What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Jeff T's Flacco ranking (1 Viewer)

Gawain

Footballguy
W/o giving away too much subscriber content, Jeff T has Joe Flacco ranked as the 33rd quarterback. There weren't any comments attached to this ranking, so just curious what he knows that we don't. I like Flacco as a QB2 this year. The uptempo Ravens offense seems to be clicking well.

 
Its probably 23rd?

Either way its too high.

Ive only been burned by Flacco every year hes been in the league, not biased or anything...

 
I would assume typo since theres only 32 teams?
I doubt it. He also has Alex Smith past 32 as well. Both AZ QB's are rated above both of these guys. For 1QB leagues these guys are retreads, but for those of us in 2QB leagues the rankings get skewed a bit. I can eliminate his rankings, but don't want to if there is some sort of analysis behind these low rankings.
 
Its probably 23rd?Either way its too high.
I think Flacco is below average as a QB, but Id like to see you name 22 QBs youd rather have.His upside is limited, but his floor is high as a QB2. He wont end up worse than a mid level QB2 if he stays healthy in all liklihood.
 
Its probably 23rd?Either way its too high.
I think Flacco is below average as a QB, but Id like to see you name 22 QBs youd rather have.His upside is limited, but his floor is high as a QB2. He wont end up worse than a mid level QB2 if he stays healthy in all liklihood.
Do you define mid level QB2 as QB14-18? Cause if thats the case odds are obviously on your side, but outside of this preseason, and one playoff game last year, Flacco has been nothing but a constant disappointment. He finished 17th last year in my main league ahead of Tebow and behind Freeman.1.Brady2.Brees3.Rodgers4.Stafford5.Newton6.Manning7.Manning8.Ryan9.Rivers10.Romo11.Cutler12.Vick13.Roethlisberger14.Freeman15.RG316.Schaub17.Fitzpatrick18.Dalton19.Smith20.Luck21.Wilson22.Weedon23.Palmer24.Cassel25.Bradford26.Skeltom27T.Mccoy, Gabbert, Sanchez, Flacco
 
He looks in command in the new no-huddle offense and his accuracy is deadly.

The only thing that could hold back Flacco from a breakthrough fantasy season is Cam Cameron being too conservative.

A top 10-12 finish would not surprise me in the least.

 
Its probably 23rd?Either way its too high.
I think Flacco is below average as a QB, but Id like to see you name 22 QBs youd rather have.His upside is limited, but his floor is high as a QB2. He wont end up worse than a mid level QB2 if he stays healthy in all liklihood.
Do you define mid level QB2 as QB14-18? Cause if thats the case odds are obviously on your side, but outside of this preseason, and one playoff game last year, Flacco has been nothing but a constant disappointment. He finished 17th last year in my main league ahead of Tebow and behind Freeman.1.Brady2.Brees3.Rodgers4.Stafford5.Newton6.Manning7.Manning8.Ryan9.Rivers10.Romo11.Cutler12.Vick13.Roethlisberger14.Freeman15.RG316.Schaub17.Fitzpatrick18.Dalton19.Smith20.Luck21.Wilson22.Weedon23.Palmer24.Cassel25.Bradford26.Skeltom27T.Mccoy, Gabbert, Sanchez, Flacco
Not sure how to answer this. Yes, I think he will finish in the QB15-20 range but has almost no shot to finish higher. Besides injury, I doubt he finishes lower as well. What you see is what you get with Flacco. Also, the OP said he was rated QB30+ so while you may say odds are on my side, I posted because I thought the OP rankings are pretty absurd.Ive never drafted Flacco, and dont plan to anytime soon. While Im no fan, if you are going to rate him amongst the worst QBs in the league judging by your list, youre severely underrating him.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
1.Brady

2.Brees

3.Rodgers

4.Stafford

5.Newton

6.Manning

7.Manning

8.Ryan

Insert Flacco

9.Rivers

10.Romo

11.Cutler

12.Vick

13.Roethlisberger

14.Freeman

15.RG3

16.Schaub

17.Fitzpatrick

18.Dalton

19.Smith

20.Luck

21.Wilson

22.Weedon

23.Palmer

24.Cassel

25.Bradford

26.Skeltom

27T.Mccoy, Gabbert, Sanchez, Flacco

 
Last edited by a moderator:
1.Brady

2.Brees

3.Rodgers

4.Stafford

5.Newton

6.Manning

7.Manning

8.Ryan

Insert Flacco

9.Rivers

10.Romo

11.Cutler

12.Vick

13.Roethlisberger

14.Freeman

15.RG3

16.Schaub

17.Fitzpatrick

18.Dalton

19.Smith

20.Luck

21.Wilson

22.Weedon

23.Palmer

24.Cassel

25.Bradford

26.Skeltom

27T.Mccoy, Gabbert, Sanchez, Flacco
Bold.
 
1.Brady

2.Brees

3.Rodgers

4.Stafford

5.Newton

6.Manning

7.Manning

8.Ryan

Insert Flacco

9.Rivers

10.Romo

11.Cutler

12.Vick

13.Roethlisberger

14.Freeman

15.RG3

16.Schaub

17.Fitzpatrick

18.Dalton

19.Smith

20.Luck

21.Wilson

22.Weedon

23.Palmer

24.Cassel

25.Bradford

26.Skeltom

27T.Mccoy, Gabbert, Sanchez, Flacco
Bold.
Thats redraft thinking BTW, Dynasty I would take Luck over him and consider RGIII
 
I think he will finish in the QB15-20 range but has almost no shot to finish higher.
Almost no shot?
Barring multiple QB1 injuries, yes.I think guys like Cutler and Schaub are really being underrated this year. I think Luck and RG3 both have a pretty good chance at outscoring Flacco this year. I think Fitzpatrick, Smith, and Freeman all have more upside than Flacco.

While I guarantee Flacco outscores a couple of these guys, I highly doubt he outscores most of them. QB is deep this year, lots of guys with potential. Like I said, I think Flacco's potential is limited, and some of that has to do with Ray Rice.

 
I've enjoyed cashing in on the general FBG hate for Joe Flacco, he can be had at bargain basement prices in most leagues. I like the direction of the offense for 2012 and see mid to high end QB2 numbers as his floor

 
Its probably 23rd?

Either way its too high.
I think Flacco is below average as a QB, but Id like to see you name 22 QBs youd rather have.His upside is limited, but his floor is high as a QB2. He wont end up worse than a mid level QB2 if he stays healthy in all liklihood.
Do you define mid level QB2 as QB14-18? Cause if thats the case odds are obviously on your side, but outside of this preseason, and one playoff game last year, Flacco has been nothing but a constant disappointment. He finished 17th last year in my main league ahead of Tebow and behind Freeman.1.Brady

2.Brees

3.Rodgers

4.Stafford

5.Newton

6.Manning

7.Manning

8.Ryan

9.Rivers

10.Romo

11.Cutler

12.Vick

13.Roethlisberger

14.Freeman

15.RG3

16.Schaub

17.Fitzpatrick

18.Dalton

19.Smith

20.Luck

21.Wilson

22.Weedon

23.Palmer

24.Cassel

25.Bradford

26.Skeltom

27T.Mccoy, Gabbert, Sanchez, Flacco
And you come down on which side again? And why?Flacco's last three years have been (I've got to believe) historically consistent. He's literally been between 3610-3622 yards for three straight years, along with 20-25 TD's. I've never seen anything like it.

He stays healthy, the team wins, he's locked up, he's played in a run-and-defense oriented situation, and his stats are identical every year. He may have, literally, the least downside of any fantasy performer in the entire league. You'd have to be insane to project him for less than 3600/20.

But of course, there are rumblings and preseasons signs that they're opening up the offense this year, and early returns say Flacco looks good and comfortable in the new and improved O. Do you want to oversell that before we see it in action? Of course not. But when a guy is as big a slam dunk as there is for 3600/20 and has obvious upside from there, you don't stick him in the 30's.

 
Good post.

I've never been a Flacco fan either, but they do appear to be opening it up this year. He could surprise, but i like hi wr torry Smith more.

 
Good post. I've never been a Flacco fan either, but they do appear to be opening it up this year. He could surprise, but i like hi wr torry Smith more.
I suspect he will hang with Matt Ryan this year; guesstimating 45% chance of Flacco outscoring him overall. Excellent value vs Ryan ADP-wise IMO.
 
'Zeff said:
And you come down on which side again? And why?

Flacco's last three years have been (I've got to believe) historically consistent. He's literally been between 3610-3622 yards for three straight years, along with 20-25 TD's. I've never seen anything like it.

He stays healthy, the team wins, he's locked up, he's played in a run-and-defense oriented situation, and his stats are identical every year. He may have, literally, the least downside of any fantasy performer in the entire league. You'd have to be insane to project him for less than 3600/20.

But of course, there are rumblings and preseasons signs that they're opening up the offense this year, and early returns say Flacco looks good and comfortable in the new and improved O. Do you want to oversell that before we see it in action? Of course not. But when a guy is as big a slam dunk as there is for 3600/20 and has obvious upside from there, you don't stick him in the 30's.
The side where he continues to be terrible and in his best year finished 17th...The team could win with Sanchez, they are literally the same person, Flacco doesnt elevate anyone - except Rice and the opposing teams defense.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
'Zeff said:
And you come down on which side again? And why?

Flacco's last three years have been (I've got to believe) historically consistent. He's literally been between 3610-3622 yards for three straight years, along with 20-25 TD's. I've never seen anything like it.

He stays healthy, the team wins, he's locked up, he's played in a run-and-defense oriented situation, and his stats are identical every year. He may have, literally, the least downside of any fantasy performer in the entire league. You'd have to be insane to project him for less than 3600/20.

But of course, there are rumblings and preseasons signs that they're opening up the offense this year, and early returns say Flacco looks good and comfortable in the new and improved O. Do you want to oversell that before we see it in action? Of course not. But when a guy is as big a slam dunk as there is for 3600/20 and has obvious upside from there, you don't stick him in the 30's.
The side where he continues to be terrible and in his best year finished 17th...The team could win with Sanchez, they are literally the same person, Flacco doesnt elevate anyone - except Rice and the opposing teams defense.
You're letting personal dislike cloud your logical ability.17th wasn't his "best year" of course. Indeed, his average finish is better than that. But even if we do him a disservice and call that his average year...you're saying this model of consistency...who puts up the same stats year after year...that you expect him to "continue" to be terrible...to "continue" to be what he is...which has proven to be a 3600/22 guy, pretty much...and that this production is suddenly going to make him the 33rd best fantasy QB in the league somehow?

If you see no upside here at all, you call him 15th-20th and sweep him under the rug. 33rd is letting personal bias interfere with reason.

 
With our leagues scoring Flacco has finished 13,13,15,18 the last four year. While this isn't spectacular it's consistent and puts him as a solid backup. So for those of you projecting him to finish 27th or worse and saying such things as "he has almost no chance to finish higher than 15-20" I'm sure you'll come back later and explain why you're wrong again.

 
'Zeff said:
And you come down on which side again? And why?

Flacco's last three years have been (I've got to believe) historically consistent. He's literally been between 3610-3622 yards for three straight years, along with 20-25 TD's. I've never seen anything like it.

He stays healthy, the team wins, he's locked up, he's played in a run-and-defense oriented situation, and his stats are identical every year. He may have, literally, the least downside of any fantasy performer in the entire league. You'd have to be insane to project him for less than 3600/20.

But of course, there are rumblings and preseasons signs that they're opening up the offense this year, and early returns say Flacco looks good and comfortable in the new and improved O. Do you want to oversell that before we see it in action? Of course not. But when a guy is as big a slam dunk as there is for 3600/20 and has obvious upside from there, you don't stick him in the 30's.
The side where he continues to be terrible and in his best year finished 17th...The team could win with Sanchez, they are literally the same person, Flacco doesnt elevate anyone - except Rice and the opposing teams defense.
You're letting personal dislike cloud your logical ability.17th wasn't his "best year" of course. Indeed, his average finish is better than that. But even if we do him a disservice and call that his average year...you're saying this model of consistency...who puts up the same stats year after year...that you expect him to "continue" to be terrible...to "continue" to be what he is...which has proven to be a 3600/22 guy, pretty much...and that this production is suddenly going to make him the 33rd best fantasy QB in the league somehow?

If you see no upside here at all, you call him 15th-20th and sweep him under the rug. 33rd is letting personal bias interfere with reason.
I didnt label him 33rd, but is there any difference between the QB18-150? Are they all unrosterable outside of a 2QB league? I am being biased, you're right his best season wasnt QB17. You are seeing an empty cup half full.To say he is a mid/bottom QB2 is doing him justice, and everyone else a great injustice. The minute amount of hype he has garnered this preseason is leading people to believe he can be something more, I submit that he cannot. He may prove me wrong and if he does thats great.

Hes never missed a game which is a credit to him. But in the 64 hes played hes had a completion percentage of 60% in only 37 of his games (57%), consistency is one thing - from the most consistent position in football. Consistently subpar and sporadically absolutely awful is another.

As ive said before in this thread, he played out of his mind and the best ive ever seen him play in the playoffs last year, specifically only in the game against NE, he has played great this preseason, but this is only one offseason removed from this season:

Code:
                                              Pass                                       Rk    G       Date    Age  Tm  Opp  Result GS  Cmp Att  Cmp%  Yds TD Int  Rate   Y/A AY/A1     1 2011-09-11 26-238 BAL  PIT  W 35-7  *   17  29 58.6%  224  3   0 117.6  7.72 9.792     2 2011-09-18 26-245 BAL  TEN L 13-26  *   15  32 46.9%  197  1   2  51.2  6.16 3.973     3 2011-09-25 26-252 BAL  STL  W 37-7  *   27  48 56.3%  389  3   0 103.6  8.10 9.354     4 2011-10-02 26-259 BAL  NYJ W 34-17  *   10  31 32.3%  163  0   1  37.4  5.26 3.815     5 2011-10-16 26-273 BAL  HOU W 29-14  *   20  33 60.6%  305  0   1  78.5  9.24 7.886     6 2011-10-24 26-281 BAL  JAX  L 7-12  *   21  38 55.3%  137  1   1  61.0  3.61 2.957     7 2011-10-30 26-287 BAL  ARI W 30-27  *   31  51 60.8%  336  0   1  72.0  6.59 5.718     8 2011-11-06 26-294 BAL  PIT W 23-20  *   28  47 59.6%  300  1   0  85.4  6.38 6.819     9 2011-11-13 26-301 BAL  SEA L 17-22  *   29  52 55.8%  255  1   1  67.4  4.90 4.4210   10 2011-11-20 26-308 BAL  CIN W 31-24  *   17  27 63.0%  270  2   1 105.5 10.00 9.8111   11 2011-11-24 26-312 BAL  SFO  W 16-6  *   15  23 65.2%  161  1   0 100.1  7.00 7.8712   12 2011-12-04 26-322 BAL  CLE W 24-10  *   10  23 43.5%  158  0   0  66.9  6.87 6.8713   13 2011-12-11 26-329 BAL  IND W 24-10  *   23  31 74.2%  227  2   1 102.5  7.32 7.1614   14 2011-12-18 26-336 BAL  SDG L 14-34  *   23  34 67.6%  226  2   2  81.3  6.65 5.1815   15 2011-12-24 26-342 BAL  CLE W 20-14  *   11  24 45.8%  132  2   1  73.6  5.50 5.2916   16 2012-01-01 26-350 BAL  CIN W 24-16  *   15  19 78.9%  130  1   0 112.7  6.84 7.89          16 Games                             312 542 57.6% 3610 20  12  80.9  6.66 6.40
 
'Zeff said:
And you come down on which side again? And why?

Flacco's last three years have been (I've got to believe) historically consistent. He's literally been between 3610-3622 yards for three straight years, along with 20-25 TD's. I've never seen anything like it.

He stays healthy, the team wins, he's locked up, he's played in a run-and-defense oriented situation, and his stats are identical every year. He may have, literally, the least downside of any fantasy performer in the entire league. You'd have to be insane to project him for less than 3600/20.

But of course, there are rumblings and preseasons signs that they're opening up the offense this year, and early returns say Flacco looks good and comfortable in the new and improved O. Do you want to oversell that before we see it in action? Of course not. But when a guy is as big a slam dunk as there is for 3600/20 and has obvious upside from there, you don't stick him in the 30's.
The side where he continues to be terrible and in his best year finished 17th...The team could win with Sanchez, they are literally the same person, Flacco doesnt elevate anyone - except Rice and the opposing teams defense.
You're letting personal dislike cloud your logical ability.17th wasn't his "best year" of course. Indeed, his average finish is better than that. But even if we do him a disservice and call that his average year...you're saying this model of consistency...who puts up the same stats year after year...that you expect him to "continue" to be terrible...to "continue" to be what he is...which has proven to be a 3600/22 guy, pretty much...and that this production is suddenly going to make him the 33rd best fantasy QB in the league somehow?

If you see no upside here at all, you call him 15th-20th and sweep him under the rug. 33rd is letting personal bias interfere with reason.
I didnt label him 33rd, but is there any difference between the QB18-150? Are they all unrosterable outside of a 2QB league? I am being biased, you're right his best season wasnt QB17. You are seeing an empty cup half full.To say he is a mid/bottom QB2 is doing him justice, and everyone else a great injustice. The minute amount of hype he has garnered this preseason is leading people to believe he can be something more, I submit that he cannot. He may prove me wrong and if he does thats great.

Hes never missed a game which is a credit to him. But in the 64 hes played hes had a completion percentage of 60% in only 37 of his games (57%), consistency is one thing - from the most consistent position in football. Consistently subpar and sporadically absolutely awful is another.

As ive said before in this thread, he played out of his mind and the best ive ever seen him play in the playoffs last year, specifically only in the game against NE, he has played great this preseason, but this is only one offseason removed from this season:

Code:
                                              Pass                                       Rk    G       Date    Age  Tm  Opp  Result GS  Cmp Att  Cmp%  Yds TD Int  Rate   Y/A AY/A1     1 2011-09-11 26-238 BAL  PIT  W 35-7  *   17  29 58.6%  224  3   0 117.6  7.72 9.792     2 2011-09-18 26-245 BAL  TEN L 13-26  *   15  32 46.9%  197  1   2  51.2  6.16 3.973     3 2011-09-25 26-252 BAL  STL  W 37-7  *   27  48 56.3%  389  3   0 103.6  8.10 9.354     4 2011-10-02 26-259 BAL  NYJ W 34-17  *   10  31 32.3%  163  0   1  37.4  5.26 3.815     5 2011-10-16 26-273 BAL  HOU W 29-14  *   20  33 60.6%  305  0   1  78.5  9.24 7.886     6 2011-10-24 26-281 BAL  JAX  L 7-12  *   21  38 55.3%  137  1   1  61.0  3.61 2.957     7 2011-10-30 26-287 BAL  ARI W 30-27  *   31  51 60.8%  336  0   1  72.0  6.59 5.718     8 2011-11-06 26-294 BAL  PIT W 23-20  *   28  47 59.6%  300  1   0  85.4  6.38 6.819     9 2011-11-13 26-301 BAL  SEA L 17-22  *   29  52 55.8%  255  1   1  67.4  4.90 4.4210   10 2011-11-20 26-308 BAL  CIN W 31-24  *   17  27 63.0%  270  2   1 105.5 10.00 9.8111   11 2011-11-24 26-312 BAL  SFO  W 16-6  *   15  23 65.2%  161  1   0 100.1  7.00 7.8712   12 2011-12-04 26-322 BAL  CLE W 24-10  *   10  23 43.5%  158  0   0  66.9  6.87 6.8713   13 2011-12-11 26-329 BAL  IND W 24-10  *   23  31 74.2%  227  2   1 102.5  7.32 7.1614   14 2011-12-18 26-336 BAL  SDG L 14-34  *   23  34 67.6%  226  2   2  81.3  6.65 5.1815   15 2011-12-24 26-342 BAL  CLE W 20-14  *   11  24 45.8%  132  2   1  73.6  5.50 5.2916   16 2012-01-01 26-350 BAL  CIN W 24-16  *   15  19 78.9%  130  1   0 112.7  6.84 7.89          16 Games                             312 542 57.6% 3610 20  12  80.9  6.66 6.40
The difference is that instead of playing TEN, STL, NYJ, HOU, JAX, ARIZ, SF, INDY and SD (All teams that had good defenses last year and limited offenses) the Ravens will be playing PHI, NE, KC, DAL, HOU, OAK, SD, WASH, DEN, and NYG (mostly teams with high power offenses). I will be surprised if the Ravens are not playing from behind more often this year and being forced to pass more often.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
'Zeff said:
And you come down on which side again? And why?

Flacco's last three years have been (I've got to believe) historically consistent. He's literally been between 3610-3622 yards for three straight years, along with 20-25 TD's. I've never seen anything like it.

He stays healthy, the team wins, he's locked up, he's played in a run-and-defense oriented situation, and his stats are identical every year. He may have, literally, the least downside of any fantasy performer in the entire league. You'd have to be insane to project him for less than 3600/20.

But of course, there are rumblings and preseasons signs that they're opening up the offense this year, and early returns say Flacco looks good and comfortable in the new and improved O. Do you want to oversell that before we see it in action? Of course not. But when a guy is as big a slam dunk as there is for 3600/20 and has obvious upside from there, you don't stick him in the 30's.
The side where he continues to be terrible and in his best year finished 17th...The team could win with Sanchez, they are literally the same person, Flacco doesnt elevate anyone - except Rice and the opposing teams defense.
You're letting personal dislike cloud your logical ability.17th wasn't his "best year" of course. Indeed, his average finish is better than that. But even if we do him a disservice and call that his average year...you're saying this model of consistency...who puts up the same stats year after year...that you expect him to "continue" to be terrible...to "continue" to be what he is...which has proven to be a 3600/22 guy, pretty much...and that this production is suddenly going to make him the 33rd best fantasy QB in the league somehow?

If you see no upside here at all, you call him 15th-20th and sweep him under the rug. 33rd is letting personal bias interfere with reason.
I didnt label him 33rd, but is there any difference between the QB18-150? Are they all unrosterable outside of a 2QB league? I am being biased, you're right his best season wasnt QB17. You are seeing an empty cup half full.To say he is a mid/bottom QB2 is doing him justice, and everyone else a great injustice. The minute amount of hype he has garnered this preseason is leading people to believe he can be something more, I submit that he cannot. He may prove me wrong and if he does thats great.

Hes never missed a game which is a credit to him. But in the 64 hes played hes had a completion percentage of 60% in only 37 of his games (57%), consistency is one thing - from the most consistent position in football. Consistently subpar and sporadically absolutely awful is another.

As ive said before in this thread, he played out of his mind and the best ive ever seen him play in the playoffs last year, specifically only in the game against NE, he has played great this preseason, but this is only one offseason removed from this season:

Pass Rk G Date Age Tm Opp Result GS Cmp Att Cmp% Yds TD Int Rate Y/A AY/A1 1 2011-09-11 26-238 BAL PIT W 35-7 * 17 29 58.6% 224 3 0 117.6 7.72 9.792 2 2011-09-18 26-245 BAL TEN L 13-26 * 15 32 46.9% 197 1 2 51.2 6.16 3.973 3 2011-09-25 26-252 BAL STL W 37-7 * 27 48 56.3% 389 3 0 103.6 8.10 9.354 4 2011-10-02 26-259 BAL NYJ W 34-17 * 10 31 32.3% 163 0 1 37.4 5.26 3.815 5 2011-10-16 26-273 BAL HOU W 29-14 * 20 33 60.6% 305 0 1 78.5 9.24 7.886 6 2011-10-24 26-281 BAL JAX L 7-12 * 21 38 55.3% 137 1 1 61.0 3.61 2.957 7 2011-10-30 26-287 BAL ARI W 30-27 * 31 51 60.8% 336 0 1 72.0 6.59 5.718 8 2011-11-06 26-294 BAL PIT W 23-20 * 28 47 59.6% 300 1 0 85.4 6.38 6.819 9 2011-11-13 26-301 BAL SEA L 17-22 * 29 52 55.8% 255 1 1 67.4 4.90 4.4210 10 2011-11-20 26-308 BAL CIN W 31-24 * 17 27 63.0% 270 2 1 105.5 10.00 9.8111 11 2011-11-24 26-312 BAL SFO W 16-6 * 15 23 65.2% 161 1 0 100.1 7.00 7.8712 12 2011-12-04 26-322 BAL CLE W 24-10 * 10 23 43.5% 158 0 0 66.9 6.87 6.8713 13 2011-12-11 26-329 BAL IND W 24-10 * 23 31 74.2% 227 2 1 102.5 7.32 7.1614 14 2011-12-18 26-336 BAL SDG L 14-34 * 23 34 67.6% 226 2 2 81.3 6.65 5.1815 15 2011-12-24 26-342 BAL CLE W 20-14 * 11 24 45.8% 132 2 1 73.6 5.50 5.2916 16 2012-01-01 26-350 BAL CIN W 24-16 * 15 19 78.9% 130 1 0 112.7 6.84 7.89 16 Games 312 542 57.6% 3610 20 12 80.9 6.66 6.40
The difference is that instead of playing TEN, STL, NYJ, HOU, JAX, ARIZ, SF, INDY and SD (All teams that had good defenses last year and limited offenses) the Ravens will be playing PHI, NE, KC, DAL, HOU, OAK, SD, WASH, DEN, and NYG (mostly teams with high power offenses). I will be surprised if the Ravens are not playing from behind more often this year and being forced to pass more often.
"The difference" isn't ####. The Ravens were better than most of the teams they played last year, they'll be better than most of the teams they play this year.Flacco was "good enough" to pilot them to 12 wins last year, and the year before. His job is as safe as any in the league. He'll put up at least another 3600/20, and if he does, his chances of finishing the year 33rd are zero.

Run is an imbecile, who's trying to make an argument where there isn't one. No idea why. Chase Stuart school of rhetoric, I guess. Site is full of them.

 
"The difference" isn't ####. The Ravens were better than most of the teams they played last year, they'll be better than most of the teams they play this year.

Flacco was "good enough" to pilot them to 12 wins last year, and the year before. His job is as safe as any in the league. He'll put up at least another 3600/20, and if he does, his chances of finishing the year 33rd are zero.

Run is an imbecile, who's trying to make an argument where there isn't one. No idea why. Chase Stuart school of rhetoric, I guess. Site is full of them.
Yes, Joe Flacco managed all those games where Ray Rice racked up 400 touches. Joe Flacco sacked all those QBs and picked off the rest. The Ravens were better than all of the teams they played last year (except NE), and it had very little to do with Flacco. I stand by my opinion, we obviously disagree.
 
I have also owned Flacco and not enjoyed the experience, but I would be happy with him as my backup QB this year, if he falls. I'm encouraged mostly by Torry Smith and the expanded offense

 
'Run It Up said:
'Zeff said:
'Zeff said:
And you come down on which side again? And why?

Flacco's last three years have been (I've got to believe) historically consistent. He's literally been between 3610-3622 yards for three straight years, along with 20-25 TD's. I've never seen anything like it.

He stays healthy, the team wins, he's locked up, he's played in a run-and-defense oriented situation, and his stats are identical every year. He may have, literally, the least downside of any fantasy performer in the entire league. You'd have to be insane to project him for less than 3600/20.

But of course, there are rumblings and preseasons signs that they're opening up the offense this year, and early returns say Flacco looks good and comfortable in the new and improved O. Do you want to oversell that before we see it in action? Of course not. But when a guy is as big a slam dunk as there is for 3600/20 and has obvious upside from there, you don't stick him in the 30's.
The side where he continues to be terrible and in his best year finished 17th...The team could win with Sanchez, they are literally the same person, Flacco doesnt elevate anyone - except Rice and the opposing teams defense.
You're letting personal dislike cloud your logical ability.17th wasn't his "best year" of course. Indeed, his average finish is better than that. But even if we do him a disservice and call that his average year...you're saying this model of consistency...who puts up the same stats year after year...that you expect him to "continue" to be terrible...to "continue" to be what he is...which has proven to be a 3600/22 guy, pretty much...and that this production is suddenly going to make him the 33rd best fantasy QB in the league somehow?

If you see no upside here at all, you call him 15th-20th and sweep him under the rug. 33rd is letting personal bias interfere with reason.
I didnt label him 33rd, but is there any difference between the QB18-150? Are they all unrosterable outside of a 2QB league? I am being biased, you're right his best season wasnt QB17. You are seeing an empty cup half full.To say he is a mid/bottom QB2 is doing him justice, and everyone else a great injustice. The minute amount of hype he has garnered this preseason is leading people to believe he can be something more, I submit that he cannot. He may prove me wrong and if he does thats great.

Hes never missed a game which is a credit to him. But in the 64 hes played hes had a completion percentage of 60% in only 37 of his games (57%), consistency is one thing - from the most consistent position in football. Consistently subpar and sporadically absolutely awful is another.

As ive said before in this thread, he played out of his mind and the best ive ever seen him play in the playoffs last year, specifically only in the game against NE, he has played great this preseason, but this is only one offseason removed from this season:

Code:
                                              Pass                                       Rk    G       Date    Age  Tm  Opp  Result GS  Cmp Att  Cmp%  Yds TD Int  Rate   Y/A AY/A1     1 2011-09-11 26-238 BAL  PIT  W 35-7  *   17  29 58.6%  224  3   0 117.6  7.72 9.792     2 2011-09-18 26-245 BAL  TEN L 13-26  *   15  32 46.9%  197  1   2  51.2  6.16 3.973     3 2011-09-25 26-252 BAL  STL  W 37-7  *   27  48 56.3%  389  3   0 103.6  8.10 9.354     4 2011-10-02 26-259 BAL  NYJ W 34-17  *   10  31 32.3%  163  0   1  37.4  5.26 3.815     5 2011-10-16 26-273 BAL  HOU W 29-14  *   20  33 60.6%  305  0   1  78.5  9.24 7.886     6 2011-10-24 26-281 BAL  JAX  L 7-12  *   21  38 55.3%  137  1   1  61.0  3.61 2.957     7 2011-10-30 26-287 BAL  ARI W 30-27  *   31  51 60.8%  336  0   1  72.0  6.59 5.718     8 2011-11-06 26-294 BAL  PIT W 23-20  *   28  47 59.6%  300  1   0  85.4  6.38 6.819     9 2011-11-13 26-301 BAL  SEA L 17-22  *   29  52 55.8%  255  1   1  67.4  4.90 4.4210   10 2011-11-20 26-308 BAL  CIN W 31-24  *   17  27 63.0%  270  2   1 105.5 10.00 9.8111   11 2011-11-24 26-312 BAL  SFO  W 16-6  *   15  23 65.2%  161  1   0 100.1  7.00 7.8712   12 2011-12-04 26-322 BAL  CLE W 24-10  *   10  23 43.5%  158  0   0  66.9  6.87 6.8713   13 2011-12-11 26-329 BAL  IND W 24-10  *   23  31 74.2%  227  2   1 102.5  7.32 7.1614   14 2011-12-18 26-336 BAL  SDG L 14-34  *   23  34 67.6%  226  2   2  81.3  6.65 5.1815   15 2011-12-24 26-342 BAL  CLE W 20-14  *   11  24 45.8%  132  2   1  73.6  5.50 5.2916   16 2012-01-01 26-350 BAL  CIN W 24-16  *   15  19 78.9%  130  1   0 112.7  6.84 7.89          16 Games                             312 542 57.6% 3610 20  12  80.9  6.66 6.40
7 games with less than 200 yards, 10 games with 0 or 1 TDs. Thats enough right there for me to not want him as my backup.
 
Its probably 23rd?Either way its too high.
I think Flacco is below average as a QB, but Id like to see you name 22 QBs youd rather have.His upside is limited, but his floor is high as a QB2. He wont end up worse than a mid level QB2 if he stays healthy in all liklihood.
Do you define mid level QB2 as QB14-18? Cause if thats the case odds are obviously on your side, but outside of this preseason, and one playoff game last year, Flacco has been nothing but a constant disappointment. He finished 17th last year in my main league ahead of Tebow and behind Freeman.1.Brady2.Brees3.Rodgers4.Stafford5.Newton6.Manning7.Manning8.Ryan9.Rivers10.Romo11.Cutler12.Vick13.Roethlisberger14.Freeman15.RG316.Schaub17.Fitzpatrick18.Dalton19.Smith20.Luck21.Wilson22.Weedon23.Palmer24.Cassel25.Bradford26.Skeltom27T.Mccoy, Gabbert, Sanchez, Flacco
Most ridiculous post of the year so far?
 
Would have loved to know the thought process that went into declaring Flacco the 33rd QB for the year. He might not have to play another down to outscore Brandon Weeden's 2012.

 
Its probably 23rd?Either way its too high.
I think Flacco is below average as a QB, but Id like to see you name 22 QBs youd rather have.His upside is limited, but his floor is high as a QB2. He wont end up worse than a mid level QB2 if he stays healthy in all liklihood.
Do you define mid level QB2 as QB14-18? Cause if thats the case odds are obviously on your side, but outside of this preseason, and one playoff game last year, Flacco has been nothing but a constant disappointment. He finished 17th last year in my main league ahead of Tebow and behind Freeman.1.Brady2.Brees3.Rodgers4.Stafford5.Newton6.Manning7.Manning8.Ryan9.Rivers10.Romo11.Cutler12.Vick13.Roethlisberger14.Freeman15.RG316.Schaub17.Fitzpatrick18.Dalton19.Smith20.Luck21.Wilson22.Weedon23.Palmer24.Cassel25.Bradford26.Skeltom27T.Mccoy, Gabbert, Sanchez, Flacco
Most ridiculous post of the year so far?
Pretty bad
 
Its probably 23rd?Either way its too high.
I think Flacco is below average as a QB, but Id like to see you name 22 QBs youd rather have.His upside is limited, but his floor is high as a QB2. He wont end up worse than a mid level QB2 if he stays healthy in all liklihood.
Do you define mid level QB2 as QB14-18? Cause if thats the case odds are obviously on your side, but outside of this preseason, and one playoff game last year, Flacco has been nothing but a constant disappointment. He finished 17th last year in my main league ahead of Tebow and behind Freeman.1.Brady2.Brees3.Rodgers4.Stafford5.Newton6.Manning7.Manning8.Ryan9.Rivers10.Romo11.Cutler12.Vick13.Roethlisberger14.Freeman15.RG316.Schaub17.Fitzpatrick18.Dalton19.Smith20.Luck21.Wilson22.Weedon23.Palmer24.Cassel25.Bradford26.Skeltom27T.Mccoy, Gabbert, Sanchez, Flacco
Most ridiculous post of the year so far?
Saw the thread, got this far, and ....see you beat me to it!! :lmao:
 
Good joe, but one more yard & i win. Dang it.

He looks pretty good, & should definitely outperform his cost. The new offense is going to ramp up his numbers.

 
Its probably 23rd?Either way its too high.
I think Flacco is below average as a QB, but Id like to see you name 22 QBs youd rather have.His upside is limited, but his floor is high as a QB2. He wont end up worse than a mid level QB2 if he stays healthy in all liklihood.
Do you define mid level QB2 as QB14-18? Cause if thats the case odds are obviously on your side, but outside of this preseason, and one playoff game last year, Flacco has been nothing but a constant disappointment. He finished 17th last year in my main league ahead of Tebow and behind Freeman.1.Brady2.Brees3.Rodgers4.Stafford5.Newton6.Manning7.Manning8.Ryan9.Rivers10.Romo11.Cutler12.Vick13.Roethlisberger14.Freeman15.RG316.Schaub17.Fitzpatrick18.Dalton19.Smith20.Luck21.Wilson22.Weedon23.Palmer24.Cassel25.Bradford26.Skeltom27T.Mccoy, Gabbert, Sanchez, Flacco
Most ridiculous post of the year so far?
It's horrible but amazingly he's had far worse posts.
 
Its probably 23rd?

Either way its too high.
I think Flacco is below average as a QB, but Id like to see you name 22 QBs youd rather have.His upside is limited, but his floor is high as a QB2. He wont end up worse than a mid level QB2 if he stays healthy in all liklihood.
Do you define mid level QB2 as QB14-18? Cause if thats the case odds are obviously on your side, but outside of this preseason, and one playoff game last year, Flacco has been nothing but a constant disappointment. He finished 17th last year in my main league ahead of Tebow and behind Freeman.1.Brady

2.Brees

3.Rodgers

4.Stafford

5.Newton

6.Manning

7.Manning

8.Ryan

9.Rivers

10.Romo

11.Cutler

12.Vick

13.Roethlisberger

14.Freeman

15.RG3

16.Schaub

17.Fitzpatrick

18.Dalton

19.Smith

20.Luck

21.Wilson

22.Weedon

23.Palmer

24.Cassel

25.Bradford

26.Skeltom

27T.Mccoy, Gabbert, Sanchez, Flacco
Most ridiculous post of the year so far?
It's horrible but amazingly he's had far worse posts.
He had worse posts today.
 
Its probably 23rd?Either way its too high.
I think Flacco is below average as a QB, but Id like to see you name 22 QBs youd rather have.His upside is limited, but his floor is high as a QB2. He wont end up worse than a mid level QB2 if he stays healthy in all liklihood.
Do you define mid level QB2 as QB14-18? Cause if thats the case odds are obviously on your side, but outside of this preseason, and one playoff game last year, Flacco has been nothing but a constant disappointment. He finished 17th last year in my main league ahead of Tebow and behind Freeman.1.Brady2.Brees3.Rodgers4.Stafford5.Newton6.Manning7.Manning8.Ryan9.Rivers10.Romo11.Cutler12.Vick13.Roethlisberger14.Freeman15.RG316.Schaub17.Fitzpatrick18.Dalton19.Smith20.Luck21.Wilson22.Weedon23.Palmer24.Cassel25.Bradford26.Skeltom27T.Mccoy, Gabbert, Sanchez, Flacco
some serious crow to be eaten here
 
Its probably 23rd?Either way its too high.
I think Flacco is below average as a QB, but Id like to see you name 22 QBs youd rather have.His upside is limited, but his floor is high as a QB2. He wont end up worse than a mid level QB2 if he stays healthy in all liklihood.
Do you define mid level QB2 as QB14-18? Cause if thats the case odds are obviously on your side, but outside of this preseason, and one playoff game last year, Flacco has been nothing but a constant disappointment. He finished 17th last year in my main league ahead of Tebow and behind Freeman.1.Brady2.Brees3.Rodgers4.Stafford5.Newton6.Manning7.Manning8.Ryan9.Rivers10.Romo11.Cutler12.Vick13.Roethlisberger14.Freeman15.RG316.Schaub17.Fitzpatrick18.Dalton19.Smith20.Luck21.Wilson22.Weedon23.Palmer24.Cassel25.Bradford26.Skeltom27T.Mccoy, Gabbert, Sanchez, Flacco
some serious crow to be eaten here
Oof.
 
With that LASER TD throw he had last night, I immediately thought of the above post which ranks him in the top 10 QBs.....and said to myself, "yup".

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top