Why would anyone want to keep anybody under these rules?
Steven Jackson for a 5th rounderAntonio Gates for a 13th rounderDrew Brees for a 15th rounderMaurice Jones-Drew for a 22nd rounderMarion Barber III for a 22nd rounderMichael Turner for a 22nd rounderThose were my potential keepers last year (along with a handful of others, such as Cotchery for a 22nd and Benson for a 4th). I wound up having to let three of them go back into the player pool, and was very sad about it. Trust me, there's plenty of reason to keep players. Other players who wound up being kept included Willie Parker, Joseph Addai, Frank Gore, Marques Colston, Larry Johnson (who kept for an 18th because someone has been rostering him since the year before he was going as Priest's handcuff in the 5th), etc.A modified keeper league like this is far superior to "keep whoever you want" league, in my opinion. Keep Whoever is just like a dynasty league on training wheels. A Cost-To-Keep league introduces all sorts of great strategies- for instance, let's say Steven Jackson would have kept for a 3rd this year instead of a 5th. Should I keep Steven Jackson, knowing this is likely my last year for him (unless I want to be the first player in league history to keep a 1st rounder), or should I keep Turner, who I could effectively own for his entire professional career as a starter? It also makes trades much more interesting, and the draft becomes an excercise in patience- you want to wait as long as humanly possible before grabbing someone, so his keeper cost is the best you can get. For instance, since Michael Turner re-entered the player pool, where does he get drafted? Does he go in the 6th, where his keeper value is pretty negligible (likely only a 2-year keeper, and an expensive one at that), or do you try to wait until the 12th and hope no one grabs him in the meantime (knowing that those other owners are also going to be deliberately waiting). In addition, late round picks can sometimes be more valuable than mid-late round picks, as rounds 14-16 become the "money rounds". Your team by that point is pretty set for this season, so you start grabbing potential keepers instead of potential starters.
j3r3m3y said:
B) Your basic rules are too strict in my opinion. Why would you want to give up a 3rd round pick to protect a 5th round player? We keep three and given those rules I would probably only keep Colston from last years team. In effect you are rewarding only the owners who get lucky and draft players that vastly out perform their draft position.
Acquiring players who make good keepers next year is not "luck", it is a demonstrable and repeatable skill. I've dominated my keeper league in large part because I have demonstrated a greater knack at this than my leaguemates. Every single season, I've had not only one of the best keeper trios, but I've also had the most additional "quality keepers" that I try to either trade or am forced to watch re-enter the draft pool. There are definite signs to look for when identifying which players are going to have a higher ADP next year than they do this year. There are SOME "lucky breaks", of course- guys like Colston or Jones-Drew- but there are "lucky breaks" in Redraft, too (such as Tomlinson scoring 31 TDs). In the long run, skilled owners will field much stronger keepers than unskilled owners.A rule that you can implement if you really don't want "lucky breaks" to dominate the league is that a player can only be kept if he was drafted the year before. Or if you don't want to go that far, then have undrafted players keep for a 10th rounder, or an 8th rounder, or whatever round you want. That rewards forward-thinking drafting more and minimizes the reward for a lucky waiver pickup.