What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

K-9 Vick out for the year? (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Portis either has no idea what dog fighting really is all about or is an idiot or both. Either way, why is he opining on this topic. He should focus on the rehab for his achy knee.
He and some other Redskins are in town for a "beach blast". The local reporters had them in for an interview. Since Vick is a hot topic, the interview was bound to turn to that.Sorry, beach blitz.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Transcript of the WAVY 10 TV video.

Portis was asked if he thought it was prevalent in the NFL or NBA he said,

Portis: "It's prevalent in life. I'm from Laurel, Mississippi. I know a lot of backroads that's got a dog fight if you want to go see it, you know?"
Unfortunately Portis is spot on here. On top of that, it's not just here in the US, but pretty much world wide. :yucky: Not sure what it says about us as human beings.

 
Transcript of the WAVY 10 TV video.

Portis was asked if he thought it was prevalent in the NFL or NBA he said,

Portis: "It's prevalent in life. I'm from Laurel, Mississippi. I know a lot of backroads that's got a dog fight if you want to go see it, you know?"
Unfortunately Portis is spot on here. On top of that, it's not just here in the US, but pretty much world wide. :yucky: Not sure what it says about us as human beings.
Sorry, I am going to have to ask for a link to dogfighting being a world wide phenomenon
 
Point 1. She "believes"

Point 2. She does not know if "these tapes even exist"

Point 3. Grant immunity from prosecution for these "reluctant to testify" witnesses, for their testimony.
I don't understand the point you are making.
Look at what I quoted.
Your defense of Vick continues to be great shtick.
No defense of Vick, Pygmy. If you read the full unedited post #232 & not just the snippet of it that massraider quoted, you'll see it was simply pointing out that Kathy Strouse's story changes from interview to interview.

Regardless of conviction, I think Goodell gives him a vacation this year & the only question in my mind, is how long that vacation will be. I figure anywhere from 4 to 8 games.

Now if the authorities can find the evidence needed to convict Vick, he's going to the pokey anywhere up to 5 years.
The only conversations I've ever had with you on this board have been you defending Mike Vick. This doesn't seem to be any different. I'm amazed at how people continue to minimize things so Vick doesn't look so bad by attacking reporters' and officers' credibility.Hint: They're not the ones with the complete lack of credibility here. Vick is.
Bad habit for you to assume you know someones position on a different topic, soley based upon previous years football discussions...but duly noted.
 
Transcript of the WAVY 10 TV video.

Portis was asked if he thought it was prevalent in the NFL or NBA he said,

Portis: "It's prevalent in life. I'm from Laurel, Mississippi. I know a lot of backroads that's got a dog fight if you want to go see it, you know?"
Unfortunately Portis is spot on here. On top of that, it's not just here in the US, but pretty much world wide. ;) Not sure what it says about us as human beings.
Sorry, I am going to have to ask for a link to dogfighting being a world wide phenomenon
Sorry msommer, no links. I'm just going on first hand experience from world travels. If you want confirmation, you'll have to look it up for yourself. :bag:

 
Transcript of the WAVY 10 TV video.

Portis was asked if he thought it was prevalent in the NFL or NBA he said,

Portis: "It's prevalent in life. I'm from Laurel, Mississippi. I know a lot of backroads that's got a dog fight if you want to go see it, you know?"
Unfortunately Portis is spot on here. On top of that, it's not just here in the US, but pretty much world wide. :bag: Not sure what it says about us as human beings.
Really? I don't know that he's that accurate that dog fighting is "prevalent in life". I live in the south and I've never heard of anyone personally being involved with it. The Vick story was the first mention I can remember in a long time. I'm sure there are statistics kept by the law enforcement people and probably the Pit Bull type rescue groups. I wonder what the actual numbers are.

J

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Transcript of the WAVY 10 TV video.

Portis was asked if he thought it was prevalent in the NFL or NBA he said,

Portis: "It's prevalent in life. I'm from Laurel, Mississippi. I know a lot of backroads that's got a dog fight if you want to go see it, you know?"
Unfortunately Portis is spot on here. On top of that, it's not just here in the US, but pretty much world wide. :shock: Not sure what it says about us as human beings.
Really? I don't know that he's that accurate that dog fighting is "prevalent in life". I live in the south and I've never heard of anyone personally being involved with it. The Vick story was the first mention I can remember in a long time. I'm sure there are statistics kept by the law enforcement people and probably the Pit Bull type rescue groups. I wonder what the actual numbers are.

J
J,I live in here in the South too, Hotlanta, & it really depends on the people you know.

For example, I work a white collar job & I'm sure not one of my professional acquaintances would have the first clue about where to go for a "dog fight".

But, talking with some of the adults at my youngest son's little league team who are blue collar & I could be at a "dog fight" right now.

Just because you're not personally aware of it, don't think it's not widespread or prevalent. To do so would be naive.

 
Transcript of the WAVY 10 TV video.

Portis was asked if he thought it was prevalent in the NFL or NBA he said,

Portis: "It's prevalent in life. I'm from Laurel, Mississippi. I know a lot of backroads that's got a dog fight if you want to go see it, you know?"
Unfortunately Portis is spot on here. On top of that, it's not just here in the US, but pretty much world wide. :confused: Not sure what it says about us as human beings.
Really? I don't know that he's that accurate that dog fighting is "prevalent in life". I live in the south and I've never heard of anyone personally being involved with it. The Vick story was the first mention I can remember in a long time. I'm sure there are statistics kept by the law enforcement people and probably the Pit Bull type rescue groups. I wonder what the actual numbers are.

J
J,I live in here in the South too, Hotlanta, & it really depends on the people you know.

For example, I work a white collar job & I'm sure not one of my professional acquaintances would have the first clue about where to go for a "dog fight".

But, talking with some of the adults at my youngest son's little league team who are blue collar & I could be at a "dog fight" right now.

Just because you're not personally aware of it, don't think it's not widespread or prevalent. To do so would be naive.
Of course. That's why I wrote that I'd like to see the numbers. And I didn't say it wasn't prevalent. I said I don't know that Portis is accurate when he says it is. Large difference.I don't do crystal meth or have friends that do. But it's prevalent. I know people that have been personally affected by it. It's constantly on the news and in conversations and it's something you hear about.

Dog fighting by comparison is absolutely non existent. Sorry if that wasn't clear.

J

 
Transcript of the WAVY 10 TV video.

Portis was asked if he thought it was prevalent in the NFL or NBA he said,

Portis: "It's prevalent in life. I'm from Laurel, Mississippi. I know a lot of backroads that's got a dog fight if you want to go see it, you know?"
Unfortunately Portis is spot on here. On top of that, it's not just here in the US, but pretty much world wide. :banned: Not sure what it says about us as human beings.
Really? I don't know that he's that accurate that dog fighting is "prevalent in life". I live in the south and I've never heard of anyone personally being involved with it. The Vick story was the first mention I can remember in a long time. I'm sure there are statistics kept by the law enforcement people and probably the Pit Bull type rescue groups. I wonder what the actual numbers are.

J
J,I live in here in the South too, Hotlanta, & it really depends on the people you know.

For example, I work a white collar job & I'm sure not one of my professional acquaintances would have the first clue about where to go for a "dog fight".

But, talking with some of the adults at my youngest son's little league team who are blue collar & I could be at a "dog fight" right now.

Just because you're not personally aware of it, don't think it's not widespread or prevalent. To do so would be naive.
Of course. That's why I wrote that I'd like to see the numbers. And I didn't say it wasn't prevalent. I said I don't know that Portis is accurate when he says it is. Large difference.I don't do crystal meth or have friends that do. But it's prevalent. I know people that have been personally affected by it. It's constantly on the news and in conversations and it's something you hear about.

Dog fighting by comparison is absolutely non existent. Sorry if that wasn't clear.

J
Gotcha :confused: Tis sad but true, but the media indeed holds a large sway over what we're aware of & become passionate about.

 
Transcript of the WAVY 10 TV video.

Portis was asked if he thought it was prevalent in the NFL or NBA he said,

Portis: "It's prevalent in life. I'm from Laurel, Mississippi. I know a lot of backroads that's got a dog fight if you want to go see it, you know?"
Unfortunately Portis is spot on here. On top of that, it's not just here in the US, but pretty much world wide. :rant: Not sure what it says about us as human beings.
Sorry, I am going to have to ask for a link to dogfighting being a world wide phenomenon
Sorry msommer, no links. I'm just going on first hand experience from world travels. If you want confirmation, you'll have to look it up for yourself. :unsure:
My firsthand experience says otherwise
 
Sorry, I am going to have to ask for a link to dogfighting being a world wide phenomenon
Wikipedia does a reasonable job with the topic.]They do fail to mention the scope of the problem. It's big in Africa and a man was recently mauled to death by fighting dogs on the lose. Australia has a huge problem. Boar Dogs are very popular and the ones who don't "get along" in the kennels or prove worthy of the hunt usually end up in the pit. Wiki only touches on the Tosa fighting in Japan, but throughout Asia dog fighting is common. Thailand even has it's own national fighting dog. In the Caspian region there's three different breeds of Ovhartka that are traditionally fought and the arguments about the best breed are intense. Russia used to have the old style Ovchartka fighting, which is really a form of selecting breeding studs, but the Euro-trash pit fighting such as we have here has taken over there.

It is an international problem, world wide, far more prevalent than the media cares to bother about. Visit your local shelters. I bet dollars to doughnuts you cannot find one with any breed more common than Pits and obvious Pit mixes. The AKC will tell you Lab and Lab mixes are America's most popular dogs. Not even close. Pit Bulls are by a wide margin and specifically because of the fight business, which operates in one form or another in every state and probably every county in this country.

 
Transcript of the WAVY 10 TV video.

Portis was asked if he thought it was prevalent in the NFL or NBA he said,

Portis: "It's prevalent in life. I'm from Laurel, Mississippi. I know a lot of backroads that's got a dog fight if you want to go see it, you know?"
Unfortunately Portis is spot on here. On top of that, it's not just here in the US, but pretty much world wide. :( Not sure what it says about us as human beings.
Sorry, I am going to have to ask for a link to dogfighting being a world wide phenomenon
Sorry msommer, no links. I'm just going on first hand experience from world travels. If you want confirmation, you'll have to look it up for yourself. :unsure:
My firsthand experience says otherwise
Then I'd say your fisthand experience is fairly lacking. :rant:
 
Transcript of the WAVY 10 TV video.

Portis was asked if he thought it was prevalent in the NFL or NBA he said,

Portis: "It's prevalent in life. I'm from Laurel, Mississippi. I know a lot of backroads that's got a dog fight if you want to go see it, you know?"
Unfortunately Portis is spot on here. On top of that, it's not just here in the US, but pretty much world wide. :( Not sure what it says about us as human beings.
Sorry, I am going to have to ask for a link to dogfighting being a world wide phenomenon
Sorry msommer, no links. I'm just going on first hand experience from world travels. If you want confirmation, you'll have to look it up for yourself. :unsure:
My firsthand experience says otherwise
Then I'd say your fisthand experience is fairly lacking. :rant:
Or that you are full of it.Whatever

 
Transcript of the WAVY 10 TV video.

Portis was asked if he thought it was prevalent in the NFL or NBA he said,

Portis: "It's prevalent in life. I'm from Laurel, Mississippi. I know a lot of backroads that's got a dog fight if you want to go see it, you know?"
Unfortunately Portis is spot on here. On top of that, it's not just here in the US, but pretty much world wide. :( Not sure what it says about us as human beings.
Sorry, I am going to have to ask for a link to dogfighting being a world wide phenomenon
Sorry msommer, no links. I'm just going on first hand experience from world travels. If you want confirmation, you'll have to look it up for yourself. :lmao:
My firsthand experience says otherwise
Then I'd say your fisthand experience is fairly lacking. :shrug:
Or that you are full of it.Whatever
You know, to me it's really irrelevant whether you believe my post or not, msommer. If you want to say to to yourself "Ahhh he's just full of it & doesn't know what he's talking about" that's cool. :) You're welcome to believe that & think that dog fighting is not a world wide problem. It's really fine man. I'm not here to preach or convert, just passing along info when I have it & it's no skin off my nose if you want to dismiss it.

However, before you get too comfortable with that line of thinking, you might want to take a look at the post & link provided by Chaos Commish.

 
Sorry, I am going to have to ask for a link to dogfighting being a world wide phenomenon
Wikipedia does a reasonable job with the topic.]They do fail to mention the scope of the problem. It's big in Africa and a man was recently mauled to death by fighting dogs on the lose. Australia has a huge problem. Boar Dogs are very popular and the ones who don't "get along" in the kennels or prove worthy of the hunt usually end up in the pit. Wiki only touches on the Tosa fighting in Japan, but throughout Asia dog fighting is common. Thailand even has it's own national fighting dog. In the Caspian region there's three different breeds of Ovhartka that are traditionally fought and the arguments about the best breed are intense. Russia used to have the old style Ovchartka fighting, which is really a form of selecting breeding studs, but the Euro-trash pit fighting such as we have here has taken over there.

It is an international problem, world wide, far more prevalent than the media cares to bother about. Visit your local shelters. I bet dollars to doughnuts you cannot find one with any breed more common than Pits and obvious Pit mixes. The AKC will tell you Lab and Lab mixes are America's most popular dogs. Not even close. Pit Bulls are by a wide margin and specifically because of the fight business, which operates in one form or another in every state and probably every county in this country.
My wife and daughter (and infrequently me) volunteer at a shelter. It is true that Pit/Pit mixes are the prevalent dog breed there. Never has there been evidence of prior fighting though. I think the reason why there's so many of these dogs at shelters is that the type of people that own them aren't dog lovers. They get them because they're tough looking, provide security, etc. Once they have them for a while and realize how much effort it takes, they give up on them.
 
Sorry, I am going to have to ask for a link to dogfighting being a world wide phenomenon
Wikipedia does a reasonable job with the topic.]They do fail to mention the scope of the problem. It's big in Africa and a man was recently mauled to death by fighting dogs on the lose. Australia has a huge problem. Boar Dogs are very popular and the ones who don't "get along" in the kennels or prove worthy of the hunt usually end up in the pit. Wiki only touches on the Tosa fighting in Japan, but throughout Asia dog fighting is common. Thailand even has it's own national fighting dog. In the Caspian region there's three different breeds of Ovhartka that are traditionally fought and the arguments about the best breed are intense. Russia used to have the old style Ovchartka fighting, which is really a form of selecting breeding studs, but the Euro-trash pit fighting such as we have here has taken over there.

It is an international problem, world wide, far more prevalent than the media cares to bother about. Visit your local shelters. I bet dollars to doughnuts you cannot find one with any breed more common than Pits and obvious Pit mixes. The AKC will tell you Lab and Lab mixes are America's most popular dogs. Not even close. Pit Bulls are by a wide margin and specifically because of the fight business, which operates in one form or another in every state and probably every county in this country.
I can say here in Phoenix AZ I have seen dog fighting rings in the rural area's here. Out where we used to fish the surrounding neighbors (a good portion of them too) had all kinds of rings, cages where they fought or placed dogs to fight. I have not seen the dog fights but you can hear the dogs and see all the rings out in the open. They don't do much to hide so I assume the law enforcement here (and I use that term loosely) don't seem to care. The depths of human depravity stopped shocking me years ago, but for some to assume something is not widespread cause "they don't see it or need statitics" to believe it's there is naive or just being obtuse.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Big Score said:
msommer said:
Big Score said:
msommer said:
Big Score said:
msommer said:
Big Score said:
Transcript of the WAVY 10 TV video.

Portis was asked if he thought it was prevalent in the NFL or NBA he said,

Portis: "It's prevalent in life. I'm from Laurel, Mississippi. I know a lot of backroads that's got a dog fight if you want to go see it, you know?"
Unfortunately Portis is spot on here. On top of that, it's not just here in the US, but pretty much world wide. :( Not sure what it says about us as human beings.
Sorry, I am going to have to ask for a link to dogfighting being a world wide phenomenon
Sorry msommer, no links. I'm just going on first hand experience from world travels. If you want confirmation, you'll have to look it up for yourself. :shrug:
My firsthand experience says otherwise
Then I'd say your fisthand experience is fairly lacking. :shrug:
Or that you are full of it.Whatever
You know, to me it's really irrelevant whether you believe my post or not, msommer. If you want to say to to yourself "Ahhh he's just full of it & doesn't know what he's talking about" that's cool. :no: You're welcome to believe that & think that dog fighting is not a world wide problem. It's really fine man. I'm not here to preach or convert, just passing along info when I have it & it's no skin off my nose if you want to dismiss it.

However, before you get too comfortable with that line of thinking, you might want to take a look at the post & link provided by Chaos Commish.
This bit struck me as important:
They do fail to mention the scope of the problem
So maybe it is just in the less sophisticated corners of the world?Maybe just here and there?

Maybe just a few places

Maybe just for the pervs who get off on bloodsport?

This doesn't look like a scourge or something that happens in every back alley as you seem to want to portrait (I understand, BS, that would make it easier to explain away Vick's potential involvement if indeed proven).

If Vick is involved he shouldhave the book thrown at him, whether it is prevalent or not. Being prevalent does not make it ok.

I still say it is not prevalent and that it is disgusting.

 
Humane Society has some good info on Dog Fighting in the US but don't attach any numbers other than there are "individuals arrested every week in scores of locations under state law" and they seem to group dogfighting with cockfighting.

Interesting that Bush just passed The Animal Fighting Prohibition Enforcement Act in early May to help law enforcement.

http://www.hsus.org/legislation_laws/feder...law_signed.html

 
Big Score said:
msommer said:
Big Score said:
msommer said:
Big Score said:
msommer said:
Big Score said:
Transcript of the WAVY 10 TV video.

Portis was asked if he thought it was prevalent in the NFL or NBA he said,

Portis: "It's prevalent in life. I'm from Laurel, Mississippi. I know a lot of backroads that's got a dog fight if you want to go see it, you know?"
Unfortunately Portis is spot on here. On top of that, it's not just here in the US, but pretty much world wide. :( Not sure what it says about us as human beings.
Sorry, I am going to have to ask for a link to dogfighting being a world wide phenomenon
Sorry msommer, no links. I'm just going on first hand experience from world travels. If you want confirmation, you'll have to look it up for yourself. :clap:
My firsthand experience says otherwise
Then I'd say your firsthand experience is fairly lacking. :shrug:
Or that you are full of it.Whatever
You know, to me it's really irrelevant whether you believe my post or not, msommer. If you want to say to to yourself "Ahhh he's just full of it & doesn't know what he's talking about" that's cool. :yes: You're welcome to believe that & think that dog fighting is not a world wide problem. It's really fine man. I'm not here to preach or convert, just passing along info when I have it & it's no skin off my nose if you want to dismiss it.

However, before you get too comfortable with that line of thinking, you might want to take a look at the post & link provided by Chaos Commish.
This bit struck me as important:
They do fail to mention the scope of the problem
So maybe it is just in the less sophisticated corners of the world?Maybe just here and there?

Maybe just a few places

Maybe just for the pervs who get off on bloodsport?

This doesn't look like a scourge or something that happens in every back alley as you seem to want to portrait (I understand, BS, that would make it easier to explain away Vick's potential involvement if indeed proven).

If Vick is involved he shouldhave the book thrown at him, whether it is prevalent or not. Being prevalent does not make it ok.

I still say it is not prevalent and that it is disgusting.
msommer,You are certainly free to think dog fighting is only an isolated minimal blood sport & neither widespread, nor prevelant.

Unfortunately for these animals, there's lots of people who think the same as you do. Well, it's not really that people "think" that, it's more that people are simply ignorant as to just how big of a problem & widespread it truly is. I think this is probably a case of the ostrich syndrome, where people just don't "want" to know about it, or believe it, as it is so disgusting & repugnant to the majority of us.

This same pattern of people refusing to believe that horrible & repugnant events are happening, is nothing new. Despite reports of the systematic liquidation of the European Jews during WWII, it was completely dismissed as only wild exaggerations.

Of course that changed once the Allies began liberating the actual Nazi Death Camps.

The reports of atrocities by Pol Pot & the Khmer Rouge were downplayed. Then Pol Pot's regime collapsed & the Killing Fields were discovered.

The list goes on.

For lots of people, ignorance is bliss.

But again, no skin off my nose if you choose to downplay & pooh pooh organized dog fighting as being neither widespread nor prevalent.

I don't think any less of you for it. :clap:

As to Vick's involvement (or anyone else for that matter)?

I think it's sick & is not something I condone.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Franchise Playa said:
The depths of human depravity stopped shocking me years ago, but for some to assume something is not widespread cause "they don't see it or need statitics" to believe it's there is naive or just being obtuse.
this is probably a case of the ostrich syndrome, where people just don't "want" to know about it, or believe it, as it is so disgusting & repugnant to the majority of us.

For lots of people, ignorance is bliss.
Welcome to America. :banned:
 
Humane Society has some good info on Dog Fighting in the US but don't attach any numbers other than there are "individuals arrested every week in scores of locations under state law" and they seem to group dogfighting with cockfighting.

Interesting that Bush just passed The Animal Fighting Prohibition Enforcement Act in early May to help law enforcement.

http://www.hsus.org/legislation_laws/feder...law_signed.html
Another good site for info on dog fighting in particular and animal abuse in general.http://www.pet-abuse.com/

Link to a search of their DB for Pit Bull fighting cases.

I read there are some 20,000 known professional dog fighters in the US. Who knows how many non-professionals there are.

As for Vick's website claiming his dogs were bred for sale...I'd love to see a list of people who bought dogs.

 
Portis' comments show us how stupid he is but it also shows us how "F"d up many sports stars are morally and ethically. I am glad Portis and Vick don't play for my favorite team because there is no way I could root for a dog fighter or sympathizer.

The part where he says you don't want to lock up a "good" role model like Vick for a little thing like a dog fight. Is there anyone out there who thinks Ron Mexico is a good role model?

Maybe Portis should be suspended for shear stupidity? But then maybe we wouldn't have enough players to play the game if we started down that road.

The whole "Sports stars and dog fighting connection" is leaving a very bad taste with me. I hope that the NFL comes down real real hard on this issue to save some animals lives and human souls.

One good side effect of all of this is maybe the people will get more educated to the horror of dog fighting.

 
just watched the tail end of an interview on sportscenter with a guy from a Atl radio show. He said the fans are talking about boycotting the Atl games if Vick is suspended. Anyone else see this?

 
just watched the tail end of an interview on sportscenter with a guy from a Atl radio show. He said the fans are talking about boycotting the Atl games if Vick is suspended. Anyone else see this?
I'd boycott too. Who wants to see Joey play qb. :rolleyes: Vick will be doing a couple of football camps here soon. I'm going to boycott them if he isn't suspended. Not that I would have gone anyway. :D Actually I might show up with a protest sign to get some face time on the news. Any ideas? How about "Put Vick in the ring, not on the field"?
 
Never been to a dog fight. Never want to. Think it is disgusting.

All that said, how is it SO different from things like professional boxing or even closer the "mixed martial arts"?

If PEOPLE get into a ring and beat each other senseless, it's a totally cool sport. If dogs do it, it's cruel, inhumane etc (which again, I AGREE with). The only differences I see is that death is probably more common at a dog fight, and there is more blood because of teeth. But those things are a matter of degree, not really a qualitative difference.

I'm also NOT saying boxing should be outlawed etc. Heck I don't know WHAT I am saying, maybe just that there is a fine line somewhere and human nature is scary in general. We are not that far removed from survival of the fittest.

As for the prevalence of dog fighting, I lean toward the Joe view. Dog fighting has not even crossed my consciousness in many moons until the Vick thing. In certain areas/groups of people, I'm sure it is fairly "prevalent" but I'm not sure that means it is "prevalent" in general. I grew up in a very rural area (PA)and was never aware of a dog fight that I could have gone to if I wanted to.

 
The fans saying they'll boycott the games if Vick gets suspended, is only a very small minority, but it plays better to our media's sensationalistic journalism, to portray it otherwise.

My car radio is always tuned to sports radio, 680 The Fan. By & large, most people calling in on this are pretty upset with Vick. Lots of dog lovers here in Atlanta.

 
Never been to a dog fight. Never want to. Think it is disgusting.All that said, how is it SO different from things like professional boxing or even closer the "mixed martial arts"?
The obvious difference is that humans who participate in boxing or mixed martial art matches, are sentinent beings who are making a voluntary choice to do so.That is not the case with dog fighting.
 
just watched the tail end of an interview on sportscenter with a guy from a Atl radio show. He said the fans are talking about boycotting the Atl games if Vick is suspended. Anyone else see this?
I wouldn't be surprised if an unusual percentage of Falcon fans think dog fighting isn't a big deal.
One good side effect of all of this is maybe the people will get more educated to the horror of dog fighting.
We'll see. There's so much sensationalized nonsense from so many different points of view that it would be great to force this topic into the national conversation and completely expose it. I have lost faith in our ability to productively have that kind of collective conversation though. We americans believe what we want, right or wrong, deny contrary evidence as poloiticized rubbish, and contribute to the BS far more than clean it up. This topic would be no different.
 
msommer,

You are certainly free to think dog fighting is only an isolated minimal blood sport & neither widespread, nor prevelant.

Unfortunately for these animals, there's lots of people who think the same as you do. Well, it's not really that people "think" that, it's more that people are simply ignorant as to just how big of a problem & widespread it truly is. I think this is probably a case of the ostrich syndrome, where people just don't "want" to know about it, or believe it, as it is so disgusting & repugnant to the majority of us.

This same pattern of people refusing to believe that horrible & repugnant events are happening, is nothing new. Despite reports of the systematic liquidation of the European Jews during WWII, it was completely dismissed as only wild exaggerations.

Of course that changed once the Allies began liberating the actual Nazi Death Camps.

The reports of atrocities by Pol Pot & the Khmer Rouge were downplayed. Then Pol Pot's regime collapsed & the Killing Fields were discovered.

The list goes on.

For lots of people, ignorance is bliss.

But again, no skin off my nose if you choose to downplay & pooh pooh organized dog fighting as being neither widespread nor prevalent.

I don't think any less of you for it. :banned:

As to Vick's involvement (or anyone else for that matter)?

I think it's sick & is not something I condone.
Dude, Not pooh pooh' ing anything. Prevalent=common. You were saying that dogfighting is a common problem all over the world. I'm saying it is not.

Oh - and the analogy to the holocausts of this world is a bit over the top.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Big Score said:
Pygmy Marmoset said:
Point 1. She "believes"

Point 2. She does not know if "these tapes even exist"

Point 3. Grant immunity from prosecution for these "reluctant to testify" witnesses, for their testimony.
I don't understand the point you are making.
Look at what I quoted.
Your defense of Vick continues to be great shtick.
No defense of Vick, Pygmy. If you read the full unedited post #232 & not just the snippet of it that massraider quoted, you'll see it was simply pointing out that Kathy Strouse's story changes from interview to interview.

Regardless of conviction, I think Goodell gives him a vacation this year & the only question in my mind, is how long that vacation will be. I figure anywhere from 4 to 8 games.

Now if the authorities can find the evidence needed to convict Vick, he's going to the pokey anywhere up to 5 years.
The only conversations I've ever had with you on this board have been you defending Mike Vick. This doesn't seem to be any different. I'm amazed at how people continue to minimize things so Vick doesn't look so bad by attacking reporters' and officers' credibility.Hint: They're not the ones with the complete lack of credibility here. Vick is.
Bad habit for you to assume you know someones position on a different topic, soley based upon previous years football discussions and the conversation you're currently in the middle of...but duly noted.
:shrug:
 
Never been to a dog fight. Never want to. Think it is disgusting.All that said, how is it SO different from things like professional boxing or even closer the "mixed martial arts"?If PEOPLE get into a ring and beat each other senseless, it's a totally cool sport. If dogs do it, it's cruel, inhumane etc (which again, I AGREE with). The only differences I see is that death is probably more common at a dog fight, and there is more blood because of teeth. But those things are a matter of degree, not really a qualitative difference.
Really? You don't see the difference between people fighting to the death with knives (dog teeth can do as much damage as a knife) for the right to have their next meal and boxing? Interesting.
 
msommer,

You are certainly free to think dog fighting is only an isolated minimal blood sport & neither widespread, nor prevelant.

Unfortunately for these animals, there's lots of people who think the same as you do. Well, it's not really that people "think" that, it's more that people are simply ignorant as to just how big of a problem & widespread it truly is. I think this is probably a case of the ostrich syndrome, where people just don't "want" to know about it, or believe it, as it is so disgusting & repugnant to the majority of us.

This same pattern of people refusing to believe that horrible & repugnant events are happening, is nothing new. Despite reports of the systematic liquidation of the European Jews during WWII, it was completely dismissed as only wild exaggerations.

Of course that changed once the Allies began liberating the actual Nazi Death Camps.

The reports of atrocities by Pol Pot & the Khmer Rouge were downplayed. Then Pol Pot's regime collapsed & the Killing Fields were discovered.

The list goes on.

For lots of people, ignorance is bliss.

But again, no skin off my nose if you choose to downplay & pooh pooh organized dog fighting as being neither widespread nor prevalent.

I don't think any less of you for it. :shrug:

As to Vick's involvement (or anyone else for that matter)?

I think it's sick & is not something I condone.
Dude, Not pooh pooh' ing anything. Prevalent=common. You were saying that dogfighting is a common problem all over the world. I'm saying it is not.
Again, I completely respect your right to believe whatever you want.
Oh - and the analogy to the holocausts of this world is a bit over the top.
If you thought I was comparing human genocide to dog fighting, then you're right, it was way over the top.That people prefer not to believe such repugnant & horrific things actually occur, or are prevelant, until they're beaten over the head with undeniable & overwhelming evidence that it is occuring & is prevelant, is nothing new.

So the anology in that context, is dead spot on.

 
All that said, how is it SO different from things like professional boxing or even closer the "mixed martial arts"?.
are you serious?? How can you even think these things are close? Maybe if you were forced into a ring against your will to fight to the death you would have a point
 
Da Guru said:
Congressman wants strong action against Vick

(May 18, 2007) -- A California congressman has joined the cause against Michael Vick, firing off a letter that urged NFL commissioner Roger Goodell to "act swiftly and forcefully" if the Atlanta Falcons quarterback was involved in dog fighting on his former property.

U.S. Rep. Tom Lantos (D-Calif.) pointed out that he's a senior member of the Oversight and Government Reform Committee, which two years ago held highly publicized hearings on the use of performance-enhancing drugs in professional sports.

Lantos raised the prospect of government intervention if the NFL fails to discipline Vick.

"I am outraged that one of the National Football League's superstars is affiliated with such a heinous enterprise," Lantos wrote.

Last month, police raised a Virginia home owned by Vick and allegedly found evidence of a major dog-fighting operation, including dozens off malnourished and injured dogs. The quarterback has denied any wrongdoing, and no criminal charges have been filed against him.

Vick has since sold the home.

"The level of cruelty involved in exploiting animals to the point that 60 malnourished and injured dogs were removed from Mr. Vick's property is mind boggling," Lantos said. "I will view anything less than the strongest repudiation of Mr. Vick's involvement as tacit support for this atrocious activity."

The NFL has said repeatedly it is investigating the case to determine if Vick violated the commissioner's tougher standards for players who run afoul of the law. Falcons spokesman Reggie Roberts reiterated the team's policy of not commenting until the investigation is completed.

Calling himself a longtime advocate of animal welfare, Lantos joined two prominent animal-rights groups that have called on Goodell to suspend or ban any players involved in dog fighting.

"As evidence of Mr. Vick's involvement mounts, I implore you to act swiftly and forcefully," the congressman wrote. "Your strong rebuke of dog fighting -- and those who promote it -- will send the message that this all-too-prevalent practice has no place in a civilized society."

In a not-so-subtle threat of possible congressional action, Lantos reminded the commissioner of his committee's efforts to weed out those who use performance-enhancing drugs.

"I also suggest you educate your players on the illegality and cruelty of dog fighting to prevent this from happening again," Lantos wrote. "It is my hope that the issue of animal fighting will not require us to further investigate the behavior of your athletes."

AP NEWS

The Associated Press News Service

Copyright 2007, The Associated Press, All Rights Reserved

http://www.nfl.com/teams/story/ATL/10187667

Anybody still think the commish will give him a slap on the wrist?
Ridiculous but understandable he is a congressman looking for a power trip .Most congressmans are morons if you figure how smart is the president ( Bush )

then they are all as smart as a 3 rd grader.
I would hate to think what Vick is...what is two steps below a moron?
I believe that's called a "congressman".
 
Never been to a dog fight. Never want to. Think it is disgusting.All that said, how is it SO different from things like professional boxing or even closer the "mixed martial arts"?If PEOPLE get into a ring and beat each other senseless, it's a totally cool sport. If dogs do it, it's cruel, inhumane etc (which again, I AGREE with). The only differences I see is that death is probably more common at a dog fight, and there is more blood because of teeth. But those things are a matter of degree, not really a qualitative difference.
Really? You don't see the difference between people fighting to the death with knives (dog teeth can do as much damage as a knife) for the right to have their next meal and boxing? Interesting.
To the extent any sense can be made from your response, :yes:
 
Never been to a dog fight. Never want to. Think it is disgusting.

All that said, how is it SO different from things like professional boxing or even closer the "mixed martial arts"?

If PEOPLE get into a ring and beat each other senseless, it's a totally cool sport. If dogs do it, it's cruel, inhumane etc (which again, I AGREE with). The only differences I see is that death is probably more common at a dog fight, and there is more blood because of teeth. But those things are a matter of degree, not really a qualitative difference.
Really? You don't see the difference between people fighting to the death with knives (dog teeth can do as much damage as a knife) for the right to have their next meal and boxing? Interesting.
To the extent any sense can be made from your response, :fishing:
Schnieke's statement: dog fighting = boxing (or "mixed martial arts")Fact: dog fighting = forcing homeless people to fight to the death for a hot meal

Implication: Schnieke's is falsely mistaking boxing for forcing homeless people to fight to the death for a hot meal

 
I'm southern through and through (Arkansas ). White male, 38 years old, NEVER have I been to a dog fight nor have I been invited, nor have any of my friends EVER talked about going etc.

If you fight dogs, I'd like the first shot at beating you senseless. Seriously. You don't take "man's best friend" and toss him into a ring to be mauled by another dog. Absolutely unacceptable.

Intentionally getting your jollies from watching dogs tear at each other ? SONOFA#####S that do that should be nutthumped and hospitalized for a month

 
I'm southern through and through (Arkansas ). White male, 38 years old, NEVER have I been to a dog fight nor have I been invited, nor have any of my friends EVER talked about going etc. If you fight dogs, I'd like the first shot at beating you senseless. Seriously. You don't take "man's best friend" and toss him into a ring to be mauled by another dog. Absolutely unacceptable.Intentionally getting your jollies from watching dogs tear at each other ? SONOFA#####S that do that should be nutthumped and hospitalized for a month
We actually toss real men's into the ring to fight for money , so whats trhe big deal about dogs .
 
Da Guru said:
Congressman wants strong action against Vick

(May 18, 2007) -- A California congressman has joined the cause against Michael Vick, firing off a letter that urged NFL commissioner Roger Goodell to "act swiftly and forcefully" if the Atlanta Falcons quarterback was involved in dog fighting on his former property.

U.S. Rep. Tom Lantos (D-Calif.) pointed out that he's a senior member of the Oversight and Government Reform Committee, which two years ago held highly publicized hearings on the use of performance-enhancing drugs in professional sports.

Lantos raised the prospect of government intervention if the NFL fails to discipline Vick.

"I am outraged that one of the National Football League's superstars is affiliated with such a heinous enterprise," Lantos wrote.

Last month, police raised a Virginia home owned by Vick and allegedly found evidence of a major dog-fighting operation, including dozens off malnourished and injured dogs. The quarterback has denied any wrongdoing, and no criminal charges have been filed against him.

Vick has since sold the home.

"The level of cruelty involved in exploiting animals to the point that 60 malnourished and injured dogs were removed from Mr. Vick's property is mind boggling," Lantos said. "I will view anything less than the strongest repudiation of Mr. Vick's involvement as tacit support for this atrocious activity."

The NFL has said repeatedly it is investigating the case to determine if Vick violated the commissioner's tougher standards for players who run afoul of the law. Falcons spokesman Reggie Roberts reiterated the team's policy of not commenting until the investigation is completed.

Calling himself a longtime advocate of animal welfare, Lantos joined two prominent animal-rights groups that have called on Goodell to suspend or ban any players involved in dog fighting.

"As evidence of Mr. Vick's involvement mounts, I implore you to act swiftly and forcefully," the congressman wrote. "Your strong rebuke of dog fighting -- and those who promote it -- will send the message that this all-too-prevalent practice has no place in a civilized society."

In a not-so-subtle threat of possible congressional action, Lantos reminded the commissioner of his committee's efforts to weed out those who use performance-enhancing drugs.

"I also suggest you educate your players on the illegality and cruelty of dog fighting to prevent this from happening again," Lantos wrote. "It is my hope that the issue of animal fighting will not require us to further investigate the behavior of your athletes."

AP NEWS

The Associated Press News Service

Copyright 2007, The Associated Press, All Rights Reserved

http://www.nfl.com/teams/story/ATL/10187667

Anybody still think the commish will give him a slap on the wrist?
Ridiculous but understandable he is a congressman looking for a power trip .Most congressmans are morons if you figure how smart is the president ( Bush )

then they are all as smart as a 3 rd grader.
I would hate to think what Vick is...what is two steps below a moron?
I believe that's called a "congressman".
:bag:
 
Never been to a dog fight. Never want to. Think it is disgusting.

All that said, how is it SO different from things like professional boxing or even closer the "mixed martial arts"?

If PEOPLE get into a ring and beat each other senseless, it's a totally cool sport. If dogs do it, it's cruel, inhumane etc (which again, I AGREE with). The only differences I see is that death is probably more common at a dog fight, and there is more blood because of teeth. But those things are a matter of degree, not really a qualitative difference.
Really? You don't see the difference between people fighting to the death with knives (dog teeth can do as much damage as a knife) for the right to have their next meal and boxing? Interesting.
To the extent any sense can be made from your response, :bag:
Schnieke's statement: dog fighting = boxing (or "mixed martial arts")Fact: dog fighting = forcing homeless people to fight to the death for a hot meal

Implication: Schnieke's is falsely mistaking boxing for forcing homeless people to fight to the death for a hot meal
Those morons that fight in those octogonal rings ( I dont know exactly how you call it , i think it s ultimate fighting ) they are allowed evry shot possible ( Knees , Elbows, butt heads ) if they would not fight for a living ( To eat ) they would be homeless , they are probably less smarts then the dogs .So what s the difference.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Never been to a dog fight. Never want to. Think it is disgusting.

All that said, how is it SO different from things like professional boxing or even closer the "mixed martial arts"?

If PEOPLE get into a ring and beat each other senseless, it's a totally cool sport. If dogs do it, it's cruel, inhumane etc (which again, I AGREE with). The only differences I see is that death is probably more common at a dog fight, and there is more blood because of teeth. But those things are a matter of degree, not really a qualitative difference.
Really? You don't see the difference between people fighting to the death with knives (dog teeth can do as much damage as a knife) for the right to have their next meal and boxing? Interesting.
To the extent any sense can be made from your response, :shrug:
Schnieke's statement: dog fighting = boxing (or "mixed martial arts")Fact: dog fighting = forcing homeless people to fight to the death for a hot meal

Implication: Schnieke's is falsely mistaking boxing for forcing homeless people to fight to the death for a hot meal
Those morons that fight in those octogonal rings ( I dont know exactly how you call it ) they are allowed evry shot possible ( Knees , Elbows, butt heads ) if they would not fight for a living ( To eat ) they would be homeless , they are probably less smarts then the dogs .So what s the difference.
I didn't think it was possible for someone to be this stupid. I sure hope you're fishing.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
We actually toss real men's into the ring to fight for money , so whats trhe big deal about dogs .
I would call that an outright lie, however in some primitive parts of the world there might still exist someplace where slaves are thrown into a ring to fight, like Gladiators.So I can't call it an outright lie, its a HUGE misleading overstatement. Nobody ....... that is " We " tosses anyone into a ring to fight for money. That just don't happen.

The big deal is that people get their jollies over watching two animals fight to the death, or fight until one is seriously hurt anyway. Thats entertainment ? Thats enjoyable ? No ........ its brutal, its inhumane, its uncalled for, unaccepted, illegal and a felony and all for a good reason.

I suppose there is still a portion of the population that "likes" it, not unlike pedophilia, child porn, polygmany and stuff like that. There are always going to be freaks who like really weird stuff, thus the laws we have to contain people like you them

 
So getting back on point lets try and talk about this.

1. I can't believe how this is dominating the air time. ESPN has really not let this story sort of slide or die...seems like it is getting a lot of air time. I can't remember Pacman getting this much air time when he was under investigation and before Goodell weighed in on him.

2. If Vick is found to be liable in any way or if he is linked to this dogfight mess, I can't see how he will not be suspended by the league. he had a picture taken of him on a myspace account smoking a blunt, the airport incident with the water bottle, the Ron Mexico fiasco...I don't see how he doesn't get at least a 2-4 game suspension.

3. If he misses time who is the QB? Joey Harrington? How good is that Schaub trade looking right now? Seriously!

I only really care in terms of FF, I am not surprised Vick would be linked to dogfighting...sorry but when he had the whole ROn Mexico fiasco you knew he was pretty much a lowlife at that point. He seems like the type of guy that might not instigate trouble but he doesn't exactly run to the phone booth and call 911 to come and help out either. He seems like the type of person that will watch his neighbors house shoot up in flames, stand back and say, "Damn Dog, look at that over there." My point is actually there are lots of people unfortunately that have this trait and share it with Vick.

If Vick misses significant time, what happens to the rest of the offense in Atlanta? Because we have seen Joey Harrington and its really not a good situation if he takes the field.

 
Stealthycat said:
We actually toss real men's into the ring to fight for money , so whats trhe big deal about dogs .
I would call that an outright lie, however in some primitive parts of the world there might still exist someplace where slaves are thrown into a ring to fight, like Gladiators.
Bum fights, in the good ol' U.S. of A., were not too far off the mark. At least those guys weren't in a cage, but they were preyed on largely because they didn't have many real-life options for obtaining food, booze, whatever.
 
If this turns out as badly for Vick as it currently appears (i.e. he is involved or had knowledge of it etc.), Vickk is going to get a hefty suspension and I wouldn't be surprised if Portis got a one game suspension for his comments.

I think Goodell is going come down like a ton of bricks on this one if it proves true.

 
And to the above debate about how common dogfighting is, I must admit some surprise to hearing how often it appears to occur in the South or elsewhere. Of course, up here in Canada, our dogs pull the sleds... so I guess I wouldn't be in the dogfighting loop.

Whether it is prevalent, common or rare seems to me to be completely irrelevant. It is awful and wrong.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top