4.31 at the combine....Fastest guy on the Team.6 catch 70 yards 1 TD vs Pitts Def and it was pouring rain. How fast can this kid run on a sunny day? Cutler really trusted him today. Discuss.
In the Feb combine he ran a 4.24 the fastest time he has ever done it. The only other player who has ran it as fast is...Chris Johnson RB Tenn.4.31 at the combine....Fastest guy on the Team.6 catch 70 yards 1 TD vs Pitts Def and it was pouring rain. How fast can this kid run on a sunny day? Cutler really trusted him today. Discuss.
i didn't remember that. sweet4.31 at the combine....Fastest guy on the Team.6 catch 70 yards 1 TD vs Pitts Def and it was pouring rain. How fast can this kid run on a sunny day? Cutler really trusted him today. Discuss.
WR3 as in ff, right?Knox is fast. He's a good young WR. If he gets the PT, he will produce. A good WR3 with a few more snaps. It's up to Lovie, but to most people it's obvious he needs more snaps.
Yes, FF.WR3 as in ff, right?Knox is fast. He's a good young WR. If he gets the PT, he will produce. A good WR3 with a few more snaps. It's up to Lovie, but to most people it's obvious he needs more snaps.
This.Not saying Knox aint his man, but i've heard this about Olsen, Bennet, and Hester, Cutler might just be going at the matchup the D gives him.
no, but you'd be better off stashing Royal instead of dropping him if possibleIs it wrong to say im thinking of dropping Royal for Knox? I think the the QB makes the WR and not the other way around.
Im not going to list my WR cuz im not a ##### but i'm really beginning to believe its the QB that makes the WR, i mean just look at Cutler vs Orton last two weeks for WR.. I usually go with the good QB theory but lately ive drafted based on WR and now am thinking I'm an idiot and its all about the QB.Sig worthy or not i just figured out my WR strategyno, but you'd be better off stashing Royal instead of dropping him if possibleIs it wrong to say im thinking of dropping Royal for Knox? I think the the QB makes the WR and not the other way around.
If the QB makes the receiver than lots of QB's have made Calvin Johnson look good. I wouldn't drop Eddie Royal.Is it wrong to say im thinking of dropping Royal for Knox? I think the the QB makes the WR and not the other way around.
Come on let's be real here. Royal is a nice WR but talent wise he's nothing special, certainly not in the same league as Megatron.If the QB makes the receiver than lots of QB's have made Calvin Johnson look good. I wouldn't drop Eddie Royal.Is it wrong to say im thinking of dropping Royal for Knox? I think the the QB makes the WR and not the other way around.
You obviously missed the point.Come on let's be real here. Royal is a nice WR but talent wise he's nothing special, certainly not in the same league as Megatron.If the QB makes the receiver than lots of QB's have made Calvin Johnson look good. I wouldn't drop Eddie Royal.Is it wrong to say im thinking of dropping Royal for Knox? I think the the QB makes the WR and not the other way around.
Hardly. I think there are a ton of WR's at or near Eddie Royal's talent level and what allows those type of WR to succeed is the system they're in and the QB who is throwing them the ball. I'm not saying to drop Eddie Royal but as long as he has a crappy QB throwing to him I wouldn't expect even WR4 numbers out of him.Obviously guys like Megatron, Fitz, AJ etc...can succeed with just about anyone tossing them the ball.meanjoegreen said:You obviously missed the point.Pipes said:Come on let's be real here. Royal is a nice WR but talent wise he's nothing special, certainly not in the same league as Megatron.meanjoegreen said:If the QB makes the receiver than lots of QB's have made Calvin Johnson look good. I wouldn't drop Eddie Royal.PatytonsGhost said:Is it wrong to say im thinking of dropping Royal for Knox? I think the the QB makes the WR and not the other way around.
Why the eyeroll? I think the evidence is mounting, but you seem bitter about this for some reason.So did Cutler make Royal or Royal made Cutler? Isn't it obvious by now? I thought Cutler was going to suck with no Marshall and Royal....![]()
1 good game.1 awful game with 4 INTs.Were you saying the same thing after last week?As for knox...raw, fast kid...how will he keep it up is the big question. Tough to know for a rookie WR and IMO Bennett will be more reliable on the year.So did Cutler make Royal or Royal made Cutler? Isn't it obvious by now? I thought Cutler was going to suck with no Marshall and Royal....![]()
You can say that Knox is raw because he is blazing fast, but, he is looks pretty much like any other WR right now rather than Nate "double TD drop" Hughes of JAX1 good game.1 awful game with 4 INTs.Were you saying the same thing after last week?As for knox...raw, fast kid...how will he keep it up is the big question. Tough to know for a rookie WR and IMO Bennett will be more reliable on the year.So did Cutler make Royal or Royal made Cutler? Isn't it obvious by now? I thought Cutler was going to suck with no Marshall and Royal....![]()
I'm in the same boat as you, although I really don't want to burn a #1 waiver spot on a WR. But even the chance of getting someone who could be Royal 2.0 may be too tempting to pass up.Showed great hands and ran crisp routes on one of the worst fields in the NFL ... in the pouring rain. I like this kid and am seriously considering using my #1 waiver claim on him this week.
Just a quick point about Cutler's awful Week 1:Hester: 90 yards receiving and a TDBennet 7 recpts. for 66 yardsBoth these were far superior to Marshall/Royal's week 1 stats in Denver. (4-27-0 and 2-18-0)It seems as though the "QB makes the WR" - and not the other way around. At least after 2 weeks.sho nuff said:1 good game.1 awful game with 4 INTs.Were you saying the same thing after last week?As for knox...raw, fast kid...how will he keep it up is the big question. Tough to know for a rookie WR and IMO Bennett will be more reliable on the year.So did Cutler make Royal or Royal made Cutler? Isn't it obvious by now? I thought Cutler was going to suck with no Marshall and Royal....![]()
I agree to a point and I'm FAR from a McD apologist but they are putting in a completely new system, Marshall spent most of the preseason on the sidelines and the QB has an index finger problem and is wearing a glove so he can hold onto the ball. Things are bad in Denver right now but they will get better. They won't get as good as last year but it'll get better.Just a quick point about Cutler's awful Week 1:Hester: 90 yards receiving and a TDBennet 7 recpts. for 66 yardsBoth these were far superior to Marshall/Royal's week 1 stats in Denver. (4-27-0 and 2-18-0)It seems as though the "QB makes the WR" - and not the other way around. At least after 2 weeks.sho nuff said:1 good game.1 awful game with 4 INTs.Were you saying the same thing after last week?As for knox...raw, fast kid...how will he keep it up is the big question. Tough to know for a rookie WR and IMO Bennett will be more reliable on the year.So did Cutler make Royal or Royal made Cutler? Isn't it obvious by now? I thought Cutler was going to suck with no Marshall and Royal....![]()
Sounds a lot like coach speak to me. To take him at his word might mean that any number of players could be in there. I don't take him at his word here though. When the game was winding down, they were calling specific plays to get the ball to Knox. I am sure coverage played into that and matchups, but they had no problem going to him. That says a lot for a rookie in the rain vs. the defending world champs. Actions speak much louder than words.From Rotoworld:"Coach Lovie Smith said Monday that Earl Bennett will remain a part of the Bears' receiver rotation despite being yanked for and outplayed by rookie Johnny Knox in Week 2."We play a lot of guys at that position," he said. "(We're) pleased with what Earl has done." Bennett offers solid possession skills, but Knox is a better big-play threat. The rotation is a situation to avoid in fantasy leagues."I disagree with the last comment. This is not a situation to avoid. Whoever emerges as the starter in Chi will have a productive year. What does the Shark Pool think about Lovie's comment on Bennett? Notice he didn't state that Bennett will remain the starter. He said Bennet will remain "a part of the Bears' receiver rotation". Maybe I'm being too technical?
“You never know how guys are going to react out there once the lights turn on,” Cutler said. “You don’t know if guys are still going to be able to play as fast as they are, and he’s one those guys, if not faster. He’s out there buzzing around making some big catches with people on him.
"And he’s not just making the standard catches. He caught that snag in there with the guy draped on him and turned it up. He’s going to be one of the guys that we’re going to look to in the future.”
That’s certainly high praise coming from a Pro Bowl quarterback, who has been impressed with Knox’s rapid development. A week earlier, the two connected on a 68-yard bomb in a loss to the Packers.
“In two games he’s come along,” Cutler said. “With [Devin Aromashodu] going down that first week [with a hamstring injury], we were kind of in a scramble. We put ‘13’ in there and he’s been turning out great. He’s in the right spots, he’s making some adjustments on the move.”
Cutler was especially excited to see how Knox instinctively dashed to the sideline on his 22-yard reception late in the first half Sunday against the Steelers.
“It’s not something we called,” Cutler said. “It was just him out there using his ability. I told him, ‘Congratulations, you’re no longer a rookie. You’re out there playing with us, and you’re doing some good things for us.’”
http://www.chicagobears.com/news/NewsStory.asp?story_id=6129
one thing I noticed is when the play breaks down Knox does a great job of improvising, and he seems to be on the same page as cutler is when the pocket breaks.“You never know how guys are going to react out there once the lights turn on,” Cutler said. “You don’t know if guys are still going to be able to play as fast as they are, and he’s one those guys, if not faster. He’s out there buzzing around making some big catches with people on him.
"And he’s not just making the standard catches. He caught that snag in there with the guy draped on him and turned it up. He’s going to be one of the guys that we’re going to look to in the future.”
That’s certainly high praise coming from a Pro Bowl quarterback, who has been impressed with Knox’s rapid development. A week earlier, the two connected on a 68-yard bomb in a loss to the Packers.
“In two games he’s come along,” Cutler said. “With [Devin Aromashodu] going down that first week [with a hamstring injury], we were kind of in a scramble. We put ‘13’ in there and he’s been turning out great. He’s in the right spots, he’s making some adjustments on the move.”
Cutler was especially excited to see how Knox instinctively dashed to the sideline on his 22-yard reception late in the first half Sunday against the Steelers.
“It’s not something we called,” Cutler said. “It was just him out there using his ability. I told him, ‘Congratulations, you’re no longer a rookie. You’re out there playing with us, and you’re doing some good things for us.’”
http://www.chicagobears.com/news/NewsStory.asp?story_id=6129Quotes like this is going to make me go agiants my judgement and try and scoop him up, sounds like Knox is making smart plays and Cutler is noticing it.
Yea, Yahoo! isI really think Knox is going to be this year's Eddie Royal. Anyone else getting that same gut feeling?
Aromashodu?? no shot, just like MB3 has no shot at getting 70% of the touches whe he comes back.Not trying to hijack, but I still think Devin Aromashodu will make some noise before the season is over. Knox got his opportunity at DA's expense. Knox seized it so far, but I really liked what I saw from Aromashodu in preseason and would love to see him get a shot too when he is healthy.
