Julio (1 Viewer)

[agr1986]

Made a trade that got vetoed in a league of mine. I would like yalls input as i see it was a slight underpay for me but commish said that i was overpay and his exact words were "I would be getting 2 good rookies for 8+ years and moncrief who had a lot of potential" I think it was the dumbest reason to have it vetoed. 

 

[fruity pebbles]

Julio by a little for me. Moncrief is a turd. In no league should that be vetoed. Actually thought it was going to get vetoed the other way.

 

[barackdhouse]

I'd prefer Julio in a vacuum but I certainly think it's fair. I wouldn't move Julio for that deal but I have no issue with it at all. I don't think a veto is appropriate. They rarely are.

 

[Arodin]

I can see both sides of this deal.  Seems entirely fair to me.

Trade vetoing is a dinosaur of a practice that ought to go the way of the dodo.  

 

[agr1986]

the thing that blew my mind is that this was vetoed and a trade got accepted almost unanimously was 1.04 and 19 late 1st mostly likely for 1.05 and devonte freeman

 

[-OZ-]

I can see both sides of this deal.  Seems entirely fair to me.

Trade vetoing is a dinosaur of a practice that ought to go the way of the dodo.  

Yep

Frankly this is probably as close to perfect value as you can get.

 

[Brownsfan]

Unless there is collusion involved, there should be no vetoes of trades. Everyone looks at things differently and nobody knows what the future holds

 

[Concept Coop]

Made a trade that got vetoed in a league of mine. I would like yalls input as i see it was a slight underpay for me but commish said that i was overpay and his exact words were "I would be getting 2 good rookies for 8+ years and moncrief who had a lot of potential" I think it was the dumbest reason to have it vetoed. 

Find another league.

 

[abbottjamesr]

Why is league veto voting a thing.  Presumably the trade makes both teams better.  Wouldn't perfect strategy be to veto all trades?  

this trade is fine

 

[menobrown]

I could not even say which side was deemed to be the "winner".  This is the kind of trade if I saw posted in the trade thread I'd have not commented on and if I did would have just said something like "seems even to me".

This kind of thing is a league deal breaker. Perhaps you got a loaded team and would enjoy sticking it to them a little longer, but I'd not want to be in a league with this kind of stuff going on.

 

[Skeletore Eh]

As a Julio owner, if you are going to move him that’s about the best you are going to get at this point in his career.  He’s a dapreciating asset 

 

[voiceofunreason]

I was just offered the 2.03 and 2.08. You can always feel the respect with an offer like that.

 

[voiceofunreason]

As a Julio owner, if you are going to move him that’s about the best you are going to get at this point in his career.  He’s a dapreciating asset 

I think this is true which makes it very tough to move him unless in a total rebuild.

 

[agr1986]

im probably one more stupid veto away from walking away from a league that vetoes trades just on personal opinion

 

[Andrew74]

No way that deserves a veto. 

 

[slicedbred21]

should not have been vetoed but i'm not sure i would even trade Julio for that...

i would be leaving that league asap