MSULions
Footballguy
I'm in a league with some friends and we've been doing it for a few years now so we decided to make it a keeper league and agreed on 2 players. But today before the draft an argument broke out over how it's going to work:
One guy is arguing that there should be a minimum one - preferably two - round penalty for each keeper. i.e. if you keep a 4th round pick you lose your 2nd round pick next year. this also makes it impossible to keep your first or second round picks. He and a couple of others are claiming that the point of a keeper league is to reward people for drafting well and finding the gems in the later rounds...yet I can't reconcile that view with penalizing them for doing it. I took Ray Rice in the 10th...does that mean if he turns out great that I should then lose my 8th round pick?
I am arguing that there should be no higher penalty and any player on your team should be keepable. The problem is I pulled the first pick and nabbed LT so now a few are #####ing that i'm just saying this because of that. but this really wasn't discussed until after the draft...I just assumed a 2 keeper league means just that, you keep your two best guys. I would feel the same way if I had the 5th, 10th or 12th pick.
3rd option of course is that there is no losing of draft picks.
So please give me some input on this...we've been a redraft league of friends for five years now...great group and I hate that this is turning sour. what option do you play? Which is most common? Frankly, I just don't understand the point of penalizing people for drafting well. i.e. I took Calvin Johnson in the 3rd, so by his system not only do I have to give up LT and COlston, but I also lose my first round pick if I keep Calvin. That seems awfully harsh to me.
so vote please...and give me some feedback if you can....
One guy is arguing that there should be a minimum one - preferably two - round penalty for each keeper. i.e. if you keep a 4th round pick you lose your 2nd round pick next year. this also makes it impossible to keep your first or second round picks. He and a couple of others are claiming that the point of a keeper league is to reward people for drafting well and finding the gems in the later rounds...yet I can't reconcile that view with penalizing them for doing it. I took Ray Rice in the 10th...does that mean if he turns out great that I should then lose my 8th round pick?
I am arguing that there should be no higher penalty and any player on your team should be keepable. The problem is I pulled the first pick and nabbed LT so now a few are #####ing that i'm just saying this because of that. but this really wasn't discussed until after the draft...I just assumed a 2 keeper league means just that, you keep your two best guys. I would feel the same way if I had the 5th, 10th or 12th pick.
3rd option of course is that there is no losing of draft picks.
So please give me some input on this...we've been a redraft league of friends for five years now...great group and I hate that this is turning sour. what option do you play? Which is most common? Frankly, I just don't understand the point of penalizing people for drafting well. i.e. I took Calvin Johnson in the 3rd, so by his system not only do I have to give up LT and COlston, but I also lose my first round pick if I keep Calvin. That seems awfully harsh to me.
so vote please...and give me some feedback if you can....
Last edited by a moderator: