What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Jon Baldwin (1 Viewer)

Cipherchris

Footballguy
I think he deserves to be the #3 wr taken despite his character. He is mentored by fitz so i believe you'll hear his name at the next fitz camp. He reminds me of Q Boldin. Toughness is great, and Challenges high throws. I think he'll make a great patriot or will fit perfectly for Vikings if they lose rice

 
He gets mentioned with Fitz because they are both big (6-3, 220) WRs from Pitt. I'm not one to say I know much about him one way or the other, but the knock on him seems to be that his defininig skill was the ability to outmuscle smaller college DBs and go up for deep balls (he averaged 18.2 YPR in 3 years). Some analysts have said his lack or both deep speed and quickness will make it difficult for him to seperate from larger/faster NFL DBs. Kinda sounds like Mike Williams to me, and he had a good season in Seattle last year.

ETA - Thought you said mentioned with Fitz, not mentored.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
He gets mentioned with Fitz because they are both big (6-3, 220) WRs from Pitt. I'm not one to say I know much about him one way or the other, but the knock on him seems to be that his defininig skill was the ability to outmuscle smaller college DBs and go up for deep balls (he averaged 18.2 YPR in 3 years). Some analysts have said his lack or both deep speed and quickness will make it difficult for him to seperate from larger/faster NFL DBs. Kinda sounds like Mike Williams to me, and he had a good season in Seattle last year.

ETA - Thought you said mentioned with Fitz, not mentored.
Not comparing because I don't think he is on fitz' level at all, but I do think I remember the one knock on Fitz coming out was his speed and some doubted seperation.
 
Baldwin is overrated because of his size. He's not nearly the talent of other wideouts in this rookie class and reportedly has issues off the field.

 
Baldwin is overrated because of his size. He's not nearly the talent of other wideouts in this rookie class and reportedly has issues off the field.
That's a strong opinion -- have you seen him play, EF7? All I have is highlights to view and they look pretty good. Anybody else have first-hand knowledge?
 
DaveR

I've seen him play but highlights usually only show what he does well. Watch full game tape and you'll see many weaknesses as well. And I trust what scouts say that watched him everyday.

 
As a Pitt fan I've watched a lot of Baldwin. He quits on too many plays in my opinion. If he can fix that I think he'll be fine but never elite. He has talent enough to play in the league but I think tough strong DB's will shut him down. Feel free to disagree as I'm not very good at talent evaluation.

 
Yes he takes off way too many plays and will certainly need to work on that as well as his route running. But he does have decent ball skills, jumps well and has a knack for making a big play. At 6'4" and 230, ill take my chances that he figures out how to be a pro.

 
Interested to see how this player pans out. Not a huge fan going into my 12-team PPR rookie draft, but ended up taking him at 1.09 after trying like hell to trade up to get Greg Little (who ended up going one pick before me at 1.08).

After surveying the remaining potential picks seemingly things had flattened off and I came to the conclusion that Jonathan Baldwin had the most apparent upside (next to maybe Cam). After mulling over all my options, a final thought I had before making the pick is that Pioli surely dug deep into his background and character (not to mention game film) and felt comfortable enough to spend a first round pick on him. That's enough of an endorsement for me to take a chance. Now I'm kinda getting pumped on his prospects!

Not a great situation he landed in at first glance but not terrible as he'll likely step in as a #2 WR and could have #3 fantasy WR value right away getting some balls thrown his way and likely making a GREAT red zone weapon. Haley is great with receivers, plus although Dwayne Bowe is a beast he's in the final year of his contract and one could argue that the Chiefs may tread carefully offering him an extension due to his questionable work habits. It's not unfathomable that he could be the de facto #1 WR in KC as early as next season.

He's made a couple of boneheaded comments but "work ethic", which is a concern that has been bandied about by copycat draft "analysts" doesn't appear to be an issue with this guy. Here's an article on the matter:

http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/sports/s_723497.html

An excerpt from the guy he trained with for the combine regarding his work ethic being poor:

"I heard those same things coming in, but it hasn't been true," Fischer said. "He hasn't shown that to me at all. From Day One, he's the one chasing me down to do extra work — every day — and that's what I like about this kid. People who want a great receiver, they'd be crazy to pass up this kid. He's a specimen. I've worked with some of the best guys in the NFL — Larry Fitzgerald, Roddy White, Vincent Jackson, Anquan Boldin and Brandon Marshall — and this kid stacks up with them pound for pound."

He worked out with Fitz and Revis before the draft, is with Cassel practicing in KC right now, and is going to attend Fitz' camp this summer so it looks like he eats sleeps and breathes football. It seems he clearly wants to be great and has the natural talent to do so. I'll be watching him over the summer hoping he proves people wrong!!

 
I think he deserves to be the #3 wr taken despite his character. He is mentored by fitz so i believe you'll hear his name at the next fitz camp. He reminds me of Q Boldin. Toughness is great, and Challenges high throws. I think he'll make a great patriot or will fit perfectly for Vikings if they lose rice
If anyone in this draft reminds me of Boldin it is Little.
 
I think he deserves to be the #3 wr taken despite his character. He is mentored by fitz so i believe you'll hear his name at the next fitz camp. He reminds me of Q Boldin. Toughness is great, and Challenges high throws. I think he'll make a great patriot or will fit perfectly for Vikings if they lose rice
If anyone in this draft reminds me of Boldin it is Little.
So does Pettis
 
He's worth a pick, that's for sure.

But I can't fault anyone for passing either.

If Baldwin were a choir boy, I'd maybe see him as the heir apparent to Bowe. But he's not a choir boy. It seems to me that if KC is ready to move on from Bowe because of his personality, they would've brought in a guy who doesn't look so much like Bowe in that regard.

I think Bowe + Baldwin (assuming he pans out) is the plan. So I favor Little over Baldwin because I think Little has an easier path to be the clear WR1 for his team.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
He's worth a pick, that's for sure.But I can't fault anyone for passing either.If Baldwin were a choir boy, I'd maybe see him as the heir apparent to Bowe. But he's not a choir boy. It seems to me that if KC is ready to move on from Bowe because of his personality, they would've brought in a guy who doesn't look so much like Bowe in that regard.I think Bowe + Baldwin (assuming he pans out) is the plan. So I favor Little over Baldwin because I think Little has an easier path to be the clear WR1 for his team.
If you are drafting a WR based on initial impact, I think you are setting yourself up to fail. There are not many WR rookie seasons like those of Mike Williams and Anquan Boldin. Most WRs need some time and polishing. With that said, I don't think we have any clue what the WR situations are going to look like in 2-3 years, so talent is the universal variable. Especially when these guys, if they pan out, should have 10 year careers. I like Baldwin more than Little, personally. It is hard for me to ignore Baldwin's physical gifts and his monster Sophomore season. If the QB situation was different, Baldwin could have mirrored his 09 numbers. Had that happened, he would be really close to Julio Jones right now. Aside from Green, every WR in the draft has pretty big questions (relative, of course). I feel best going with the guy with unique physical gifts, and the guy that an NFL franchise decided was worth a first round pick. Also the hit ratio of late first rounders compared to 2nd round WRs is huge. As much as WRs in the 1st bust, the 2nd round is almost embarrassing, even in comparison.
 
He's worth a pick, that's for sure.But I can't fault anyone for passing either.If Baldwin were a choir boy, I'd maybe see him as the heir apparent to Bowe. But he's not a choir boy. It seems to me that if KC is ready to move on from Bowe because of his personality, they would've brought in a guy who doesn't look so much like Bowe in that regard.I think Bowe + Baldwin (assuming he pans out) is the plan. So I favor Little over Baldwin because I think Little has an easier path to be the clear WR1 for his team.
First of all, I never said I favored Baldwin over Little. Also, I disagree on the presumed similarity of Bowe and Baldwin. They both have some degree of knuckleheadedness, so yes there are some similarities. Baldwin made some comments that made him look like a diva, and got into a little bit of trouble at school. Bowe has made his own ill-advised comments and has gone even further getting suspended four games for PED's.Where Bowe had mainly gotten into hot water with the team was due to WORK ETHIC. Now, Bowe did come into camp in shape last year and had a great year. However two years ago he showed up at a sloppy 240 and led the league in drops even though he missed the four games. He stunk due to lack of dedication.If he can't string two solid seasons together he probably won't be getting that long term deal. I'm interested to see what his commitment level is this (possibly extended) offseason.Baldwin on the other hand APPEARS to be huge into conditioning.
 
'Concept Coop said:
'JamesTheScot said:
He's worth a pick, that's for sure.But I can't fault anyone for passing either.If Baldwin were a choir boy, I'd maybe see him as the heir apparent to Bowe. But he's not a choir boy. It seems to me that if KC is ready to move on from Bowe because of his personality, they would've brought in a guy who doesn't look so much like Bowe in that regard.I think Bowe + Baldwin (assuming he pans out) is the plan. So I favor Little over Baldwin because I think Little has an easier path to be the clear WR1 for his team.
If you are drafting a WR based on initial impact, I think you are setting yourself up to fail. There are not many WR rookie seasons like those of Mike Williams and Anquan Boldin. Most WRs need some time and polishing. With that said, I don't think we have any clue what the WR situations are going to look like in 2-3 years, so talent is the universal variable. Especially when these guys, if they pan out, should have 10 year careers.
I'm not advocating expecting an impact as a rookie from any WR.But I disagree that we won't have a clue what a WR situation will look like in 2-3 years. Is there certainty? No. But that doesn't equate to not having a clue.If you have young talent in place, you can reasonably expect that talent to be retained. If you have aging vets on the decline, then you can reasonably expect those vets to move on or give way to the up and comers.While it's true that these guys have 10 year careers, it's a bit odd to then ignore that fact that their peers also have 10 year careers. So as with the Bowe v. Baldwin issue, Bowe is young enough and talented enough to remain in KC by virtue of a new contract. If that happens, I don't like Baldwin as much. If it doesn't, then Baldwin gets a bump.Compare that to Little, who has no one like a Bowe on that team in front of him. So compare the odds that Bowe re-signs with KC compared to the odds that Cleveland brings in a big name WR via free agency next year.Of course, you can bump this thread to embarrass me if Bowe leaves in free agency and signs with Cleveland. :D
 
'Concept Coop said:
'JamesTheScot said:
He's worth a pick, that's for sure.

But I can't fault anyone for passing either.

If Baldwin were a choir boy, I'd maybe see him as the heir apparent to Bowe. But he's not a choir boy. It seems to me that if KC is ready to move on from Bowe because of his personality, they would've brought in a guy who doesn't look so much like Bowe in that regard.

I think Bowe + Baldwin (assuming he pans out) is the plan. So I favor Little over Baldwin because I think Little has an easier path to be the clear WR1 for his team.
If you are drafting a WR based on initial impact, I think you are setting yourself up to fail. There are not many WR rookie seasons like those of Mike Williams and Anquan Boldin. Most WRs need some time and polishing. With that said, I don't think we have any clue what the WR situations are going to look like in 2-3 years, so talent is the universal variable. Especially when these guys, if they pan out, should have 10 year careers.
I'm not advocating expecting an impact as a rookie from any WR.But I disagree that we won't have a clue what a WR situation will look like in 2-3 years. Is there certainty? No. But that doesn't equate to not having a clue.

If you have young talent in place, you can reasonably expect that talent to be retained. If you have aging vets on the decline, then you can reasonably expect those vets to move on or give way to the up and comers.

While it's true that these guys have 10 year careers, it's a bit odd to then ignore that fact that their peers also have 10 year careers. So as with the Bowe v. Baldwin issue, Bowe is young enough and talented enough to remain in KC by virtue of a new contract. If that happens, I don't like Baldwin as much. If it doesn't, then Baldwin gets a bump.

Compare that to Little, who has no one like a Bowe on that team in front of him. So compare the odds that Bowe re-signs with KC compared to the odds that Cleveland brings in a big name WR via free agency next year.

Of course, you can bump this thread to embarrass me if Bowe leaves in free agency and signs with Cleveland. :D
I always thought it was better to have someone like Bowe on the other side to draw the double teams. It's not like RBs where one player can block another's chances. (see Wayne and Harrison, Driver (when he was younger) and Jennings, Jackson and Maclin, Boldin and Fitzgerald, Randy Moss and Chris Carter, and Jerry Rice and John Taylor).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
As a Pitt fan I've watched a lot of Baldwin. He quits on too many plays in my opinion. If he can fix that I think he'll be fine but never elite. He has talent enough to play in the league but I think tough strong DB's will shut him down. Feel free to disagree as I'm not very good at talent evaluation.
it shows the way you talk about JB... Baldwin is a stud in the making, quit all this hater talk... that's funny :popcorn:
 
As a Pitt fan I've watched a lot of Baldwin. He quits on too many plays in my opinion. If he can fix that I think he'll be fine but never elite. He has talent enough to play in the league but I think tough strong DB's will shut him down. Feel free to disagree as I'm not very good at talent evaluation.
it shows the way you talk about JB... Baldwin is a stud in the making, quit all this hater talk... that's funny :popcorn:
I really feel this guy will be a bust long term. Too many red flags on and off the field.
 
As a Pitt fan I've watched a lot of Baldwin. He quits on too many plays in my opinion. If he can fix that I think he'll be fine but never elite. He has talent enough to play in the league but I think tough strong DB's will shut him down. Feel free to disagree as I'm not very good at talent evaluation.
it shows the way you talk about JB... Baldwin is a stud in the making, quit all this hater talk... that's funny :popcorn:
I really feel this guy will be a bust long term. Too many red flags on and off the field.
There's been more than one story this offseason about how all those "red flags" have been greatly overblown.
 
As a Pitt fan I've watched a lot of Baldwin. He quits on too many plays in my opinion. If he can fix that I think he'll be fine but never elite. He has talent enough to play in the league but I think tough strong DB's will shut him down. Feel free to disagree as I'm not very good at talent evaluation.
it shows the way you talk about JB... Baldwin is a stud in the making, quit all this hater talk... that's funny :popcorn:
I really feel this guy will be a bust long term. Too many red flags on and off the field.
There's been more than one story this offseason about how all those "red flags" have been greatly overblown.
Just like the Kenny Britt flags were overblown?
 
He's worth a pick, that's for sure.

But I can't fault anyone for passing either.

If Baldwin were a choir boy, I'd maybe see him as the heir apparent to Bowe. But he's not a choir boy. It seems to me that if KC is ready to move on from Bowe because of his personality, they would've brought in a guy who doesn't look so much like Bowe in that regard.

I think Bowe + Baldwin (assuming he pans out) is the plan. So I favor Little over Baldwin because I think Little has an easier path to be the clear WR1 for his team.
If you are drafting a WR based on initial impact, I think you are setting yourself up to fail. There are not many WR rookie seasons like those of Mike Williams and Anquan Boldin. Most WRs need some time and polishing. With that said, I don't think we have any clue what the WR situations are going to look like in 2-3 years, so talent is the universal variable. Especially when these guys, if they pan out, should have 10 year careers.
I'm not advocating expecting an impact as a rookie from any WR.But I disagree that we won't have a clue what a WR situation will look like in 2-3 years. Is there certainty? No. But that doesn't equate to not having a clue.

If you have young talent in place, you can reasonably expect that talent to be retained. If you have aging vets on the decline, then you can reasonably expect those vets to move on or give way to the up and comers.

While it's true that these guys have 10 year careers, it's a bit odd to then ignore that fact that their peers also have 10 year careers. So as with the Bowe v. Baldwin issue, Bowe is young enough and talented enough to remain in KC by virtue of a new contract. If that happens, I don't like Baldwin as much. If it doesn't, then Baldwin gets a bump.

Compare that to Little, who has no one like a Bowe on that team in front of him. So compare the odds that Bowe re-signs with KC compared to the odds that Cleveland brings in a big name WR via free agency next year.

Of course, you can bump this thread to embarrass me if Bowe leaves in free agency and signs with Cleveland. :D
I always thought it was better to have someone like Bowe on the other side to draw the double teams. It's not like RBs where one player can block another's chances. (see Wayne and Harrison, Driver (when he was younger) and Jennings, Jackson and Maclin, Boldin and Fitzgerald, Randy Moss and Chris Carter, and Jerry Rice and John Taylor).
While doing no analysis whatsoever, I prefer a rookie WR who has a slightly older good WR across from him. Think back to Reggie Wayne or TO coming in with Harrison and Rice; or Moss with Carter. Not so much Dez Bryant as Austin isn't old. Someone to learn the ropes from and pull coverage early in his career but won't be around long-term. Of course, with FA maybe that isn't a big factor.
 
As a Pitt fan I've watched a lot of Baldwin. He quits on too many plays in my opinion. If he can fix that I think he'll be fine but never elite. He has talent enough to play in the league but I think tough strong DB's will shut him down. Feel free to disagree as I'm not very good at talent evaluation.
it shows the way you talk about JB... Baldwin is a stud in the making, quit all this hater talk... that's funny :popcorn:
I really feel this guy will be a bust long term. Too many red flags on and off the field.
There's been more than one story this offseason about how all those "red flags" have been greatly overblown.
Just like the Kenny Britt flags were overblown?
You can cherry pick one example to try to prove your feeling on another if you'd like. That's not my game.
 
As a Pitt fan I've watched a lot of Baldwin. He quits on too many plays in my opinion. If he can fix that I think he'll be fine but never elite. He has talent enough to play in the league but I think tough strong DB's will shut him down. Feel free to disagree as I'm not very good at talent evaluation.
it shows the way you talk about JB... Baldwin is a stud in the making, quit all this hater talk... that's funny :popcorn:
I really feel this guy will be a bust long term. Too many red flags on and off the field.
There's been more than one story this offseason about how all those "red flags" have been greatly overblown.
Just like the Kenny Britt flags were overblown?
You can cherry pick one example to try to prove your feeling on another if you'd like. That's not my game.
1st off I hardly agree Kenny Britt's value is affected by his off the field traffic tickets. So yeah, Britt's red flags are overblwn. Secondly Baldwin is hands down the WR4 prospect coming out of this class and given his natural talent and Little being out of football for a year, its reasonable to like him over Little. Moreso if Bowe test FA next season.
 
'HPD said:
'BeTheMatch said:
'Hoss_Cartwright said:
'BeTheMatch said:
'Hoss_Cartwright said:
'T with T said:
As a Pitt fan I've watched a lot of Baldwin. He quits on too many plays in my opinion. If he can fix that I think he'll be fine but never elite. He has talent enough to play in the league but I think tough strong DB's will shut him down. Feel free to disagree as I'm not very good at talent evaluation.
it shows the way you talk about JB... Baldwin is a stud in the making, quit all this hater talk... that's funny :popcorn:
I really feel this guy will be a bust long term. Too many red flags on and off the field.
There's been more than one story this offseason about how all those "red flags" have been greatly overblown.
Just like the Kenny Britt flags were overblown?
You can cherry pick one example to try to prove your feeling on another if you'd like. That's not my game.
1st off I hardly agree Kenny Britt's value is affected by his off the field traffic tickets. So yeah, Britt's red flags are overblwn. Secondly Baldwin is hands down the WR4 prospect coming out of this class and given his natural talent and Little being out of football for a year, its reasonable to like him over Little. Moreso if Bowe test FA next season.
If you think Britt's problems are overblown and you're a Britt owner, then you have some very sad days in your future as a Britt owner.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
'FUBAR said:
He's worth a pick, that's for sure.

But I can't fault anyone for passing either.

If Baldwin were a choir boy, I'd maybe see him as the heir apparent to Bowe. But he's not a choir boy. It seems to me that if KC is ready to move on from Bowe because of his personality, they would've brought in a guy who doesn't look so much like Bowe in that regard.

I think Bowe + Baldwin (assuming he pans out) is the plan. So I favor Little over Baldwin because I think Little has an easier path to be the clear WR1 for his team.
If you are drafting a WR based on initial impact, I think you are setting yourself up to fail. There are not many WR rookie seasons like those of Mike Williams and Anquan Boldin. Most WRs need some time and polishing. With that said, I don't think we have any clue what the WR situations are going to look like in 2-3 years, so talent is the universal variable. Especially when these guys, if they pan out, should have 10 year careers.
I'm not advocating expecting an impact as a rookie from any WR.But I disagree that we won't have a clue what a WR situation will look like in 2-3 years. Is there certainty? No. But that doesn't equate to not having a clue.

If you have young talent in place, you can reasonably expect that talent to be retained. If you have aging vets on the decline, then you can reasonably expect those vets to move on or give way to the up and comers.

While it's true that these guys have 10 year careers, it's a bit odd to then ignore that fact that their peers also have 10 year careers. So as with the Bowe v. Baldwin issue, Bowe is young enough and talented enough to remain in KC by virtue of a new contract. If that happens, I don't like Baldwin as much. If it doesn't, then Baldwin gets a bump.

Compare that to Little, who has no one like a Bowe on that team in front of him. So compare the odds that Bowe re-signs with KC compared to the odds that Cleveland brings in a big name WR via free agency next year.

Of course, you can bump this thread to embarrass me if Bowe leaves in free agency and signs with Cleveland. :D
I always thought it was better to have someone like Bowe on the other side to draw the double teams. It's not like RBs where one player can block another's chances. (see Wayne and Harrison, Driver (when he was younger) and Jennings, Jackson and Maclin, Boldin and Fitzgerald, Randy Moss and Chris Carter, and Jerry Rice and John Taylor).
While doing no analysis whatsoever, I prefer a rookie WR who has a slightly older good WR across from him. Think back to Reggie Wayne or TO coming in with Harrison and Rice; or Moss with Carter. Not so much Dez Bryant as Austin isn't old. Someone to learn the ropes from and pull coverage early in his career but won't be around long-term. Of course, with FA maybe that isn't a big factor.
I think Dallas can support two fantasy WR1s. Romo could easily throw for 5k yards and each of them could easily surpass 1k yards in that environment.I can't see Matt Cassel (or any KC QB for that matter) throwing for 4k much less 5k. Plus you have Moeaki, Charles and McCluster in addition to Bowe in KC. In Dallas you have only Felix and Witten, and Felix won't catch more than 35 balls most likely.

Therefore I don't see KC supporting two fantasy WR1s anytime soon. They ranked 3rd from last in 2010, and Haley seems to favor ground-game, ball-control, clock-control, and defense. Dallas I know will put on aerial show for time immemorial and has a better ecosystem for WRs. Baldwin could be good, but he's not likely to surpass Bowe as the top target and therefore will be limited until there is both a QB and offensive philosophy change in KC.

 
He reminds me a lot of David Boston. I will take a non roided David Boston any day.
David Boston without roids is a scrub.
Actually the roids killed his career. His "bulk" made him stiff and slow - before that he was a stud.
He was on roids/HGH his whole career - it both made it and ruined it. I think he would have been a good receiver without them but he was more obsessed with his body than playing WR.
 
I think Dallas can support two fantasy WR1s. Romo could easily throw for 5k yards and each of them could easily surpass 1k yards in that environment.

I can't see Matt Cassel (or any KC QB for that matter) throwing for 4k much less 5k. Plus you have Moeaki, Charles and McCluster in addition to Bowe in KC. In Dallas you have only Felix and Witten, and Felix won't catch more than 35 balls most likely.

Therefore I don't see KC supporting two fantasy WR1s anytime soon. They ranked 3rd from last in 2010, and Haley seems to favor ground-game, ball-control, clock-control, and defense. Dallas I know will put on aerial show for time immemorial and has a better ecosystem for WRs. Baldwin could be good, but he's not likely to surpass Bowe as the top target and therefore will be limited until there is both a QB and offensive philosophy change in KC.
Peyton Manning has never thrown for 5,000 yds and you think Tony Romo could "easily throw for 5k yards"?
 
He's worth a pick, that's for sure.But I can't fault anyone for passing either.If Baldwin were a choir boy, I'd maybe see him as the heir apparent to Bowe. But he's not a choir boy. It seems to me that if KC is ready to move on from Bowe because of his personality, they would've brought in a guy who doesn't look so much like Bowe in that regard.I think Bowe + Baldwin (assuming he pans out) is the plan. So I favor Little over Baldwin because I think Little has an easier path to be the clear WR1 for his team.
And I am leery of Cleveland and Redskins WR's. KC gave up a lot to take him so I'll assume they researched him well.I agree they want both WR's if he works out. I would give it 2-3 years to see.As for being slow he ran the same as AJ Green. I hate gossip. If you guys don't want to take chance on him don't but make it for something he's actually done.
 
I think Dallas can support two fantasy WR1s. Romo could easily throw for 5k yards and each of them could easily surpass 1k yards in that environment.

I can't see Matt Cassel (or any KC QB for that matter) throwing for 4k much less 5k. Plus you have Moeaki, Charles and McCluster in addition to Bowe in KC. In Dallas you have only Felix and Witten, and Felix won't catch more than 35 balls most likely.

Therefore I don't see KC supporting two fantasy WR1s anytime soon. They ranked 3rd from last in 2010, and Haley seems to favor ground-game, ball-control, clock-control, and defense. Dallas I know will put on aerial show for time immemorial and has a better ecosystem for WRs. Baldwin could be good, but he's not likely to surpass Bowe as the top target and therefore will be limited until there is both a QB and offensive philosophy change in KC.
Peyton Manning has never thrown for 5,000 yds and you think Tony Romo could "easily throw for 5k yards"?
:goodposting: Its only been done twice in the history of the NFL

 
Last edited by a moderator:
if you extrapolate Romos numbers before the injury he was on pace to throw for 5000 yards and this was with a rookie Dez Bryant , starting Roy Williams.. What do you think a Healthy Romo with a year older, wiser, more motivated Dez, along with Austin, Witten, F.jones, and don't forget Murray. Also don't forget the addition of OT Tyron Smith to help protect Romos blindside. Hard to predict 5000 yards but I think I see what the guy was getting at. 4700 and 35 tds wouldn't be impossible for Romo.

 
if you extrapolate Romos numbers before the injury he was on pace to throw for 5000 yards and this was with a rookie Dez Bryant , starting Roy Williams.. What do you think a Healthy Romo with a year older, wiser, more motivated Dez, along with Austin, Witten, F.jones, and don't forget Murray. Also don't forget the addition of OT Tyron Smith to help protect Romos blindside. Hard to predict 5000 yards but I think I see what the guy was getting at. 4700 and 35 tds wouldn't be impossible for Romo.
Pretty tough to get much meaning by extrapolating from a 5 game base. Orton was on pace for over 5500 yards last year after 5 games but obviously didn't come anywhere near that number or continue that pace.
 
FWIW, I had the WR3 and WR4 picks in our rookie draft and took Little and Cobb over Baldwin. I worry a little bit about what I saw on tape (a little stiffer than he should be, even given his size; tendency to give up on some plays) and what I heard about his attitude (sold out his QB numerous times, which admittedly is second hand knowledge). Now, his QB did suck and he was wasted last year but I guess I prefer the WR diva tendencies not to appear until the guy is doing well in the NFL. I worry about a guy who didn't seem to give the best effort, even if his team did suck, coming to the NFL and turning it on. Lots of guys who do give great effort in college fail to keep up with the necessary effort in the NFL.

On top of all that, I don't know that I think Todd Haley is the guy to deal with a WR with those attributes. He seemed to put the screws on Bowe and managed to play mind games with Charles. Maybe Haley will be the best thing that ever happened to Baldwin, but I think that's a risky landing spot, environmentally, compared to a place like NE or BAL or PIT or somewhere more stable.

Just my two cents.

 
DaveRI've seen him play but highlights usually only show what he does well. Watch full game tape and you'll see many weaknesses as well. And I trust what scouts say that watched him everyday.
:goodposting: I would put him fifth behind Green, Jones, Cobb, and Little.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
i am a pitt fan so i watched baldwin for a few years now. classic boom or bust in the NFL. i, for one, am down on him. his mental game is not there and i have doubts that he'll come around. his play on the field is inconsistent. he seems to get disinterested when he is not integrated into the offense early on. i am very leery of him but would take him at the right spot. in other words, he'll never fall to me and i won't be sad about it. buyer beware if you're counting on him.

 
'HPD said:
'BeTheMatch said:
'Hoss_Cartwright said:
'BeTheMatch said:
'Hoss_Cartwright said:
'T with T said:
As a Pitt fan I've watched a lot of Baldwin. He quits on too many plays in my opinion. If he can fix that I think he'll be fine but never elite. He has talent enough to play in the league but I think tough strong DB's will shut him down. Feel free to disagree as I'm not very good at talent evaluation.
it shows the way you talk about JB... Baldwin is a stud in the making, quit all this hater talk... that's funny :popcorn:
I really feel this guy will be a bust long term. Too many red flags on and off the field.
There's been more than one story this offseason about how all those "red flags" have been greatly overblown.
Just like the Kenny Britt flags were overblown?
You can cherry pick one example to try to prove your feeling on another if you'd like. That's not my game.
1st off I hardly agree Kenny Britt's value is affected by his off the field traffic tickets. So yeah, Britt's red flags are overblwn. Secondly Baldwin is hands down the WR4 prospect coming out of this class and given his natural talent and Little being out of football for a year, its reasonable to like him over Little. Moreso if Bowe test FA next season.
Speaking of tickets, ay caramba!!!!http://www.newsobserver.com/2011/06/24/1298282/unc-confirms-greg-little-received.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top