Here's what Schultz's lawyer is already saying:The law "applies only to children under the care and supervision of the organization for which he works, and that's Penn State, it's not The Second Mile," Farrell said of his client. "This child, from what we know, was a Second Mile child."
Sandusky was not an employee, but he did have emeritus status. What does that mean? An office at the football facilities, a desk, a phone, an internet account through Penn State, a parking pass, keys to all the football facilities, welcome to attend any practice or event. Much of the sexual abuse took place in the showers at the football facility. Some of took place at a golf resort hotel the team stayed the night before every home game. He ate meals with the team just as he did when he was an assistant. He and anyone in his household were given free tuition to any courses.Regardless of his official title, his retirement package from Penn State guaranteed him the same access and prestige - and probably even more of the latter - that he enjoyed when he was the DC.
Seems to me that it's almost exactly what the report says.Curley and Schultz described it as "horsing around". They DID NOT describe it as "sexual" or "abuse".
No clue, not a lawyer. I know a little about Grand Jury proceedings from having a staff member sit on one.My understanding (and one of the many FFA lawyers will correct me if I'm wrong) is none of this is relevant other than bringing an indictment. From here onward, the evidence will be presented anew at trial. Any testimony from the Grand Jury is hearsay and cannot be presented.
