What brings Lawson over Wimbley on my board is how I suspect each will be used. I think Wimbley's role will be the typical 3-4 OLB, while I think SF will attempt to make Lawson a weapon on D, a guy that they will move around and look for sacks, tackles for losses and even some INT's. Something more like a Jason Taylor role on the D, a disrupter. I think Wimbley on the other hand, will put up more typical stats as an 3-4 OLB. I think Lawson has more upside from a FF standpoint. He could be the fastest guy on the field in that SF defense.