agreed in ppr I say he gets 60-70 rushing and 5-60 rec and a td... he will score 23 fpoints in ppr.I really like him in PPR this week. Starting him with confidence in the one league I was able to grab him.
the optimism is for people in week 7 starting garbage at rb or trying to fill empty slots with a warm body.He looked pretty terrible to me against a really poor Redskins D. Not sure what all the optimism is for?
what's this based on, btw?He looked pretty terrible to me against a really poor Redskins D.
Ranked 27th against the run?what's this based on, btw?He looked pretty terrible to me against a really poor Redskins D.
Those numbers are deceiving... He carried the ball a lot at the end of the game when Dallas was killing clock. Not calling Randle ADP, but these numbers (10 for 17) are slightly unfair to judge him by.Ranked 27th against the run?what's this based on, btw?He looked pretty terrible to me against a really poor Redskins D.
Not going to disagree... But the situation this week is as good as a WW player could get - should see the majority of snaps against a bad def on a good offense.Perhaps situation played a role.
Wasn't too impressed in the pre-draft process though, or preseason either... Again, maybe that's just me.
would that have something to do with giving up 263 yds to philly in week 1?Ranked 27th against the run?what's this based on, btw?He looked pretty terrible to me against a really poor Redskins D.
Gotta be based on the first 2 weeks when McCoy and Starks ran wild on WAS. They changed their nickel to 3 corners, 1 safety, 4 LBs in week 3, benched speed bump Bacarri Rambo, and haven't been all that bad defending th run since. But they have seen 3 straight injuries to opponent's RBs, and they really give it up to RBs in the passing game.what's this based on, btw?He looked pretty terrible to me against a really poor Redskins D.
Oh god.Gotta be based on the first 2 weeks when McCoy and Starks ran wild on WAS. They changed their nickel to 3 corners, 1 safety, 4 LBs in week 3, benched speed bump Bacarri Rambo, and haven't been all that bad defending th run since. But they have seen 3 straight injuries to opponent's RBs, and they really give it up to RBs in the passing game.what's this based on, btw?He looked pretty terrible to me against a really poor Redskins D.
Week 3: Bush: injured DNP; Bell:20-63-1, 4-69
Week 4: McFadden: 5-29, 3-31, injured; Jennings: 15-45, 8-71
Week 5: bye
Week 6: Murray 7-29-1, 2-21 injured; Randle: 11-17-1, 2-15
Matt Forte will either kill them or get killed.
I find their projections to be off more often than not. Last week they had RG3 projected to get 31 points. I'm as big of an RG3 fan as anyone, but I didn't believe for a second he was getting 31 last week. Just like I don't think Randle will finish top 5 among RBs this week.ESPN is going a little overboard with their projection I think ....they are calling for 14pts in my standard league ..if only ESPN was ever right
This is the sense I've had since the preseason. Tanner seems to me to be a great back for the one cut system in Dallas now. He makes good decisions and takes advantage of the holes he has. Of course this is mostly based on preseason, but the assessment of any back on the team not named Murray is.He looked pretty terrible to me against a really poor Redskins D. Not sure what all the optimism is for?
Tanner should also be involved on third down and short yardage, at least according the Fort Worth Star-Telegram:
http://sportsblogs.star-telegram.com/cowboys/2013/10/the-cowboys-added-davin-meggett-to-practice-squad-to-shore-up-injury-depleted-running-back-corps.html
Honestly part of me wonders if Tanner is the better add...
that means he will finish 35thESPN FF loves him this week. Projected to finish top 5 at RB in my ppr league. Ahead of 6 of the top 10 RBs this week.
um...he was nothing special. Your from Texas so I can see why you feel this way. He will split w/ Tanner and be underwhelming.Anyone saying he didnt look good didnt watch the game. He had a nice burst on runs where he wasnt just trying to run out the clock.
He is a carbon copy of Murray in my opinion. They play a lot alike. He was solid in college and most experts said he was a steal in the draft where the Cowboys got him.
I dont think he is the 2nd coming of Emmitt but the O-Line in Dallas is much better than last year and he is young and fresh against a poor defensive team.
I will give him 15/70/TD 4 REC 28 yards= 19 points in a PPR. Pretty solid start either way.
Why?um...he was nothing special. Your from Texas so I can see why you feel this way. He will split w/ Tanner and be underwhelming.Anyone saying he didnt look good didnt watch the game. He had a nice burst on runs where he wasnt just trying to run out the clock.
He is a carbon copy of Murray in my opinion. They play a lot alike. He was solid in college and most experts said he was a steal in the draft where the Cowboys got him.
I dont think he is the 2nd coming of Emmitt but the O-Line in Dallas is much better than last year and he is young and fresh against a poor defensive team.
I will give him 15/70/TD 4 REC 28 yards= 19 points in a PPR. Pretty solid start either way.
It was alluded to earlier in the thread but simply because Randle, as many rookies do, struggles in pass pro.Why?um...he was nothing special. Your from Texas so I can see why you feel this way. He will split w/ Tanner and be underwhelming.Anyone saying he didnt look good didnt watch the game. He had a nice burst on runs where he wasnt just trying to run out the clock.
He is a carbon copy of Murray in my opinion. They play a lot alike. He was solid in college and most experts said he was a steal in the draft where the Cowboys got him.
I dont think he is the 2nd coming of Emmitt but the O-Line in Dallas is much better than last year and he is young and fresh against a poor defensive team.
I will give him 15/70/TD 4 REC 28 yards= 19 points in a PPR. Pretty solid start either way.
I'll 2nd this as another Big12 guy. Dude was great in college.Texasmouth said:Anyone saying he didnt look good didnt watch the game. He had a nice burst on runs where he wasnt just trying to run out the clock.
He is a carbon copy of Murray in my opinion. They play a lot alike. He was solid in college and most experts said he was a steal in the draft where the Cowboys got him.
I dont think he is the 2nd coming of Emmitt but the O-Line in Dallas is much better than last year and he is young and fresh against a poor defensive team.
I will give him 15/70/TD 4 REC 28 yards= 19 points in a PPR. Pretty solid start either way.
I love him to esp for this week... When murray is back ok, but until then esp vs a weak eagle d he is top 5 imo in ppr. You def can tell who missed out on Randle. I believe he will catch more passes then Murray did and will be given every opportunity to run the ball as Murray did.ESPN FF loves him this week. Projected to finish top 5 at RB in my ppr league. Ahead of 6 of the top 10 RBs this week.
why wouldn't you believe for a second that Rg3 could get 31 points... thats 300 yards and 2 tds basically with 20 rushing yards.... Your telling me Rg3 isn't capable of that? Randle is a great option this week esp if you are in a bind.I find their projections to be off more often than not. Last week they had RG3 projected to get 31 points. I'm as big of an RG3 fan as anyone, but I didn't believe for a second he was getting 31 last week. Just like I don't think Randle will finish top 5 among RBs this week.ESPN is going a little overboard with their projection I think ....they are calling for 14pts in my standard league ..if only ESPN was ever right
And who burned their top priority or FAAB on a guy that's a sub-par RB.I love him to esp for this week... When murray is back ok, but until then esp vs a weak eagle d he is top 5 imo in ppr. You def can tell who missed out on Randle. I believe he will catch more passes then Murray did and will be given every opportunity to run the ball as Murray did.ESPN FF loves him this week. Projected to finish top 5 at RB in my ppr league. Ahead of 6 of the top 10 RBs this week.
11.5 points for a plug and play? I'll take it.He looked pretty overwhelmed when he came in vs the Skins. Didn't run with much authority, and seemed to get pushed around when asked to block. Nice matchup but I can't shake the feeling he'll end the day with something like 14-50-0, 4-25-0.
Philly also did a nice job last week containing Martin, outside of a 24 yarder