So you think he actually does WORSE this year?Because 10 other guys
Relative to the field? I sure do. Can't rely on a whole tier of players above you getting hurt or suspended every season, while you stay healthy and your timeshare buddy battles injuries.So you think he actually does WORSE this year?Because 10 other guys
This is a poor narrative considering Hill didn't see significant action the first half of the season.Relative to the field? I sure do. Can't rely on a whole tier of players above you getting hurt or suspended every season, while you stay healthy and your timeshare buddy battles injuries.So you think he actually does WORSE this year?Because 10 other guys![]()
lol, Gio isn't.I'd call him about 60/40 to be the best FF RB on the Bengals.![]()
I'd call it about 90/10. Hill is a better inside runner, outside runner, pass blocker and arguably has better hands than Bernard. The only thing Bernard has over Hill is route running.I'd call him about 60/40 to be the best FF RB on the Bengals.![]()
Bell was/is in a real offense.I don't think it is all that different than someone saying Le'Veon Bell would be #1 a year ago.
I didn't realize his injury was that serious. Ok, I won't be drafting him at all.Says the guy who hopes to snag Arian Foster at bottom of round 1. Please lock this thread. It's a curse to all Jeremy Hill owners.
Dalton threw for 33 TDs just two seasons ago. Last season the Bengals lost AJ Green for multiple games and Eifert and Marvin Jones for practically the whole season.Bell was/is in a real offense.I don't think it is all that different than someone saying Le'Veon Bell would be #1 a year ago.
Right, but their OC then was a pass-happy one; their OC now loves to run the ball. Green being healthy should get Daltons' TD total back in the 20s, but I'd be shocked if he hit 30 this year.Dalton threw for 33 TDs just two seasons ago. Last season the Bengals lost AJ Green for multiple games and Eifert and Marvin Jones for practically the whole season.Bell was/is in a real offense.I don't think it is all that different than someone saying Le'Veon Bell would be #1 a year ago.
An OC that wants to run the ball is a good thing for Hill.Right, but their OC then was a pass-happy one; their OC now loves to run the ball. Green being healthy should get Daltons' TD total back in the 20s, but I'd be shocked if he hit 30 this year.Dalton threw for 33 TDs just two seasons ago. Last season the Bengals lost AJ Green for multiple games and Eifert and Marvin Jones for practically the whole season.Bell was/is in a real offense.I don't think it is all that different than someone saying Le'Veon Bell would be #1 a year ago.
What about it? They have a really good OL that they just keep pouring resources into, and they want to run the ball a ton. And he's better than Gio in almost every aspect of the game.Andy Dalton
Agreed.An OC that wants to run the ball is a good thing for Hill.Right, but their OC then was a pass-happy one; their OC now loves to run the ball. Green being healthy should get Daltons' TD total back in the 20s, but I'd be shocked if he hit 30 this year.Dalton threw for 33 TDs just two seasons ago. Last season the Bengals lost AJ Green for multiple games and Eifert and Marvin Jones for practically the whole season.Bell was/is in a real offense.I don't think it is all that different than someone saying Le'Veon Bell would be #1 a year ago.
Obviously anyone who says this is much more likely to be correct than the OP...you're essentially taking the field. Not exactly going out on a limb there.What he said.In PPR he won't be #1.
Going out on a limb isn't synonymous with saying something good. Why award bonus credit for saying something less likely to be correct?Obviously anyone who says this is much more likely to be correct than the OP...you're essentially taking the field. Not exactly going out on a limb there.What he said.In PPR he won't be #1.
Because at least it generates worthwhile conversation. You could go into any prediction thread here and just say "eh, probably not" with no reasoning and end up correct more often than not. Because taking the field is always a safer play.Going out on a limb isn't synonymous with saying something good. Why award bonus credit for saying something less likely to be correct?Obviously anyone who says this is much more likely to be correct than the OP...you're essentially taking the field. Not exactly going out on a limb there.What he said.In PPR he won't be #1.
I understand the need to pimp up your jewel. I would be doing the same if I loved the guy so much.I'd call it about 90/10. Hill is a better inside runner, outside runner, pass blocker and arguably has better hands than Bernard. The only thing Bernard has over Hill is route running.I'd call him about 60/40 to be the best FF RB on the Bengals.![]()
I'd call it about 90/10. Hill is a better inside runner, outside runner, pass blocker and arguably has better hands than Bernard. The only thing Bernard has over Hill is route running.I'd call him about 60/40 to be the best FF RB on the Bengals.![]()
And that's enough to keep Hill out of that top spot. As productive and good as Hill is, to be the top RB in any comprehensive ff league, you have to be getting the meaningful passing game plays, too. Bell wouldn't have been dominant without all those catches last year. In recent years, same for Foster and Charles and McCoy.Crack the RB1 ranks? Hill was a RB1 last year. He finished 10.
Yes, he's better than Bernard in just about every facet. It was obvious early in the season. It became more obvious as the season rolled on. Bernard has the edge as a receiver, but that's it.
This is odd for someone who just said Peterson might do it.... He is just as receiving limited as Hill, maybe more so. It certainly helps to be involved in the passing game,minute it's not nessecary.And that's enough to keep Hill out of that top spot. As productive and good as Hill is, to be the top RB in any comprehensive ff league, you have to be getting the meaningful passing game plays, too. Bell wouldn't have been dominant without all those catches last year. In recent years, same for Foster and Charles and McCoy. And it's not just the ppr points you get for the catch, it's those 300 extra yards and 3-4 TDs that come with it. That is what separates the elite.Crack the RB1 ranks? Hill was a RB1 last year. He finished 10.
Yes, he's better than Bernard in just about every facet. It was obvious early in the season. It became more obvious as the season rolled on. Bernard has the edge as a receiver, but that's it.
I'm responding to the quote that Bell was in a real offense (which implies Cinncy is not one). Cinncy offense has a ton of weapons in the passing game to keep a defense honest and like you said an OC committed to the run.Right, but their OC then was a pass-happy one; their OC now loves to run the ball. Green being healthy should get Daltons' TD total back in the 20s, but I'd be shocked if he hit 30 this year.Dalton threw for 33 TDs just two seasons ago. Last season the Bengals lost AJ Green for multiple games and Eifert and Marvin Jones for practically the whole season.Bell was/is in a real offense.I don't think it is all that different than someone saying Le'Veon Bell would be #1 a year ago.
The difference is Adrian Peterson's talent is well-established and he has the biggest chip on his shoulder that ever was. There are already many news tidbits coming out that Peterson is itching very badly to remind the world of what he is. There are also reports coming out that the Vikes have said they will give him more receiving opportunities.This is odd for someone who just said Peterson might do it.... He is just as receiving limited as Hill, maybe more so.It certainly helps to be involved in the passing game,minute it's not nessecary.And that's enough to keep Hill out of that top spot. As productive and good as Hill is, to be the top RB in any comprehensive ff league, you have to be getting the meaningful passing game plays, too. Bell wouldn't have been dominant without all those catches last year. In recent years, same for Foster and Charles and McCoy. And it's not just the ppr points you get for the catch, it's those 300 extra yards and 3-4 TDs that come with it. That is what separates the elite.Crack the RB1 ranks? Hill was a RB1 last year. He finished 10.
Yes, he's better than Bernard in just about every facet. It was obvious early in the season. It became more obvious as the season rolled on. Bernard has the edge as a receiver, but that's it.
Bell is Hill and Gio combined, though.I'm responding to the quote that Bell was in a real offense (which implies Cinncy is not one). Cinncy offense has a ton of weapons in the passing game to keep a defense honest and like you said an OC committed to the run.Right, but their OC then was a pass-happy one; their OC now loves to run the ball. Green being healthy should get Daltons' TD total back in the 20s, but I'd be shocked if he hit 30 this year.Dalton threw for 33 TDs just two seasons ago. Last season the Bengals lost AJ Green for multiple games and Eifert and Marvin Jones for practically the whole season.Bell was/is in a real offense.I don't think it is all that different than someone saying Le'Veon Bell would be #1 a year ago.
For the record I don't project Hill as the No. 1 running back. I was simply responding to the chain that I did and Bell did kind of come out of nowhere to a large extent in 2014.Bell is Hill and Gio combined, though.I'm responding to the quote that Bell was in a real offense (which implies Cinncy is not one). Cinncy offense has a ton of weapons in the passing game to keep a defense honest and like you said an OC committed to the run.Right, but their OC then was a pass-happy one; their OC now loves to run the ball. Green being healthy should get Daltons' TD total back in the 20s, but I'd be shocked if he hit 30 this year.Dalton threw for 33 TDs just two seasons ago. Last season the Bengals lost AJ Green for multiple games and Eifert and Marvin Jones for practically the whole season.Bell was/is in a real offense.I don't think it is all that different than someone saying Le'Veon Bell would be #1 a year ago.All those touches that put Gio on a PPG basis right in the same neighborhood as Hill, even after Hill emerged, were going to go to Bell. That ain't happening in Cinci. In fact, unless Gio gets hurt again, Hill will lose some of them simply due to a healthier timeshare mate.
The thing is, the OP did not present it as a "bold prediction" or going out on a limb. He just made a statement and asked "why not" without offering any reasoning of his own to support it. So the thread is ultimately generating worthwhile discussion but it's entirely fair to respond by saying "in PPR he won't be #1."Because at least it generates worthwhile conversation. You could go into any prediction thread here and just say "eh, probably not" with no reasoning and end up correct more often than not. Because taking the field is always a safer play.Going out on a limb isn't synonymous with saying something good. Why award bonus credit for saying something less likely to be correct?Obviously anyone who says this is much more likely to be correct than the OP...you're essentially taking the field. Not exactly going out on a limb there.What he said.In PPR he won't be #1.
I'd definitely take Hill before Gore in redraft ppr. I'd probably call Hill and Demarco pretty much a wash--and I would personally take Hill over Forsett. Dalton is not a trustworthy qb--and I think the coaches will rely more on the running game than Daltons arm. I think Hill could be primed for a big season (barring injury)--and Gio could be one of the best handcuffs in the game (to the point where he's probably a solid flex option in ppr leagues).Guys I would take before him in ppr
ADP
Bell
Lacy
Charles
McCoy
Murray
Forsett
Gore
Lynch
Forte
Why draft him in the 3rd when you can get Spiller in the 6th.