Jason Witten (1 Viewer)

[NYCGangGreen]

With the Terry Glenn injury news, and the connections he already has with Romo......Witten is primed to put up huge numbers from here on out.

Teams will now double T.O. (or cheat coverage his way) on almost every play, leaving the #2 WR (Crayton, Hurd) with lesser coverage, and Witten has already produced now without Bledsoe....I have to think that this guy will just become an even more integral part of the offense(which is not normal of a Parcells team) but I don't see any other way it can go.



EDIT....SORRY WITTEN........quick typing....and normal English possesed me to put an H!

 

[Real Man of Genius]

W-I-T-T-E-N

 

[Bri]

I agree but his lack of production in some games this year has temperred my enthusiasm.

I also think the young WRs ability to go deep should help him too.

 

[tick dog]

No doubt, Whitten whill have a solid game. So whill Crayton.

 

[Jayrod]

First of all there is no "h" and second of all, no Terry Glenn hurts due to more coverage shifting his way.

 

[SickThing]

Never listen to advice on players from people who don't know how to spell his name.

 

[code]

W-I-T-T-E-N

 

[tick dog]

No doubt, Whitten whill have a solid game. So whill Crayton.

I guess my reprimand was too subtle.

 

[Bri]

First of all there is no "h" and second of all, no Terry Glenn hurts due to more coverage shifting his way.

He stays in to block alot(too much IMO) so I don't see the coverage shifting as a practical thing for the D.

 

[Morton Muffley]

First of all there is no "h" and second of all, no Terry Glenn hurts due to more coverage shifting his way.

He stays in to block alot(too much IMO) so I don't see the coverage shifting as a practical thing for the D.

Not anymore. Now that Bledsoe is on the bench Witten's been used much more in the passing game. His per game targets with Romo are nearly double what they were when Bledsoe was playing.

 

[hellz_fireflies]

He will get more targets but Owens is the guy...Crayton will be good too...all know Tuna hates to start rookie wr!

 

[tecmo bo]

With the Terry Glenn injury news, and the connections he already has with Romo......Whitten is primed to put up huge numbers from here on out.Teams will now double T.O. (or cheat coverage his way) on almost every play, leaving the #2 WR (Crayton, Hurd) with lesser coverage, and Whitten has already produced now without Bledsoe....I have to think that this guy will just become an even more integral part of the offense(which is not normal of a Parcells team) but I don't see any other way it can go. EDIT....SORRY WITTEN........quick typing....and normal English possesed me to put an H!

maybe you should edit the whole post then

 

[NYCGangGreen]

With the Terry Glenn injury news, and the connections he already has with Romo......Whitten is primed to put up huge numbers from here on out.Teams will now double T.O. (or cheat coverage his way) on almost every play, leaving the #2 WR (Crayton, Hurd) with lesser coverage, and Whitten has already produced now without Bledsoe....I have to think that this guy will just become an even more integral part of the offense(which is not normal of a Parcells team) but I don't see any other way it can go. EDIT....SORRY WITTEN........quick typing....and normal English possesed me to put an H!

maybe you should edit the whole post then

Sorry...fixed, trying to keep an eye out while I'm @ work.....don't have the luxury of wasting too much time.

 

[Bri]

First of all there is no "h" and second of all, no Terry Glenn hurts due to more coverage shifting his way.

He stays in to block alot(too much IMO) so I don't see the coverage shifting as a practical thing for the D.

Not anymore. Now that Bledsoe is on the bench Witten's been used much more in the passing game. His per game targets with Romo are nearly double what they were when Bledsoe was playing.

Seemed to me he was in plenty last couple games I saw. No clue why but I saw last few games while in NY. Targets don't equal going out for a pass, I get your point though

 

[joffer]

... no Terry Glenn hurts due to more coverage shifting his way.

 

[raceguy]

Targets don't equal going out for a pass

Gonna need some splaining on that please

 

[Boone22]

First of all there is no "h" and second of all, no Terry Glenn hurts due to more coverage shifting his way.

He stays in to block alot(too much IMO) so I don't see the coverage shifting as a practical thing for the D.

Not anymore. Now that Bledsoe is on the bench Witten's been used much more in the passing game. His per game targets with Romo are nearly double what they were when Bledsoe was playing.

Seemed to me he was in plenty last couple games I saw. No clue why but I saw last few games while in NY. Targets don't equal going out for a pass, I get your point though

With the switch at QB, Witten has been freed up to go out into pass patterns more. With Bledsoe at QB (early in the year) Witten was forced to stay in to block. But now that a more mobile Romo is playing QB, Witten has been running more patterns. Just look at Witten's numbers with Bledsoe vs his numbers now with Romo.Edited to add Witten's numbers...

With Bledsoe in 5 games

16/168/0TDs

With Romo in 3 games

15/202/1TD

 

[Bri]

Targets don't equal going out for a pass

Gonna need some splaining on that please

He's not targetted every single time he leaves the LOS on a pass route. They throw to TO, Glenn and others too

 

[Bri]

First of all there is no "h" and second of all, no Terry Glenn hurts due to more coverage shifting his way.

He stays in to block alot(too much IMO) so I don't see the coverage shifting as a practical thing for the D.

Not anymore. Now that Bledsoe is on the bench Witten's been used much more in the passing game. His per game targets with Romo are nearly double what they were when Bledsoe was playing.

Seemed to me he was in plenty last couple games I saw. No clue why but I saw last few games while in NY. Targets don't equal going out for a pass, I get your point though

With the switch at QB, Witten has been freed up to go out into pass patterns more. With Bledsoe at QB (early in the year) Witten was forced to stay in to block. But now that a more mobile Romo is playing QB, Witten has been running more patterns. Just look at Witten's numbers with Bledsoe vs his numbers now with Romo.Edited to add Witten's numbers...

With Bledsoe in 5 games

16/168/0TDs

With Romo in 3 games

15/202/1TD

I think he's going out on more pass routes, I just think he's still in too much. IMO if Fasano is in, Witten shouldn't be blocking. And FWIW I don't care for Fasano getting a single pass

 

[Morton Muffley]

First of all there is no "h" and second of all, no Terry Glenn hurts due to more coverage shifting his way.

He stays in to block alot(too much IMO) so I don't see the coverage shifting as a practical thing for the D.

Not anymore. Now that Bledsoe is on the bench Witten's been used much more in the passing game. His per game targets with Romo are nearly double what they were when Bledsoe was playing.

Seemed to me he was in plenty last couple games I saw. No clue why but I saw last few games while in NY. Targets don't equal going out for a pass, I get your point though

With the switch at QB, Witten has been freed up to go out into pass patterns more. With Bledsoe at QB (early in the year) Witten was forced to stay in to block. But now that a more mobile Romo is playing QB, Witten has been running more patterns. Just look at Witten's numbers with Bledsoe vs his numbers now with Romo.Edited to add Witten's numbers...

With Bledsoe in 5 games

16/168/0TDs

With Romo in 3 games

15/202/1TD

I think he's going out on more pass routes, I just think he's still in too much. IMO if Fasano is in, Witten shouldn't be blocking. And FWIW I don't care for Fasano getting a single pass

Not a Dallas expert by any means but I was under the impression that Fasano was not a good blocker. As such, if Fasano is in the game it's more likely that Witten will be blocking.