In fairness to Clausen, he actually looked pretty good with the exception of the pick six. He certainly looked better than he did during the entire preseason/season last year.With that said, Cam Newton should still end up as the starter. He will have his struggles, but he showed enough on Saturday (and has during training camp as well) to prove that he's at least a better opening day starter than Clausen or Anderson.Newton for sure? He looked good in the first game while Clausen looked lost.
Panthers HC Ron Rivera thinks both No. 1 overall pick Cam Newton and Jimmy Clausen could see time at quarterback this season."We lost 24 practices, 1,500 snaps," said Rivera, of Newton's development. "We've had to back off." The Panthers concede that Newton has a big hurdle in going from a no-huddle offense and a silent count to playing in a pro-style offense. Clausen turned in an up-and-down performance in the Panthers' preseason debut on Saturday, eliciting "Cam" chants early on from the home crowd. However, Newton was also uneven, and though he's a good bet to take the most snaps this season, Clausen will surely get on the field at some point, if not in Week 1. Aug 14, 10:19 AM
Well that touchdown was a better catch then it was a throw. Just like the pick 6 it was thrown behind the receiver only this time Olsen was able to snag it. And Newton had several catchable balls dropped. So the ratings are misleading if you didn't actually see the game.Cam Newton 8/19 for 134 yards and a 66.6 passer rating against second stringers
Jimmy Clausen 4/7 for 69 yards, 1 TD, 1 INT for a 90.8 passer rating against first stringers.
They're going to give Newton tons of opportunities to win the job, but I think people are really overstating how well Cam looked and how 'poor' Jimmy Clausen looked.
Clausen didn't do or show nearly enough last year for it to be "his" job.Cam Newton is a project. He's not going to be ready, and for his own sake, the Panthers would be smart to roll out Clausen to the Wolves. He's at least had a season under his belt. I know fantasy football fans want Cam Newton in there. But in reality football, it's Clausen's starting spot to lose. Once the season is lost, they will ease in Cam with no pressure. By then, he'll have absorbed the playbook a few months and won't have to worry about the won-loss record. I don't see that happening until at least week 10.
DeAngelo ran the wrong route on the Pick 6 and the throw to Olsen was solid, if not perfect. Yes, Cam had some receivers drop the ball...because he was playing with second string receivers...against second string defense. Marc James actually said Newton looked like a "7-year all pro" instead of a rookie. Tone down the hyperbole a bit. He may be a good - or even great - starting NFL QB, but he was 40% passing against second stringers in his first game action. The Cam love is just a little too thick for me after his - in my opinion - decent showing.Well that touchdown was a better catch then it was a throw. Just like the pick 6 it was thrown behind the receiver only this time Olsen was able to snag it. And Newton had several catchable balls dropped. So the ratings are misleading if you didn't actually see the game.Cam Newton 8/19 for 134 yards and a 66.6 passer rating against second stringers
Jimmy Clausen 4/7 for 69 yards, 1 TD, 1 INT for a 90.8 passer rating against first stringers.
They're going to give Newton tons of opportunities to win the job, but I think people are really overstating how well Cam looked and how 'poor' Jimmy Clausen looked.
This is BS. Admittedly, I like Clausen, but he was given no shot on a lame duck team that spent next to nothing waiting for this years bonanza. Fox was on his way out and Clausen hasn't had his chance to show whether or not is should be 'his' job. Problem is now, the fans want Newton, so he'll get no fair shot. I expect him to be 'showcased' some this year and shopped in the offseason.Clausen didn't do or show nearly enough last year for it to be "his" job.Cam Newton is a project. He's not going to be ready, and for his own sake, the Panthers would be smart to roll out Clausen to the Wolves. He's at least had a season under his belt. I know fantasy football fans want Cam Newton in there. But in reality football, it's Clausen's starting spot to lose. Once the season is lost, they will ease in Cam with no pressure. By then, he'll have absorbed the playbook a few months and won't have to worry about the won-loss record. I don't see that happening until at least week 10.
Cam played one series against the first stringers and led the team down the field for an impressive drive that resulted in a FG. The lower performance came against the second string, because he was also with a second string.One other thing to note: They specifically left out all plays that would allow Cam to run the ball.Cam Newton 8/19 for 134 yards and a 66.6 passer rating against second stringers
According to Clausen, DeAngelo ran the right route, but Clausen accidentally threw the ball behind DeAngelo. If you weren't a Notre Dame fan, would you be so high on Clausen?DeAngelo ran the wrong route on the Pick 6 and the throw to Olsen was solid, if not perfect.Well that touchdown was a better catch then it was a throw. Just like the pick 6 it was thrown behind the receiver only this time Olsen was able to snag it. And Newton had several catchable balls dropped. So the ratings are misleading if you didn't actually see the game.Cam Newton 8/19 for 134 yards and a 66.6 passer rating against second stringers
Jimmy Clausen 4/7 for 69 yards, 1 TD, 1 INT for a 90.8 passer rating against first stringers.
They're going to give Newton tons of opportunities to win the job, but I think people are really overstating how well Cam looked and how 'poor' Jimmy Clausen looked.
That's revisionist history. Carolina went 8-8 in 2009 against a difficult schedule. Their O/U win total in Vegas was 8.5, the same as the Bears and Falcons. Looking back on the Panthers '10 season, they actually finished 13th in rushing and 12th in YPC despite playing on a terrible team. They were 10th in YPC allowed. They had a middle of the road pass defense on an efficiency basis. And oh yeah -- they ranked 32nd in passing yards, 32nd in passing TDs and 32nd in net yards per attempt.Clausen joined only JaMarcus Russell and Andrew Walter as QBs to average fewer than 3.00 Adjusted Net Yards per Attempt in a season.This is BS. Admittedly, I like Clausen, but he was given no shot on a lame duck team that spent next to nothing waiting for this years bonanza. Fox was on his way out and Clausen hasn't had his chance to show whether or not is should be 'his' job. Problem is now, the fans want Newton, so he'll get no fair shot. I expect him to be 'showcased' some this year and shopped in the offseason.Clausen didn't do or show nearly enough last year for it to be "his" job.Cam Newton is a project. He's not going to be ready, and for his own sake, the Panthers would be smart to roll out Clausen to the Wolves. He's at least had a season under his belt. I know fantasy football fans want Cam Newton in there. But in reality football, it's Clausen's starting spot to lose. Once the season is lost, they will ease in Cam with no pressure. By then, he'll have absorbed the playbook a few months and won't have to worry about the won-loss record. I don't see that happening until at least week 10.
Woah. While Clausen may have been playing on a lame duck team (with horrible offensive playcalling), he clearly showed that he was lacking very basic quarterback skills. At one point I was keeping track of how many botched snaps that happened with him under center, and I ended up at 16 through five games. After that point I stopped keeping track, but the issues definitely continued. Clausen never looked confident. He locked into one receiver, and generally overthrew them anyway.I'm not saying that Clausen didn't get a back break. He was forced into starting on a terrible team with a coaching staff who had very little interest in doing anything to make him successful. With that said, he was quite poor at the things he COULD control. Another issue, which is most hearsay (but comes from reputable sources), is that it has been said that he is a very difficult teammate. He is quiet, doesn't communicate well with his teammates, and has been called "cocky" more than a few times. On the other side, everyone claims that Newton has won over his teammates quickly and is clearly the more "respected" of the two players. In Clausen's defense, he looked 100% better on Saturday than he looked at any point last season. I DO think he has potential to be a solid player in the NFL (never great, but I don't think that it's out of the realm of possibility that he could eventually be at an Alex Smith level). I think he needs to sit behind a vet for a few years and learn from them. The same argument can probably be made for Cam, but as a number one pick who is already showing good flashes in a shortened offseason, I think it's much more likely that he can find success by starting early on.This is BS. Admittedly, I like Clausen, but he was given no shot on a lame duck team that spent next to nothing waiting for this years bonanza. Fox was on his way out and Clausen hasn't had his chance to show whether or not is should be 'his' job. Problem is now, the fans want Newton, so he'll get no fair shot. I expect him to be 'showcased' some this year and shopped in the offseason.Clausen didn't do or show nearly enough last year for it to be "his" job.Cam Newton is a project. He's not going to be ready, and for his own sake, the Panthers would be smart to roll out Clausen to the Wolves. He's at least had a season under his belt. I know fantasy football fans want Cam Newton in there. But in reality football, it's Clausen's starting spot to lose. Once the season is lost, they will ease in Cam with no pressure. By then, he'll have absorbed the playbook a few months and won't have to worry about the won-loss record. I don't see that happening until at least week 10.
Interesting, look who is 7th worst on the NYPA- Delhomme 2009.Looking back on the Panthers '10 season, they actually finished 13th in rushing and 12th in YPC despite playing on a terrible team. They were 10th in YPC allowed. They had a middle of the road pass defense on an efficiency basis. And oh yeah -- they ranked 32nd in passing yards, 32nd in passing TDs and 32nd in net yards per attempt.
Clausen joined only JaMarcus Russell and Andrew Walter as QBs to average fewer than 3.00 Adjusted Net Yards per Attempt in a season.
I agree with this. I'm a Clausen fan and a Newton owner. I like what I saw from Newton in that game, despite not seeing any runs. It was a good first step in his career, but Clausen looked like the better QB but that doesn't get ESPN ratings...Cam Newton 8/19 for 134 yards and a 66.6 passer rating against second stringers
Jimmy Clausen 4/7 for 69 yards, 1 TD, 1 INT for a 90.8 passer rating against first stringers.
They're going to give Newton tons of opportunities to win the job, but I think people are really overstating how well Cam looked and how 'poor' Jimmy Clausen looked.
Clausen's not going to throw a teammate under the bus. Regardless, he had a nice outing. As did Newton. But all the press goes to Newton...with a good deal of hyperbole.According to Clausen, DeAngelo ran the right route, but Clausen accidentally threw the ball behind DeAngelo. If you weren't a Notre Dame fan, would you be so high on Clausen?DeAngelo ran the wrong route on the Pick 6 and the throw to Olsen was solid, if not perfect.Well that touchdown was a better catch then it was a throw. Just like the pick 6 it was thrown behind the receiver only this time Olsen was able to snag it. And Newton had several catchable balls dropped. So the ratings are misleading if you didn't actually see the game.Cam Newton 8/19 for 134 yards and a 66.6 passer rating against second stringers
Jimmy Clausen 4/7 for 69 yards, 1 TD, 1 INT for a 90.8 passer rating against first stringers.
They're going to give Newton tons of opportunities to win the job, but I think people are really overstating how well Cam looked and how 'poor' Jimmy Clausen looked.
He never showed a single flash. Bradford had rookie receivers and not a great offensive line. Everyone is pretty sure he has what it takes. Can't say the same for Clausen. I watch every game. I saw every painful down. And not once did Clausen do anything that made me say that guy has what it takes. I think if he has a shot it is in the West Coast offense but even then I think serviceable is all you get.This is BS. Admittedly, I like Clausen, but he was given no shot on a lame duck team that spent next to nothing waiting for this years bonanza. Fox was on his way out and Clausen hasn't had his chance to show whether or not is should be 'his' job. Problem is now, the fans want Newton, so he'll get no fair shot. I expect him to be 'showcased' some this year and shopped in the offseason.Clausen didn't do or show nearly enough last year for it to be "his" job.Cam Newton is a project. He's not going to be ready, and for his own sake, the Panthers would be smart to roll out Clausen to the Wolves. He's at least had a season under his belt. I know fantasy football fans want Cam Newton in there. But in reality football, it's Clausen's starting spot to lose. Once the season is lost, they will ease in Cam with no pressure. By then, he'll have absorbed the playbook a few months and won't have to worry about the won-loss record. I don't see that happening until at least week 10.
No he didn't. Clausen said that was his bad throw. Although DeAngelo should have gotten his head around.Oh and the 7 year all pro is a little much. Cam looked good for a first time on the field but I wouldn't go beyond that.DeAngelo ran the wrong route on the Pick 6 and the throw to Olsen was solid, if not perfect. Yes, Cam had some receivers drop the ball...because he was playing with second string receivers...against second string defense. Marc James actually said Newton looked like a "7-year all pro" instead of a rookie. Tone down the hyperbole a bit. He may be a good - or even great - starting NFL QB, but he was 40% passing against second stringers in his first game action. The Cam love is just a little too thick for me after his - in my opinion - decent showing.Well that touchdown was a better catch then it was a throw. Just like the pick 6 it was thrown behind the receiver only this time Olsen was able to snag it. And Newton had several catchable balls dropped. So the ratings are misleading if you didn't actually see the game.Cam Newton 8/19 for 134 yards and a 66.6 passer rating against second stringers
Jimmy Clausen 4/7 for 69 yards, 1 TD, 1 INT for a 90.8 passer rating against first stringers.
They're going to give Newton tons of opportunities to win the job, but I think people are really overstating how well Cam looked and how 'poor' Jimmy Clausen looked.
Agreed, the same thing happened with Clausen last year. He was in no way ready to be an NFL qb last year. He needed time to be groomed and caught up to speed with the NFL game. In fact, Clausen could still use a year of learning behind someone. The panthers currently don't have a mentor on their team and they have 2 young QB's both in dire need of that.The Panthers are nuts if they throw Newton to the wolves this early. Talk about unwise use of a large investment. If they were smart they would let him sit for two or three years and learn the NFL game and work on his craft. He's not ready to be an NFL qb and this will only ruin his confidence.
That's not how it works in the modern NFL. 3 years from the now the entire regime will be gone and the new guys will bring in a new QB.The Panthers are nuts if they throw Newton to the wolves this early. Talk about unwise use of a large investment. If they were smart they would let him sit for two or three years and learn the NFL game and work on his craft. He's not ready to be an NFL qb and this will only ruin his confidence.
It worked pretty well for Aaron Rodgers. It's not like that isn't the "modern NFL". Which is worse, ruining your 20 million dollar investment or wating for him to become an NFL qb?That's not how it works in the modern NFL. 3 years from the now the entire regime will be gone and the new guys will bring in a new QB.The Panthers are nuts if they throw Newton to the wolves this early. Talk about unwise use of a large investment. If they were smart they would let him sit for two or three years and learn the NFL game and work on his craft. He's not ready to be an NFL qb and this will only ruin his confidence.
How do you know he isn't ready to be an NFL QB? Who is he going to learn behind, Clausen or Derek Anderson? Plenty of rookies recently have gone through the growing pains of starting and have done fine such as Bradford, Flacco, Ryan, McCoy, Freeman, Sanchez, and Stafford. Clausen had some experience last year, but thus far he doesn't look better than Newton. Newton has a lot of confidence, and I don't think that will be ruined if he starts for the Panthers this season. They are rebuilding, and I see nothing nuts about Newton learning on the job this year.'Hoss_Cartwright said:The Panthers are nuts if they throw Newton to the wolves this early. Talk about unwise use of a large investment. If they were smart they would let him sit for two or three years and learn the NFL game and work on his craft. He's not ready to be an NFL qb and this will only ruin his confidence.
Time will tell, but I don't like his odds. He doesn't look like an NFL qb to me.How do you know he isn't ready to be an NFL QB? Who is he going to learn behind, Clausen or Derek Anderson? Plenty of rookies recently have gone through the growing pains of starting and have done fine such as Bradford, Flacco, Ryan, McCoy, Freeman, Sanchez, and Stafford. Clausen had some experience last year, but thus far he doesn't look better than Newton. Newton has a lot of confidence, and I don't think that will be ruined if he starts for the Panthers this season. They are rebuilding, and I see nothing nuts about Newton learning on the job this year.'Hoss_Cartwright said:The Panthers are nuts if they throw Newton to the wolves this early. Talk about unwise use of a large investment. If they were smart they would let him sit for two or three years and learn the NFL game and work on his craft. He's not ready to be an NFL qb and this will only ruin his confidence.
In a perfect world all rookie QB's would be able to sit a year and learn, that isn't reality anymore.Also if a QB is going to get broken by making mistakes he'll never be good whether they start year 1 or year 3.I actually think it's better to let them play right away to learn if they have a winning mind set or not, why wait 3 years and then find out you have a clunker.'Hoss_Cartwright said:It worked pretty well for Aaron Rodgers. It's not like that isn't the "modern NFL". Which is worse, ruining your 20 million dollar investment or wating for him to become an NFL qb?'zadok said:That's not how it works in the modern NFL. 3 years from the now the entire regime will be gone and the new guys will bring in a new QB.'Hoss_Cartwright said:The Panthers are nuts if they throw Newton to the wolves this early. Talk about unwise use of a large investment. If they were smart they would let him sit for two or three years and learn the NFL game and work on his craft. He's not ready to be an NFL qb and this will only ruin his confidence.
The Panthers have a HOF veteran already on the roster with years of playing at a high level left? We're talking about rebuilding franchises who take a QB at the top of round 1. They need results immediately, not in 3 years.'Hoss_Cartwright said:It worked pretty well for Aaron Rodgers. It's not like that isn't the "modern NFL". Which is worse, ruining your 20 million dollar investment or wating for him to become an NFL qb?'zadok said:That's not how it works in the modern NFL. 3 years from the now the entire regime will be gone and the new guys will bring in a new QB.'Hoss_Cartwright said:The Panthers are nuts if they throw Newton to the wolves this early. Talk about unwise use of a large investment. If they were smart they would let him sit for two or three years and learn the NFL game and work on his craft. He's not ready to be an NFL qb and this will only ruin his confidence.
If they agreed with you, they would never have drafted him.Time will tell, but I don't like his odds. He doesn't look like an NFL qb to me.
They may need results right now, but like I said, why ruin your investment? You may gain a lot more later by being conservative with him now. That's just my opinion.The Panthers have a HOF veteran already on the roster with years of playing at a high level left? We're talking about rebuilding franchises who take a QB at the top of round 1. They need results immediately, not in 3 years.'Hoss_Cartwright said:It worked pretty well for Aaron Rodgers. It's not like that isn't the "modern NFL". Which is worse, ruining your 20 million dollar investment or wating for him to become an NFL qb?'zadok said:That's not how it works in the modern NFL. 3 years from the now the entire regime will be gone and the new guys will bring in a new QB.'Hoss_Cartwright said:The Panthers are nuts if they throw Newton to the wolves this early. Talk about unwise use of a large investment. If they were smart they would let him sit for two or three years and learn the NFL game and work on his craft. He's not ready to be an NFL qb and this will only ruin his confidence.
I take it you did not watch a single snap he played. Kid looked AWFUL! Just like he did at Notre Dame, just like his brother at Tennessee. Whoever thought theThis is BS. Admittedly, I like Clausen, but he was given no shot on a lame duck team that spent next to nothing waiting for this years bonanza. Fox was on his way out and Clausen hasn't had his chance to show whether or not is should be 'his' job. Problem is now, the fans want Newton, so he'll get no fair shot. I expect him to be 'showcased' some this year and shopped in the offseason.Clausen didn't do or show nearly enough last year for it to be "his" job.Cam Newton is a project. He's not going to be ready, and for his own sake, the Panthers would be smart to roll out Clausen to the Wolves. He's at least had a season under his belt. I know fantasy football fans want Cam Newton in there. But in reality football, it's Clausen's starting spot to lose. Once the season is lost, they will ease in Cam with no pressure. By then, he'll have absorbed the playbook a few months and won't have to worry about the won-loss record. I don't see that happening until at least week 10.
If the Panthers had a good veteran for him to sit behind and learn from, I would agree. Derek Anderson or Jimmy Clausen have nothing to teach Cam other than what NOT to do. I would have preferred a quality vet starting this year, but without that on the team, Newton needs to get thrown to the wolves.'Hoss_Cartwright said:The Panthers are nuts if they throw Newton to the wolves this early. Talk about unwise use of a large investment. If they were smart they would let him sit for two or three years and learn the NFL game and work on his craft. He's not ready to be an NFL qb and this will only ruin his confidence.
Then he will fail, because he simply isn't ready and isn't close.If the Panthers had a good veteran for him to sit behind and learn from, I would agree. Derek Anderson or Jimmy Clausen have nothing to teach Cam other than what NOT to do. I would have preferred a quality vet starting this year, but without that on the team, Newton needs to get thrown to the wolves.
Do the Panthers have a Hall of Fame QB on the roster?'Hoss_Cartwright said:It worked pretty well for Aaron Rodgers. It's not like that isn't the "modern NFL". Which is worse, ruining your 20 million dollar investment or wating for him to become an NFL qb?'zadok said:That's not how it works in the modern NFL. 3 years from the now the entire regime will be gone and the new guys will bring in a new QB.'Hoss_Cartwright said:The Panthers are nuts if they throw Newton to the wolves this early. Talk about unwise use of a large investment. If they were smart they would let him sit for two or three years and learn the NFL game and work on his craft. He's not ready to be an NFL qb and this will only ruin his confidence.
Most Panthers fans in Charlotte want Cam in there too... I'm on the fence. I think Clausen could do better in 2011, but Cam needs the reps.Cam Newton is a project. He's not going to be ready, and for his own sake, the Panthers would be smart to roll out Clausen to the Wolves. He's at least had a season under his belt. I know fantasy football fans want Cam Newton in there. But in reality football, it's Clausen's starting spot to lose. Once the season is lost, they will ease in Cam with no pressure. By then, he'll have absorbed the playbook a few months and won't have to worry about the won-loss record. I don't see that happening until at least week 10.
I saw the game, And I disagree. There were some dropped passes missed by the WR for both QB's, but I didn't see the TD pass as a product of the WR. And I didn't think any of Cam's passes were particularly note worthy. Not even the "frozen Rope" as the announcers called it. Cam get too much hype from all directions. A lot of Carolina fans and locals by into it.Well that touchdown was a better catch then it was a throw. Just like the pick 6 it was thrown behind the receiver only this time Olsen was able to snag it. And Newton had several catchable balls dropped. So the ratings are misleading if you didn't actually see the game.Cam Newton 8/19 for 134 yards and a 66.6 passer rating against second stringers
Jimmy Clausen 4/7 for 69 yards, 1 TD, 1 INT for a 90.8 passer rating against first stringers.
They're going to give Newton tons of opportunities to win the job, but I think people are really overstating how well Cam looked and how 'poor' Jimmy Clausen looked.
Saw it. Clearly you're as biased as I am. Merrill Hoge had some good thoughts on the game. He said Clausen outplayed Newton. He also said the pick 6 probably wasn't Clausen's fault. Feel free now to insult Merrill Hoge.I take it you did not watch a single snap he played. Kid looked AWFUL! Just like he did at Notre Dame, just like his brother at Tennessee. Whoever thought theThis is BS. Admittedly, I like Clausen, but he was given no shot on a lame duck team that spent next to nothing waiting for this years bonanza. Fox was on his way out and Clausen hasn't had his chance to show whether or not is should be 'his' job. Problem is now, the fans want Newton, so he'll get no fair shot. I expect him to be 'showcased' some this year and shopped in the offseason.Clausen didn't do or show nearly enough last year for it to be "his" job.Cam Newton is a project. He's not going to be ready, and for his own sake, the Panthers would be smart to roll out Clausen to the Wolves. He's at least had a season under his belt. I know fantasy football fans want Cam Newton in there. But in reality football, it's Clausen's starting spot to lose. Once the season is lost, they will ease in Cam with no pressure. By then, he'll have absorbed the playbook a few months and won't have to worry about the won-loss record. I don't see that happening until at least week 10.family could play ball was delusional. Clausen is AWFUL and will only lengthen the pain from last season. They'll give him a game or two to completely destroy himself before inserting Newton as the full-time starter. Both will struggle, but I can't see Newton's rookie season being nearly as bad as Clausens. Let's face it: the guy couldn't outplay Todd Collins in a H2H matchup.
Neither can I, but primarily because the team last year and the team this year are totally different. I think they give Newton the starting job from D1, because that's what the fans want. But that doesn't change my opinion that Clausen hasn't gotten a fair shake in Carolina and I hope he ends up getting a real shot somewhere else, because despite what you think, he is good enough to be a starting QB in this league. Not a star, perhaps, but a good starter.I can't see Newton's rookie season being nearly as bad as Clausens
Disagree. If he starts the season its because Rivera thinks it gives them the best chance to win long term.I think they give Newton the starting job from D1, because that's what the fans want.
Yeah cause Merrill Hoge is some Delphic oracle. Probably wasn't his fault? It either was or wasn't and I guess I'll take Jimmy's word it was.Saw it. Clearly you're as biased as I am. Merrill Hoge had some good thoughts on the game. He said Clausen outplayed Newton. He also said the pick 6 probably wasn't Clausen's fault. Feel free now to insult Merrill Hoge.I take it you did not watch a single snap he played. Kid looked AWFUL! Just like he did at Notre Dame, just like his brother at Tennessee. Whoever thought theThis is BS. Admittedly, I like Clausen, but he was given no shot on a lame duck team that spent next to nothing waiting for this years bonanza. Fox was on his way out and Clausen hasn't had his chance to show whether or not is should be 'his' job. Problem is now, the fans want Newton, so he'll get no fair shot. I expect him to be 'showcased' some this year and shopped in the offseason.Clausen didn't do or show nearly enough last year for it to be "his" job.Cam Newton is a project. He's not going to be ready, and for his own sake, the Panthers would be smart to roll out Clausen to the Wolves. He's at least had a season under his belt. I know fantasy football fans want Cam Newton in there. But in reality football, it's Clausen's starting spot to lose. Once the season is lost, they will ease in Cam with no pressure. By then, he'll have absorbed the playbook a few months and won't have to worry about the won-loss record. I don't see that happening until at least week 10.family could play ball was delusional. Clausen is AWFUL and will only lengthen the pain from last season. They'll give him a game or two to completely destroy himself before inserting Newton as the full-time starter. Both will struggle, but I can't see Newton's rookie season being nearly as bad as Clausens. Let's face it: the guy couldn't outplay Todd Collins in a H2H matchup.
Neither can I, but primarily because the team last year and the team this year are totally different. I think they give Newton the starting job from D1, because that's what the fans want. But that doesn't change my opinion that Clausen hasn't gotten a fair shake in Carolina and I hope he ends up getting a real shot somewhere else, because despite what you think, he is good enough to be a starting QB in this league. Not a star, perhaps, but a good starter.I can't see Newton's rookie season being nearly as bad as Clausens