In looking into Jim Thome's career, he has put up some fantastic numbers.
Within the next month or two, he will pass Palmeiro and Killebrew to move in the top 10 of all time in home runs, with a decent shot of passing McGwire and Frank Robinson:
7. Frank Robinson 586
8. Alex Rodriguez 585
9. Mark McGwire 583
10. Harmon Killebrew 573
11. Rafael Palmeiro 569
12. Jim Thome 567
That's some pretty good company, but is it enough to merit HOF induction?
Over a 10 year span (1996-2006 - I am excluding 2005 as he only played 59 games), Thome hit 410 home runs, received mvp votes 8 times (no wins, 4 top 10 finishes), led the league in walks 3 times (led the league is k's three times), averaged 110 rbi's per year, averaged 104 runs per year, and had an obs average of ~ 1.000 (5 times above with a high of 1.102, and 5 times below, with a low of .929, but nothing else under .958)
These are some pretty gaudy offensive numbers, although Baseball reference ranks his monitor scores as borderline HOF worth.
Sooooo, what you got?
Within the next month or two, he will pass Palmeiro and Killebrew to move in the top 10 of all time in home runs, with a decent shot of passing McGwire and Frank Robinson:
7. Frank Robinson 586
8. Alex Rodriguez 585
9. Mark McGwire 583
10. Harmon Killebrew 573
11. Rafael Palmeiro 569
12. Jim Thome 567
That's some pretty good company, but is it enough to merit HOF induction?
Over a 10 year span (1996-2006 - I am excluding 2005 as he only played 59 games), Thome hit 410 home runs, received mvp votes 8 times (no wins, 4 top 10 finishes), led the league in walks 3 times (led the league is k's three times), averaged 110 rbi's per year, averaged 104 runs per year, and had an obs average of ~ 1.000 (5 times above with a high of 1.102, and 5 times below, with a low of .929, but nothing else under .958)
These are some pretty gaudy offensive numbers, although Baseball reference ranks his monitor scores as borderline HOF worth.
Sooooo, what you got?
I think Thome is going to be hurt by a lot of factors. Some of which include:-Steroid Era-Tons of other high home run totals by non-hof players during Thome's time-Led the league in home runs only once during his career-In his 20 year career, only made 5 all star teams, and a lack of hardware to his accomplishments (i.e. No MVP awards (not even a top 3 finish), never led the league in RBI's, runs, average, obp....only once led the league in slugging)I'm sure I'm being harsh, and I know I am a tougher voter than most (although I have my weaknesses for players I prefer for sure)....but I never thought of Thome as anything more than a great middle of the lineup hitter. I really think Palmeiro is a great barometer to Thome's HOF credibility. The only problem you are going to have is that whole steroid thing. But, take that out of the equation for a second, and Palmeiro also has a lot of home runs, but never led the league, never won an mvp award....but Palmeiro has a better case for the HOF in my opinion, buoyed by probably his 3 gold gloves. Palmeiro has better hof monitor batting scores than Thome also.I hate the 600 home runs is automatic HOF induction argument. Give me Bagwell and his 449 home runs in the HOF. I'll take Frank Thomas and his 521 homers in the hof. I'll pass on Thome, and I'll pass on Palmeiro. Oh, I'll definitely pass 100% of the time on McGwire too.

McGriff tried to stick around too, to reach 500 hr's and "automatic induction". I dunno, McGriff was really good and never had the aura of steroids over his head either.

