Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums
Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
Kamala Harris Helped Bail Out Criminals (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter Bronan
- Start date
Phil Elliott
Footballguy
I think a lot of people would support her for doing this more than her role as AG.
Thunderlips
Footballguy
She's still better than Trump.
At what point do you vote with your head rather than your feelings?
Thunderlips confirms he has no problem with elected Democrats (and possible president given Bidens health issues) baling out criminals and left wing radical domestic terrorists.
Other than that, I am sure he is a stand up guy and a the sort of person we would all want as a neighbor.
The General
Footballguy
I think there might be more to this story.
Like what?
Hows this for an uncomfortable fact?
Democrats thought that these riots would reflect badly on Trump. Kamala was taking a very public stance to associate herself with the protests because she believed it would benefit her politically. So she publicly endorsed organizations who are raising money to bail out domestic terrorists and convicted criminals. This not only puts them back out on the streets, it sends a message to the other left wing radicals and criminals that they have institutional support behind them.
How would you like to excuse that?
Joe Summer
Footballguy
I support bail reform, so I'm not opposed to this idea as a matter of principle.
The General
Footballguy
sho nuff
Footballguy
The minute i push the button that selects Biden over Trump I am doing so with my head.
and the personal crap has no business here
Its not an opinion - its a fact. You have her public statements that she made herself to substantiate it. How can you deny whats right in front of you?
Lets just agree with the fact that you dont feel comfortable with this, but instead of demonstrating any integrity at all and condemning it, you choose to rather ignore it because it does not suit the narrative you prefer and have emotionally invested in.
ZERO INTEGRITY.
What personal crap? Nice try.
Voting for the Democrats at this stage is voting for
1) A presidential candidate who has a history of racial discrimination ON A POLICY LEVEL
2) A VP who was promoting fund raising efforts to bail out domestic terrorists and criminals that hi jacked the BLM protests.
3) A party that is doing everything it can to avoid federal assistance to deal with their cities burning to the ground because they think its politically expedient in a push to secure power. They are public about it, I have posted excerpts from interviews with the mainstream media.
If you are voting for that with your head then so be it, thats on YOU and its a statement YOU are making about your character. Thats not me making a statement about you or me being personal at all.
Last edited by a moderator:
The General
Footballguy
I disagree with this.
The Minneapolis Freedom Fund has a tough job. Hopefully they did some good.
I’m also not going to agree with everything a candidate does. Is this a rule?
sho nuff
Footballguy
The “no integrity “ the sarcastic crap saying your sure someone is a good guy and so in (among other bs you have posted while trolling this board)
I am voting for all of that (well if you take out a bunch of the biased spin you added)for the many reasons already posted about the corruption and criminal nature of the Trump administration and the enabling of the current GOP.
parasaurolophus
Footballguy
Definitely not ok with people bailing out criminals when it is politically expedient to do so.
Wait, which party are we talking about here?
Criminal nature of the Trump administration. Yep, that any day now its Mueller time eh? What a joke that this falsehood continues to be spread. The reality is that the left did not like the fact that they lost an election, nothing more. They have dont everything they can to make the country ungovernable and attack the presidency from day 1. Regardless of what you think of Trump the character, it has essentially been an attempted coup.
You would think that after 4 years of Dems trying to undermine a presidency to the point where they are prepared to let their own cities burn to the ground, you might take a step back and consider the possibility that maybe, JUST MAYBE, you are an on the wrong side of the facts here.
You want to vote for the party burning down cities, baling out criminals and supporting domestic terrorists? Thats on you buddy, your forefathers would be ashamed of you but you are what you are.
Last edited by a moderator:
FreeBaGeL
Footballguy
Did she pick the individuals that were bailed out? Or just ask twitter followers to donate to a fund that was mostly doing something good but didn't pick all the best people?
I'm just wondering how far we can take this, given that so many prominant Republicans have donated to causes that ended up aiding bad people.
Not to mention conservative darling Chick-fil-a. Or every person that's ever dropped a buck into the collection plate at Catholic church whose coffers were later used to cover up and defend a slew of child rapists.
I'm just wondering how far we can take this, given that so many prominant Republicans have donated to causes that ended up aiding bad people.
Not to mention conservative darling Chick-fil-a. Or every person that's ever dropped a buck into the collection plate at Catholic church whose coffers were later used to cover up and defend a slew of child rapists.
Last edited by a moderator:
sho nuff
Footballguy
Nothing you posted here was fact. But you bore me now and i don’t suspect you will last long here. Good bye.
IvanKaramazov
Footballguy
She could name Angela Davis AG and Bill Ayers Secretary of Defense and I'd still take her over Trump.
DocHolliday
Footballguy
The media is going to promote Biden and Harris no matter what they have done in the past. The media is on the left team and doesn’t care about what is right or wrong, what hurts citizens, or what is best for country. The media wants their team to win at all cost.
SaintsInDome2006
Footballguy
ZeroHedge will corrode your brain, fyi.
Here is the source article:
- Fox Minny.
- I'm fine with cash bail and don't support what this group supports, but I get the idea of people so poor they can't access the bail system, and especially of supporting protesters. I'm also pro-free speech and bail is an entirely local issue. Harris also made clear why she posted the link to the group:
Trump campaign taking leaps and bounds on this one.
Stealthycat
Footballguy
bail out the criminals and get 'em back on the streets
who voted on that one thread that GOP is the ones behind the rioting/looting ???
who voted on that one thread that GOP is the ones behind the rioting/looting ???
There just has to be.
Otherwise...it would be a bad thing....and we simply cannot have that.
Last edited by a moderator:
Skoo
Footballguy
sho nuff
Footballguy
Cjw_55106
Footballguy
This thread is the PSF in a nutshell. The left constantly questions how anyone can support the president with how terrible a person he is. When the right asks a similar question about a Dem, the left responds with a bunch of whataboutisms. In other words, we should criticize Trump, but not Biden or Harris. God forbid.
This country will be in a better place when people realize both sides are out for only themselves and they dont care one iota about you.
This country will be in a better place when people realize both sides are out for only themselves and they dont care one iota about you.
Mile High
Footballguy
Cjw_55106
Footballguy
Skoo
Footballguy
Cjw_55106
Footballguy
Im guessing none. Not as bad as pardoning someone who was an Army Intelligence analyst convicted of leaking documents that revealed classified information...but we all have different opinions.
sho nuff
Footballguy
It is today's political climate in a nutshell...people talking partial truths (at best) to bash another person and make claims that are not really supported by facts...then expecting everyone to criticize that VP candidate for something.
And yeah...when it comes down to choosing between 2 candidates...there will be whataboutisms. Because the current occupant of the White House is that bad.
This wasn't some similar question about a dem...it was a bogus scenario meant to troll people.
sho nuff
Footballguy
You just complained about whataboutisms...then this is your reply not a few minutes later?
One that completely ignores what the complaint was in the fist place about pardons. Does comparing sheer number matter? Is it the same as pardoning those who may have committed crimes for your benefit...who were on the payroll of POTUS? Do you think all pardons are equal?
Last edited by a moderator:
sho nuff
Footballguy
Cjw_55106
Footballguy
I was just trying to fit in.
In reality, I dont believe the president should have authority to pardon anyone.
sho nuff
Footballguy
Oh....ok.....
facts vs feelings....I get it.
I guess that he could canonize someone and we'll call it semantics....
Whatever progresses the agenda of, "Orange Man, Bad".
Last edited by a moderator:
"Bailing out"??
Or "Freeing them from an unjust incarceration"
....it's all semantics, ya know !
Last edited by a moderator:
sho nuff
Footballguy
sho nuff
Footballguy
Or understanding the point of what he was saying was clear even saying pardon vs saying commuted sentence.
And yes...in the instance of commuting sentences of his cronies...that was bad.
Cjw_55106
Footballguy
Last edited by a moderator:
sho nuff
Footballguy
Not really...the semantics started from the beginning with a trolling thread from a trolling poster making claims about who was bailed out with the funds from. Saints shed some light on it...which went largely ignored because the agenda of some.
HTH
Shutout
Footballguy
That's the basic Democratic method. Pretend it doesn't exist until it can no longer the ignored or it goes away. That's why you saw zero mention of riots and unrest across America by the Democratic party nor one single speaker in the entire DNC over four days mention it until Don Lemon pointed out that tpolls are slipping and it needed addressed.
The Democrats want to remove cash bail across the USa as they have said it's oppressive and disadvantageous to people who can't afford it. So we know their reason for support but we have also seen this activity in practice in New York and it's disasterous.
She said what she said on June 1. The tweet is still there. She went on the corner report shortly after and said the activity won't stop and don't expect it to until their "justice" is served. Several DE emocratic politicians have outright encouraged people to keep stirring things up and have not been corrected or disavowed. It's a clear mindset from the party that is pushing it.
sho nuff
Footballguy
Sure...but the point seems to be you only care that one side has an agenda...as if yours isn't plainly obvious.
sho nuff
Footballguy
Which politicians have encouraged "stirring things up" in a violent way?
Encouraging protest and even civil unrest is not the same thing...nor should it be disavowed. It should be pushed...it is how we enact change in this country when those in power (no matter what party they are members of) continue to resist and refuse change.
Similar threads
