Jamal Lewis is a very pedestrian but solid workhorse back, and decent fantasy RB2...who just happened to have one fluke 2,000 yard year. Honestly. Take away Jam's 2000 yard season and his production in each of his other three years is nearly identical on a per game basis.
With the Ravens committed to throwing the ball more this year, Lewis' limited production as a receiver or goal line back, his ankle, AND Chester Taylor's re-signing, you should NOT overpay for Jam. 2nd round as your RB2?

First round?
If Jamal Lewis is a rb2 why is he ranked #6 rb by Mr Wood in FBG magazine's overall rankings.
As someone else already astutely noted, that ranking was done almost eight weeks ago, and as I have gone through and refined my 2005 projections, I've ratcheted expectations down. Much like many of you, I mistakenly looked at Jamal as being a more productive fantasy back than he's actually been, then an objective look at the facts took place and I saw clear as day that I had been too aggressive in my assumptions for Jam. Our rankings are real-time, so check back any day and his ranking may be adjusted accordingly. We can agree to disagree, that's fine. If we all agreed, there would be no point in having fantasy drafts, we would all just draw numbers out of a hat and then distribute the players based on our universally agreed upon rankings. Monkeface Prickleback almost seems angry that I'm somehow insulting HIS guy...believe me, I'm paid to evaluate and pass judgement on 100s of NFL players each year, so save for an occasional bout of Eagles homerism, I bear no personal biases.
If Jam finishes as RB10-RB12 and you take him 9th overall, will that be devastating? NO, of course not. But at the same time, that means someone else in your league is getting someone that SHOULD have been taken higher and ultimately may end up with a more productive 1st and 2nd round RB combination.
Also, to be fair...where I could be wrong in my assumptions, ranked my order of liklihood.
1)
His yards per carry...In four seasons, he's averaged 4.4, 4.3, 5.3, and 4.3. My projections call for him to average 4.4 yards per carry. The argument for improvement would be that Fassel + Boller + Mason + Clayton give the Ravens a semblance of a passing attack, thus opening up running lanes for Jamal that he's never had before. A very possible scenario. So let's say his YPC goes from 4.4 to 4.7 (a very strong step forward), based on the same number of carries (300)...his yardage total would go from 1,320 to 1,440, giving him 12 extra fantasy points. That would be enough to lift him into a tie for 12th place on my current RB projections. Again, solid RB2, but not an RB1 much less a top tier RB1.
2)
His number of carries...I project Jamal for 300 carries. Again, in three of his four seasons he's averaged just over 19 carries a game, so were he to maintain that over a full season, you're looking at 304 carries. As I showed earlier in this thread, it's rare for an NFL back to exceed 320 carries. Considering, as everyone has stated in support of Jamal, that the Ravens have had a sorry passing game up to this point in Jam's career, any improvement therein is most definitely not going to drive a major uptick in his total carries. Projecting ANY RB for more than 300-320 carries is a risky proposition, much less someone who hasn't been able to train off a bum ankle.
3)
His number of touchdowns...This is the metric most likely to be wrong, one way or the other. Projecting touchdowns, by virtue of their small sample size (even the best players only score a handful of TDs per year), any TD projection on ANY player is going to be less statistically consistent than the other variables that go into player performance. That said, all we can do is look at past performance and evaluate what, if anything has changed that would allow them to improve or decline.
Jamal Lewis hasn't been without opportunities at the goal line. From 2002-2004, Lewis ranks 13th in the league in goal line carries.
Here are the top 20 goal line rushers, ranked by TD conversion percentage...
Priest Holmes (2002--2004) - 68 rushes \ 41 \ 60.3% Goal Line TD%
Shaun Alexander (2002--2004) - 63 rushes \ 33 \ 52.4% Goal Line TD%
Jerome Bettis (2002--2004) - 44 rushes \ 22 \ 50.0% Goal Line TD%
Marshall Faulk (2002--2004) - 35 rushes \ 17 \ 48.6% Goal Line TD%
LaDainian Tomlinson (2002--2004) - 63 rushes \ 30 \ 47.6% Goal Line TD%
Tiki Barber (2002--2004) - 42 rushes \ 20 \ 47.6% Goal Line TD%
Travis Henry (2002--2004) - 37 rushes \ 17 \ 45.9% Goal Line TD%
Stephen Davis (2002--2004) - 31 rushes \ 14 \ 45.2% Goal Line TD%
Eddie George (2002--2004) - 41 rushes \ 18 \ 43.9% Goal Line TD%
Domanick Davis (2002--2004) - 32 rushes \ 14 \ 43.8% Goal Line TD%
Moe Williams (2002--2004) - 39 rushes \ 17 \ 43.6% Goal Line TD%
Zack Crockett (2002--2004) - 37 rushes \ 16 \ 43.2% Goal Line TD%
Jamal Lewis (2002--2004) - 37 rushes \ 16 \ 43.2% Goal Line TD%
Clinton Portis (2002--2004) - 46 rushes \ 19 \ 41.3% Goal Line TD%
Deuce McAllister (2002--2004) - 45 rushes \ 18 \ 40.0% Goal Line TD%
Corey Dillon (2002--2004) - 48 rushes \ 16 \ 33.3% Goal Line TD%
Ricky Williams (2002--2004) - 41 rushes \ 13 \ 31.7% Goal Line TD%
Edgerrin James (2002--2004) - 56 rushes \ 16 \ 28.6% Goal Line TD%
Mike Alstott (2002--2004) - 32 rushes \ 8 \ 25.0% Goal Line TD%
Fred Taylor (2002--2004) - 31 rushes \ 6 \ 19.4% Goal Line TD%As you can see, Jamal has a) gotten plenty of goal line rushes and b) has been in the middle of the pack in conversion percentage. So if you want to argue that he's going to see more goal line opportunities because the offense is going to be more effective in general, I could see that happening but considering, again, he's already among the top 15 over that span (despite missing some games), I'm not sure the numbers support your contention.
4)
His receiving totals -- Jamal has a new offensive coordinator so we don't know if he's going to be used more as a receiver, I would agree with anyone that he can't be used much less

, having caught a whopping 10 balls in 12 games a year ago. So I'm comfortable with my projection of 25 receptions for 225 yards. If a tailback doesn't catch a ton of outlet and dumpoff passes from an inexperieced QB without any weapons at WR, why on Earth would he catch MORE now that Boller is more experienced and has Clayton and Mason to throw to? Furthermore, for those who dismiss Chester Taylor, they didn't re-sign him for $3 million to keep him off the field. And since Jamal is world's better as a runner, obviously they plan on using Taylor as a 3rd down back particularly in receiving sets.
Net-net...Jamal, unlike most other backs who get consideration in the first round, NEEDS a massive amount of carries to even figure into the mix at a top 5-10 fantasy player. That's not a knock on him, that's just the circumstance he finds himself in as the team best utilizes their personnel. Could Jamal finish among the top 10? Certainly. I rank him 14th currently and he would need 16 points to break into the top 10 at his position. 16 points is another 2 touchdowns and 40 yards rushing, so anything is possible.