costs.
with trump as pres., prime has jumped 1%? forget the deep dive stuff, the US electorate are morons. I would be complaining, if I were a dem. that fact and how much more interest and loans cost. I know how prime works, but I would be willing to bet that Johnny Lunchbox red state has no clue. just dumb everything down going forward to the nth degree.I'm running into a lot of over-leveraged clients that are getting into ARMs with teaser rates.
I don't fully understand why we aren't seeing more inflation with how much the money supply has increased since 2008 combined with such low interest rates. What makes me nervous is that if we see another major market correction the Fed does not have the same tools at it's disposal to stabilize the economy. Obviously if the Fed raises interest rates it will create an issue with our debt payments.
This tax bill is only going to makes things hurt even more when the market corrects.
By any chance would you be interested in some Florida real estate?David,
I’m dangerously close on pinning fantasy championships on kerwynn Williams on Wayne gallman based on your current rankings. You’re making me nervous, my friend, with every minute I see you in here. I mean it, seriously, whatever whimsical political slight breeze you feel let me feel the breeze and fly this kite. I need you steering my sails in the direction of titles. Oh captain, my captain, the only numerical trends I need you considering right now span across a specific sample size of fifteen weeks.
TIA (again)
Please check Zerohedge for their lead pipe Rothchilde's rankings for the latest.David,
I’m dangerously close on pinning fantasy championships on kerwynn Williams on Wayne gallman based on your current rankings. You’re making me nervous, my friend, with every minute I see you in here. I mean it, seriously, whatever whimsical political slight breeze you feel let me feel the breeze and fly this kite. I need you steering my sails in the direction of titles. Oh captain, my captain, the only numerical trends I need you considering right now span across a specific sample size of fifteen weeks.
TIA (again)
Running equipment = good paying job.I assume that for the average person, having a "good economy" means having good-paying jobs available with stability and a chance for advancement. Boosting investment in equipment and software seems largely antithetical to that for the majority of the population.
Yeah those Bush administration policies are still working their wonders.By keeping along the same trends from the previous administration?
Why did he and others clam things were so bad then...but now he is making it great (when it really hasn’t changed as far as job growth and other factors)?
The "Bush crash" was a result of Clinton policies. Clinton de-regulated the banking industry by repealing Glass-Steagall which then started loaning large quantities of high-risk predatory loan (see, sub-prime mortgages). Then Billy exempted credit-default swaps from regulation. This allowed companies like Lehman Brothers and Bear Stearns to create mortgage backed securities for credit poor borrowers. Then those companies took those junk securities, wrapped them in insurance from companies who weren't liquid enough to cover them and make them look like they were A rated. Clinton policies also pressured banks to lend money to low-income applicants (Community Reinvestment Act).Re the economy, I'm most interested in what missteps that led to the Bush crash are being repeated now, or what other factors like inflation, interest rates, war etc. might contribute to the timing of the inevitable downturn. Both because I want Trump removed and because I'm trying to optimize the timing of selling my house.
All of the Clinton era policies wouldn't have mattered much if the bold hadn't happened, which was FRAUD committed by investment groups that nearly derailed our entire economy.The "Bush crash" was a result of Clinton policies. Clinton de-regulated the banking industry by repealing Glass-Steagall which then started loaning large quantities of high-risk predatory loan (see, sub-prime mortgages). Then Billy exempted credit-default swaps from regulation. This allowed companies like Lehman Brothers and Bear Stearns to create mortgage backed securities for credit poor borrowers. Then those companies took those junk securities, wrapped them in insurance from companies who weren't liquid enough to cover them and make them look like they were A rated. Clinton policies also pressured banks to lend money to low-income applicants (Community Reinvestment Act).
Bush was a fault for not un-doing much of what Clinton did.
This take seems a little overly partisan to me. Among other thing, the Act that repealed Glass-Steagall had three Republican names on it.The "Bush crash" was a result of Clinton policies. Clinton de-regulated the banking industry by repealing Glass-Steagall which then started loaning large quantities of high-risk predatory loan (see, sub-prime mortgages). Then Billy exempted credit-default swaps from regulation. This allowed companies like Lehman Brothers and Bear Stearns to create mortgage backed securities for credit poor borrowers. Then those companies took those junk securities, wrapped them in insurance from companies who weren't liquid enough to cover them and make them look like they were A rated. Clinton policies also pressured banks to lend money to low-income applicants (Community Reinvestment Act).
Bush was a fault for not un-doing much of what Clinton did.
Funny, I responded to a person who asked "I'm most interested in what missteps that led to the Bush crash are being repeated now." When the fact of the matter was, it stemmed from the policies of the previous administration, not Bush. Although I did fault Bush for not acting to take away the freedoms that banks and investment firms had due to the previous administration.This take seems a little overly partisan to me. Among other thing, the Act that repealed Glass-Steagall had three Republican names on it.
More importantly, however, I think primary responsibility should be put at the feet of Wall Street, not the government. What you're doing is like faulting the police for a drunk driver who plowed into your house because their DUI enforcement was insufficient instead of faulting the ####### who got drunk and drove his car into your living room.
what companies pay people good money to run equipment? they want to automate.Running equipment = good paying job.
Depends on the type of equipment. There is good money on running construction equipment. Even automation equipment requires programmers, technicians and engineers to maintain and run them.what companies pay people good money to run equipment? they want to automate.
I know, you were just responding to the other post, it wasn't really fair of me to criticize your post given the context. It's just that there's just a tendency to make the 07/08 crisis about government failings generally instead of Wall Street's failings that always annoys me. Obviously there's a lot of things that could have been done differently but as time as gone on the actual perpetrators have somehow not gotten the lion's share of the blame and it always gets under my skin. If anything the government saved us from a much worse/longer recession, yet here we are eight years later rolling back regulations across the board and trusting big business to do what's best for the people again. Anyway, rant over. Sorry I mixed you up in it. Carry on.Funny, I responded to a person who asked "I'm most interested in what missteps that led to the Bush crash are being repeated now." When the fact of the matter was, it stemmed from the policies of the previous administration, not Bush. Although I did fault Bush for not acting to take away the freedoms that banks and investment firms had due to the previous administration.
Don't worry there's not a bubble in blockchain currencies or anything.I know, you were just responding to the other post, it wasn't really fair of me to criticize your post given the context. It's just that there's just a tendency to make the 07/08 crisis about government failings generally instead of Wall Street's failings that always annoys me. Obviously there's a lot of things that could have been done differently but as time as gone on the actual perpetrators have somehow not gotten the lion's share of the blame and it always gets under my skin. If anything the government saved us from a much worse/longer recession, yet here we are eight years later rolling back regulations across the board and trusting big business to do what's best for the people again. Anyway, rant over. Sorry I mixed you up in it. Carry on.
Incorrect againYeah those Bush administration policies are still working their wonders.
Bush's tax cuts are still in place. Obama's economic policy consisted of a stimulus which has since expired. The only lingering effect from Obama was.......Incorrect again
Bush tax cuts are what spurred the economy? That’s what you’re going to go with?Bush's tax cuts are still in place. Obama's economic policy consisted of a stimulus which has since expired. The only lingering effect from Obama was.......
to extend Bush's tax cuts.
Saying a stimulus "expired" is absurd. It's like saying a putt "expires" after your club makes contact with the ball.Bush's tax cuts are still in place. Obama's economic policy consisted of a stimulus which has since expired. The only lingering effect from Obama was.......
to extend Bush's tax cuts.
I’m thinking of pivoting from bad puns and homoerotic jokes about French strikers to block chain.Don't worry there's not a bubble in blockchain currencies or anything.