What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Just who are the Fascist? (1 Viewer)

The fact that any of you defend these radical animals is highly disturbing.

Joe has allowed this place to turn into a lefty version if StormFront.
I know a guy that was given a lengthy time out for simply suggesting Trump supporters were probably racist.   Tread lightly. Or don’t. I’m not your mother.

 
Speaking of Tucker Carlson...(and yes, this may turn out to be a nothingburger, too, since the video does not show what Avenatti alleges it shows).

https://hillreporter.com/tucker-carlson-allegedly-involved-in-assault-of-gay-immigrant-13853

Tucker Carlson Allegedly Involved in Assault of Gay Immigrant

Moments ago, Attorney Michael Avenatti tweeted that he is investigating an alleged assault committed by Fox News’ Tucker Carlson and/or members of his inner circle.  The incident that apparently took place at a club in Virginia last month is at least partially corroborated through a video (seen below) — although no violence or assault is depicted in the video (shown at above link).

Avenatti also says that the incident ‘likely includes underage drinking in violation of VA law’, although no more details of these allegations have yet to be released.

“We are attempting to locate additional witnesses and to identify those depicted in the video,” Avenatti tweeted. “In particular, we need assistance identifying the balding man that grabs the man seated at the bar. We anticipate charges being filed. Anyone with knowledge, pls contact us.”

The video, which can be seen above, was also tweeted by Avenatti.  It clearly shows Tucker Carlson repeatedly cursing, and telling another individual to “get the f–k out of here” several times.

Avenatti went on to respond to an individual asking him what the video reveals, by saying, “You mean other than Tucker repeatedly cursing a guy out seated at the bar while a friend/associate of his makes a bee line for the guy, grabs him off his chair, and then threatens violence?”
:lmao:

Typical Squiz, linking a radical blog, quoting obvious lies, leaving out relevant facts.

I'll help. 

Politico (yes they are extremely biased but at least considered semi-crsemi-credible

Carlson, in a lengthy statement provided through Fox News, said the incident began when a man at the club last month verbally harassed his teenage daughter on her way back from a bathroom and called her a “whore” and “####.”

He acknowledged that his son then confronted the man and threw wine at him. But Carlson maintains neither he nor his son assaulted the man involved. Avenatti disputed that account, saying it’s an “absolute lie.”

The video, caught on another patron’s cell phone, captures part of an argument involving Carlson and a man seated at the bar, whom Avenatti describes in the tweet as a “gay Latino immigrant.” Only a portion of the video was released.

“Guys. Guys, get the f--- out of here,” Carlson, who is seen standing near the bar, can be heard saying. An individual in the video can be seen grabbing a man by the collar. That’s when another person intercedes: “Hey. Hey! … There’s no excuse for violence.” Another person interjects, asking: “Did you see what he did?”
So, drunk guy stops Carlson's teenage daughter on her way back from the restroom, calls her a whore and a ####. Carlson Jr confronts the guy, he admits to it.

Things get heated. Wine is spilled. Someone else grabs the guy's collar.

Creepy Porn Lawyer who recently got caught with a witness fabricating lies about gang rape now claims that Carlson assaulted the guy AND used homophobic and racist language.

It is hard to believe that anyone still take this guy seriously, but I guess as long as he is defending "your side" he is cool to make up any story he wants.
 
I know a guy that was given a lengthy time out for simply suggesting Trump supporters were probably racist.   Tread lightly. Or don’t. I’m not your mother.
So OPMis suspended again?

Can I borrow Orton2Olsen on my next inevitable suspension?

 
I did not excuse it. I suggested the perpetrators be charged.   I would qualify that as condemnation.  His home was not "attacked." No one was ever in any danger.

The garbage that Mr. Carlson spews on a nightly basis is sad.
His wife was home alone when the thugs showed up.  They pounded on the door and were screaming.  His wife was scared to death and hid in the pantry.  The thugs threw their body against the door in an attempt to break in and cracked their front door.  The incident is under criminal investigation by police. 

 
His wife was home alone when the thugs showed up.  They pounded on the door and were screaming.  His wife was scared to death and hid in the pantry.  The thugs threw their body against the door in an attempt to break in and cracked their front door.  The incident is under criminal investigation by police. 
There was a link earlier showing it didn’t appear as bad as Carlson said (and was still wrong to have it happen at all) including no damage to the door.

 
His wife was home alone when the thugs showed up.  They pounded on the door and were screaming.  His wife was scared to death and hid in the pantry.  The thugs threw their body against the door in an attempt to break in and cracked their front door.  The incident is under criminal investigation by police. 
I feel bad for his wife. Really. But the rest of this is according to Carlson's recount. He wasn't there. There was no damage to the door, and according to first hand accounts no one threw themselves against anything.  The whole narrative is spin.

I feel compelled to add the disclaimer that no one is ok with this and charges should be brought. 

 
That is his MO here. Antagonize posters who disagree with him and keep it up until they respond in kind, then report them. 

Which is why he is on the ignore hall of fame.

And an annual finalist in the contest over at e.
I'm new here but I've lurked for a while. It seems to be his mission and joy to report people and get them suspended. 

 
Typical Squiz, linking a radical blog, quoting obvious lies, leaving out relevant facts.

I'll help. 

Politico (yes they are extremely biased but at least considered semi-crsemi-credible
The above link you posted is not taken from Politico (so the attribution to them is false). The tip off was the bolded reference to Avenatti (below) followed by an obvious opinion about him, which Politico would never do in a news piece:
 

Creepy Porn Lawyer who recently got caught with a witness fabricating lies about gang rape now claims that Carlson assaulted the guy AND used homophobic and racist language.

It is hard to believe that anyone still take this guy seriously, but I guess as long as he is defending "your side" he is cool to make up any story he wants.



 
OMG, I can't stop laughing. Fox is “punishing” us by not tweeting to make us feel bad for Tucker Carlson?

https://www.inquisitr.com/5156116/fox-news-quits-twitter-in-protest-of-tweets-targeting-tucker-carlson/

Fox News Reportedly Quits Twitter In Protest Of Tweets Targeting Tucker Carlson

Fox News has been silent on Twitter for nearly two days in what is reported to be a protest of the way the social media platform handled tweets targeting anchor Tucker Carlson.

For 30 hours and counting, Fox News has been on a total Twitterblackout, not posting anything at all since a tweet from early Thursday morning about a federal judge ruling against Donald Trump on DACA. The company’s Fox News Politics account has also been silent, with its last post coming just a few minutes before the last one on the main account on Thursday morning.

The exile caught the attention of the rest of Twitter and led to some speculation about why the network would go on radio silence at a time when there are some major news stories, including accusations from Donald Trump that Democrats are trying to steal Senate races in Florida and Arizona.

There have been reports that the network is boycotting Twitter after protests against one of its anchors, Tucker Carlson. Protesters have gathered outside Carlson’s home, and some had shared the Fox News anchor’s address on Twitter. 

[...]

 
More proof people here think Carlson deserves no sympathy for this attack on his home and family, but that he deserved it.  Because he disagrees. 

 
More proof people here think Carlson deserves no sympathy for this attack on his home and family, but that he deserved it.  Because he disagrees. 
Nobody claimed this.  Why do you keep posting false assertions?

And I think you’re being called out in another thread.  Might want to check it out.

 
More proof people here think Carlson deserves no sympathy for this attack on his home and family, but that he deserved it.  Because he disagrees. 
No one has said that. Repeatedly setting up that Straw Man doesn't make it true.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Oh, so they didn't vandalize his home? His wife wasn't hiding in fear? 
You were asked for a link...back up your statement and provide one.  That’s how this site works rather than yiu continuing to make unsubstantiated and false claims and then never responding about them.  That is considered trolling...

 
You were asked for a link...back up your statement and provide one.  That’s how this site works rather than yiu continuing to make unsubstantiated and false claims and then never responding about them.  That is considered trolling...
I have to provide a link that his wife was in fear and his home was vandalized? Is anyone denying that at this point? No link. It's not in dispute. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have to provide a link that his wife was in fear and his home was vandalized? Is anyone denying that at this point? No link. It's not in dispute. 
Much of the original story is actually I’m dispute.  And it’s not just this thread where you have been asked to provide links to support your claims and have refused to do so.  You should stop doing that.

And frankly if you are who everyone is saying...you shouldn’t be posting here.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I guess that's why there's a criminal police investigation. Because no crimes were committed. And nice story, from a left wing hack who participated in this incident.  
Sure there should be an investigation.  But your “evidence”, that you won’t even link to,  has come from a right wing hack who wasn’t there and who appears to have exaggerated what happened.

 
It's dawned on me that democrats have no choice  but  to attack the victims of left wing violence, or ignore it. Otherwise they would have to admit their side does what they accuse the right of doing. Can't have that. Their whole platform consists of  accusing the right of being thugs, racists and facists. And when it comes to rhetoric resulting in violence, we can start with Auntie Maxine and Eric Holder, and Hollywood. 

 
It's dawned on me that democrats have no choice  but  to attack the victims of left wing violence, or ignore it. Otherwise they would have to admit their side does what they accuse the right of doing. Can't have that. Their whole platform consists of  accusing the right of being thugs, racists and facists. And when it comes to rhetoric resulting in violence, we can start with Auntie Maxine and Eric Holder, and Hollywood. 
You are reaching now as you can’t back up your other statements.

 
It's dawned on me that democrats have no choice  but  to attack the victims of left wing violence, or ignore it. Otherwise they would have to admit their side does what they accuse the right of doing. Can't have that. Their whole platform consists of  accusing the right of being thugs, racists and facists. And when it comes to rhetoric resulting in violence, we can start with Auntie Maxine and Eric Holder, and Hollywood. 
Not sure why you're getting all racist about it.

 
I have no need to back up what is known. Your level of debate is below my standards. Saying " got a link" isn't really debate. 
It is asking for proof or documentation of any claims that have made and so far, you have failed to do that, you just keep parroting that it is an established fact, but have shown nothing to prove that, while others here have provided links disputing your assertions of what really happened at TC's.

Just saying I have no need to back up what is known, when it isn't known or hasn't been proven, isn't debate or discussion, it is deflection and trolling.

 
I have no need to back up what is known. Your level of debate is below my standards. Saying " got a link" isn't really debate. 
This post seems to confirm what others have said.  You are the poster formerly known as Eminence aren’t you?  Care to address that claim which several now have made?

Because the rest of your post here your standard appears to be make a bunch of claims you can’t back up or refuse to do so...which has been considered trolling by the moderation on this site.

 
You would be, if you were familiar with some of his prior "work". Normal behavior from this particular poster, apparently on at least his 4th alias.
I think we need the mods to confirm it is Eminence.  If so...how is he allowed to post here after threatening another member on Twitter?

 
Merkel and the UN Secretary-General didn't use the "F" word, but it is pretty clear that's what they're talking about at the WWI Armistice events this weekend:

After the ceremony, Merkel and UN Secretary-General Guterres gave the opening speeches at a new peace forum in Paris set up by Macron -- with both warning that rising nationalism threatens the rules-based international order.

"The concern I have is that blinkered nationalist views may gain ground once again," Merkel said, warning that people were calling the "European peace project" into question.

Guterres warned of "many parallels with both the start of the twentieth century and the 1930s, giving us grounds to fear that an unpredictable chain of events could ensue".


Hint, they're not talking about Antifa.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Please do. And apologize when you get your answer. 
Apologize for what? Being suspicious because you won’t answer questions about it and post a lot like him?

That would be an odd apology for doing nothing wrong.

Its telling that you can’t even answer when asked.  Similar to what was done with the Stuart Ullman alias.

 
Apologize for what? Being suspicious because you won’t answer questions about it and post a lot like him?

That would be an odd apology for doing nothing wrong.

Its telling that you can’t even answer when asked.  Similar to what was done with the Stuart Ullman alias.
I am not those people. Go ahead and find out and get back to me. You seem to want to run me out of here. I guess if you persist you will. You  have a reputation for doing that. 

 
Tweet thread discussing police interaction.  And it doesn’t support Tucker’s words on the incident.

https://twitter.com/drrjkavanagh/status/1061484728652570624?s=21
I read this.  And the column on ThinkProgress. 

There's no question a line was crossed, but it's a very different line if those are accurate.  Defacing his driveway concerns me much less than actual threats, and was (for the larger group) an unsanctioned action according to these reports.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top